Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

gojun077

Steidlmayer's OFI

Recommended Posts

In "Steidlmayer On Markets" 2nd edition (2003), Steidlmayer talks about

OFI (On-Floor Information) as an indicator for trading the first three time

periods for the following day. If OFI for the previous day is <1.0, then we

should consider going short the next morning, and if OFI > 1.0, long.

 

The formula for calculating OFI was simply:

 

OFI = AVG SIZE OF FILLED BUY ORDERS/AVG SIZE OF FILLED SELL ORDERS

 

However, in an interview with Active Trader Magazine in the September 2005

issue, the formula for On-Floor Information was a bit different:

 

OFI= (Bought contracts/buy orders) / (Sold Contracts/Sell Orders)

 

The resulting OFI figures can be quite different when we factor in the number

of contracts entered in the limit order book

(the divisor in the second formula above).

 

In my casual empirical observation of OFI figures and the next morning's move

in KOSPI200 futures, OFI doesn't seem to be a good predictor in this

market.

 

My question is- does anyone else use OFI in their trading, and which method

do you use to calculate the OFI figure?

 

Cheers from South Korea,

Jun

 

(I apologize for starting a new thread as a newbie...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jun,

 

Gosh, don't ever apologize for starting a thread! Especially about things like this. I've never run across OFI, but I've never read Steidlmayer either. I heard he can be a tough read for some people...and childrens books are tough for me, so I'll stick with easier things :)

 

It's an interesting point you bring up. I'd love to know more about how you get this data and if there are markets now-a-days that this pertains to.

 

Thanks, and sorry i dont have any insight for you on it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

aha ¡¡ interesting, the big question would be, where do we collect this type of data (if it is available for TS/ or esignal).... in order to make this formula work on TS... I mean the "buy/ sell orders" data...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To make the OFI calculation, you would need tick data. Here in Korea,

this data is usually provided by brokerage companies free of charge

through 'HTS' (Home trading system) programs provided to customers.

 

The data comes in the following format:

 

Time Ask Bid Curr. Chg(yest) OI Theo. Fut. BASIS Volume # Sold # Bought

 

15:05:00 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,472 2

15:05:00 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,470 1

15:04:59 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,469 1

15:04:59 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,121 189.66 1.87 157,468 3

15:04:59 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,465 1

15:04:59 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,464 1

15:04:58 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,121 189.66 1.82 157,463 1

15:04:58 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,121 189.66 1.87 157,462 1

15:04:57 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,121 189.66 1.87 157,461 10

15:04:57 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,121 189.66 1.87 157,451 1

15:04:57 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,121 189.66 1.87 157,450 5

15:04:56 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,445 1

15:04:56 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,444 1

15:04:56 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,443 2

15:04:56 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,441 6

15:04:55 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,435 5

15:04:54 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,430 5

15:04:53 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,425 1

15:04:53 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,424 3

15:04:51 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,421 5

15:04:50 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,416 2

15:04:49 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,414 2

15:04:49 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,412 15

15:04:49 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,397 1

15:04:49 189.55 189.5 189.5 0.9 94,109 189.66 1.82 157,396 7

15:04:49 189.55 189.5 189.55 0.95 94,109 189.66 1.87 157,389 1

 

 

(I apologize for the poor formatting- it looks nice on my screen, but the exported text is hard to read) I'm sure similar data is available from your service providers' screens. Once you have the tick data, simply calculate the average of the contracts sold column, and do the same for the contracts bought column. Then divide (avg bought)/(avg sold)

and you get your OFI. As I stated in my earlier post, there are different ways to calculate OFI. This is the easiest method.

 

The second method requires data from the limit order book. It takes into account the number and size of orders in the order book in calculating OFI.

First, the formula:

 

(Total # of contracts bot/# of buy side contracts in order book) / (Total # of contracts sold/# sell side contracts in order book)

 

Sometimes, however, I feel the second method gives a misleadingly low OFI figure. Consider the case of a monster up day. On such a day, there will be a large bias of longs vs shorts. When we divide the number of Total contracts bought by the huge number of unfilled orders in the order book, the numerator of the OFI will be small. Let me illustrate with some real numbers from the KOSPI200 futures on 3-27:

 

75,047 contracts sold, 84,676 contracts bought

avg number of contracts on the sell side of the limit order book: 3,781

avg number of contracts on the buy side of the limit order book: 5,658

 

(84,676/5,658) / (75,047/3,781) = 0.75, a very bearish OFI figure, but using the first method above, we get:

avg size of buys: 6.76 contracts, avg size of sells: 6.07 contracts,

OFI = 6.76/6.07 = 1.11, a moderately bullish OFI figure

 

Although MP is getting quite popular among day traders here in S. Korea, the OFI concept is still not well-known. I'm still in the process of gathering data for OFI correlation to the next morning's up/down movement. I will post my findings after gathering a few weeks' data...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gojun,

 

This might be a little off-topic and I apologize. I see you are located in South Korea which triggered my interest. How is the day trading population in Korea? Has it always been big or is this a recent trend? In Japan, day trading took off in 2006. What markets do most day traders in Korea trade? Thanks

 

James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Soultrader-

 

In response to your post regarding the daytrading population in S. Korea, it is

absolutely HUGE in stock index futures, namely, the KOSPI200. On some days,

individuals make up 50% of total volume! Also, options activity on ATM and

slightly OTM index options are mostly driven by retail buy-side activity. Margins are really steep, though (15% for KOSPI200 futures!), after a spate of retirees losing all their money in the futures market or getting wiped out after selling OTM naked puts.

 

So how is trading in Japan? I recall reading an article in the WSJ a few weeks ago that talked about housewives and salarymen currency trading after work and how individuals are getting into the yen-carry trade through futures brokerages...We're in the same time zone, apparently. It's 6:51am right now, best luck trading today!

 

-Jun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the carry-trade is getting contagious. I read this strategy is blamed for the Yen's movement in last few months. Don't know if it's true or not though. Forex seems to be on everyone's mind in recent times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think stocks are what's on everyone's mind, making record highs around the world. With so many great stock index futures to trade around the world (KOSPI, NIKKEI, FTSE, DAX, CAC etc.) it make no sense just to concentrate on US markets.

 

As for the original question, there are so many fake orders entered on the order book it makes no sense to use that information for trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think stocks are what's on everyone's mind, making record highs around the world. With so many great stock index futures to trade around the world (KOSPI, NIKKEI, FTSE, DAX, CAC etc.) it make no sense just to concentrate on US markets.

 

As for the original question, there are so many fake orders entered on the order book it makes no sense to use that information for trading.

 

I agree with the fact of fake orders... its not reliable information...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's true that lots of limit orders are placed far away from

the current price, especially when traders are caught on the

wrong side of a move. It's kind of an attempt to 'psych' out

the market. However, it can also be a good contrary indicator,

as Steidlmayer pointed out on pg. 153 of "Steidlmayer on Markets"

(3rd Ed):

 

'One relevant observation I have made pertaining to watching

the book and order flow on my Trading Technologies (TT)

front end is that when the book is stacked (aggregate bids vs.

aggregate offers), the book is usually wrong. When I say

stacked, I mean it has slightly less than twice as many total

bids as total offers or slightly less than twice as many total

offers as total bids. What is probably happening is a trader or

traders on the wrong side of the market are putting in false

bids or offers defending open position, which are cancelled

once the market gets close to the trade price.'

 

I'm sure many of you are familiar with this situation. There might

be a huge overhang of several thousand sell orders 5 or more

ticks above the market that suddenly evaporate once aggressive

buyers start hitting the ask. I disagree that order book info is

worthless. It is certainly misleading, but that doesn't mean we

should discard it entirely. Perhaps some of you out there use the

huge imbalances (when the book is "stacked") as a clue for reversals

of intraday moves.

 

Also in S. Korea, we have an indicator called the "buy ratio" which is simply

a ratio of the outstanding buy orders to sell orders. When it's above 1,

the indicator is bullish, and when it's below 1, it's bearish. Of course,

there's more to it than just that, but really fast-moving day traders

like to use it as a momentum signal. I've attached a chart showing the

movements of the buy ratio vs. the KOSPI200 futures from April 6th. It's

pretty amazing how closely the two track each other. (the buy ratio is

in red, and the kospi200 is in blue)

4-6-07-kospi200-0706-buyrat.jpg.a8ef1bab0a94c777eaffb6dd78e6a6ea.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gojun : I understand basicly what you mean and it makes a lot of sense... I think we dont have access to that type of data here on US markets... and never seen ploted on a chart that information... its very interesting the type of data your market gives to their participants... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
It's true that lots of limit orders are placed far away from

the current price, especially when traders are caught on the

wrong side of a move. It's kind of an attempt to 'psych' out

the market. However, it can also be a good contrary indicator,

as Steidlmayer pointed out on pg. 153 of "Steidlmayer on Markets"

(3rd Ed):

 

'One relevant observation I have made pertaining to watching

the book and order flow on my Trading Technologies (TT)

front end is that when the book is stacked (aggregate bids vs.

aggregate offers), the book is usually wrong. When I say

stacked, I mean it has slightly less than twice as many total

bids as total offers or slightly less than twice as many total

offers as total bids. What is probably happening is a trader or

traders on the wrong side of the market are putting in false

bids or offers defending open position, which are cancelled

once the market gets close to the trade price.'

 

Paul Rotter made a mint "spoofing" like this in the Eurex German Bobl, Bund and Schatz treasury futures.

 

The attached article should provide more detail as to what he was alleged to have done, and how his activities earned him the notorious handle of "The Flipper".

paul-rotter-trader-monthly-flipping-out.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFI is published but in a very obscure way deep inside the LDB - Liquidity Data Bank - at the CBOT. The OFI was Pete Steidlmayer's beginning of the change from the tradional market profile and looking at responsive and initiative trade to moving onto the higher plane of vertical and horizontal with front page and back page analysis that then becomes the basis for capital flow and his software

 

Rather than look for this OFI then I suggest that as an alternative because as I have frequently demonstrated there are alternatives to susbcribing to the LDB which is cumbersome, expensive and time consuming in many respects - and these days everyone is so into instant gratification - that a look at the thread posted about

when does a profile become fat may offer further insight

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f6/mp-question-how-many-30-min-1865.html

 

The basis in very simplistic terms for OFI effectively is a ratio of uptics vs downtics. However it has to be considered that in the short term not all down tics are sells and not all uptics are buys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.