Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Defining Trading Mistakes

Recommended Posts

Losing money is a necessary part of learning to trade in the forex markets. It is important to remember this, because there is essentially no trader that can claim to win 90-100% of his trades and still be taken seriously by his peers. Since losing trades are an inevitability, it is unfair to define all losing trades as mistakes - because this simply is not the case. A better approach is to define trading mistakes as the events that are actually under our control and work out in the wrong direction. As long as we keep position sizes to manageable levels and spot true mistakes early (when mistakes are actually made), we can avoid substantial damage to a trading account and correct errors so that we can continue improving and moving forward toward your trading goals.

 

Analyzing Seemingly Chaotic Markets

 

When looking to trade and analyze markets that appear chaotic on the surface, it is easy to become frustrated when looking at how price activity unfolds in real-time. This creates some differences when looking at price activity from an historical perspective (which, in hindsight, is much easier). In most cases, new traders will look for ways to improve their methods and build on their strategies using defined trading markets and a specific set of rules on which to base positions. But for most of these early traders, a majority of these positions might turn out to lose money. If you place 10 real money trades and then 6 of those trades lose money, most new traders might say that 6 mistakes have been made - but this is not always the case.

 

For example, let’s assume that we use classic RSI readings and support and resistance levels to generate trading ideas. The classic trading signal might be seen if the RSI indicator falls below the 30 reading and starts to turn back in the upward direction (indicating oversold price activity). When this signal is seen as prices fall to a clearly defined support level, long positions can be taken on the expectation that prices will rise further in the future.

 

Unsuccessful Trades vs. Trading Mistakes

 

In some cases, ideas like this will be successful and generate gains. In other cases, markets will continue through oversold territory and stop out your position for a loss. In the second scenario, did the trader make a mistake? The clear answer is “no,” because all of the original trading rules were in place before the position was established. Once all of these factors are in place, we have no control over what happens next in the market. Using our original definition, connecting true trading mistakes to factors and elements we can actually control, these types of situations cannot be considered mistakes. These are simply unsuccessful trades.

 

When we look at historical price activity, it is much easier to spot the situations where trading rules unfolded in a successful fashion. In real-time, however, those situations can only be judged in terms of probability. There are key differences here. Market scenarios that do not fall in line with the initial probabilities must be categorized correctly, because assigning the word “mistake” to setups that are normally successful might prevent us from using those strategies again in the future. This can reduce the occurrence of winning trades and limit overall gains as well.

 

Elements of Trading Mistakes

 

One way that traders can help their strategies and continue improving is to deconstruct the rules that make up their trading systems. Breaking those rules now becomes the only trading mistake we can make. If, for example, we set leverage limits to create 2-3% account risk at any given moment, a trading mistake could be seen if we enter into a position that creates the possibility for a 5% loss at any given time.

 

In the RSI trading example above, a mistake might be seen if we were chasing markets and established positions before the RSI indicator actually fell below 30 and started to rise again. Whether your trading system is simple or complicated, remaining loyal to your pre-established rules is a vital prerequisite for success, and can help give you a leg-up over the competition. No trader knows where prices will actually be at the end of the day, so it doesn’t make sense to describe inaccurate price forecasting as a “mistake.” Instead, mistakes are directed at behaviors, and not in the end result of any individual trade.

 

An alternate viewpoint can be seen in traders that operate with no plan at all. In this case, we might actually say that any trading decision is a mistake. When traders with no game plan are able to execute a successful trade, should these be considered successful behaviors? Luck of the draw does not create a successful traders, because repeating these same behaviors will not result in consistent profitability over time. In order to have consistent success, you will need to have a clear set of trading rules so that you can enter into positions when the opportunity arises.

 

Analysis vs. Control

 

Both technical and fundamental analysis can help us to take advantage of changes in price and market valuations - but this does not mean these analysis methods give us control over the markets. Of course, there are behaviors that can be followed which can improve the chances of profitability and minimize the damage seen when markets move in an unexpected direction. But the validity of these behaviors should be judged on performance over time, rather than in individual situations.

 

Building on the strength of certain analysis methods, setting clear parameters for risk and reward will depend heavily on your ability to implement conservative position sizing. When looking at all of the possible mistakes, failures here mark one of the worst. If this area is not working out for you, this is the first place to focus your attention. There are special apps and calculators that can help with these problems (helping you set percentage risk parameters that will automatically calculate profit targets and stop losses). Other areas to watch are the time of day you trade, methods for trading during active or subdued markets, and how much capital to trade at any given time. Ultimately, you should make time to reassess your trading rules to see if there are inconsistencies for certain market environments. When you watch your progress in these ways, you can minimize your trading mistakes and show consistent improvement toward your trading goals.

images.jpg.be1f20956f39bb217095f7dd212a9337.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
    • UTZ Utz Brands stock, watch for a bottom breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?UTZ
    • FL Foot Locker stock, nice breakdown follow through at https://stockconsultant.com/?FL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.