Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

MadMarketScientist

Day Trading the E-mini Futures with Predictor

Recommended Posts

Boehner... no progress made

 

Market is in range we are look for OF reversal.. I'm bid 9.25

 

--

Entered market.... look for drive higher now

 

wow, you did well to enter at 9.25, how did you manage that.

What did your low print as around 11:02

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've exited at 14.25.... When I say 'entered market' or went to market it means I entered market order. If I say bid or offered it meant I have a resting limit order.

 

Also the time stamps don't matter on these messages because I go back and edit them. I do this because the minimum message length rule.

 

Of course, the messages here are delayed. Often I will have a bid and be reading tape at the same time... if we take out an order book imbalance or I feel we can drive higher then sometimes I'll go to market.. its a riskier trade but often works well.

 

My software and ability to see the OB and OF imbalances I feel is an edge for me.. Levels came spot in today too (just by chance -- as I said they aren't all that accurate but still more accurate then any published levels). One feature I really liked today was ability to paint an area.... I paint the high zone red and then the low zone blue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One theme we are seeing repeated is that techs, traditionally a leader, are weaker. We've seen this for a few days now. This may be an important theme. It may indicate that the market is rallying on relief of various fears but that outlook for tech is poor. If outlook for tech is poor then that raises a question in my mind...

 

At this point, I've soundly exceeded my profit targets and don't anticipate to be taking any more trades.

 

The market is fairly 2-sided right now... most of the order flow is buying but there is heavy limit order supply exhausting this order flow so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.. this was a 1 shot.. after we cross 20 I considered that the market might be outside my range/abnormal. In these situations, you have to protect yourself.. I've tried this before, took a small stop, and came back the market was 20 points higher.

 

for whatever reason my posts are slow to appear.

 

great job calling that s&p short. i have 2 mini dows on averaged at 13115. playing small ball today looking for a return to the hourly pivot of 13045. I'm stopped at BE+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks.. this was a 1 shot.. after we cross 20 I considered that the market might be outside my range/abnormal. In these situations, you have to protect yourself.. I've tried this before, took a small stop, and came back the market was 20 points higher.

 

I got whipped around, stopped at BE. Then put them back on a bit lower when Boehner started flapping his mouth and walked away with a very modest $200 loss entirely due to breaking my #1 rule: never, ever, EVER jump in without a trade trigger. Life has no absolutes. Except that. It's one thing to trade and be wrong -- I'm ok with that; being wrong is inevitable. Its entirely another to jump in without a signal. I might as have wiped my rear with a few c notes today :doh:

 

All in all, c'est la vie. the above diatribe is my one terrible bad habit of a spreader trying to trade outright contracts. there are trading rules for each strategy (calendar/butterflies vs outright) that do NOT overlap. glad all is well today on your end. monday is a new day!

Edited by rtg
clarity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rtg... everyone has to trade according to own rules. I'm interested in spread trading. What do you spread? Any day trading opportunities in your spreads?

 

i do calendar and butterfly spreads on corn

 

i am long 100 dec/mar contracts. typically, i will walk away from thanksgiving - new years day simply because it is so squirrelly but there was a nice dip possibly from institutional investors at close on nov 29th and i got fills as it closed. typically, its a position game over weeks or months based (almost entirely) on fundamentals of the plant/harvest cycle, import/exports and perception of conditions , weather, etc. its a completely different animal from the politics and technical trading on the outrights right now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rtg: Your basis is seasonal?

 

I'm weighing if I could be wrong... strong OF buying came in after I made that call. But, it was unable to drive price to new high. I'll probably adjust/pull in my target.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rtg: Your basis is seasonal?

 

absolutely. it all depends on the previously mentioned conditions and those conditions can change quickly! it is largely a fundemental game of yield per acre, import/export supply/demand. rhetorically, things like: will the russians stop exports until price hits a certain level, how will argentina respond to tight supplies in the US, ethanol production, etc etc. there is more to it than that, obviously, but that is the general idea of the fundies involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a specialized game. I'm interested in futures spreads. But, I'm more interested in whether/how-to it would be possible to model spreads that are mean reverting and can be traded intraday, somewhat like a vertical options spread.

 

What I'd really like to do is to trade inside a vertical spread... i.e to be able to trade like a futures but have my risk at the extents bounded. NADEX offers the closest thing to what I'm describing but they aren't as efficient as trading the ES for me. If they could improve that efficiency then I'd take a look at them again..

 

 

absolutely. it all depends on the previously mentioned conditions and those conditions can change quickly! it is largely a fundemental game of yield per acre, import/export supply/demand. rhetorically, things like: will the russians stop exports until price hits a certain level, how will argentina respond to tight supplies in the US, ethanol production, etc etc. there is more to it than that, obviously, but that is the general idea of the fundies involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those following me, what we seen in this case was a strong negative order flow and limit orders took all that supply. I feel the flow was institutional/algorithmic but it wasn't enough to drive the market to new lows. If the sellers aren't able to drive price to new lows then they must cover. This is why I take an agnostic approach to order flow. I'm looking for the patterns in terms of the current context. What makes trading difficult is that any indicator you take that works well in a range market will fail in a trending market and vice versa.. All the rules just reverse.

 

I never had more then 1 tick F.E in that trade which was a warning but there were several times when it seemed like it could work. My goal is to use my read to guide me. So, I'd rather exit on my read then take the stop hit. In this case, I pulled my stop in and lost about 2 ticks more then I should have. But, it was a close call and I didn't lose the maximum.

 

One of the ideas on my mind, beyond the order flow and book imbalances, was this consumer credit report coming out and the negative sentiment report: I thought that traders might connect the two. Apparently.. jobs report trumps all.

 

Sellers have shown a new response from 17.. If you recall 16-20 is the sell range for the day. Worth to consider if the day structure is setting up as a trend day.. in which case we could close in that region

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are my levels/estimates for highs and lows over the next 24 hours-- for anyone following along. Market is currently at 1416. I'm not tracking or trading it now.

 

H2: 1424

H1: 1420

L: 1414

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The low proj. has held over night but looks to be tested. If we get a runner to downside then 14 could become resistance. My game plan is to look for a weakness off the open followed by a bounce. I'm not anticipating significant range extension to downside but do anticipate general weakness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very strong drive off open... if I can't get long near 14 then I'll will be looking for a short off the 20

---

Long off the 15.75

----

Out at around 17.50....

 

Still anticipating range bound structure... will look for shorts in the 20 region

---

Short at market.. bad fill

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cleared the short... added at the highs. I've approximately met my profit target today and will be slowing down. May be DFD...

----

 

What's interesting to note is that at 19.00 we had nearly 3x as much buying as selling but the market moved away. I call this Limit Resistance. In this case, it wasn't seen in the book imbalances but this high volume is indicative of a replenishing offer. Often, the market reverses from high volume because such volume is created by limit order traders exhausting the market order supply.

 

This is why the levels are a help because apparently some large speculators are also able to anticipate where the highs and lows are and use those areas to exit trades. Often they'll use a replenishing offer/bid to get as much as possible and then go to market to get the rest.

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Market looks to be getting weaker here... a retest of 14 seems possible.

 

----

 

Short again.. looking for drive lower from this area.

---

 

Tremendous buying programs went off... looks like sellers in at the 20.50

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.