Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Understanding Liquidity in the Forex Markets

Recommended Posts

When most potential traders start to research the forex markets, most of the common explanations describe foreign exchange as the “largest and most liquid market in the world,” and then go on to cite number of transactions that are made on a daily or weekly basis. In many cases, these articles will also compare the forex to the number of regular transactions that are seen in the stock or bond markets, and, of course, these numbers equal the proverbial “drop in the ocean” when compared alongside one another. But despite the frequency with which these facts are printed, traders will usually disregard liquidity as an important factor when trades are placed.

 

This type of activity is surprising, especially when these areas are disregarded by technical analysts or charting traders. Liquidity is one of the central issues to consider when determining the likelihood that a certain level of support or resistance will hold and continue to remain valid. To be sure, liquidity in the forex market can be confusing to new and old traders alike. Since the forex market is so large, it can be difficult to determine liquidity levels with a high degree of accuracy. But there are still trends that can be identified, and certain market behaviors that are repeatedly seen during certain time of the year. Periods of economic data release also exhibit certain characteristics in terms of market liquidity, so it does make sense to have an understanding of how these factors will influence prices when levels trading.

 

Liquidity vs. Volatility

 

It should be understood that liquidity is measured in terms of the active number of buyers and sellers that are available for transactions in a market at any given time. If I am trying to sell an asset at $100 and there are no available buyers at that price, markets will gap to the next available price. If I am able to find a willing buyer at $100, we can complete the transaction and there will be no gaps in the market price. In this second hypothetical, we are seeing the effects of a transaction in a market with higher liquidity levels. For active traders, this will generally mean that these markets will experience reductions in volatility.

 

In some cases, however, markets can be both volatile and liquid at the same time, but this is usually the result of external factors (such as major news headlines or significant market data). But the strong liquidity levels that are present in the forex market should be viewed as a strong positive when compared to other reforms of trading. The $4 trillion in daily transactions will generally ensure that you are able to get in and out of the markets at the price you want, and will also help trading probabilities in regions of clearly defined support and resistance (since there is a reduced likelihood for false breaks).

 

Examples of Price Extremes

 

If we think back to the Credit Crisis of 2008, we can remember that anyone trying to sell a home missed the benefits of market liquidity. Credit and available cash was much more difficult to come by, and this prevented some home sales from completing, as the negative impacts snowballed. What about a case where a stock trader finds himself on the wrong side of the market (shorting) as the news is reporting that the company is being bought at a premium during afterhours trading? In both of these cases, individuals found themselves in a situation where they could not “exit a trade” at the desired time and price because of the low level liquidity conditions in that were seen in the market environment.

 

While these extremes are not seen to the same extent in the forex markets, there was still major declines in forex market volatility in 2008, and many major price gaps were seen. It should also be noted that the majority of the volatile activity in 2008 was in the downward direction (for stocks and high yielding currencies), and this is no coincidence. In the attached chart, we can see the 2008 price activity in the EUR/USD.

Price gaps generally accompany market uncertainty, so, for certain asset classes, this is a very bearish scenario. This is another way changes in market liquidity can give traders an indication of where asset prices are likely to head next.

 

Signs of Significant Liquidity Changes

 

Since changes in liquidity can have a major influence on trades and trading decisions (giving validity to price levels, and helping determine potential direction), it is important to have an idea of when these changes are likely to occur. A market that is highly liquid might also be referred to as a “deep” or “smooth” market, and this is because the number of active traders is “deep” and overall price activity is usually “smooth.” Some currency pairs have greater liquidity than others. The most commonly traded pairs (such as EUR/USD, USD/JPY, and GBP/USD) will have might higher liquidity levels (and more stable price action), than pairs like EUR/HUF, USD/NOK, or USD/MXN.

 

When managing risks (setting stop losses) liquid markets offer better protection levels. This is because the enhanced volatility that is usually seen after a major break (typical areas for stop placement) can lead to price gaps and more substantial losses. For this reason, some traders stick to liquid markets (commonly traded pairs), traded during stable times (not after data releases or during periods of extreme uncertainty).

 

Spotting Times of Declining Liquidity

 

Since forex is a 24 hour market, there is no added element of session closing (such as what is seen with stock exchanges), but there are still many situations where declines in liquidity can lead to dangerous price gaps. If, for example, a major interest rate announcement or high-interest news event might jar market expectations. In other cases, prices might see gaps as forex market open initially during the Monday Asia session (Sunday night in North America). Price gaps are much less common in forex markets (some studies suggest that 0.5% of forex price activity occurs during a gap), and there are some times during the day that bring reduced liquidity (such as session changes), and these times will be especially important for scalpers and others using short term strategies (which generally require tight stop losses).

 

Asian session hours tend to be less active (favoring range bound strategies), while the London and US sessions tend to be more active (prone to large percentile moves and breakouts), but this activity tends to taper off during the afternoon periods in both areas. Additionally, market periods tend to slow during the Summer months and mid-month periods, while the end of the month will often see activity spikes as a larger number of investors square positions.

 

Conclusion: Stay On Top of Market Liquidity and Its Impact on Prices

 

Most traders tend to disregard the impact of liquidity and the related impact that this can have on price action. When dealing with less liquid currency pairs (or times when markets are holding off from establishing positions), markets are prone to see larger price moves - and these price moves tend to favor certain types of strategies. For these reasons it is important to have a handle on liquidity and its implications, as this can lead to positioning processes that are more streamlined and efficient based on what markets are likely to encounter going forward.

images.jpg.01ddedb5f44b9f6aed2876338c4d7665.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice

 

A market order takes liquidity off the market.

Limit orders add liquidity to the market.

 

 

 

The price (bid/ask) that you see is:

Bid: The highest (best) buy limit prices( the highest price that limit buy orders are placed)

Ask: The lowest (best) selling limit prices ( the lowest price that sell limit orders are placed)

 

In the case of few seconds before a major news release spreads widen because the liquidity providers (banks etc) withdraw their orders from the market, (because if the new is "market moving" then there might be an agressive one-side move which they will not be able to hedge against) thus making the difference between the price levels of the orderbook bigger. That means that the distance between the Bid/Ask prices described above widens because the orders 'waiting' at the orderbook are less.

 

While in periods of low liquidity, since the distance between the orders in the orderbook is larger, and the volumes waiting to be executed are smaller, the price moves sharper because there is more distance to move from level to level and the volums at each level are smaller.

 

A market order can move the price to another level if it consumes the liquidity that exists at that level. If there were only limit or stop orders placed then the price would stand still.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.