Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Aceoface

Pyramid Positions

Recommended Posts

I made countless simulations of a version of the turtles trading system with pyramining positions but could not get better equity curve statistics than the non pyramiding version. When pyramiding with a risk of say, 0.90% per ATR, i could get the same CAGR% with better stats (better sharpe, info ratio, MAR, less trades) with 1.3% risk per ATR and no-pyramid. The risk per trade is the same because pyramiding means a higher number of ATRs at risk. Yet non pyramiding looks better.

Anyone has a contrarian view on this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe the Turtle strategy was ever meant to be traded systematically. I highly recommend picking up a copy of "Way of The Turtle" by original Turtle Curtis Faith if you have not done so already. I believe there is a lot more "art" to trading than "science." You learn the art part through experience. With that in mind, sometimes it is a good idea to pyramid, and sometimes it's a lousy idea. I've done plenty of backtesting over time, and the Turtle system is really not that great as a mechanical system. However, it is good basic plan that can be improved upon with discretion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also ran many tests and variations on the turtle ideas a few years back.....our conclusion was that it worked really well for a period, and may work really well again at some other period in the future. Overall with variations it can be profitable as a portfolio, with a long enough time frame and providing an adequate return

As for pyramiding we came to the conclusion that pyramiding 1-2 times extra was all that was required to get adequate value out of it, beyond that it just added to the PL volatility.

Much as Eigergroup - discretion - unable to be backtested really well can help (or hinder ) the system.

Others have made mention they believe the system works mainly as it gets on board the outlier moves. There is also the additional element of it being able to compound returns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Aceoface said:
I made countless simulations of a version of the turtles trading system with pyramining positions but could not get better equity curve statistics than the non pyramiding version. When pyramiding with a risk of say, 0.90% per ATR, i could get the same CAGR% with better stats (better sharpe, info ratio, MAR, less trades) with 1.3% risk per ATR and no-pyramid. The risk per trade is the same because pyramiding means a higher number of ATRs at risk. Yet non pyramiding looks better.

Anyone has a contrarian view on this?

 

Hi Aceoface,

 

It's a long time since I tested anything trend-following related, but here are a few thoughts that might possibly be useful:

 

Have you tried testing the system without the more complicated trailing of stops that it originally entailed? What happens if you just add to your exposure as you add each contract. If you're limiting the 1 contract risk to 2N each time, instead of trailing the stop to mantain that, limit the 1 contract risk to 2N/Max Possible contracts. This should at least give you an idea of how much the performance is linked to pyramiding per se, and how much it is linked to the associated trailing of stops.

 

Generally, I would try disregarding risk in the backtesting and see where that leads you. Quite often you can do this and it will lead you towards a more optimal approach, and then you can start dialling the risk management back in.

 

Have a look at what happens when you use a different measure to the Average True Range: Newsletter 1211

 

Finally, I'll just mention that Eckhardt's fund continues to trade as a trend-following operation, so some variation on all of this continues to work, which should be encouragement if you're finding yourself doubting the whole thing.

 

Hope that's some help.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Pyramiding can work, and can beat a non-pyramid version (during a trend). So the issue becomes manifold:

1 - How good is your trend ID? How many stop outs are part of trading trend situations that work? How many stop outs indicate the trend ID setup is probably going to fail? This can be a money mgmt stop loss/stop trading factor

2 - What timeframe is your trend on? Are you using multiple timeframes? For example this morning in the EURUSD, using currency strength to identify up and down swings on 15m data, there were 3 trade worthy swings from 315 EST. Pyramiding entries on a 20 tick chart gave about 3% return on capital on each one potential. The buy and hold was around 1/10th of that.

3 - On what basis are you pyramiding? Meaning, what is your edge? If you are just pyramiding off ATR entries, what kind of stop loss range are we talking about? It is preferable to buy low and sell high, you want each entry to have built in reward to risk advantage in pyramiding. If your reward to risk is no better with pyramiding, then there is no point, which may explain the OP's findings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been trading Forex for a number of years now and I am convinced that pyramiding is the way to go. It is as easy to find a good Forex trade as it is to find a trade worth adding lots to. The trick I have found is to be able to add to your position on a risk free basis and at the same time giving your stop the maximum amount of space. When this happens you are stopped out at breakeven at worst but you have the opportunity to add considerably to your deal pushing your risk return ratio through the roof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.