Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Understanding Liquidity in the Forex Markets

Recommended Posts

When most potential traders start to research the forex markets, most of the common explanations describe foreign exchange as the “largest and most liquid market in the world,” and then go on to cite number of transactions that are made on a daily or weekly basis. In many cases, these articles will also compare the forex to the number of regular transactions that are seen in the stock or bond markets, and, of course, these numbers equal the proverbial “drop in the ocean” when compared alongside one another. But despite the frequency with which these facts are printed, traders will usually disregard liquidity as an important factor when trades are placed.

 

This type of activity is surprising, especially when these areas are disregarded by technical analysts or charting traders. Liquidity is one of the central issues to consider when determining the likelihood that a certain level of support or resistance will hold and continue to remain valid. To be sure, liquidity in the forex market can be confusing to new and old traders alike. Since the forex market is so large, it can be difficult to determine liquidity levels with a high degree of accuracy. But there are still trends that can be identified, and certain market behaviors that are repeatedly seen during certain time of the year. Periods of economic data release also exhibit certain characteristics in terms of market liquidity, so it does make sense to have an understanding of how these factors will influence prices when levels trading.

 

Liquidity vs. Volatility

 

It should be understood that liquidity is measured in terms of the active number of buyers and sellers that are available for transactions in a market at any given time. If I am trying to sell an asset at $100 and there are no available buyers at that price, markets will gap to the next available price. If I am able to find a willing buyer at $100, we can complete the transaction and there will be no gaps in the market price. In this second hypothetical, we are seeing the effects of a transaction in a market with higher liquidity levels. For active traders, this will generally mean that these markets will experience reductions in volatility.

 

In some cases, however, markets can be both volatile and liquid at the same time, but this is usually the result of external factors (such as major news headlines or significant market data). But the strong liquidity levels that are present in the forex market should be viewed as a strong positive when compared to other reforms of trading. The $4 trillion in daily transactions will generally ensure that you are able to get in and out of the markets at the price you want, and will also help trading probabilities in regions of clearly defined support and resistance (since there is a reduced likelihood for false breaks).

 

Examples of Price Extremes

 

If we think back to the Credit Crisis of 2008, we can remember that anyone trying to sell a home missed the benefits of market liquidity. Credit and available cash was much more difficult to come by, and this prevented some home sales from completing, as the negative impacts snowballed. What about a case where a stock trader finds himself on the wrong side of the market (shorting) as the news is reporting that the company is being bought at a premium during afterhours trading? In both of these cases, individuals found themselves in a situation where they could not “exit a trade” at the desired time and price because of the low level liquidity conditions in that were seen in the market environment.

 

While these extremes are not seen to the same extent in the forex markets, there was still major declines in forex market volatility in 2008, and many major price gaps were seen. It should also be noted that the majority of the volatile activity in 2008 was in the downward direction (for stocks and high yielding currencies), and this is no coincidence. In the attached chart, we can see the 2008 price activity in the EUR/USD.

Price gaps generally accompany market uncertainty, so, for certain asset classes, this is a very bearish scenario. This is another way changes in market liquidity can give traders an indication of where asset prices are likely to head next.

 

Signs of Significant Liquidity Changes

 

Since changes in liquidity can have a major influence on trades and trading decisions (giving validity to price levels, and helping determine potential direction), it is important to have an idea of when these changes are likely to occur. A market that is highly liquid might also be referred to as a “deep” or “smooth” market, and this is because the number of active traders is “deep” and overall price activity is usually “smooth.” Some currency pairs have greater liquidity than others. The most commonly traded pairs (such as EUR/USD, USD/JPY, and GBP/USD) will have might higher liquidity levels (and more stable price action), than pairs like EUR/HUF, USD/NOK, or USD/MXN.

 

When managing risks (setting stop losses) liquid markets offer better protection levels. This is because the enhanced volatility that is usually seen after a major break (typical areas for stop placement) can lead to price gaps and more substantial losses. For this reason, some traders stick to liquid markets (commonly traded pairs), traded during stable times (not after data releases or during periods of extreme uncertainty).

 

Spotting Times of Declining Liquidity

 

Since forex is a 24 hour market, there is no added element of session closing (such as what is seen with stock exchanges), but there are still many situations where declines in liquidity can lead to dangerous price gaps. If, for example, a major interest rate announcement or high-interest news event might jar market expectations. In other cases, prices might see gaps as forex market open initially during the Monday Asia session (Sunday night in North America). Price gaps are much less common in forex markets (some studies suggest that 0.5% of forex price activity occurs during a gap), and there are some times during the day that bring reduced liquidity (such as session changes), and these times will be especially important for scalpers and others using short term strategies (which generally require tight stop losses).

 

Asian session hours tend to be less active (favoring range bound strategies), while the London and US sessions tend to be more active (prone to large percentile moves and breakouts), but this activity tends to taper off during the afternoon periods in both areas. Additionally, market periods tend to slow during the Summer months and mid-month periods, while the end of the month will often see activity spikes as a larger number of investors square positions.

 

Conclusion: Stay On Top of Market Liquidity and Its Impact on Prices

 

Most traders tend to disregard the impact of liquidity and the related impact that this can have on price action. When dealing with less liquid currency pairs (or times when markets are holding off from establishing positions), markets are prone to see larger price moves - and these price moves tend to favor certain types of strategies. For these reasons it is important to have a handle on liquidity and its implications, as this can lead to positioning processes that are more streamlined and efficient based on what markets are likely to encounter going forward.

images.jpg.01ddedb5f44b9f6aed2876338c4d7665.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice

 

A market order takes liquidity off the market.

Limit orders add liquidity to the market.

 

 

 

The price (bid/ask) that you see is:

Bid: The highest (best) buy limit prices( the highest price that limit buy orders are placed)

Ask: The lowest (best) selling limit prices ( the lowest price that sell limit orders are placed)

 

In the case of few seconds before a major news release spreads widen because the liquidity providers (banks etc) withdraw their orders from the market, (because if the new is "market moving" then there might be an agressive one-side move which they will not be able to hedge against) thus making the difference between the price levels of the orderbook bigger. That means that the distance between the Bid/Ask prices described above widens because the orders 'waiting' at the orderbook are less.

 

While in periods of low liquidity, since the distance between the orders in the orderbook is larger, and the volumes waiting to be executed are smaller, the price moves sharper because there is more distance to move from level to level and the volums at each level are smaller.

 

A market order can move the price to another level if it consumes the liquidity that exists at that level. If there were only limit or stop orders placed then the price would stand still.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm pretty sure that a Russian resident would say that recessions are real today. Their prime interest rate is 21%, their corporate military contractors are threatening to file bankruptcy, and sticks of butter are kept under lock and key in their grocery stores because shoplifters are stealing it in bulk so they can resell it on the black market. A downturn is cyclical until it turns into a collapse. I really don't think anyone will be buying-into this mess.😬
    • Well said. This principle is highly analogous to trading. Any human can easily click buy or sell when they "feel" that price is about to go up or down. The problem with feeling, commonly referred to as "instinctive" trading, is that it cannot be quantified. And because it cannot be quantified, it cannot be empirically tested. Instinctive trading has the lowest barrier to entry and therefore returns the lowest reward. As this is true for most things in life, this comes as no surprise. Unfortunately, the lowest barrier to entry is attractive to new traders for obvious reasons. This actually applied to me decades ago.🤭   It's only human nature to seek the highest amount of reward in exchange for the lowest amount of work. In fact, I often say that there is massive gray area between efficiency and laziness. Fortunately, losing for a living inspired me to investigate the work of Wall Street quants who refer to us as "fishfood" or "cannonfodder." Although I knew that we as retail traders cannot exploit execution rebates or queues like quants do, I learned that we can engage in automated scalp, swing, and trend trading. The thermonuclear caveat here, is that I had no idea how to write code (or program) trading algorithms. So I gravitated toward interface-based algorithm builders that required no coding knowledge (see human nature, aforementioned). In retrospect, I should never have traded code written by builder software because it's buggy and inefficient. However, my paid subscription to the builder software allowed me to view the underlying source code of the generated trading algo--which was written in MQL language. Due to a lack of customization in the builder software, I inevitably found myself editing the code. This led me to coding research which, in turn, led me to abandoning the builder software and coding custom algo's from scratch. Fast forward to the present, I can now code several trading strategies per day across 2 different platforms. Considering how inefficient manual backtesting is, coding is a huge advantage. When a new trading concept hits me, I can write the algo, backtest it, and optimize it within an hour or so--across multiple exchanges and symbols, and cycle through hundreds of different settings for each input. And then I get pages upon pages of performance metrics with the best settings pre-highlighted. Having said all of this, I am by no means an advanced programmer. IMHO, advanced programmers write API gateways, construct their own custom trading platforms, use high end computers with field programmable gateway array chips, and set up shop in close proximity to the exchanges. In any event, a considerable amount of work is required just to get toward the top of the "fishfood"/"cannonfodder" pool. Another advantage of coding is that it forces me to write trade entry and exit conditions (triggers) in black & white, thereby causing me to think microscopically about my precise trade trigger conditions. For example, I have to decide whether the algo should track the slope, angle, and level of each bar price and indicator to be used. Typing a hard number like 50 degrees of angle into code is a lot different than merely looking at a chart myself and saying, that's close enough.  Code doesn't acknowledge "maybe" nor "feelings." Either the math (code) works (is profitable) or doesn't work (is a loser). It doesn't get angry, sad, nor overly optimistic. And it can trade virtually 24 hours per day, 5 days per week. If you learn to code, you'll eventually reach a point where coding an algo that trades as you intended provides its own sense of accomplishment. Soon after, making money in the market merely becomes a side effect of your new job--coding. This is how I compete, at least for now, in this wide world of trading. I highly recommend it.  
    • VRA Vera Bradley stock watch, pull back to 5.08 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?VRA
    • MU Micron stock watch, pull back to 102.83 gap support area with high trade quality at https://stockconsultant.com/?MU
    • ACLX Arcellx stock watch, trending at 84.6 support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?ACLX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.