Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Variations on the Traditional Price Channel

Recommended Posts

It can be said that technical analysis in the forex markets is essentially an exercise in framing price activity. Strong skills in this area can help traders to identify exit and entry levels that enhance profitability probabilities, and these framing techniques use historical price activity to determine the possibility of reversal or extension in a given price movement. While these techniques are incapable of predicting the future price of an asset, they can aid in forming expectations in whether or not prices have additional room to extend, or are more likely to reverse. In most cases, traders are looking for indications that one of these scenarios is in place before establishing new positions (or looking to close established positions).

 

Of course, there is a wide variety of methods technical analysts can use to frame price activity, so it is important to test out a few of these approaches in order to determine which feels most comfortable for you. When studying charts, in many situations, it will look as though market values are completely dictated by momentum (or some other force of nature), and that prices can only reverse once this momentum has reached an extreme.

 

Price framing techniques can be one of the best methods for determining when this momentum has reached its extreme points, and when there is an increased likelihood that these formations will result in a bounce or price failure, appropriate entry and exit levels can be identified. When using price channels for these strategies, there are a few different formats that can be applied, and so traders only familiar with the traditional format should take a look at some of the other options to see which format is most suitable. Here, we will look at 3 common approaches to price channel analysis: Trend Line Channels, median-line analysis with Andrew’s Pitchfork Channels, and Donchian Channels.

 

Trend Line Channels

 

Price channels can accomplish different things when traders are attempting to pinpoint continuations in developed trends, or reversals back into an established ranges. Its important to understand the basics, so first we will look at Trend Line Channels. Because of the simplicity involved, some traders might overlook this method of analysis but the fact is that Trend Line Channels can be a highly effective, and can be a very good place to start when traders have limited technical analysis experience. Trend Line Channels are easy to identify and understand, and these can be used in both range bound and trending markets. The central elements are dual trend lines, connecting points of support and resistance, and these channels can come in uptrends, downtrends, and range bound markets. The central visual should be familiar, in the first attachment is an example of an uptrend channel.

 

As a general rule, prices should reach both the upper (resistance) trend line, and the lower (support) line at least two times. Preferably you will see three separate tests, and more is definitely better (improves on the validity of the channel). In rising Trend Line Channels, market momentum is positive and prices are making higher highs along with higher lows. This generally leads to buy entries at channel lows and possible sell exits near the top of the channel. Sell entries are generally not advised in these cases (at channel tops), as the majority of the market momentum is in the upward direction.

 

In declining Trend Line Channels, market momentum is negative and prices are making lower highs along with lower lows. This generally leads to sell entries at channel highs and possible buy exits near the top of the channel. Buy entries are generally not advised in these cases (at channel bottoms), as the majority of the market momentum is in the downward direction.

 

Looking for Price Extremes with Donchian Channels

 

Donchian Channels were created by Richard Donchian in the 1980s, and these studies have had a massive impact on the way markets view channel activity on historical price charts. The main themes center on areas of buying strength and the differences seen in the areas of selling weakness. Donchian Channels are used as a breakout strategy with a high probability outcome, which located areas where prices have surpassed significant highs or lows over a given time frame (which can be individually selected).

 

Donchian Channels tend to give the best signals during market environments with strong trends, weaker results tend to be seen during sideways ranges. The Donchian Channel system looks for trend-following breakouts, and the signals are based on the following criteria:

 

  • Prices closing above the Donchian Channel produce buy signals (and indicate areas to close shorts)
  • Prices closing below the Donchian Channel produce sell signals (and indicate areas to close longs)

Trading with Donchian Channels produces relatively few signals but in high probability systems, formations tend to have improved accuracy. In the second attachment, we can see a visual of how Donchian Channels look on a price chart.

 

 

Watching the Median Line with the Andrews Pitchfork

 

Andrews Pitchfork methods tend to fall into the “advanced” category of trading but once we understand the locations trading signals are generated, the tool becomes much easier to use. On the whole, the Andrews Pitchfork system is based on the idea that market values revert to the mean on averaged time frames and divergences from the indicator’s median line will continue until price trends reverse. The main benefit of the Andrews Pitchfork is that it allows for tight stop losses and conservative profit targets.

 

The overall construction of the Andrews Pitchfork is built on market pivots. Three channel lines are drawn (which looks like a pitchfork). A “buy” signal is seen when prices start from the mid point, rise to the upper trend line, and then fall to the lower trend line. The first profit target is the median line, the second profit target is the upper trend line. Stop losses can be placed just below the lower trend line, but the eventual profit target is seen at the upper trend line. A “sell” signal is seen when prices start from the mid point, fall to the lower trend line, and then rise to the upper trend line. Sell entries can be taken here. The first profit target is the median line, the second profit target is the lower trend line. Stop losses can be placed just below the upper trend line.

 

In Andrews Pitchfork analysis most of the arguments rest on the fact that prices gravitate toward the midline 80% of the time when markets are trending. In strongly trending markets, traders tend to target the opposing trendline (for profit targets), and stops can be placed outside the Pitchfork, sometimes using the Average True Range to define extreme areas.

 

Conclusion: Consider All Trend Channel Strategies

 

It is important to remember that trend line strategies can be a highly effective method for determining exit and entry points for chart based trades. In many cases stop losses can be kept tight, which is very helpful in improving risk to reward ratios. Here, we looked at three different formats and traders can choose from the traditional Trend Line Channel, the Donchian Channel and the Andrews Pitchfork, as one of these methods of likely to aid in your individual approach to technical analysis.

initialchannel1.png.ef52a429bfa29a9745dc522e05cea1a8.png

2.PNG.5704e322b68c8cf6e9333f2139667b68.PNG

Pitchfork.jpg.afdfbc804cfcacb7a544ddc935c85125.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.