Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Raleigh Lee

Don't Be Fooled By Randomness

Recommended Posts

...

 

2. TA offers no edge. How can you get an edge from something that cant be defined in exact enough ways to measure?

 

This one keeps coming up, yet none of the TA fans are ever able to provide the evidence of statistical proof that TA offers an edge. There is not one study that has proven this.

 

If TA did offer an edge, trading would be easy due to the ease of learning TA.

 

If all you needed ...

 

TA can offer an edge. Using a pseudorandom number generator to take random entries I recently showed in a talk how using pattern entries can be better than random. How could I do that? TA methods can be defined exactly enough to measure - including chart patterns. I'm a TA guy, so i'm sensitive on this one... i want people to understand its not garbage.

 

Statistical proof? Dude. Read NonRandom Walk Down Wall Street... Statistical as you can get.

 

Trading will seldom be easy.. Even when TA offers an edge. People will screw themselves too often to allow an edge to play out, poor money management, emotionally driven behavior.. Even in automation things can go wrong and poor human decision making comes in to play (Knight).. Many TA approaches are no good by themselves - i'll agree with that.. its like sifting for gold, you can't stare at each unsifted pile and toss it out without even looking!:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and for the record (again) markets cycle from random to non-random,

 

I agree, they do seem to. But are these cycles you describe random, non-random, or does that depend on some further 'meta-cycle' of randomness/non-randomness?

 

I find the idea of a strategy that discriminates between random and non-random market behaviour uncomfortable, but that's just me. I think it makes better sense to assume that the markets are always either random or non-random (a clearly false assumption), and then to find approaches that balance losses and gains favourably during those periods when this assumption is false. I'll happily explain why if anyone is interested.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BHS, ...and when you (happily) explain could you include an explaination in a little bit more depth why you "think it makes better sense to assume that the markets are always either random or non-random" . Thanks. zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From a trading standpoint, the practical reality is that it doesn't make any difference. Though I didn't post this series of (6) charts this morning to make any sort of statement about randomness or the absence thereof, it occurred to me when I finished that if I had approached the morning with the idea that it was all random, I likely would have been too paralyzed to take any action.

 

But maybe that's just me.

 

Instead I assumed that traders had some intent, and my course of action was clear throughout the morning.

 

I could have used an indicator, of course, but if I believed the market was random, I probably wouldn't have taken its "signals". To do so anyway would have fed the anxiety that I likely would have felt by not understanding what was going in the first place. This would not have put me in the best place to trade, or not, the remaining opportunities in the day. Or perhaps even the next (trading) day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the best evidence (beside common sense) for non random behavior is in today's chart

 

Here you have a chart with three standard deviation lines in place....I base my actions on the concept that a certain percentage of price action is going to be contained within these lines AND I know that other traders make similar distinctions.....the result is that people like myself (people with similar training and backgrounds) make decisions to put money to work based on these concepts....the result is that price is "moved" in a non-random purposeful manner.

 

That's all I have time for today;

 

Best of luck folks

Steve

5aa711d655c84_TodaysChart.thumb.PNG.5f5d0a55624a9df33c6e6f2df2c88425.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes horse i would like to hear you explain that happily.Don't do it grumpily (it's not your style anyway)

 

Do you think it's time to find an alternative to the word "random" ?

 

Hi Mitsubishi,

 

I think of it in the following way . . .

 

Assume that you have a "perfect" methodology for exploiting both random and non-random behaviour. Assume that I have a perfect method for exploiting only random behaviour.

 

Price is behaving randomly, so we're both making money. As price behaviour begins to change to non-random, we both start to lose money. Eventually (unless you can also be assumed to have some sort of perfect zero-lag regime switching model - one assumption too many for me!), you will start to make money once more as you shift to your non-random methodology.

 

You seem to have stolen a gain on me, until . . .

 

The market begins to behave randomly again. From the very instant this happens I am perfectly placed to take advantage of it. You, meanwhile, are waiting for your model to recognise the shift. If the shift is not clean then your model gets whipsawed. My model would never get whipsawed - it's just 'right' or 'wrong'. Also, consider that even if we both make exactly the same, your switching model has expended more 'effort' than mine. So it's less efficient.

 

Even if you have a sound method for identifying such shifts in something like real time, then other problems may arise:

 

1) Consistencyof returns is key to successful money management/position-sizing. In an ideal world, you want all trades to be as similar as possible - the closer every trade is to your avaerage trade, the better (this is why an outlier strategy that has higher single contract average returns as a second strategy may not perform as well as the second when both are optimally position-sized). How likely is it that your returns from each of your methodologies (random and non-random) are truly afine?

 

2) As per my previous post, the rules governing shifts from random to non-random may change, should they even exist in the first place. Most likely, such cycles are also random, at least some of the time . . . Whatever the case, introducing a reliance upon regime recognition into your approach is introducing another potential failure point (I'm sure engineers must have a term for such things). Put simply, the more things you try and respond to, the more chance you have of getting something wrong. If you just position yourself to exploit one type of behaviour, then you have no chance of getting it wrong when that type of behaviour prevails.

 

I hope that wasn't too grumpy, and hope it makes some kind of sense, even to those who disagree!

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BHS, ...and when you (happily) explain could you include an explaination in a little bit more depth why you "think it makes better sense to assume that the markets are always either random or non-random" . Thanks. zdo

 

Hi ZDO,

 

Please see my rambling reply above . . .

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think of it in the following way . . .

 

Assume that you have a "perfect" methodology for exploiting both random and non-random behaviour. Assume that I have a perfect method for exploiting only random behaviour.

 

 

A record of randomly generated price and volume points can from time to time appear to be non-random. It would appear to be non-random when it mimics a market generated record of a similarly priced instrument. On the other hand, a market generated record of price and volume, occasionally, but only rarely, appears to be randomly generated. A methodology which trades only random behavior will lose more often than the methodology which exploits non-random behavior if both the former and latter are true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A record of randomly generated price and volume points can from time to time appear to be non-random. It would appear to be non-random when it mimics a market generated record of a similarly priced instrument. On the other hand, a market generated record of price and volume, occasionally, but only rarely, appears to be randomly generated. A methodology which trades only random behavior will lose more often than the methodology which exploits non-random behavior if both the former and latter are true.

 

I wasn't claiming that prices are random (or that they are non-random); I was saying that it may make sense to trade as though they are always one or the other. If your statements above are true, then you could trade as though markets are always non-random, including through those brief periods when they are random.

 

In short, I was arguing for simplicity in a strategy, rather than one which tries to distinguish between two different types of price behaviour (and all the complications that involves).

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Come on Phoenix. You know everything about everything. Tell me how I made money using a branch of TA where there was no price movement?

 

 

This I got to see!....

 

Ringside seats folks......

 

How to polish a turd coming up.......

 

You talk a big game, but provide a screenshot of this so-called production otherwise I can't take anything you say seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You talk a big game, but provide a screenshot of this so-called production otherwise I can't take anything you say seriously.

 

Bothered.

 

Youve probably read the following posts by now in which case you probably understand a screenshot is really quite irrelevant. Maybe you'd like to do some work yourself rather than expect others to feed you?

 

Anyway - back on topic.....

 

I view the randomness idea as a bit of a fools errand. No one inputs orders 'at random'. Randomness is just what the market may appear to be if you cant make sense or deal with the seeming disorder of the trades.

 

Professional quants treat the markets as random simply as a model as they appreciate they cant predict markets or the next few trades. Just because some treat the market as random, it doesnt mean they think the market is random.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one inputs orders 'at random'.

 

Hello,

 

That's not true.

 

Consider the following time series:

 

2,792,34,4,7,2,567,114,9,1,8,8,441,16,93,4

 

What's the pattern?

 

The pattern is that the number doubles - 2,4,8,16 . . . But you can't see the pattern because I have disrupted it with randomly generated numbers. I know what the numbers are, so I can simply discount them to see the underlying sequence, but you don't know which numbers are random and which are pattern generated.

 

I have added noise to the time series.

 

It has been widely reported that certain market making firms insert orders of random size, at random price, and with random cycle frequency, into the markets to add noise that they can decode but that will disrupt the way that price and volume data is perceived by other particpants.

 

Furthermore, consider that random order placement and random markets are not synonymous.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Edited by BlueHorseshoe
It would help if my examples made sense!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,

 

That's not true.

 

Consider the following time series:

 

2,792,34,4,7,2,567,114,9,1,8,8,441,16,93,4

 

What's the pattern?

 

The pattern is that the number doubles - 2,4,8,16 . . . But you can't see the pattern because I have disrupted it with randomly generated numbers. I know what the numbers are, so I can simply discount them to see the underlying sequence, but you don't know which numbers are random and which are pattern generated.

 

I have added noise to the time series.

 

It has been widely reported that certain market making firms insert orders of random size, at random price, and with random cycle frequency, into the markets to add noise that they can decode but that will disrupt the way that price and volume data is perceived by other particpants.

 

Furthermore, consider that random order placement and random markets are not synonymous.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Are they really doing this or is this just a possibility that someone thought of?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are they really doing this or is this just a possibility that someone thought of?

 

Developers have acknowledged the use of random cycle generators, it seems, but I think this particular application is just informed speculation (it came from an Eric Hunsader article). The idea seems to be to try and screw other participants' read of market depth.

 

Any suggestions as to why else certain firms would spit random orders (and also orders arranged in pretty but pointless geometric patterns) into the market?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Developers have acknowledged the use of random cycle generators, it seems, but I think this particular application is just informed speculation (it came from an Eric Hunsader article). The idea seems to be to try and screw other participants' read of market depth.

 

Any suggestions as to why else certain firms would spit random orders (and also orders arranged in pretty but pointless geometric patterns) into the market?

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I can see random orders being placed and pulled, but it is hard for me to understand why a firm would place random executions unless that firm controlled the bulk of the order flow of that instrument or was part of group of market makers who together controlled the market place. Otherwise, I don't see it and would like to know how or why they would do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,

 

That's not true.

 

Consider the following time series:

 

2,792,34,4,7,2,567,114,9,1,8,8,441,16,93,4

 

What's the pattern?

 

The pattern is that the number doubles - 2,4,8,16 . . . But you can't see the pattern because I have disrupted it with randomly generated numbers. I know what the numbers are, so I can simply discount them to see the underlying sequence, but you don't know which numbers are random and which are pattern generated.

 

I have added noise to the time series.

 

It has been widely reported that certain market making firms insert orders of random size, at random price, and with random cycle frequency, into the markets to add noise that they can decode but that will disrupt the way that price and volume data is perceived by other particpants.

 

Furthermore, consider that random order placement and random markets are not synonymous.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Sure - you make a valid point. One platform I used allowed the user to specify random volumes in iceberg order types (the child orders are random numbers smaller than the parent order).

 

I see no reason why this wouldnt be extended to time based order types where the times of child orders are selected at random between two points of the day for example.

 

What I meant of course was that the decision to enter an order isn't random. Elements of the execution of large institutional orders may be random, but not the decision itself to trade, or the parameters of the trade. That would be daft of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are the kinds of discussions that are (in view) pointless...non-productive

 

For every strategy used there is a relatively simple response that can be used, for example if a participant acting on a daily time is concerned about the effect of HFT on their system they can simply take entries at the VWAP or open an account with a broker who provides that service.

 

Equally simple strategies are available for the intraday participant. It becomes a matter of learning what your options are (educating yourself)...but then success in this business was always about that....

 

to participate on the intraday time frame, I have adjusted the timing of my entries and in the process I actually gained access to additional volatility while maintaining the same risk parameters...and finally, what NEVER changes is the way that professional interests act on the market with respect to inventory bias....they ALWAYS look to squeeze whichever side is out of balance....the result? You can actually use HFT activity to get a nice boost toward your profit targets (assuming you have a reasonably decent system and can figure out where the longer time frame targets are)....

 

What amuses me is that so many here want to debate this at length...without taking the time to really think about what is realistic in terms of usable info....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can see random orders being placed and pulled, but it is hard for me to understand why a firm would place random executions unless that firm controlled the bulk of the order flow of that instrument or was part of group of market makers who together controlled the market place. Otherwise, I don't see it and would like to know how or why they would do it.

 

Hi MightyMouse,

 

Some orders get placed miles away from the last traded price and aren't expected to trade, just intended to spoof the order book, I guess. And some firms probably do control most of the order flow in some thinly traded equities. And some institutions seemingly use iceberg type algos for execution that have randomising elements exactly as TheDude describes.

 

All of this is, of course, completely anecdotal - I have no first hand experience of how a market-maker or large institution operates.

 

Just to progress the discussion, I think it is perfectly plausible to have a profitable strategy that has randomly generated entry orders . . .

 

And I think that people are continuing to confuse the question of whether price is random with the question of whether price is predictable (by which I mean conforms to probabilistic models). The two need not be mutually exclusive.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and finally, what NEVER changes is the way that professional interests act on the market with respect to inventory bias....they ALWAYS look to squeeze whichever side is out of balance....the result? You can actually use HFT activity to get a nice boost toward your profit targets (assuming you have a reasonably decent system and can figure out where the longer time frame targets are)....

 

What amuses me is that so many here want to debate this at length...without taking the time to really think about what is realistic in terms of usable info....

 

Hi Steve,

 

The first paragraph above seems useful info - please could you clarify and expand upon it a little?

 

Thanks,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Steve,

 

The first paragraph above seems useful info - please could you clarify and expand upon it a little?

 

Thanks,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Inventory occurs as a result of transactions. Markets worldwide continue to be primary vehicles for institutional use, with commercial interests adding to that volume...institutions generally "stage" inventory in specific places as they anticipate seasonal price movement (that they generate) over a period of time. Worldwide, we also see Asian and European institutions staging their inventory at specific prices during the overnight market. They do this because they need to generate alpha and the choices available to them are now very limited. The cumulative effect is that an imbalance is created (and acted upon at the next market open).

 

This also relates to the subject of orders placed at distance from current price....again there is little I can say without burning bridges, so I will simply point out the obvious....to the extent that orders (especially size) are placed at a distance from the last transaction, the chances of getting tagged are reduced to near zero, and if there is a utility as a result of that placement (and I can assure you there is) then the purpose is served and risk is managed very effectively using that strategy. In my office orders of this type were termed "smoke" or "smoking"......I leave it to the multi-dimensional thinkers in the crowd to figure it out...

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inventory occurs as a result of transactions. Markets worldwide continue to be primary vehicles for institutional use, with commercial interests adding to that volume...institutions generally "stage" inventory in specific places as they anticipate seasonal price movement (that they generate) over a period of time. Worldwide, we also see Asian and European institutions staging their inventory at specific prices during the overnight market. They do this because they need to generate alpha and the choices available to them are now very limited. The cumulative effect is that an imbalance is created (and acted upon at the next market open).

 

This also relates to the subject of orders placed at distance from current price....again there is little I can say without burning bridges, so I will simply point out the obvious....to the extent that orders (especially size) are placed at a distance from the last transaction, the chances of getting tagged are reduced to near zero, and if there is a utility as a result of that placement (and I can assure you there is) then the purpose is served and risk is managed very effectively using that strategy. In my office orders of this type were termed "smoke" or "smoking"......I leave it to the multi-dimensional thinkers in the crowd to figure it out...

 

Thanks - this type of post provides a perspective I don't have.

 

Just to be clear, are you saying that short term participants will "squeeze" longer term participants, or visa-versa? Is there any kind of integrity/consistency to the motives of long term participants upon which such strategies could be realised?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
These are the kinds of discussions that are (in view) pointless...

 

What seems pointless, I debate at length; what seems point-ful . . . I just get on with.

 

That way you never risk throwing out a gem with the trash ;

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

theres only one reason why orders are placed away from the market ahead of time - and thats to get time priority in the queue. if you dont need/want to trade at the level, then you pull the order.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you dont need/want to trade at the level, then you pull the order.

 

Within reason/ability to pay fines, yes.

 

We're re-treading old ground here though, and it doesn't have much to do with whether or not price movement is random . . .

 

Both short term and long term participants react to price. I would contend that price movement is more random in the shorter term. Which must come first, the random price movement to which shorter term participants react, or the misguided reaction that leads to random price movement in the short term?

 

And are longer term price movements really as non-random as they seem? If your outlook is "forever", the stock market always seems to trend up. But what if you enlarge your perspective proportionately? What will an equity chart for the past 100 years and the next 900 look like?

 

"Prices always revert to their mean, and over a long enough timeframe that mean is always zero"

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • AXSM Axsome Therapeutics stock watch. pullback to 120.5 gap support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?AXSM
    • Date: 14th March 2025.   Gold Surges Past Record High as Market Volatility Persists.     Gold Surges Past Record High as Market Volatility Persists Gold surged towards $2,994 per ounce, surpassing its previous high set on Thursday. With a 2.6% rise this week, gold is on track for its most significant gain since November. Meanwhile, gold futures in New York comfortably exceeded the $3,000 mark, reflecting strong investor sentiment toward the precious metal. The robust performance of gold this quarter extends its strong annual rally in 2024. Market uncertainty, exacerbated by the US administration’s aggressive trade policies, has dampened risk appetite for equities, pushing the S&P 500 into correction territory this week. Central bank purchases increased ETF inflows, and bullish forecasts from major banks have further fueled gold’s ascent. Trade Tensions and Market Impact Former President Donald Trump escalated trade tensions by proposing a 200% tariff on European alcoholic beverages, including wine and champagne. Additionally, he reaffirmed his stance on retaining tariffs on steel and aluminium and signalled that reciprocal tariffs on global trade partners could take effect as early as April 2. As we approach the second quarter, reciprocal tariffs could drive another wave of market turbulence, solidifying gold’s appeal as a safe-haven asset. Gold and Equity Market Reactions The upward momentum in gold has also lifted mining stocks, with Australia’s Evolution Mining Ltd. reaching an all-time high. Global holdings in gold-backed ETFs increased to 2,687 tons, marking the highest level since November 2023. Analysts at major banks remain bullish on gold’s trajectory. Macquarie Group recently forecasted a potential spike to $3,500 per ounce in Q2, while BNP Paribas revised its outlook to show gold prices consistently above $3,000. Gold traded at $2,983.50 per ounce in the Asia session, reflecting a 14% year-to-date gain. Meanwhile, silver edged lower after nearing $34 per ounce, while platinum and palladium recorded gains.     US Stock Market Recovery Amid Uncertainty After a sharp sell-off, US stock futures rebounded. Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.4%, while S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite futures gained 0.6% and 0.8%, respectively. Despite the slight recovery, Wall Street remains on edge following the S&P 500’s descent into correction territory. Trump’s firm stance on tariffs has added to market concerns. During a meeting with NATO’s secretary general, he dismissed any possibility of easing trade restrictions, acknowledging that further market disruptions may lie ahead. Government Shutdown and Economic Indicators Adding to the economic uncertainty, a potential US government shutdown loomed over Wall Street. However, a breakthrough emerged late Thursday as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer signalled a willingness to advance a Republican-led stopgap spending bill. Today the University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment survey is expected to shed light on how consumers are coping with inflation and trade disruptions. Last month’s report indicated weakening economic confidence, which could have further implications for spending trends. Asian Markets Rally Amid China’s Economic Stimulus Asian stock markets saw a strong performance this morning, brushing off Wall Street’s losses. Chinese stocks surged after state-run banks and financial institutions were instructed to support consumer spending. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index jumped 2.5% to 24,038.85, while the Shanghai Composite Index gained 1.9% to 3,420.65. In Tokyo, the Nikkei 225 added 0.9%, while Australia’s ASX 200 climbed 0.6%. China’s National Financial Regulatory Administration issued directives aimed at boosting consumer finance, including encouraging credit card usage and providing support for struggling borrowers. Economists, however, argue that broader reforms—such as wage growth and enhanced social welfare—are necessary for sustained economic recovery. Wall Street’s Struggles Amid AI Stock Declines Despite positive economic data, including lower-than-expected wholesale inflation and strong job market indicators, stock market turbulence continued. AI-related stocks, which have been at the forefront of market gains, faced renewed pressure. Palantir Technologies fell 4.8%, Super Micro Computer dropped 8%, and Nvidia fluctuated before closing 0.1% lower. Tesla also struggled, declining 3% and extending its 2025 losses to over 40%. In contrast, Intel shares soared 14.6% after announcing Lip-Bu Tan as its new CEO. Oil Prices and Currency Movements In commodities, US crude oil prices rose by $0.46 to $67.01 per barrel, while Brent crude increased by $0.44 to $70.32 per barrel. The US dollar strengthened to 148.63 Yen, while the Euro dipped slightly to $1.0845. Conclusion Market volatility remains high as investors navigate shifting trade policies, inflation concerns, and economic uncertainties. While gold continues to shine as a safe-haven asset, equity markets face persistent headwinds. As geopolitical and economic developments unfold, traders and investors must remain vigilant in the days ahead.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • ItuGlobal: Our Latest NETELLER VIPs 2025 ITU GLOBAL VIP Members’ Rewards Every calendar year, we choose 2 customers to become our VIPs. They’ve permanently special status with us and they can fund/withdraw Neteller through us, at parallel market rates, whether they open brokerage accounts through us or not.   These are people who funded with the highest amount of Neteller, and who also withdrew the highest amount of Neteller through us.  They would be announced in January each year and added to our list of VIPs. ItuGlobal: Our Latest NETELLER VIPs 2025 Adetoye Oyebanji Babalola: Adetoye O. has started selling large quantities of Neteller to us since the very beginning of our company’s existence. He also sold Perfect Money to us many times, when PM was still available in Nigeria. Besides, he has given us a lot of helpful business advice, which has proven to be invaluable to us. He deserves to become our VIP. Isiaka Adekunle Mohammed: He is a constant buyer. Buying e-currencies and also funding his Instaforex account through us. We thank Isiaka A. for his trust in us and wish him the best in everything he does. Abiodun Lawanson: This is an avid buyer and seller of Neteller. He buys and makes profits and sells back to us. Sometimes when we are not online, he will send an offline message and we will process his order once we come back online. He has thus become our VIP. Source: Ituglobalfx.com.ng  
    • The best and the most sure-fire way to avoid all these forms of nonsense is NEVER to send any money to anyone, no matter the circumstances they claim... Even your closest family members.   Whatever they claim will happen to them, let it happen.   There is nothing new under the sun...   You need to be extremely cruel.... Never send anything of value to anybody, no matter what they claim, even if they claim death.   If you can follow this GOLDEN RULE, you will avoid a lot of regrets, heartaches and disappointments from all areas.   I send money only to people I have promised before.... Or someone I am seeing face-to-face... Or someone I have confirmed beyond reasonable doubts from external/independent sources that they really need the money.   Otherwise, nobody under this heaven can come out of blue (unless my parents or wife), even my siblings and request money.   Over 90% of requests for financial assistance and are fraudulent.   After all, if you die today... The scammers (even in the family) will continue to live without you.   Those who are merciful, kind-hearted and soft-hearted are the easy preys and targets of these scoundrels - 419 scammers.   They like gullible people and hate tough/cruel people.   Do not allow anyone to cause you to feel guilty for what you don’t do… Those dubious people want to make you feel guilty for not helping. But you don’t need to feel guilty as long as you’re not the cause of their problems or the issues they have.   It is better to lose customers/friends/family members/anyone's goodwill and keep your money, than to lose their goodwill and also lose your money.   Because that is what will happen at last... I have lost count of how many people that are currently regretting giving out loans, just because they want to retain goodwill.   When you're trying to please people, you end up displeasing yourself... And you will discover that those who are encouraging you to be kind and generous are themselves wicked and stingy.   Esin o dede l’oro... Araye lo ko esin loro. (It's humans being that taught the horse how to be cruel).   The best way to avoid falling for scam is NEVER to send anything of value to anyone, no matter who the person is to you or how they relate to you on this planet...   And never try to get anything for free or reap where you don't sow and never try to get rich quickly.   Follow this: You will escape/avoid all scams, lies, pretenses, fakeries, headaches, sorrow, regrets, high BP, later in your life.   Ignore this rule at your own PERIL.   Have a nice day. PS: And scammers will be using AI also for impersonations, phishing attempts and deepfake tricks. Just delay indefinitely and make independent calls, research and investigation before you part with anything of value. If you can't go through the rigors, just ignore the deals. I hope the Western World will soon pass legislation to regulate AI and deal with those who use it for evil.  To get free, winning trading signals, please visit: https://t.me/predictmag 
    • C Citigroup stock watch, pullback to the 68.43 gap support area, with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?C
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.