Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Personality and Consistency in Forex Trading

Recommended Posts

In a market that is as large as the forex, building an edge and maintaining that edge can seem like a daunting task. New traders often find themselves in situations where the first few trades go well, leverage is then maximized in anticipation of huge gains, and then a string of losers destroys the trading account beyond repair. This is an experience that has been had by most (if not all) experienced traders, and this can be a costly but valuable lesson on the road to a successful trading career. One of the things that should be understood first is that the behaviors described above represent the exact opposite of trading consistency, and consistency is what you will need (more than anything else) to develop a successful trading career.

 

Playing to Your Strengths

 

One commonly cited trading fact that might not seem apparent in the early stages is that aiming toward consistency is more important than aiming toward the 100% perfect trading system. Traders that are able to develop a system that plays to their strengths, time availability, and investment goals are the ones that will be able to gain an edge on the rest of the market. This is because playing to your strengths will make consistency easier to achieve, and this is where your focus should be - rather than in looking to try to capture every pip out of every market move. Finding the “perfect trading system” or capturing 100% of every market moves are unrealistic pursuits. What is possible is looking internally to see which styles and approaches work best for your investment profile and then to apply those methods using strict rules that can be regularly followed and repeated on a consistent basis.

 

Imagine someone approached Kobe Bryant and suggested that he suppress his love of basketball and the natural talent he has developed playing the sport because he could make more money playing baseball. In hindsight, most people would say choosing baseball (and ignoring his natural impulses) would have been an unwise choice. This analogy can be applied to trading in the various occasions we see new traders persuaded to use advertised investment systems that promise great gains but do nothing to take the personality profile of the trader into consideration.

But when traders use automated systems, those traders will have no way of understanding the risks involved with the systems and when losses do occur, traders will usually scrap the system entirely and waste a good deal of time and money on something that yielded no real advantages (intellectual or financial).

 

Forgetting the “Perfect Strategy”

 

Another common characteristic of new traders can be seen when looking for the “holy grail” or the “perfect” trading strategy. But the unfortunate reality that what works well for one trader is not necessarily got to “rain profits” for another trader. But the fact that there is no “perfect” system should be viewed as a positive - because now you can stop looking. Instead, you should be looking for the system that is perfect for you. It is your mindset and personality that is the most important component of any trading system, so you can save your time, energy, and sanity spent looking for a Holy Grail system that just doesn’t exist. In place of this, you should be looking for a trading system that allows you to spot high probability setups with consistency. Repeatability over time is the ultimate goal, rather than a system that can be followed blindly and applied to any trading style.

 

Consistency Over “Perfection”

 

When attaching your personality to your regular trading system, you should only rely on indicators that you can fully understand and are comfortable reading. The formulas before most of the commonly used indicators are relatively simple to understand, and there are many helpful articles on this site that can guide you in the right direction. It never makes sense to use an indicator if you do not understand how its calculations are made, and you are comfortable with the way it displays signals.

 

Money management techniques are also a central issue here, as some traders are willing to take on more risk than others. Are you an aggressive trader or a conservative trader? In all cases, you money management system must be one that will allow you to remain cool, calm, and collected under even the most volatile market conditions. For the most part, indicators are used to give exit and entry signals, as these tools will provide price action signals that are relatively easy to spot and understand. Not all indicators look (or behave) the same, however, so it is important to choose indicators that move in ways that work well with your natural reactions. Indicators work along with your money management system in ways that cannot be duplicated by another trader. The combination of all of these factors will create your unique niche, and allow you to develop your edge over the market in the longer term.

 

Looking at Hypothetical Reactions

 

To exemplify this, we can look at two hypothetical examples in a long term uptrend. Let’s assume that the uptrend ran for 500 pips, and that the “beginner’s mindset” will be deemed as a failure if all of those pips are not captured in a long position. In some cases, it might be possible to capture all of these pips, but when using a system that is consistent and repeatable, this will not be the case in the vast majority of trading situations. A repeatable system that promises to capture 100% of a trading move simply does not exist, and thus it is unrealistic to have expectations like this. More often, the beginner trader will wait too long to exit a position and a corrective downward move will be seen (forcing the trader to give back some portion of the original gains). This unfortunate occurrence is all too common and comes as the result of the beginner's mindset focused on finding the perfect system.

 

Instead, the experienced trader’s focus is elsewhere: for example, on identifying trades with strong risk to reward ratios. For the experienced traders, the proverbial “holy grail” comes with high probability trading setups that can be regularly identified with simplicity and consistency. These long term scenarios (a large number of trades) is far more important than any individual trade. In the hypothetical long term uptrend example above, the experienced trader would exit the position once risk to reward ratios are satisfied and the trend has started to reach an exhaustion point.

 

Conclusion: Focus on Consistency, Not Perfection

 

It is natural for traders to want to squeeze every possible pip out of a market move, but the unfortunate reality is that in trading it is simply not possible to hit the “bullseye” on every shot. Because of this, experienced traders avoid this practice altogether and instead choose to focus on systems that match the personality of the individual and can be repeated with high levels of consistency. With this, it becomes clear that trading takes work, and that there is not Holy Grail trading system that can be applied to everyone. Instead, the best approach is to look for trading opportunities that match your personal requirements for high probability scenarios using indicator setups that are easy to use and understand. Of course, losses will be seen but the main goal here is to find systems that generate profits over the long run, not in single instances.

consistency-of-claims.jpg.ec9d0f2723421983007c8f6949793ed6.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.