Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Raleigh Lee

Don't Be Fooled By Randomness

Recommended Posts

Some studies have shown that a high percentage of chart patterns may be simply random lines on a piece of paper. Burton Malkiel in A Random Walk Down Wall Street cited an experiment his students participated in, constructing a hypothetical stock chart. Each day they flipped a coin, plotting heads as a 1/2-point gain and tails as a 1/2-point decline. The resulting chart from these random coin flips displayed all the classical patterns such as head and shoulder formations, flags, pennants, triangles, etc. There were even indications of cycles.

 

Sticking to the original idea ( i do try sometimes ;) ).....

 

I think there have been several references to the original post and coin flipping experiments.

 

Therefore, if we are all agreed that random outcomes can indeed look like a price chart, then it would suggest than in order to make money, the skill lies in risk management and money management - not analysis.

 

I appreciate there are some aspects of a price chart that cant be mimicked so easily with the coin flip chart such as volume, and non linear price/time segments. And that would suggest these differences are the only variables worthy of any kind of analysis - the patterns and magic lines certainly arent as any profitable trader will tell you.

 

This is just yet another massive nail in the coffin of the hobby trader and his charts. This is partly because the chart trader needs to wait until the end of the time segment to make his decision - which is an utter nonsense if day trading, but may have some merit if position trading.

 

This is because the settlement of a day (NOT the close) means something. The close of an intraday bar means jack shnit of course.

Edited by TheDude

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Within reason/ability to pay fines, yes.

 

 

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

most prop traders are acting as liquidity providers. they want to get filled. they want to be on every price if they can.

 

a profitable short term strategy aims to trade as often as it can in order to play the edge out as often as it can.

 

also, the unit cost of transactions decline the more volume is traded. Exchanges rarely enforce those fines unless you really screw up their bandwidth with an autospreader with incorrect parameters. No exchange is going to stop liquidity being added to its books unless its stopping others from trading.

 

i see you have yet to read Irene Aldridge. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bothered.

 

Youve probably read the following posts by now in which case you probably understand a screenshot is really quite irrelevant. Maybe you'd like to do some work yourself rather than expect others to feed you?

 

Anyway - back on topic.....

 

 

Actually it's not. Either put up or shut up. You spend way too much time trying to dispel the generosity of others. Why should anyone listen to you in the first place? Oh that's right .... that's where the trading record comes into play. So again, what do you have for us besides fancy forum talk? Let's see a screen shot breakdown of your historical trading statistics. Surely your platform keeps tabs of it and SURELY you can show us a nice shot of your P/L.

 

Won't happen though. You'll continue to play the elitist contrarian "I know everything about the market" role.

 

Steve you've done a fantastic job in this thread bud. Keep up the good work. Learning a tremendous amount.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok well thanks I guess, and I couple of quick comments

 

and these comments are NOT meant to be critical..

 

First, its a good idea to know your statistics....and by that I mean just basic descriptive and inferential concepts....if you actually do the work, it gives you an advantage...if on top of that you have maturity and common sense, the difference between you and the "next" participant is significant....

 

Item #2...understand also that a significant number of participants are NOT traditionally educated...typically those folks have had to rely on their understanding of human behavior to make a living elsewhere in the world....this understanding of basic human nature gives them a very real advantage....they use it (some might even say they rely on it) when they make decisions....

 

Look folks its really pretty simple, markets exhibit dual aspects....in the same way that in physics we say that particles exhibit wavelike behavior, markets exhibit characteristics of very basic human behavior (fear & greed)....as I have said, markets tend to cycle from random to non random behavior...we can test data..(I do it every weekend) and those of us with a suitable background can see it....skilled observers who have to make a living in the markets on a daily basis NEVER discount the fact that human emotion is a work....once you understand how this works, the question random or non....is simple to answer (its both)...

 

Now I have to get ready for the next session

 

Best of luck folks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let's see a screen shot breakdown of your historical trading statistics. Surely your platform keeps tabs of it and SURELY you can show us a nice shot of your P/L.

 

I can't show you this, not at all . . . therefore, please feel free to ignore everything I have said hitherto in this post or any other. It's for the best . . .

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

ps. truth comes in very, very small chunks, and from a thousand sources - it is unreasonable to expect the gospel from one man with screenshot proof that he is the messiah!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually it's not. Either put up or shut up. You spend way too much time trying to dispel the generosity of others. Why should anyone listen to you in the first place? Oh that's right .... that's where the trading record comes into play. So again, what do you have for us besides fancy forum talk? Let's see a screen shot breakdown of your historical trading statistics. Surely your platform keeps tabs of it and SURELY you can show us a nice shot of your P/L.

 

Won't happen though. You'll continue to play the elitist contrarian "I know everything about the market" role.

 

Steve you've done a fantastic job in this thread bud. Keep up the good work. Learning a tremendous amount.

 

 

LOL

 

You're not following this at all are you pal.

 

The screenshot I mentioned was in reference to the strategies being discussed, not P&L. In other words, you cant really show a screenshot of stock lending for example, or an options hedge.

 

It was in reference to the fact that TA isn't much use in my opinion, and next to useless when day trading. The posts were to prove the point that there are other ways of making money that have less risk than TA, and have a clear edge which TA does not. Primarily though, it was to show that not all analysis was TA or FA as some here try to impose.

 

If you had the brain power to understand and follow what was being discussed you would have understood this.

 

Therefore, perhaps it is you that should 'put up or shut up', or at least have the manners to follow the line of conversation before spouting off your pie hole!

 

Finally, I dont believe Steve was even in this thread at the time of conversation. Hey! We have a trend here! A trend of errors and mistakes on your part. Lets bring the conversation back on track.... Is your foolishness random, or purposeful?

 

Do try harder next time.

 

:rofl:

Edited by TheDude

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.