Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Gekko78

Why Futures Are Better

Recommended Posts

I trade currency futures and Forex and believe, in some instances, Forex is better than futures. here are my comments to relevant points as they pertain to currencies.

 

1, 3, 7, 9: These points deal with transaction costs, leverage and minimum funding requirements.

 

My vote for Forex over Futures here is directed at beginners. $12.50 or 1 contract is too much for beginners who open a small account. If you open a 4k account (9) and open a trade with a 10 point stop loss, you stand to lose 3.5% of your equity in 1 trade. I rounded it up to include commissions. So imagine the very real possibility of losing 4 trades in a row, I saw mentioned in one of the comments. Other comments I saw suggest risking 0.5% per trade, which is good advice. Therefore you would need a minimum of 28k with a maximum stop loss of 10 points per trade.

Introduce high leverage and you are asking to blow your account. 50:1 is plenty.

There are very decent Forex brokers who have virtually no entry requirements and position size can be kept really small until you become certain of purpose and confident in ability.

 

2. Very true that Forex brokers are not regulated by a central exchange, but the whole "trading against you argument" is the least of your worries. My background is software engineering. I have created software that has compared multiple Forex data feeds to specifically test how brokers might introduce spikes to chase stops or induce slippage. I didn't find any evidence. Even when I trade futures and Forex side by side the price movement is very correlated. I have never, not once, had an issue with slippage via 4 Forex brokers I have used. Your trading will lose you money, not dodgy Forex prices.

 

4, 19. In futures, trading the DOM, using Market profile and Volume analysis is powerful. These can be emulated on the Forex side, if you know how. If you are a futures trader who trades via charts, then you will not really be making good use of level II data. I developed my own market profile tool for use with Forex. This, in a nutshell, analyses time spent at price. Tick volume analysis on the Forex side measures activity and so you don't see the actual orders, but if you know what you are doing tick volume analysis can be powerful. ADX and/or moving averages can be used to define market state. So unless you are a die hard DOM trader, I don't see the huge advantage that many claim.

 

10. There is plenty of liquidity in Forex. Again compare the close correlations and it is clear. Actually, I often find Forex to be more liquid.

 

11. This one is UK specific. If you trade Forex through a spread betting firm then you don't pay capital gains tax full stop. In the UK, spread betting falls under the gambling act and so is not subject to tax. This combined with the London session being so active is what makes traders from other nations jealous of UK traders. If Forex trading was taxed that would mean that you would be able to offset your losses. So until the majority of traders start winning more than they lose, profitable traders will be fine.

 

12, 16. There is sufficient correlation and anti-correlation in Forex to supply you with plenty of opportunity. Understanding currency price and commodity price correlation enables you to be even more tuned into discovering opportunities. Could expand on this topic a lot more, but that would take me off topic...

 

13. Safety of funds is something you need to be aware of in Forex. Always go with an FSA regulated broker, preferably a public company with a long history. Forget segregated funds. It doesn't happen. If your broker is FSA regulated you are insured up to 50k. This should suit most retail traders. If you do want to trade a large account you can get your broker to open a proxy account where the funds are stored in your own account but the broker accesses funds required for trading. No risk at all.

 

14, 18. This is not true of Forex. There are always plenty of opportunities. The Market Makers Model applies to all Markets. Accumulation (the range), manipulation (the fake out) and release (the break out)

 

17. Volatility is good. I make money because of it.

 

Hopefully my comments are helpful and I wish you all happy trading

 

twitter: @shawnbarrett

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sbfx, good post.

 

I am a futures trader... but :)

 

re:

 

 

4, 19. In futures, trading the DOM, using Market profile and Volume analysis is powerful. These can be emulated on the Forex side, if you know how. If you are a futures trader who trades via charts, then you will not really be making good use of level II data. I developed my own market profile tool for use with Forex. This, in a nutshell, analyses time spent at price. Tick volume analysis on the Forex side measures activity and so you don't see the actual orders, but if you know what you are doing tick volume analysis can be powerful. ADX and/or moving averages can be used to define market state. So unless you are a die hard DOM trader, I don't see the huge advantage that many claim.

 

 

yes.

another example - I happened across an 'indicator' that correlates + at 90% + with real volume ... and it has not a fkn thing to do with volume... :)

 

plus,as you mentioned in one of the other #s, since FX and futures directionally track so well at tick level, one can use futures feed and trade FX if needed

 

 

 

 

 

...

 

10. ... Actually, I often find Forex to be more liquid.

...

 

an additional point for some to consider... if you may potentially be holding a contract for months, FX is definitely superior cost wise to near month futures ...no rollover costs

...and is often even better than far out futures... bcse no 'far out' illiquidity slips if you do need to exit early.

 

another point - it is possible to more than cover all your FX sprd expenses with interest income.

example: I use cycles work to progressively build/scale up short positions in USD/INR ... size of each transaction geometrically larger than previous one...

Long TRY/JPY works almost as well... and also has low corre. with the USD/INR

 

...

 

13. ... safety of funds.

...

 

 

Forget about it...

ie your deposits are NOT safe period

ie your money is no safer at an FCM than it is with an FX house

 

 

Bottom line - Each trader should find and use the best instruments for his or her own needs - methods, sizing, holding periods, costs, etc

AND

each trader should study this area enough to be able to avail himself of any benefits of each type of instrument across all 'exchanges' if needed

 

all the best,

 

zdo

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I trade currency futures and Forex and believe, in some instances, Forex is better than futures. here are my comments to relevant points as they pertain to currencies.

 

1, 3, 7, 9: These points deal with transaction costs, leverage and minimum funding requirements.

 

My vote for Forex over Futures here is directed at beginners. $12.50 or 1 contract is too much for beginners who open a small account. If you open a 4k account (9) and open a trade with a 10 point stop loss, you stand to lose 3.5% of your equity in 1 trade. I rounded it up to include commissions. So imagine the very real possibility of losing 4 trades in a row, I saw mentioned in one of the comments. Other comments I saw suggest risking 0.5% per trade, which is good advice. Therefore you would need a minimum of 28k with a maximum stop loss of 10 points per trade.

Introduce high leverage and you are asking to blow your account. 50:1 is plenty.

There are very decent Forex brokers who have virtually no entry requirements and position size can be kept really small until you become certain of purpose and confident in ability.

 

2. Very true that Forex brokers are not regulated by a central exchange, but the whole "trading against you argument" is the least of your worries. My background is software engineering. I have created software that has compared multiple Forex data feeds to specifically test how brokers might introduce spikes to chase stops or induce slippage. I didn't find any evidence. Even when I trade futures and Forex side by side the price movement is very correlated. I have never, not once, had an issue with slippage via 4 Forex brokers I have used. Your trading will lose you money, not dodgy Forex prices.

 

4, 19. In futures, trading the DOM, using Market profile and Volume analysis is powerful. These can be emulated on the Forex side, if you know how. If you are a futures trader who trades via charts, then you will not really be making good use of level II data. I developed my own market profile tool for use with Forex. This, in a nutshell, analyses time spent at price. Tick volume analysis on the Forex side measures activity and so you don't see the actual orders, but if you know what you are doing tick volume analysis can be powerful. ADX and/or moving averages can be used to define market state. So unless you are a die hard DOM trader, I don't see the huge advantage that many claim.

 

10. There is plenty of liquidity in Forex. Again compare the close correlations and it is clear. Actually, I often find Forex to be more liquid.

 

11. This one is UK specific. If you trade Forex through a spread betting firm then you don't pay capital gains tax full stop. In the UK, spread betting falls under the gambling act and so is not subject to tax. This combined with the London session being so active is what makes traders from other nations jealous of UK traders. If Forex trading was taxed that would mean that you would be able to offset your losses. So until the majority of traders start winning more than they lose, profitable traders will be fine.

 

12, 16. There is sufficient correlation and anti-correlation in Forex to supply you with plenty of opportunity. Understanding currency price and commodity price correlation enables you to be even more tuned into discovering opportunities. Could expand on this topic a lot more, but that would take me off topic...

 

13. Safety of funds is something you need to be aware of in Forex. Always go with an FSA regulated broker, preferably a public company with a long history. Forget segregated funds. It doesn't happen. If your broker is FSA regulated you are insured up to 50k. This should suit most retail traders. If you do want to trade a large account you can get your broker to open a proxy account where the funds are stored in your own account but the broker accesses funds required for trading. No risk at all.

 

14, 18. This is not true of Forex. There are always plenty of opportunities. The Market Makers Model applies to all Markets. Accumulation (the range), manipulation (the fake out) and release (the break out)

 

17. Volatility is good. I make money because of it.

 

Hopefully my comments are helpful and I wish you all happy trading

 

twitter: @shawnbarrett

 

I could go through these point by point but I will not. As I learned many years ago " a man convinced against his will is off the same opinion still"

 

One thing I will comment on is you mention $12.50 is to much for a new trader to handle. While I agrees with you this is more a mental roadblock which really has nothing to do with FX or futures. That is psychology.

 

If $12.50 is to much to handle then trade 6b which is only $6.25 per tick.

 

If futures and FX correlate so well then why not go with the safer bet and trade futures. By safer I am simply referring to $$ safety. Not trading.

 

Having traded FX for about 5 years and then coming over to futures I wish I would have went with futures to start.

 

I did not lose in FX I just started researching more about futures and liked what they offered better than FX. I like reading the tape , I like seeing orders and order flow , I like time and sales. None of these things were available to me in FX . Candlesticks cannot tell you if the order that moved price was 50 lots or 2000 lots.....big difference there.

 

Hey if you are making $$ in FX then awesome !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Use what works for you. I formerly traded the Beige Book but stopped when it became the Rainbow Book. Now I just listen to Obama. When he says everything is peachy, I short everything. When Warren Buffet says he pays a lower tax rate than his secretary, I buy Puts in prisons. Elementary dear Watson...

 

Nice.... LOL:thumbs up:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One thing I will comment on is you mention $12.50 is to much for a new trader to handle. While I agrees with you this is more a mental roadblock which really has nothing to do with FX or futures. That is psychology.

 

If $12.50 is to much to handle then trade 6b which is only $6.25 per tick.

 

Or the NQ. 5 bucks. And it moves much better than the ES.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or the NQ. 5 bucks. And it moves much better than the ES.

 

Gekko is right...it is all about what's happening between the ears. If you can't win at $12.50 per tick, you can't win at $10, $5, $2 or a nickel for that matter. You just die slower.

 

With Futures, my commission and Exc. fees are paid and I can be making money from the very first tick. All things considered, Futures offer the most level playing field...certainly for the small trader.

 

You know your ES, DbP. It's the only market I know of that you have to pack a lunch and a sleeping bag to trade... all while holding your nose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... All things considered, Futures offer the most level playing field

...

 

I agree.... but

 

Neither field is level...

and the issue I'm having is that some of us are trying to portray the 'slopes' of the FX field to be MUCH steeper than the fairer 'slopes' of the Futures field. That's really not the case.

The FX field is generally slightly steeper for the whole population. But, for individual traders (because of ALL the differences in stuff between and below the ears, etc etc. etc.) FX may actually present less "unfairness" [snic].

Also, any very small beginning trader (who is not specializing on volume and order flow 'stuff') who commits to trying out for this game would be much better off starting with an OAND@ account instead of a barely one day margin futures account - which is way too small...

ie how much capital you can allocate (and risk, etc). and then what you do with it are MUCH BIGGER field levelers than which exchange or instrument or whatever one is using.

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a lot of the complaints about the FX market should in fact be leveled at the type of bucket shop broker who plies their customer with promises of riches, excess leverage, low or zero commissions and or spreads - and then trades against them with unfair rules.

Often retail customers cant make the minimum account holdings for a good broker.

Additionally, it has taken longer than is required for many FX spreads to collapse, brokers to become more transparent and electronic.....those who dont usually get left behind or prey on the low hanging fruit.

 

A good FX broker generally does not trade against you, the spreads are smaller, the margins better and the liquidity deeper than in the futures.......either market is fine - the broker is probably the major determining factor. :2c:

 

eg: I use Interactive brokers - today i saw (yes with my own two eyes) at least three times in the EURUSD a similar spread in the futures of 1.3107 - 09 in the FX 1.3055-06 --- with more size in the FX

 

I direct attention to this FWIW......http://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/?f=%2Fen%2Ftrading%2Fpdfhighlights%2FPDF-Forex.php

 

I have no affiliation with them but would recommend them as a broker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a lot of the complaints about the FX market should in fact be leveled at the type of bucket shop broker who plies their customer with promises of riches, excess leverage, low or zero commissions and or spreads - and then trades against them with unfair rules.

Often retail customers cant make the minimum account holdings for a good broker.

Additionally, it has taken longer than is required for many FX spreads to collapse, brokers to become more transparent and electronic.....those who dont usually get left behind or prey on the low hanging fruit.

 

A good FX broker generally does not trade against you, the spreads are smaller, the margins better and the liquidity deeper than in the futures.......either market is fine - the broker is probably the major determining factor. :2c:

 

eg: I use Interactive brokers - today i saw (yes with my own two eyes) at least three times in the EURUSD a similar spread in the futures of 1.3107 - 09 in the FX 1.3055-06 --- with more size in the FX

 

I direct attention to this FWIW......http://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/?f=%2Fen%2Ftrading%2Fpdfhighlights%2FPDF-Forex.php

 

I have no affiliation with them but would recommend them as a broker.

 

As long as there can be bucket shops in the Forex, there WILL be bucket shops in the Forex. Not every broker will trade against you, but good luck taking a broker's word for it.

 

Every trader has their favorite broker and I'm not going to promote mine here, but I used Interactive Broker for a while back when they were promoting $4.80 RT commissions. Every time I needed to speak to them, I got a recording. They never called me back until the next day...and then billed me $30 for the phone call!!! No thanks.

 

Tick charts are an important fundamental chart type that millions of traders use. IB does not provide tick data, period. I would never consider any broker that is stuck in the 1990's. Good accurate unfiltered tick data is essential to me and many others. So, IB will ne technology They'll never see my business again....but that's just my opinion, of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Roger, what is the optimal nomber of ticks for intraday charts? or does it depend on what object you are trading ?

 

As long as there can be bucket shops in the Forex, there WILL be bucket shops in the Forex. Not every broker will trade against you, but good luck taking a broker's word for it.

 

Every trader has their favorite broker and I'm not going to promote mine here, but I used Interactive Broker for a while back when they were promoting $4.80 RT commissions. Every time I needed to speak to them, I got a recording. They never called me back until the next day...and then billed me $30 for the phone call!!! No thanks.

 

Tick charts are an important fundamental chart type that millions of traders use. IB does not provide tick data, period. I would never consider any broker that is stuck in the 1990's. Good accurate unfiltered tick data is essential to me and many others. So, IB will ne technology They'll never see my business again....but that's just my opinion, of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always focused on the futures to the exclusion of other markets. There is a lot going for them as discussed here.

 

There are some downsides to futures though. The first is the large contract size which is too large for many traders. This large contract size also suffers from not being very "granular", ie if you wanted you can't just go long equivalent to 100k notional but have to choose 75k or 150K for ES. Some futures like CL are due to the size swing too risky for smaller traders. The large tick size makes tape reading more valuable but it also means it costs more to cross the spread. I wouldn't want to see that changed.

Stop losses can be used to manage risk but have the effect of introducing an element of unpredictability.

 

Unless one trades futures spreads (which most retail traders aren't aware of), its also hard to formulate relative value statements. For example, if one wanted to express sentiment that A outperforms B. There are exchange listed index spreads but they aren't discussed. Another problem with futures traders is they tend to be directional only traders. This again isn't required but unless one has multiple accounts then one can't be long/short same instrument (though the upcoming NinjaTrader webinar plans to speak to that).

 

Alternatives:

NADEX spreads -- One could use our tape reading program but trade the risk limited spreads. I'm watching the spreads with AlphaReveal in real-time today and they seem pretty tight. Another option would be to scalp in the futures and then hedge off using NADEX. I think this could work quite well for some of my "bigger" trades.

 

Forex -- Again, the benefit smaller contract size. An option would be to read the tape off the 6E. I haven't tried this but its something I'd like to try.

 

Weekly futures options & options -- bull/bear spreads could set up multi week trades without stop out risk

 

Stocks: Ability to pair off anything with anything.

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Roger, what is the optimal nomber of ticks for intraday charts? or does it depend on what object you are trading ?

 

Yes, it would depend on the instrument you trade. Intraday, the ES might move in a range of 80 ticks and, if you looked at Crude Oil or Gold futures (CL or GC), you could very well see a daily range of 300 ticks. While the ES tick value is $12.50, there are only 4 ticks to the point. CL and GC have a tick value of $10 but there are 10 ticks to the point.

 

If we agree that a market that doesn't move cannot make money for anyone then isn't it logical that the more a market moves intraday the more opportunity there is for taking profit? There are lots of futures markets that offer this...good consistent smooth up and down volatility every day...but the ES isn't one of them.

 

Hope this helps....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as an aside, I think the ES moves quite nicely. I think the key is to understand your market and how it moves. I don't trade CL but obviously those trading it will try to catch a larger run.. With the ES there is plenty to be made in little chops and also runs. I've never had a need to trade another market and I know many traders who trade equity indexes and won't go near something like CL. One of the nice things about the ES historically is that the market will chop around long enough for a trader to recognize they're wrong and get out without taking a stop loss. The market tends to be moving faster these days and trading more like actually the CL which is a downside for me.

 

One thing to be aware of is that if one wants to use a tight stop then they'll do better trading a market that makes larger moves. The reason for this is that such methods need big winners to overcome lower win percentage. These traders lose a lot of money in "chop" zones as they constantly get stopped out for losses when they wouldn't have needed too if they used a larger stop.

 

Likewise traders who look to trade chops/reversals can take large losses when volatility increases. Because a larger stop is basically a bet on a lower volatility environment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Roger.

Now, what is the main advantage you find in tick charts over time charts?

 

Yes, it would depend on the instrument you trade. Intraday, the ES might move in a range of 80 ticks and, if you looked at Crude Oil or Gold futures (CL or GC), you could very well see a daily range of 300 ticks. While the ES tick value is $12.50, there are only 4 ticks to the point. CL and GC have a tick value of $10 but there are 10 ticks to the point.

 

If we agree that a market that doesn't move cannot make money for anyone then isn't it logical that the more a market moves intraday the more opportunity there is for taking profit? There are lots of futures markets that offer this...good consistent smooth up and down volatility every day...but the ES isn't one of them.

 

Hope this helps....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Roger.

Now, what is the main advantage you find in tick charts over time charts?

 

I haven't traded straight generic tick charts in years but, when I did, I found them to help eliminate some of the noise that time based charts are famous for. They're far from perfect but seem to be more in tune with the market by measuring transactions rather than some arbitrary length of time.

 

But the difference isn't all that dramatic. I ended up having to create my own bar type. The goal was to have the bars themselves filter the vast majority of market noise before a single indicator is ever applied. I'm very pleased with how it turned out.

Edited by Roger Felton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every trader has their favorite broker and I'm not going to promote mine here, but I used Interactive Broker for a while back when they were promoting $4.80 RT commissions. Every time I needed to speak to them, I got a recording. They never called me back until the next day...and then billed me $30 for the phone call!!! No thanks.

 

Tick charts are an important fundamental chart type that millions of traders use. IB does not provide tick data, period. I would never consider any broker that is stuck in the 1990's. Good accurate unfiltered tick data is essential to me and many others. So, IB will ne technology They'll never see my business again....but that's just my opinion, of course.

 

Which is why I underlined in my post - "Often retail customers cant make the minimum account holdings for a good broker" - when I ring them up - very rarely required - I get straight through on a line to someone either in the US, Switzerland or Hong Kong.....

 

Yes - their data is not the best, and it maybe inadequate for some - but there are options around whereby you can use a separate data provider.

 

Personally I am happy to promote a broker that i think does a good job in many respects and I have no affiliation with them. Each person can try out what suits them, and we can all hope the bucket shops dont do too much damage (wishful thinking I know)

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All this flow of compliments don't tell me how to better trade futures.

 

May we re read the title of the thread.

 

Actually the thread is about why futures are better than forex, not about how better to trade futures.

 

But then threads often lose their way after about the tenth post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem aggravated, imho. Why hide? If he is doing some thing wrong, then the mods should intervene and sanction him accordingly. Otherwise he deserves the treatment of all accepted TL members who abide the the forum rules.

 

If you are not here to sell or promote then create a new TL user and post freely without the hassle.

 

Problem solved?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why hide?

 

Because "All I want here is for these attacks to cease and just let my post contributions stand on their own merit". Change TL user and stop promoting and the attacks stop and his post stand on their own merit - simple right.

 

TL owners are weak in this regard and have in the past tended to sided with the vendors.

Edited by TradeRunner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was the first to call for a cease fire here.

Now, I don't see what was promoted on this very thread.

 

Because "All I want here is for these attacks to cease and just let my post contributions stand on their own merit". Change TL user and stop promoting and the attacks stop and his post stand on their own merit - simple right.

 

TL owners are weak in this regard and have in the past tended to side with the vendors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.