Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Do Or Die

List of ETFs for Sector Rotation

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Sector rotation is one of the easiest and top performing trading strategy. It is easy because you have to track markets only on daily time frame and hence requires little dedicated time. It performs well because other strategies in similar time frame (holding period > 6 months) tend to get whipsawed in current economic mess.

 

cyclicalpic.jpg

 

The strategy is so much in demand that ETFs have been launched entirely to mirror a sector rotation portfolio. The Guggenheim/Zacks Sector Rotation ETF (Ticker: XRO) seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the performance of an equity index called the Zacks Sector Rotation Index. However, it is illiquid, and past performance data does not covers a full market cycle.

 

Take past 6 months sector performance for example. The defensive sectors of Consumer Staples, Health Care, and Utilities (XLP,XLV,XLU) are performing much better than the leading sectors of Financials, Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials (XLF,XLK,XLY, XLI). This means money is flowing to the defensive sectors; i.e., the overall market is bearish. The regional banks topped out much earlier than DOW as a sign of warning (also mentioned here). I have also attached the sector scenario for market bottom in 2009, which looks just the reverse of current situation.

attachment.php?attachmentid=25707&stc=1&d=1313173909

attachment.php?attachmentid=25706&stc=1&d=1313173791

 

 

To use the list of ETFs, please keep the following points in mind:

  1. Illiquid ETFs may be used as indicators for market trend but do not use them for actual trading because they have tendency to deviate erratically from benchmark returns.
  2. The Equal weighted Rydex ETFs (first ticker letter R) tends to mirror the broad markets.
  3. The Is and Xs are market-cap weighted, meaning that larger companies have greater representation in the index. So far they have been the best indicators for identifying business cycles.
  4. Small Caps tend to outperform in the last leg of a bull market.
  5. There are also ETFs managed by rule based quantitative analysis by First Trust and Powershares. However, comprehensive information on the selection criteria is not available.
  6. The inverse ETFs or Short ETFs do not actually reverse the returns of their benchmark. You are better off shorting a relevant ETF than buying it’s inverse.

 

SECTOR-WISE LIST

 

XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR

RCD Consumer Discretionary

IYC iShares Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Sector Index Fund

PSCD S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary Portfolio

AXDI MSCI ACWI ex US Consumer Discretionary Sector Index Fund

 

XLP Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR 10.84%

RHS Consumer Staples

IYK iShares Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Sector Index Fund

PSCC S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples Portfolio

AXSL MSCI ACWI ex US Consumer Staples Sector Index Fund

 

XLE Energy Select Sector SPDR

RYE Energy

IYE iShares Dow Jones U.S. Energy Sector Index Fund

PSCE S&P SmallCap Energy Portfolio

AXEN MSCI ACWI ex US Energy Sector Index Fund

 

XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR

RYF Financials

IYF iShares Dow Jones U.S. Financial Sector Index Fund

PSCF S&P SmallCap Financials Portfolio

AXFN MSCI ACWI ex US Financials Sector Index Fund

 

XLV Health Care Select Sector SPDR

RYH Health Care

PSCH S&P SmallCap Health Care Portfolio

AXHE MSCI ACWI ex US Health Care Sector Index Fund

 

XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR

RGI Industrials

IYJ iShares Dow Jones U.S. Industrial Sector Index Fund

PSCI S&P SmallCap Industrials Portfolio

AXID MSCI ACWI ex US Industrials Sector Index Fund 7.89%

 

XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR

RTM Materials

IYM iShares Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Sector Index Fund

PSCM S&P SmallCap Materials Portfolio

AXMT MSCI ACWI ex US Materials Sector Index Fund

 

XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR

RYT Technology

IYW iShares Dow Jones U.S. Technology Sector Index Fund

PSCT S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio

AXIT MSCI ACWI ex US Information Technology Sector Index Fund

 

XLU Utilities Select Sector SPDR

RYU Utilities

IDU iShares Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Sector Index Fund

PSCU S&P SmallCap Utilities Portfolio

AXUT MSCI ACWI ex US Utilities Sector Index Fund

 

 

Posting a comment will only take you 2 minutes, but it will be the strongest motivation for me to share something better.

bottom.thumb.png.e8387fa9eb02457eba2b874808e6b0eb.png

Top.thumb.png.722a394b8df2dd3a41ae277b14aad6c3.png

Edited by Do Or Die
formatting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

Of the EFTs you noted relative to illiquid, which for trading does not workout well as to pricing, can you some how de-note within your groupings which you believe to be the more illiquid?

Jay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, Do or die. Great strategy, where do you get your research from? I know there is alot of info out there.How often do you rebalance your portfolio? Thanks

 

Hi,

 

My research comes from my trading experience. I do not use this strategy. I have better cards (see here, here and here).

 

Sector rotation is a significant improvement over any strategy that you are using for broad market. For example, If you buy the SPY on 200 MA crossovers; switching to sector rotation whenever it crosses the MA will make a significant difference. At the most basic level, it will improve returns over buy and hold.

 

I will post a backtested strategy example when get time.

Edited by Do Or Die

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HI,

Of the EFTs you noted relative to illiquid, which for trading does not workout well as to pricing, can you some how de-note within your groupings which you believe to be the more illiquid?

Jay

 

The X's and I's are the most liquid in the list (ticker symbol starting with X or I). The others are mentioned as indicators only.

 

As a general rule keep away from ETFs where avg daily volume is less than 10,000 shares

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I did test two very basic tests of sector rotation on SPDRs (XLB, XLY, XLP, XLE, XLF, XLV, XLI, XLK, XLU). I do not enjoy programming and hopefully some one will improve these tests.

 

Trading Rules:

 

Keep a log of month-to-month performance of the sector ETFs. At the beginning of each month, buy the strongest of 3 sectors based on their past month returns. Alternatively to test a market neutral strategy, at each month buy the strongest and short the weakest of sector ETFs, maintaining 3 positions at all times. There are NO stop losses.

Summary:

A long-only always-in-market strategy shows returns similar to SnP 500.

A market neutral strategy made 63.86% (CAR of 7.23%) comparative to 200 day MA crossover strategy returns on SnP 50029.6% in the same period

These tests are only to show the edge or the advantage sector rotation can give you against a broad market index trading strategy. This is not a trading system.

 

Market-Neutral Performance

No. of Trades 141 Winners 58.16% Losers 41.84%  

attachment.php?attachmentid=25727&stc=1&d=1313412001

attachment.php?attachmentid=25728&stc=1&d=1313412001

Amibroker Code

SetBacktestMode(backtestRotational);
SetOption("UsePrevBarEquityForPosSizing", True);
SetOption("MinShares", 1);
SetOption("AllowPositionShrinking",True);
SetOption("AccountMargin",100);
Totalpositions = 3;
SetOption("WorstRankHeld", Totalpositions + 1);
SetOption("MaxOpenPositions", Totalpositions );
SetOption("SeparateLongShortRank", True ); 
SetOption("MaxOpenLong", 3);
SetOption("MaxOpenLong", 3);
//Monthly Rotation
perf= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -1 );
perf1= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -2 );
score= 100*((perf- perf1)/perf1);
PositionSize = -100/Totalpositions;
PositionScore = score;
m = Month();
newMonth = m != Ref( m, -1);
PositionScore = IIf(newMonth, PositionScore, scoreNoRotate);

 

Long-Only Performance

No. of Trades 177 Winners 63.84% Losers 36.16%  

attachment.php?attachmentid=25725&stc=1&d=1313412001

attachment.php?attachmentid=25726&stc=1&d=1313412001

Amibroker Code

SetBacktestMode(backtestRotational);
SetOption("UsePrevBarEquityForPosSizing", True);
SetOption("MinShares", 1);
SetOption("AllowPositionShrinking",True);
SetOption("AccountMargin",100);
Totalpositions = 3;
SetOption("WorstRankHeld", Totalpositions + 1);
SetOption("MaxOpenPositions", Totalpositions );
//Monthly Rotation
perf= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -1 );
perf1= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -2 );
score= 100*((perf- perf1)/perf1) + 100;
PositionSize = -100/Totalpositions;
PositionScore = score;
m = Month();
newMonth = m != Ref( m, -1);
PositionScore = IIf(newMonth, PositionScore, scoreNoRotate);

5aa7109829f12_11_PortfolioEquity.png.1bb87ef76c76d049645accc81cc8df63.png

5aa710982ee79_13_ProfitTable.png.f7aa62f8e6d6a25014784d268e7f0e9c.png

5aa7109832b0e_1_PortfolioEquity.png.3e6108a2ba184f6847e70ca7c4ca831f.png

5aa7109836a28_3_ProfitTable.png.58de0dcccef13730c63e672e2b75d4d3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no experience with amibroker / portfolio backtesting.

 

 

Would you be able to test: select the best 3 performing etfs for last 6 months (trailing), sell only when the top 3 drop out of the top 50% of performers. Perform this monthly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you be able to test: select the best 3 performing etfs for last 6 months (trailing), sell only when the top 3 drop out of the top 50% of performers. Perform this monthly.

 

Please put things in rules when you're asking anyone to program. Assuming we're using the 9 SPDRs to test, do you mean?

 

  1. At each month, buy top 3 based on last six months performance
  2. At each month, sell if any spdr falls below the rank of 4 'past six month performers'

 

Both rules will contradict each other, because if we're buying top 3 performers we need to sell if their performance drops below top 3 (not top 4).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting article Do Or Die,

I have recently deployed this application in an attempt to validate the theory.

Free stock market forecast. Buy sell emails. Neural network, indexes, technical analysis predictions

The principle is as follow :

- you select a set of reference ETFs (although I set up a predefined one)

- you choose one share to be analysed

The software will first calculate the past inter dependencies between the historical data of the ETF and the historical data of your share.

It will then infer the trend of your share based on the latest data of the set of ETF.

Any thoughts?

Regards,

G.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.