Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mslk

Is It Time to Give Up and Join 90% of “losers”?

Recommended Posts

As committed and dedicated as I was - after 4 years pursuing Automated Strategies (total 9 years active in Forex, with primary focus on day-trading, both mean-reverse and trend-following) I am finally ready to give up. About $100K spent, over 20 various ideas for Algo explored (programmed and tested – both back-test and forward-test, both demo and real, both domestic bank and international prime-broker, etc. - you name it), but eventually all failed, or seem so.

 

Was it (i) wrong market selection, or

(ii) bad ideas for Algo in essence, or

(iii) wrong targets and too high expectations, or

(iv) technology/platforms shortfalls, or

(v) absence of clear and transparent performance/quality evaluation criteria, as well as similar criteria for the progress of the entire Project, or

(vi) poor terms definitions and lack of understanding/communications with investors, or

(vii) just myself not being smart enough, or

could be a combination of all above -- one way or another I have finally hit a threshold.

 

So at this point would greatly appreciate an advice – double the efforts and keep digging in (?), or quit it for good and forget it as a worst nightmare (?).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're pursuing the wrong markets in the wrong way with the wrong objectives, digging in probably won't help much, not after four years.

 

Perhaps you should ask yourself why you got into trading in the first place. Are you interested in pursuing a strategy that isn't automated? Or even mechanical? Are you interested in pursuing some other market, something that you actually know something about (assuming you're not a banker or some other sort of currency specialist)?

 

Ordinarily I'd read somebody's past posts to get an idea of who they are and what they want, but you've got 119 of them, so forgive me if I don't take that time. But if your objectives and desires have changed, they may not be pertinent anyway other than to remind you of your regrets. If you want to pursue a different course, you can put all that behind you. But you must first determine just what it is you've learned, if anything, from the experience.

A losing trader can do little to transform himself into a winning trader. A losing trader is not going to want to transform himself. That’s the kind of thing winning traders do.

-- Ed Seykota

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ed Seykota said some very interesting things about trading, and many think him eccentric (and they are being kind)....I like the guy. If you really consider what he is saying and then ask yourself whether you are ready to LEAVE BEHIND HASN'T WORKED AND START NEW then you MIGHT have a chance...not a great chance, not a good chance but what we used to call a "fighting chance"

 

I was doing some research for my next class and found the following data from the US Small Business Administration; Here is just a small part of what I learned;

 

(Assuming you agree that trading is a business)

 

About 10% of all new business fail within the first year

Approximately 50% are still in business after 5 years

2/3rds of all small businesses fail within 10 years

 

and real question is why

 

Here are my answers

 

1.) Low barriers to entry....all you need to start a trading business is computer, an account, and a couple thousand dollars...that's all...and because the barriers are so low, there's a lot of competition

2) Lack of competitive advantage.....most new traders don't have an edge. Generally they misunderstand what an "edge" (a competitive advantage) is...they learn "by hard experience" that what they believe will work......doesn't....

3.)Lack of experience/or education....both are necessary and most new traders start without a basic understanding of the profession...

4)No business plan/no risk management plan....the basis of every business requires that the owner find a way to overcome expenses and make a profit...most folks either don't start with a viable plan OR they abandon it at crucial times, and that sinks their ship....

5)Unrealistic expectations......This profession, like any other requires skill, discipline and commitment to a common goal....it can take years just to acquire the experience and education necessary to compete successfully. It also takes sufficient capital and access to the right tools....lacking just one of these elements can mean failure...the most common failure is the belief "I'm the exception...I can make it without covering all the bases" OR (just as commonly)...."I'll take care of it later"....

 

If some of these things correspond to your situation, I suggest you take stock of your inner resources and ask yourself whether you have the energy to fix it, or start over and learn a new game....many of us go through the same process and it comes down to answering that same question....fix it, start over new or find a different game to play.......

 

Good luck

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mslk said:
As committed and dedicated as I was - after 4 years pursuing Automated Strategies (total 9 years active in Forex, with primary focus on day-trading, both mean-reverse and trend-following) I am finally ready to give up. About $100K spent, over 20 various ideas for Algo explored (programmed and tested – both back-test and forward-test, both demo and real, both domestic bank and international prime-broker, etc. - you name it), but eventually all failed, or seem so.

 

Was it (i) wrong market selection, or

(ii) bad ideas for Algo in essence, or

(iii) wrong targets and too high expectations, or

(iv) technology/platforms shortfalls, or

(v) absence of clear and transparent performance/quality evaluation criteria, as well as similar criteria for the progress of the entire Project, or

(vi) poor terms definitions and lack of understanding/communications with investors, or

(vii) just myself not being smart enough, or

could be a combination of all above -- one way or another I have finally hit a threshold.

 

So at this point would greatly appreciate an advice – double the efforts and keep digging in (?), or quit it for good and forget it as a worst nightmare (?).

 

I am making lots of assumptions here......

 

i) no such thing - some are just harder than others and require different strengths and styles that perform better. Sounds like if you tried them all you did not work out which style suits you, why it would work and how you would make it work. You should at least have one that you predominately favour, stuck with and prefer.

ii) should have been worked out in testing and shown to work, and shown to suit 1)

iii) wrong targets (if price targets -then testing a review should reveal this) if expectations then most likely yes - forget the BS - be realistic - be properly capitalised, get a good solid consistent return - not some BS shoot the lights out. This should all be part of why you are doing it. (I would not open a sandwich shop and think i will become a billionarie unless i have some usp to be able to turn it into a worldwide franchsie AFTER the first shop works)

iv) dont blame the tools - of if you are doing so then quit.

v) see iii

vi) WTF - are you trading for yourself or do you have a completely different business whereby you have to try and meet investor expectations as well.

vii) possibly - there is no shame in that.....and maybe your strengths are better suited elsewhere. Smarts are not required.

 

There is no shame in trying failing, learning and moving on. I worked out once very quickly i would hate to be a lawyer/salesperson/fundamental analyst (thank god it was a quick discovery)

Persistence and learning from mistakes is a good thing, persistence and repeating the same mistakes because you dont learn from failure is idiotic.

Maybe the mistake is not in your trading at all.

 

It also sounds if you were day trading for 9 years you dont need the money - or you were not really day trading......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mslk said:

 

So at this point would greatly appreciate an advice – double the efforts and keep digging in (?), or quit it for good and forget it as a worst nightmare (?).

 

Did you actually lose money trading or did you get eaten alive by your transaction costs?

Big, big, difference.

 

You may be deciding to quit as a winning trader who over traded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading is a hard business. What I discovered is a consistency in identifying and entering good trades. However, once into a position, I failed miserably at managing it.

Emotions would override my trading rules, and I would take on too much risk and/or get out or a profitable position way too early. I battled this hit and miss form of breakeven trading for 10 years and often considered giving it up.

 

I then tried automation and found it too much of a challenge to program and automate my entry signals--as my rules relied on a variation of circumstances that is sometimes hard for me to even define, much less code. What I did find is a middle ground where I enter my trades manually and let the program sync to the broker positions and manage them accordingly. It is then a matter of allowing the program to do its job which I find easier and less stressful than doing it myself.

 

Once I coupled my entries to the software exits, I became profitable on a consistent basis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if the OP will be back or not, but for some reason this thread interests me, and I've reviewed his posts. While his story is hardly unique, the posts present what to some would be a fascinating look at how and when and where and why a journey goes wrong. If all beginners were to read it, they could very well save themselves a ton of money and time.

 

While some would claim that the problem lies within his brain stem, I suggest as always that the problem lies instead in the desire to trade somebody else's system in general and the lack of a trading plan in particular (and, no, trading somebody else's system is not a plan, at least a plan which will guide one toward success). And since developing and testing a plan is faster and cheaper than surgery or therapy, I suggest the plan route.

Edited by DbPhoenix
Added link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mslk said:
...

 

So at this point would greatly appreciate an advice – double the efforts and keep digging in (?), or quit it for good and forget it as a worst nightmare (?).

 

mslk,

 

First things first…

"digging in"

vs

“ you have to be willing to sacrifice who you are for who you can become.” Dan Millman

 

First things first…

if your passion for trading is still high even in ‘failure’, then persist; ...else, get out.

 

 

… and re “persist”, in my observations of many traders across the years …

a losing trader works… develops… practices until he gets ‘it’ right (wot :confused:)

a trader transitioning from loser to winner works… develops… practices until he gets ‘it’ wrong

a winning trader works… develops… practices until he can’t get ‘it’ wrong

 

 

All the best... which ever way you go...

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mslk said:
As committed and dedicated as I was - after 4 years pursuing Automated Strategies (total 9 years active in Forex, with primary focus on day-trading, both mean-reverse and trend-following) I am finally ready to give up. About $100K spent, over 20 various ideas for Algo explored (programmed and tested – both back-test and forward-test, both demo and real, both domestic bank and international prime-broker, etc. - you name it), but eventually all failed, or seem so.

 

Was it (i) wrong market selection, or

(ii) bad ideas for Algo in essence, or

(iii) wrong targets and too high expectations, or

(iv) technology/platforms shortfalls, or

(v) absence of clear and transparent performance/quality evaluation criteria, as well as similar criteria for the progress of the entire Project, or

(vi) poor terms definitions and lack of understanding/communications with investors, or

(vii) just myself not being smart enough, or

could be a combination of all above -- one way or another I have finally hit a threshold.

 

So at this point would greatly appreciate an advice – double the efforts and keep digging in (?), or quit it for good and forget it as a worst nightmare (?).

 

I've been a lurker here for about 4 years now but given that the pain of loss and learning isn't that far in the past for me I feel compelled to respond to this. Based on what you've written it sounds like you've been focused mainly on the tertiary aspects of trading without ever having learned how to actually trade. That you were willing to give $100K to the market (all the professional traders thank you for this by the way) tells me you're trading entirely on hope and not on know-how. Forget about banks, algorithms, investors, platforms and the like, and focus on learning the market you're trading! If you can't open a chart of the eurusd (for example) and know why price turned where it did you have no business even thinking about the other stuff yet. Doubling your efforts on the things you have been focused on is just going to dig you into a deeper hole twice as fast. You need to commit and dedicate yourself to the thing that actually matters, learning as much about how and why price moves as you can. If you aren't willing to spend the time doing this, then yes, you should walk away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mslk said:
As committed and dedicated as I was - after 4 years pursuing Automated Strategies (total 9 years active in Forex, with primary focus on day-trading, both mean-reverse and trend-following) I am finally ready to give up. About $100K spent, over 20 various ideas for Algo explored (programmed and tested – both back-test and forward-test, both demo and real, both domestic bank and international prime-broker, etc. - you name it), but eventually all failed, or seem so.

 

Was it (i) wrong market selection, or

(ii) bad ideas for Algo in essence, or

(iii) wrong targets and too high expectations, or

(iv) technology/platforms shortfalls, or

(v) absence of clear and transparent performance/quality evaluation criteria, as well as similar criteria for the progress of the entire Project, or

(vi) poor terms definitions and lack of understanding/communications with investors, or

(vii) just myself not being smart enough, or

could be a combination of all above -- one way or another I have finally hit a threshold.

 

So at this point would greatly appreciate an advice – double the efforts and keep digging in (?), or quit it for good and forget it as a worst nightmare (?).

 

I've been a lurker here for about 4 years now but given that the pain of loss and learning isn't that far in the past for me I feel compelled to respond to this. Based on what you've written it sounds like you've been focused mainly on the tertiary aspects of trading without ever having learned how to actually trade. That you were willing to give $100K to the market (all the professional traders thank you for this by the way) tells me you're trading entirely on hope and not on know-how. Forget about banks, algorithms, investors, platforms and the like, and focus on learning the market you're trading! If you can't open a chart of the eurusd (for example) and know why price turned where it did you have no business even thinking about the other stuff yet. Doubling your efforts on the things you have been focused on is just going to dig you into a deeper hole twice as fast. You need to commit and dedicate yourself to the thing that actually matters, learning as much about how and why price moves as you can. If you aren't willing to spend the time doing this, then yes, you should walk away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

– double the efforts and keep digging in (?)

 

No, insanity is expecting different results by doing the same thing over and over. I think you need time to rest, regroup and review. It would help to know what you are trading and where you are.

 

I personally would not trade Forex although some have success with it, I trade e-mini futures which covers just about everything.

 

You are the holy grail, you have to find a method that you believe in, even if it is as basic as a moving average crossover or a CCI cross (they both work, properly managed).

Start with a clean slate, be prepared, don't rush, let the trade come to you. If you fail, don't beat yourself up, move on. The psychological baggage will take time to overcome but you can make it. Most of all stop trading with real money. Paper trade until you are consistent, analyze your mistakes, overcome bad habits.

 

There are thousands of vendors out there selling systems and training, very few can be trusted in my book, most I think are just out to take your money.

 

.....or quit it for good and forget it as a worst nightmare (?).

 

There is nothing wrong with walking away for a while and quitting is not failure either. You may have to stop and work a while to build up your account, that is not failure.

 

Success:

 

Fall down 6 times,

get up 7 times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At some point in time most traders come to recognize the problem with their trading is them, not the platform or the methodology (particularly if you can sim trade profitably). Trading requires a very different kind of "success mind" than the "success mind" that drives success in professional careers and businiesses. But until you recognize the problem is not "out there" but "in there", you'll chase the Holy Grail and keep putting a dent into your capital. Developing the trading mind is moving from an urgent discipline (gotta be trading to make money) to a patient disipline that can wait for the trade to come to you rather than chase the trade.

 

MM also makes a very good point. Less is more. Over trading creates enormous costs to over come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was once like you. Not so much on the automated tradings robots and such but, on the side of trading for about 5 years and still losing lots of money consistently. Two phrases I came across about 2 years ago changed everything for me:

 

1) "Failure is not defeat until you stop trying" Got that gem in a fortune cookie"

 

2) " True genius resides in simplicity" read this in a book.

 

Once I embraced both of these everything changed for me.

 

I stopped "looking" for a way to trade the market , I let the market show me the best way. I know this may not make sense but It has worked for me. I am now profitable with no indicators, robots or anything like that at all just price action and nothing more......Simple.

 

My best advice is to open up a live chart with nothing on it but price and just watch and study it. It may take a few weeks, months or even years but, if you have the patience the answers will appear.....just keep thinking of saying number 2 and you will get it.

 

I wish you the best of luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that advice given here is largely ignored.....Ed Seykota's quote (from DB's post) is pretty accurate....losers are losers because they define themselves in those terms.....winners have a positive self image and when THEY lose, they take the time to figure out why, then they go out and find the tools necessary to "transform" themselves (*back into winners....)

 

and although no one is going to pay much attention or give a damn, I have been there......and I know just how much pure hell it can be to have no idea of where to start to turn it around....like all things in life, you either rise to the occasion or you don't.

 

* I start out with the idea that we are all capable of being winners naïve I know but its my freakin life and that's how I choose to waste it....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  steve46 said:
I suspect that advice given here is largely ignored.....Ed Seykota's quote (from DB's post) is pretty accurate....losers are losers because they define themselves in those terms.....winners have a positive self image and when THEY lose, they take the time to figure out why, then they go out and find the tools necessary to "transform" themselves (*back into winners....)

 

and although no one is going to pay much attention or give a damn, I have been there......and I know just how much pure hell it can be to have no idea of where to start to turn it around....like all things in life, you either rise to the occasion or you don't.

 

* I start out with the idea that we are all capable of being winners naïve I know but its my freakin life and that's how I choose to waste it....

 

I agree pretty much with everything you said here. I heard something about 6 years ago that reminds me of what you are saying....." The difference between successful people and unsuccessful people is that successful do what unsuccessful people are not willing to do"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to try breaking all the rules that most traders live by. For one month on a demo. Say using 2 to 4 contracts of something maybe an emini? Most lose anyway.

 

Just an idea..most would say a crazy idea. However you might be surprised with the results.

 

On a demo do things like average down your losses. Use no stop losses until have one half of your account is blown. That is, use none until you are left with 50% of your account...if that happens..

 

Catch falling knifes

 

Try to catch tops and bottoms.

 

Generally just break all the rules you know about.

 

I know..i am crazy......:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

 

report back.....:cool:

 

REMEMBER ON A DEMO ONLY...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Changed my mind with regard to my post

 

If a person feels that they have given it their "all"...then try something else

 

If a person feels down and depressed and has lost a lot of money.....I like to quote an old friend who said that "nothing is ever as good or as bad as it seems".....find a way to recoup your losses and live to fight another day.

 

Good luck

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.