Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Defining Trading Mistakes

Recommended Posts

Losing money is a necessary part of learning to trade in the forex markets. It is important to remember this, because there is essentially no trader that can claim to win 90-100% of his trades and still be taken seriously by his peers. Since losing trades are an inevitability, it is unfair to define all losing trades as mistakes - because this simply is not the case. A better approach is to define trading mistakes as the events that are actually under our control and work out in the wrong direction. As long as we keep position sizes to manageable levels and spot true mistakes early (when mistakes are actually made), we can avoid substantial damage to a trading account and correct errors so that we can continue improving and moving forward toward your trading goals.

 

Analyzing Seemingly Chaotic Markets

 

When looking to trade and analyze markets that appear chaotic on the surface, it is easy to become frustrated when looking at how price activity unfolds in real-time. This creates some differences when looking at price activity from an historical perspective (which, in hindsight, is much easier). In most cases, new traders will look for ways to improve their methods and build on their strategies using defined trading markets and a specific set of rules on which to base positions. But for most of these early traders, a majority of these positions might turn out to lose money. If you place 10 real money trades and then 6 of those trades lose money, most new traders might say that 6 mistakes have been made - but this is not always the case.

 

For example, let’s assume that we use classic RSI readings and support and resistance levels to generate trading ideas. The classic trading signal might be seen if the RSI indicator falls below the 30 reading and starts to turn back in the upward direction (indicating oversold price activity). When this signal is seen as prices fall to a clearly defined support level, long positions can be taken on the expectation that prices will rise further in the future.

 

Unsuccessful Trades vs. Trading Mistakes

 

In some cases, ideas like this will be successful and generate gains. In other cases, markets will continue through oversold territory and stop out your position for a loss. In the second scenario, did the trader make a mistake? The clear answer is “no,” because all of the original trading rules were in place before the position was established. Once all of these factors are in place, we have no control over what happens next in the market. Using our original definition, connecting true trading mistakes to factors and elements we can actually control, these types of situations cannot be considered mistakes. These are simply unsuccessful trades.

 

When we look at historical price activity, it is much easier to spot the situations where trading rules unfolded in a successful fashion. In real-time, however, those situations can only be judged in terms of probability. There are key differences here. Market scenarios that do not fall in line with the initial probabilities must be categorized correctly, because assigning the word “mistake” to setups that are normally successful might prevent us from using those strategies again in the future. This can reduce the occurrence of winning trades and limit overall gains as well.

 

Elements of Trading Mistakes

 

One way that traders can help their strategies and continue improving is to deconstruct the rules that make up their trading systems. Breaking those rules now becomes the only trading mistake we can make. If, for example, we set leverage limits to create 2-3% account risk at any given moment, a trading mistake could be seen if we enter into a position that creates the possibility for a 5% loss at any given time.

 

In the RSI trading example above, a mistake might be seen if we were chasing markets and established positions before the RSI indicator actually fell below 30 and started to rise again. Whether your trading system is simple or complicated, remaining loyal to your pre-established rules is a vital prerequisite for success, and can help give you a leg-up over the competition. No trader knows where prices will actually be at the end of the day, so it doesn’t make sense to describe inaccurate price forecasting as a “mistake.” Instead, mistakes are directed at behaviors, and not in the end result of any individual trade.

 

An alternate viewpoint can be seen in traders that operate with no plan at all. In this case, we might actually say that any trading decision is a mistake. When traders with no game plan are able to execute a successful trade, should these be considered successful behaviors? Luck of the draw does not create a successful traders, because repeating these same behaviors will not result in consistent profitability over time. In order to have consistent success, you will need to have a clear set of trading rules so that you can enter into positions when the opportunity arises.

 

Analysis vs. Control

 

Both technical and fundamental analysis can help us to take advantage of changes in price and market valuations - but this does not mean these analysis methods give us control over the markets. Of course, there are behaviors that can be followed which can improve the chances of profitability and minimize the damage seen when markets move in an unexpected direction. But the validity of these behaviors should be judged on performance over time, rather than in individual situations.

 

Building on the strength of certain analysis methods, setting clear parameters for risk and reward will depend heavily on your ability to implement conservative position sizing. When looking at all of the possible mistakes, failures here mark one of the worst. If this area is not working out for you, this is the first place to focus your attention. There are special apps and calculators that can help with these problems (helping you set percentage risk parameters that will automatically calculate profit targets and stop losses). Other areas to watch are the time of day you trade, methods for trading during active or subdued markets, and how much capital to trade at any given time. Ultimately, you should make time to reassess your trading rules to see if there are inconsistencies for certain market environments. When you watch your progress in these ways, you can minimize your trading mistakes and show consistent improvement toward your trading goals.

images.jpg.be1f20956f39bb217095f7dd212a9337.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.