Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

DbPhoenix

Wyckoff Lite

Recommended Posts

.

.

.

 

Richard Wyckoff was a pioneer of technical analysis. While Dow contributed the theory that price moves in a series of trends and reactions, and Schabacker classified those movements into chart patterns, developed gap theory, and stressed the role of trader behavior in the development of patterns and support/resistance, Wyckoff contributed the study of the relationship between volume and price movement to detect imbalances between supply and demand, which in turn provided clues to direction and potential turning points. By also studying the dynamics of consolidations or horizontal movements, was able to offer a complete market cycle of accumulation, mark-up, distribution, and mark-down, which was in large part the result of shifts in ownership between retail traders and professional money.

 

Wyckoff sought to develop a comprehensive trading system which (a) focused on those markets and stocks that were “on the springboard” for significant moves, (b) initiated entries at those points which offered the highest probability of success, and © exited the positions at the most advantageous time, all with the least possible degree of risk*. His favorite metaphor for the markets and market action was water: waves, currents, eddies, rapids, ebb and flow. He did not view the market as a battlefield nor traders as combatants. He counseled the trader to analyze the waves, determine the current, “go with the flow”, much like a sailor. He thus encouraged the trader to find his entry using smaller “waves”, then, as the current picked him up, ride the current through the larger waves to the natural culmination of the move, even to the extent of pressing one’s advantage, or “pyramiding”, as opposed to cutting profits short, or “scalping”.

 

What distinguishes Wyckoff from all of the various Wyckoff knockoffs in circulation are (1) the emphasis on the continuity of price and (2) the lack of "setups".

 

Continuity of Price: Wyckoff began as a tape reader. By the time he incorporated daily charts into his trading, the continuity of price movement via the tape, tick by tick, had become so ingrained that he could see price no other way. Even though he might be looking at a series of daily bars on an end-of-day chart, he saw price as continuous. Thus the bar itself was irrelevant to him, and he was just as comfortable using line charts as bar charts. The line chart, in fact, more closely conforms to this continuity.

 

"Setups": There are no "setups" in Wyckoff, at least insofar as we commonly use the term. He did not say that if price does this, you buy and if price does that, you short. Rather he stressed that the trader must be sensitive to imbalances in buying pressure and selling pressure, particular at levels where these imbalances might most likely result in profit opportunities, e.g., reversals. Therefore, the "trading signal" is not, for example, a "double bottom" or a "higher low" or a "climax bottom" or even what some call a "spring" (not a Wyckoff term); the trading signal is provided by the imbalances between buying pressure and selling pressure (which is why software won't work), and if one does not view price as a continuous movement and is not sensitive to these continuous shifts in balance/imbalance, he will not understand what it is that he's supposed to do.

*Risk is minimized by (1) focusing on liquid markets, (2) monitoring the imbalances between buying pressure and selling pressure at those levels of “support” or “resistance” where price is most likely to reverse its trend, (3) entering on reversals (or, if necessary, retracements) rather than breakouts, and (4) getting out when the market tells you to.

 

 

WYCKOFF LITE

 

Wyckoff's original course** came in two "divisions": The Richard D. Wyckoff Method of Trading and Investing in Stocks: A Course of Instruction in Stock Market Science and Technique, which amounted to about 400pp, and The Richard D. Wykcoff Method of Trading in Stocks: A Course of Instruction in Tape Reading and Active Trading, which added 97pp,

 

Those who are intimidated by the prospect of working their way through 500p of a century-old course and/or those who are skeptical of the value of the course at the outset may be game for an abbreviated course, not a shortcut, but an "essence".

 

This can be accomplished in two phases. The first is targeted toward those who may be interested but first want to know what this is all about. This amounts to about 45p (that's the best I can do) from Division 1: The Basic Law of Supply and Demand (Section 2), Judging the Market by its Own Action (Section 3), and Buying and Selling Waves (Section 5), the application of all of which are demonstrated by Wyckoff himself in a year-long study (Determining the Trend of the Market, Section 7) of the market from the end of 1930 through 1931 and an 18-month study of a stock, from 1934 through 1935.

 

If after reading this tenth of the entire course, you think there may be something to all this after all, step in to phase two. This amounts to the four sections above plus the Forward (Section 1), Volume Studies (Section 14), Significance of Trend Lines (Section 15), Refinements (Section 21), Stop Orders (Section 23), General Instructions: Cautionary Suggestions (Section 24), and Market Philosophy (Section 25), about 90 additional pages all told.

 

SEARCHES

 

You may search Wyckoff's course (links provided above) just as you would any pdf. Open the pdf, click Ctrl+F, and enter your search term, e.g., trend or trendline or whatever. Once the function has found the first instance of your search term, click Next to go to the next instance.

 

 

WYCKOFF LITE-R

Given that you are in charge of your own learning, you have the option of skipping the Wyckoff course entirely, except perhaps as a resource, and skipping ahead to "Trading By Price" (a 21st -version of Wyckoff's approach). Whether or not this will work for you without ever consulting the original Wyckoff material is a matter of cloudy prognostication. But not all roads are smooth.

 

 

GLOSSARY

 

Note: Included in this glossary are what I call "abbreviations of convenience", e.g., AOC (abbreviation of convenience). Wyckoff didn't use them; he spelled everything out. But then Wyckoff didn't post to message boards. So please understand and forgive their use. They save a lot of wear and tear on the fingertips.

 

Accumulation: An area where stoc]ks are purchased – or “accumulated” -- with the intention to mark up prices at some later time. Every traded stock is in one of four phases: Accumulation, Mark-up, Distribution, Mark-down. Absorption is a form of "re-accumulation" which occurs toward the end of the Mark-up phase as price approaches old resistance. Buyers "absorb" the offerings of bulls who bought at that old resistance and now want out, as well as the offerings of bears who bought on the way down to that old resistance and now see an opportunity to get out even (see Determining the Trend of the Market by the Daily Vertical Chart, Division 1, p. 8).

 

Breakout: BO (AOC). A breakout is not just a matter of a price exceeding a previous price level. Price must break out of something, most often a trading range.

 

Buying Climax: the opposite of a Selling Climax (see Determining the Trend of the Market by the Daily Vertical Chart, Division 1, pp. 1, 2).

 

Composite Operator: Wyckoff’s name for the total sum of forces, including the public, that move the market.

 

Demand: Buying power, buying pressure.

 

Demand Line: that line which passes through two successive swing lows (the low points of two successive reactions). Also DL (AOC).

 

Distribution: An area where stocks are sold with the intention to mark down prices at some later time.

 

EOD: End of Day (AOC).

 

HH: Higher High (AOC).

 

HL: Higher Low (AOC).

 

LH: Lower High (AOC).

 

LL: Lower Low (AOC).

 

LSH: Last Swing High (AOC). A swing high or low represents a point at which traders are no longer able to find trades. Whether that point represents important support or resistance will be seen the next time traders push price in that direction. But everyone knows this point, even if they aren't following a chart. It exists independently of the trader and his lines and charts and indicators and displays. It is the point beyond which price could not go. Hence its importance, both to those who want to see price move higher and those who don't.

 

LSL: Last Swing Low (AOC). See above.

 

Mark-down: The phase of the cycle where prices decline, from the beginning of a bear campaign to its bottom.

 

Mark-up: The phase of the cycle where prices rise, from the beginning of a bull campaign to its top.

 

Overbought Position Line: that line which is drawn parallel to a demand line and passes through the first point of resistance (rally top) which intervenes between two successive points of demand in an up trend (whew!). In order to cut down on the jargon, the Supply Line is used here to perform the same function.

 

Oversold Position Line: that line which is drawn parallel to a supply line and passes through the first point of support (reaction low) which intervenes between two successive rally tops in a down trend (whew!). In order to cut down on the jargon, the Demand Line is used here to perform the same function.

 

Price movement [price action]: the continuous tick-by-tick (transaction-by-transaction) movement of price as shown on the tape [or on a corresponding chart].

 

Rally: A phase in the market that experiences rising prices, that is, higher highs and higher lows.

 

Reaction: A phase in the market that experiences declining prices, that is, lower highs and lower lows.

 

Resistance: An area where selling pressure overwhelms buying pressure. More specifically, resistance is the zone or level at which those who have enough money to make a difference attempt to retard, halt, and reverse a rise by selling.

 

Retracement: RET (AOC). The first pullback after a break through support or resistance and the second opportunity (the first being the break itself) to enter the trade. If price does not resume its course, the "retracement" becomes a failed breakout.

 

Reversal: REV (AOC). A bounce off of or rejection of a support or resistance level.

 

RT: Real Time (AOC).

 

S/R or S&R: Support and Resistance (AOC).

 

Secondary Reaction: The reaction following a Technical Rally.

 

Selling Climax: A major panic that occurs at the end of a steep decline in prices (see Determining the Trend of the Market by the Daily Vertical Chart, Division 1, pp. 1, 2).

 

Shakeout: A sudden break below a support level followed by a rapid reversal.

 

Springboard: A stock (or group or the market as a whole) is on the springboard following a period of preparation for an advance or decline.

 

Stop Loss: An order to exit a trade if the market does something that proves your initial decision to enter the trade was wrong.

 

Supply: Selling power, selling pressure.

 

Supply Line: that line which passes through two successive swing highs (tops of rallies). Also SL (AOC).

 

Support: An area where buying pressure overwhelms selling pressure. More specifically, support is the zone or level at which those who have enough money to make a difference are willing to show their support by retarding, halting, and reversing the decline by buying.

 

Tape: a thin strip of paper on which is printed a series of stock symbols, each print representing a transaction in that stock and consisting of the price at which the transaction took place and the volume of shares changing hands. Modern day equivalents are the "time-and-sales window" and the one-tick chart.

 

Tape Reading: the art of determining the immediate course or trend of prices from the action of the market as it appears on the tape of the stock ticker.

 

Technical Rally: The rally that occurs after a Selling Climax.

 

Thrust: A break above a resistance level followed by a rapid reversal.

 

Trading Range: A period of balance between supply and demand forces. Prices move within a range where the bottom represents demand and the top represents supply. Also TR (AOC).

 

Trend: The line of least resistance.

 

Trendlines: Straight lines drawn through the tops or bottoms of the price path established during an upward climb or downward pitch. They “serve to define the stride of the price movement, thereby frequently directing our attention either to possibilities of an approaching change of trend or to an actual reversal.” Also TL (AOC).

 

Volume: Number of units changing hands in each transaction.

 

Wave(s): See Buying and Selling Waves, Division 1, Section 5.

 

**Please note that this forum is focused on Wyckoff's original course. Wyckoff died in 1934, and his course passed into other hands. The provenance of the material and the relative quality of subsequent additions, deletions, alterations and so forth is not the concern of the forum but rather the study of the original material, the belief being that by studying the original material, the individual is in a better position to evaluate any other approaches, methods, systems, etc that are "based on Wyckoff", whether they make that claim or not. Without access to the material, the individual is in the position of having to take somebody's word for the content and intent, and that's not the best basis for beginning a trading strategy.

 

 

Enjoy. :)

Edited by DbPhoenix
Fix link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that this forum is focused on Wyckoff's original course, The Richard D. Wyckoff Method of Trading and Investing in Stocks: A Course of Instruction in Stock Market Science and Technique and The Richard D. Wykcoff Method of Trading in Stocks: A Course of Instruction in Tape Reading and Active Trading. Wyckoff died in 1934, and his course passed into other hands. The provenance of the material and the relative quality of subsequent additions, deletions, alterations and so forth is not the concern of the forum but rather the study of the original material, the belief being that by studying the original material, the individual is in a better position to evaluate any other approaches, methods, systems, etc that are "based on Wyckoff", whether they make that claim or not. Without access to the material, the individual is in the position of having to take somebody's word for the content and intent, and that's not the best basis for beginning a trading strategy.

 

All threads which contain sections of the original course or pertain directly to the original course are designated with an arrow in a green circle.

 

Enjoy. :)

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.