Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

gojun077

Steidlmayer's OFI

Recommended Posts

In "Steidlmayer On Markets" 2nd edition (2003), Steidlmayer talks about

OFI (On-Floor Information) as an indicator for trading the first three time

periods for the following day. If OFI for the previous day is <1.0, then we

should consider going short the next morning, and if OFI > 1.0, long.

 

The formula for calculating OFI was simply:

 

OFI = AVG SIZE OF FILLED BUY ORDERS/AVG SIZE OF FILLED SELL ORDERS

 

However, in an interview with Active Trader Magazine in the September 2005

issue, the formula for On-Floor Information was a bit different:

 

OFI= (Bought contracts/buy orders) / (Sold Contracts/Sell Orders)

 

The resulting OFI figures can be quite different when we factor in the number

of contracts entered in the limit order book

(the divisor in the second formula above).

 

In my casual empirical observation of OFI figures and the next morning's move

in KOSPI200 futures, OFI doesn't seem to be a good predictor in this

market.

 

My question is- does anyone else use OFI in their trading, and which method

do you use to calculate the OFI figure?

 

Cheers from South Korea,

Jun

 

(I apologize for starting a new thread as a newbie...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jun,

 

Gosh, don't ever apologize for starting a thread! Especially about things like this. I've never run across OFI, but I've never read Steidlmayer either. I heard he can be a tough read for some people...and childrens books are tough for me, so I'll stick with easier things :)

 

It's an interesting point you bring up. I'd love to know more about how you get this data and if there are markets now-a-days that this pertains to.

 

Thanks, and sorry i dont have any insight for you on it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

aha ¡¡ interesting, the big question would be, where do we collect this type of data (if it is available for TS/ or esignal).... in order to make this formula work on TS... I mean the "buy/ sell orders" data...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To make the OFI calculation, you would need tick data. Here in Korea,

this data is usually provided by brokerage companies free of charge

through 'HTS' (Home trading system) programs provided to customers.

 

The data comes in the following format:

 

Time Ask Bid Curr. Chg(yest) OI Theo. Fut. BASIS Volume # Sold # Bought

 

15:05:00 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,472 2

15:05:00 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,470 1

15:04:59 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,469 1

15:04:59 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,121 189.66 1.87 157,468 3

15:04:59 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,465 1

15:04:59 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,464 1

15:04:58 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,463 1

15:04:58 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,121 189.66 1.87 157,462 1

15:04:57 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,121 189.66 1.87 157,461 10

15:04:57 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,121 189.66 1.87 157,451 1

15:04:57 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,121 189.66 1.87 157,450 5

15:04:56 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,445 1

15:04:56 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,444 1

15:04:56 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,443 2

15:04:56 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,441 6

15:04:55 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,435 5

15:04:54 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,430 5

15:04:53 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,425 1

15:04:53 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,424 3

15:04:51 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,421 5

15:04:50 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,416 2

15:04:49 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,414 2

15:04:49 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,412 15

15:04:49 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,397 1

15:04:49 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,396 7

15:04:49 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,389 1

 

 

(I apologize for the poor formatting- it looks nice on my screen, but the exported text is hard to read) I'm sure similar data is available from your service providers' screens. Once you have the tick data, simply calculate the average of the contracts sold column, and do the same for the contracts bought column. Then divide (avg bought)/(avg sold)

and you get your OFI. As I stated in my earlier post, there are different ways to calculate OFI. This is the easiest method.

 

The second method requires data from the limit order book. It takes into account the number and size of orders in the order book in calculating OFI.

First, the formula:

 

(Total # of contracts bot/# of buy side contracts in order book) / (Total # of contracts sold/# sell side contracts in order book)

 

Sometimes, however, I feel the second method gives a misleadingly low OFI figure. Consider the case of a monster up day. On such a day, there will be a large bias of longs vs shorts. When we divide the number of Total contracts bought by the huge number of unfilled orders in the order book, the numerator of the OFI will be small. Let me illustrate with some real numbers from the KOSPI200 futures on 3-27:

 

75,047 contracts sold, 84,676 contracts bought

avg number of contracts on the sell side of the limit order book: 3,781

avg number of contracts on the buy side of the limit order book: 5,658

 

(84,676/5,658) / (75,047/3,781) = 0.75, a very bearish OFI figure, but using the first method above, we get:

avg size of buys: 6.76 contracts, avg size of sells: 6.07 contracts,

OFI = 6.76/6.07 = 1.11, a moderately bullish OFI figure

 

Although MP is getting quite popular among day traders here in S. Korea, the OFI concept is still not well-known. I'm still in the process of gathering data for OFI correlation to the next morning's up/down movement. I will post my findings after gathering a few weeks' data...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gojun,

 

This might be a little off-topic and I apologize. I see you are located in South Korea which triggered my interest. How is the day trading population in Korea? Has it always been big or is this a recent trend? In Japan, day trading took off in 2006. What markets do most day traders in Korea trade? Thanks

 

James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Soultrader-

 

In response to your post regarding the daytrading population in S. Korea, it is

absolutely HUGE in stock index futures, namely, the KOSPI200. On some days,

individuals make up 50% of total volume! Also, options activity on ATM and

slightly OTM index options are mostly driven by retail buy-side activity. Margins are really steep, though (15% for KOSPI200 futures!), after a spate of retirees losing all their money in the futures market or getting wiped out after selling OTM naked puts.

 

So how is trading in Japan? I recall reading an article in the WSJ a few weeks ago that talked about housewives and salarymen currency trading after work and how individuals are getting into the yen-carry trade through futures brokerages...We're in the same time zone, apparently. It's 6:51am right now, best luck trading today!

 

-Jun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the carry-trade is getting contagious. I read this strategy is blamed for the Yen's movement in last few months. Don't know if it's true or not though. Forex seems to be on everyone's mind in recent times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think stocks are what's on everyone's mind, making record highs around the world. With so many great stock index futures to trade around the world (KOSPI, NIKKEI, FTSE, DAX, CAC etc.) it make no sense just to concentrate on US markets.

 

As for the original question, there are so many fake orders entered on the order book it makes no sense to use that information for trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think stocks are what's on everyone's mind, making record highs around the world. With so many great stock index futures to trade around the world (KOSPI, NIKKEI, FTSE, DAX, CAC etc.) it make no sense just to concentrate on US markets.

 

As for the original question, there are so many fake orders entered on the order book it makes no sense to use that information for trading.

 

I agree with the fact of fake orders... its not reliable information...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's true that lots of limit orders are placed far away from

the current price, especially when traders are caught on the

wrong side of a move. It's kind of an attempt to 'psych' out

the market. However, it can also be a good contrary indicator,

as Steidlmayer pointed out on pg. 153 of "Steidlmayer on Markets"

(3rd Ed):

 

'One relevant observation I have made pertaining to watching

the book and order flow on my Trading Technologies (TT)

front end is that when the book is stacked (aggregate bids vs.

aggregate offers), the book is usually wrong. When I say

stacked, I mean it has slightly less than twice as many total

bids as total offers or slightly less than twice as many total

offers as total bids. What is probably happening is a trader or

traders on the wrong side of the market are putting in false

bids or offers defending open position, which are cancelled

once the market gets close to the trade price.'

 

I'm sure many of you are familiar with this situation. There might

be a huge overhang of several thousand sell orders 5 or more

ticks above the market that suddenly evaporate once aggressive

buyers start hitting the ask. I disagree that order book info is

worthless. It is certainly misleading, but that doesn't mean we

should discard it entirely. Perhaps some of you out there use the

huge imbalances (when the book is "stacked") as a clue for reversals

of intraday moves.

 

Also in S. Korea, we have an indicator called the "buy ratio" which is simply

a ratio of the outstanding buy orders to sell orders. When it's above 1,

the indicator is bullish, and when it's below 1, it's bearish. Of course,

there's more to it than just that, but really fast-moving day traders

like to use it as a momentum signal. I've attached a chart showing the

movements of the buy ratio vs. the KOSPI200 futures from April 6th. It's

pretty amazing how closely the two track each other. (the buy ratio is

in red, and the kospi200 is in blue)

4-6-07-kospi200-0706-buyrat.jpg.a8ef1bab0a94c777eaffb6dd78e6a6ea.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gojun : I understand basicly what you mean and it makes a lot of sense... I think we dont have access to that type of data here on US markets... and never seen ploted on a chart that information... its very interesting the type of data your market gives to their participants... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
It's true that lots of limit orders are placed far away from

the current price, especially when traders are caught on the

wrong side of a move. It's kind of an attempt to 'psych' out

the market. However, it can also be a good contrary indicator,

as Steidlmayer pointed out on pg. 153 of "Steidlmayer on Markets"

(3rd Ed):

 

'One relevant observation I have made pertaining to watching

the book and order flow on my Trading Technologies (TT)

front end is that when the book is stacked (aggregate bids vs.

aggregate offers), the book is usually wrong. When I say

stacked, I mean it has slightly less than twice as many total

bids as total offers or slightly less than twice as many total

offers as total bids. What is probably happening is a trader or

traders on the wrong side of the market are putting in false

bids or offers defending open position, which are cancelled

once the market gets close to the trade price.'

 

Paul Rotter made a mint "spoofing" like this in the Eurex German Bobl, Bund and Schatz treasury futures.

 

The attached article should provide more detail as to what he was alleged to have done, and how his activities earned him the notorious handle of "The Flipper".

paul-rotter-trader-monthly-flipping-out.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFI is published but in a very obscure way deep inside the LDB - Liquidity Data Bank - at the CBOT. The OFI was Pete Steidlmayer's beginning of the change from the tradional market profile and looking at responsive and initiative trade to moving onto the higher plane of vertical and horizontal with front page and back page analysis that then becomes the basis for capital flow and his software

 

Rather than look for this OFI then I suggest that as an alternative because as I have frequently demonstrated there are alternatives to susbcribing to the LDB which is cumbersome, expensive and time consuming in many respects - and these days everyone is so into instant gratification - that a look at the thread posted about

when does a profile become fat may offer further insight

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f6/mp-question-how-many-30-min-1865.html

 

The basis in very simplistic terms for OFI effectively is a ratio of uptics vs downtics. However it has to be considered that in the short term not all down tics are sells and not all uptics are buys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
    • Does any crypto exchanges get banned in your country? How's about other as Bybit, Kraken, MEXC, OKX?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.