Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Don4

Dons trading journal GBP/USD

Recommended Posts

Hey walter, How have you been doing my friend? My girls are also 11 .But anyway, I have at one point started looking into futures as another option ,but my understanding is around $25,000 would be a minimum as far as account size. But that is just my understanding from reading a little on it here.

 

Very Fine Don ¡¡ it has been a great weekend... really good times indeed..

 

Don, as Cooter just mentioned you dont need 25k to get started on futures, maybe 3 to 5k can make it, it really depends on the broker... now, should you consider at least 3 months of paper trading before going live... this is a very jealous market you must have it right under your fingertips before going live..

 

cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just wondering is there any free charting(live) for futures or is it all delayed?

 

free charting live nope... even delayed I dont know what choices there are.. I am actually using trademaven wich has Dom and charts where you can practice placing trades on simulator... it costs only $50 month... I think its the most cheap and functional alternative out there...

 

Ninja is also an alternative, data would be the issue... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
K.I.S.S Don.

 

Don't underestimate this wisdom from Milliard, Don! I think many people fail specifically because they won't keep things simple - or on the first sign that their strategy isn't working, they change to something else. I'm not implying that you're in this boat. I'm stating it more for those who are following your thread of progression. Those who do the best have a simple strategy and stick with it. That doesn't mean you can't tweak it. Adjusting to the market as it changes is a necessity. But simple things are far easier to adjust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks cowpip for the reinforcement, and for everyone who has posted here trying to keep me focused. Everything that im going through now, i new was going to happen as i mentioned in my first few posts of the journal. The drawdowns are sometimes hard to handle but I must keep pushing forward for the full 6 months. To see where i stand with my system and to know what tweaking needs to be done. So again thanks to all who have posted for keeping me focused on my goals and forcing me to stick to my plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don

 

Forgive me if I am way out of line here.

I was following Cable at the time some of your sells went bad.

The thought I had then was tweeking up your trigger price might have avoided the bad ones but i'm only guessing at an answer.

 

Of course it might cost you just as many good trades and it might reduce the optimum tp and screw up the whole thing. So the next thought was have two trading plans, one for a rising market as in past months and a second one with wider trigger price for the flat or uncertain market we have now.

 

As you say you are getting a lot right, the thing is to "mine" the recent failed trades for differences from normal trades. Losing trades are the best to examine for any improvements that might be made.

 

They are just stray thoughts, apologies if they seem shallow or off target.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don

 

Forgive me if I am way out of line here.

I was following Cable at the time some of your sells went bad.

The thought I had then was tweeking up your trigger price might have avoided the bad ones but i'm only guessing at an answer.

 

Of course it might cost you just as many good trades and it might reduce the optimum tp and screw up the whole thing. So the next thought was have two trading plans, one for a rising market as in past months and a second one with wider trigger price for the flat or uncertain market we have now.

 

As you say you are getting a lot right, the thing is to "mine" the recent failed trades for differences from normal trades. Losing trades are the best to examine for any improvements that might be made.

 

They are just stray thoughts, apologies if they seem shallow or off target.

 

Thanks Pyenner for the reply, What i found out in backtesting was my first initial plan is where im at now, I tried many different approaches but none seemed to help long term.(Widen stops,trailing stops,move stops to breakeven after 10,20,30,etc..pips) no mater what i did nothing seemed to help. But what ive been noticing is that about 85% of the time when my orders are triggered there is a retracement of some sort. So for now im working on a way to capitalize on that. I know never add to a losing position. But since i use such hard stops i never consider it a losing trade until stops are hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still in the trade i posted earlier with a TP at 1.9893,Its been one of those days. Price has played around my TP for the last 7 hours comming within 3 pips a few times, these are the tuff ones that closing out would seem to be the best thing to do but by doing that i would be going against my rules. So ill just have to wait and see what happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, also noticed the frequent retracements but I have not been following cable long enough to know what is normal with it. This is the first week I have traded cable, and I'm also long, but I need more experience with it before I could be any help. I hope you find some clue there that turns out to be useful. Eliminating just a few of the losing trades would make a big difference. Yes, easier said than done but that is where the payoff should be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your prices are optimum then sma or weighted average might be tried as a secondary filter for distinquishing better trades from worse trades.

Don't trust statistical indicators, prefer straight prices, but if you turn over enough stones maybe something comes up. Just searching for ideas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok stopped out pretty early on this one, Honestly pyenner for this system there are no indacators I really dont even need a chart to trade it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats probably why it works.

To clarify,

If price above sma then accept long trigger signals only.

If price below sma then accept short trigger signals only.

Maybe a second sort of trigger signal to test against your main trigger signal.

Dunno.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Still in the trade i posted earlier with a TP at 1.9893,Its been one of those days. Price has played around my TP for the last 7 hours comming within 3 pips a few times, these are the tuff ones that closing out would seem to be the best thing to do but by doing that i would be going against my rules. So ill just have to wait and see what happens.

 

I think it's ok to manually exit if it's only a few pips away for swing trades and doing it only from time to time. If you can modify your rules to allow you only 1 exit and only if it's few ticks away, that would be sufficient. You're really well, keep it up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it's ok to manually exit if it's only a few pips away for swing trades and doing it only from time to time. If you can modify your rules to allow you only 1 exit and only if it's few ticks away, that would be sufficient. You're really well, keep it up!

 

 

Hey torero nice to here from you again! Yea, i tell you this is one of the hardest parts for me.There are many times im in profit that ends up being a losing trade,I can deal with those without much emotions.But its the ones that are real close that take their effect on me. There are 2 ways that I look at it if I have taken those close trades that never happened my drawdowns would probably be kept in check (a little better). But then again this is very common occurance to approach my tp's pull back then trigger them. But yea i do understand what your saying and its something i need to look into.I just dont know how it will affect the longterm profitability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thats probably why it works.

To clarify,

If price above sma then accept long trigger signals only.

If price below sma then accept short trigger signals only.

Maybe a second sort of trigger signal to test against your main trigger signal.

Dunno.

 

I really dont think it would work, I believe it would only hurt the way my system uses probabilities. But i will look at it,thanks pyenner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Don,

 

One possible idea, is that you have a unit of time that triggers a different way to handle your exits. Do you have any stats to do with trade length? Perhaps you find that the ones that end up coming close to profit target and then reversing for a full stop out are the ones that at their maximum in your favor are the longest in time. If that is the case, then one might consider adding a time switch that allows you to scale out, and possibly adjust stop loss levels. Or keep it where it is and take the full hit on the reduced position. I can't come up with too many ideas without seeing statistics.

 

Best regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Don,

 

One possible idea, is that you have a unit of time that triggers a different way to handle your exits. Do you have any stats to do with trade length? Perhaps you find that the ones that end up coming close to profit target and then reversing for a full stop out are the ones that at their maximum in your favor are the longest in time. If that is the case, then one might consider adding a time switch that allows you to scale out, and possibly adjust stop loss levels. Or keep it where it is and take the full hit on the reduced position. I can't come up with too many ideas without seeing statistics.

 

Best regards,

MK

 

 

Midnight thats a pretty interesting idea, But what information would be needed. The duration of how long each trade lasted (total) Or how long they was in profit. Exactly what type of statistics are needed. Thanks for your help MK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

G'day Don,

 

I'd maybe start by examining more about the scenario you previously mentioned is annoying. How close do they come to your target. How much time has elapsed on them. Maybe even add some context, like how are they in relation to the daily chart. Basically just hunting for common data. Won't be 100% of course, but might be enough to smooth out the curve a little. Just some ideas...All the best on your journey, things are generally going well for you.

 

Out of curiosity, have things become more difficult since we stopped trending so hard (on the daily chart)?

 

My best regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
G'day Don,

 

I'd maybe start by examining more about the scenario you previously mentioned is annoying. How close do they come to your target. How much time has elapsed on them. Maybe even add some context, like how are they in relation to the daily chart. Basically just hunting for common data. Won't be 100% of course, but might be enough to smooth out the curve a little. Just some ideas...All the best on your journey, things are generally going well for you.

 

Out of curiosity, have things become more difficult since we stopped trending so hard (on the daily chart)?

 

My best regards,

MK

 

 

Thanks mk Ill look into what you mentioned above. It may take some time but may be well worth my efforts. As far as being difficult (trending). Well i guess i am in a drawdown. But it never really matterd much if we were trending or ranging(as far as backtesting) I guess during trending conditions I would have a larger target but since everything is based on % it didnt really matter wether i was shooting for 100 pips or 20pips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.