Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Misc Forex Ranblings

Recommended Posts

Please feel free to post any ideas you may have about Forex residing in a corner of your mind somewhere.

 

 

Here's a copy of an Email I just shot off to a friend.

 

Hi XXXX

 

Hope all is well with you and XXXX and the kids.

 

Take a look at yesterday's daily Candle on G/U..... looks very nice but I am little reticent about buying sterling.

 

Sooo.... I am buying a small piece of A/U, just got in @ 10298. s/l 9995 figure I'll just hold for about 10550 ( it is positive roll). ((barely)).

 

 

If it moves faster than I expect, who knows, last July it was at 11084.

 

 

Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Forex. I like it a lot. I just do not like trading Forex anymore.

 

Here are a few reasons why I do not like trading it anymore:

 

1) No centralized market or regulations.

2) Most forex brokers are taking the other side of your trade (trading against you)

3) false spreads ( they create the market)

4) No true volume or way to read order flow ( tape) since there is not one AND no time and sales.

 

These are just a few for me. If it works for you awesome!

 

 

I still trade currencies but I do it in the futures market like the GBP futures. Safer , to me , and I can read the order flow and see what is actually happening . Brokers are not trading against you they just make commission( which by the way is cheaper) Candles can only tell you so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FX rambling....

 

50% may not be a fib number but its a handy little number to use for indicating a zone/area to ponder entering a trade on a retracement in a trend - particularly in the EURUSD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FX rambling....

 

50% may not be a fib number but its a handy little number to use for indicating a zone/area to ponder entering a trade on a retracement in a trend - particularly in the EURUSD

 

That's funny, I was explaining fib retracements to someone the other day. I told them that 50% was not really a fib number, but price has to pass thru it anyway to get to 61.8

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sometimes hear forex compared to poker. The similarities are not actually all that great. No trading session has ever ended with an exchange of insults, spilled whiskey, an upturned table and a gun fight between a bunch of unwashed guys in cowboy hats. Has it?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I sometimes hear forex compared to poker. The similarities are not actually all that great. No trading session has ever ended with an exchange of insults, spilled whiskey, an upturned table and a gun fight between a bunch of unwashed guys in cowboy hats. Has it?!

Trader commits suicide after killing 12 in gun spree | World news | guardian.co.uk

 

Some people would be better sticking to cards!

Trading is too violent!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I sometimes hear forex compared to poker. The similarities are not actually all that great. No trading session has ever ended with an exchange of insults, spilled whiskey, an upturned table and a gun fight between a bunch of unwashed guys in cowboy hats. Has it?!

 

I believe the 2 being compared is quite accurate. Not s much how you mentioned it but as to a game of skill as opposed to a game of chance like roulette or slots or something like that.

 

In poker the ability to read the other players moves before they make them is quite valuable.

 

In trading the same thing applies. Even thoug opyou cannot see anyone physically you still have the ability to read what players might be doing or thinking if you know what to look for and how to do it.

 

In fx specifically this is quite hard but there are other markets that this can be done in once you understand how ether work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mystic - if you still hold the Aussie, you must be nearly at b/e?

 

I see that it was you who sent it to the woodshed - it never recovered after you bought it!

Did you buy above or below the WPP?

 

You might make enough to paint the house shortly!

 

Funny thing is, the darned thing can rally even while the Aussie current account deficit blows out to double the forecast!

 

Go figure!

 

Traders who dabble in macroeconomics are bound to end up insane in one way or another!

Trader.JPG.f34deb4cbab042ab9888f5225364f3ee.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

https://www.tradingview.com/x/oG5GxHZ8/

 

 

These are the free charts at tradingview.

I was watching them this morning during NFP. My MT4 frooze up, these remained fast.

 

 

P.S crap. I just realized I spelled Ramblings wrong.

Edited by Mysticforex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1) No centralized market or regulations.

2) Most forex brokers are taking the other side of your trade (trading against you)

3) false spreads ( they create the market)

4) No true volume or way to read order flow ( tape) since there is not one AND no time and sales.

 

 

1) Wild West.. If you have the compound to billions drive, its the best market - liquidity in the true interbank, i mean

2) Use currenex, icap, etc

3) pay to play.. but if the broker is ripping you off - switch

4) there is orderbookfx i think they use the EBS data which is something like 1/5 of the interbank

 

if you aren't that highly capitalized i feel your pain. If you've got 10k USD at least - check out IB. I've been happy with the fills in FX with them, vast majority of the time, good spreads too. NOT AFFILIATED, IB, etc... just a trader

Peace

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The truth:

 

It's important to follow the rules but its more important to know when to quit.

 

You know your sys and style better than me but personally I would ask 'why have I had a good week?'. If it's because of optimum mental focus, good attention and decision making then yes if that's in danger of being diluted after big wins then a break would be in order. However if it's been a good week because of something the market has been doing then it would not make sense to stop - if the market is still in that state then make hay while the sun shines. That could be academic though because as you say it's easy to fluff up and get complacent and over trade if over confident so even if the market is acting optimally you can't trade well if you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The bible is Trading and Exchanges by Larry Harris. Not a cheap book but worth the read.

 

Also... Foreign Exchange Market Microstructure - Georgetown University http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/evansm1/wpapers_files/tour.pdf

 

 

And . . A Guided Tour of the Market Micro Structure Approach to Exchange .http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/lyons/Vitale%20survey%20micro%20FX.pdf

 

 

 

And Market microstructure and theory.http://www.amazon.com/Market-Microstructure-Theory-Maureen-OHara/dp/0631207619

 

 

Enjoy:

Edited by Mysticforex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.