Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

BlueHorseshoe

Puzzles for Traders

Recommended Posts

And it's for sure not that he used the suspension cables, thus travelling outside the main bridge/road area, going around it?

 

Or was he in a helicopter? Or a plane?

 

Or was he actually King Kong and thus able to step over this man-sized bridge, a la the big version of Mighty Mouse's theory?

 

Or is he Spiderman?

 

If not, at me to the uncle list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If we exchange railroad trax with river will it ruin the puzzle? Just tryin to narrow things down...OR you could just tell us the answer.
i guess i could let you make it a river if you insist. i can't tell the answer until more people cry "uncle".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i guess i could let you make it a river if you insist. i can't tell the answer until more people cry "uncle".

 

OK Patuca

I guess two can play your game of suspence

Please hold the answer till Sunday night.

That will give us all another chance.

And I know you are dying to tell us .......

kind regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i guess i could let you make it a river if you insist. i can't tell the answer until more people cry "uncle".

 

I could live without knowing for a few more days... possibly a lifetime. I've kinda lost interest to be honest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK Patuca

I guess two can play your game of suspence

Please hold the answer till Sunday night.

That will give us all another chance.

And I know you are dying to tell us .......

kind regards

bobc

 

Since we are waiting till Sunday....I bet I can tell you the score of the 49ers vs Falcons game before it starts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK Patuca

I guess two can play your game of suspence

Please hold the answer till Sunday night.

That will give us all another chance.

And I know you are dying to tell us .......

kind regards

bobc

sunday night will be fine ...i don't suspect anyone will guess it by then but if they do they will be first to ever guess it. i could give the answer anytime but i need to see more "uncle" cries. i realize it is hard for traders to take a stop loss but it is all part of trading...(according to conventional wisdom.. if you use Stop loses unlike ZDO and myself who are the only two crazy people on board) ..well sometimes i use them if i "feel" like it.:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No offense intended... it's been a fun problem to consider (thought I nailed it with post #88). Thanks for raising it. I'm just ready to hear the solution.

 

That sounds like uncle to me.

 

Let's give it a few more days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sunday night will be fine ...i don't suspect anyone will guess it by then but if they do they will be first to ever guess it. i could give the answer anytime but i need to see more "uncle" cries. i realize it is hard for traders to take a stop loss but it is all part of trading...(according to conventional wisdom.. if you use Stop loses unlike ZDO and myself who are the only two crazy people on board) ..well sometimes i use them if i "feel" like it.:cool:

 

There isn't a need for a stop if there is nothing to lose. There is nothing to lose by waiting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a man came to a bridge that crossed a railroad track. he went across the bridge but yet went around the bridge at exactly the same time. how did he do it?

 

The man is the man in the moon.

 

Or, he is flying over the bridge

Edited by MightyMouse

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The guys is so big that he has a gravitational field that warps the dimenions of time and space so that he both crosses it and surrounds it at the same time.
nope no warping gravitational field

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in the meantime.....

2 for fun...

 

There is a potential liar - lets call him Lance.....he says he lied and cheated throughout his career and then denied it afterwards.

Now he says he is coming clean, and revealing all with the revelations that no one could have done what he did in his career without lying and cheating.....

Is he now lying about lying or is he coming clean :)

 

..........

 

Socialists claim the wealthy steal from the workers, the wealthy claim those that dont work steal from them, anarchists claim the government steals from everyone, criminals claim they steal because they either need to feed a habit or they were abused growing up - the leaders claim they are merely facilitating the stealing for everyone as the markets need regulated theft as they are too efficient at doing it themselves.

The question is - when someone breaks into your home, are they socialist, the wealthy, anarchists, the government or just plain criminals?

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
in the meantime.....

2 for fun...

 

There is a potential liar - lets call him Lance.....he says he lied and cheated throughout his career and then denied it afterwards.

Now he says he is coming clean, and revealing all with the revelations that no one could have done what he did in his career without lying and cheating.....

Is he now lying about lying or is he coming clean :)

 

..........

 

Socialists claim the wealthy steal from the workers, the wealthy claim those that dont work steal from them, anarchists claim the government steals from everyone, criminals claim they steal because they either need to feed a habit or they were abused growing up - the leaders claim they are merely facilitating the stealing for everyone as the markets need regulated theft as they are too efficient at doing it themselves.

The question is - when someone breaks into your home, are they socialist, the wealthy, anarchists, the government or just plain criminals?

 

I think Lance will be recorded in athletic history as the greatest liar and cheater ever, even though he may not deserve the title.

 

It makes me wonder, actually frightens me, about who will ever surpass Bernie Madoff in the world of financial fraud. Someone someday will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
in the meantime.....

2 for fun...

 

There is a potential liar - lets call him Lance.....he says he lied and cheated throughout his career and then denied it afterwards.

Now he says he is coming clean, and revealing all with the revelations that no one could have done what he did in his career without lying and cheating.....

Is he now lying about lying or is he coming clean

 

The answer to this one is that you would have to be a real moron to agree to be interviewed by Opra

..........

 

Socialists claim the wealthy steal from the workers, the wealthy claim those that dont work steal from them, anarchists claim the government steals from everyone, criminals claim they steal because they either need to feed a habit or they were abused growing up - the leaders claim they are merely facilitating the stealing for everyone as the markets need regulated theft as they are too efficient at doing it themselves.

The question is - when someone breaks into your home, are they socialist, the wealthy, anarchists, the government or just plain criminals?

 

The answer to this one is that he would be a dead wealthy socialist anarchist government criminal, because if he is breaking into my home, while I am at home, I would shoot him. Survivors will be shot again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Coin-flipping analogies are commonly used in explanations of probability in trading literature, so here's a heads or tails puzzle . . .

 

I'm flipping a coin. It's evenly weighted, giving a 50/50 probability of heads or tails with each toss. We will each predict a sequence of three flips, and the person whose sequence occurs first is the winner. I predict:

 

Heads, Tails, Tails.

 

To maximise your chances of winning, what sequence should you predict and why?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Coin-flipping analogies are commonly used in explanations of probability in trading literature, so here's a heads or tails puzzle . . .

 

I'm flipping a coin. It's evenly weighted, giving a 50/50 probability of heads or tails with each toss. We will each predict a sequence of three flips, and the person whose sequence occurs first is the winner. I predict:

 

Heads, Tails, Tails.

 

To maximise your chances of winning, what sequence should you predict and why?

 

BlueHorseshoe

heads tails heads maybe

 

Coins have no memory and one flip has nothing to do with another. Every flip starts out fifty-fifty.

 

Three coin tosses. we have one chance of getting all heads, three chances of getting one head and two tails, three chances of getting two heads and one tail, and one chance of getting three tails. adding this together comes to 8, the probability of getting two heads and one tail is 3/8.

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
heads tails heads maybe

 

Coins have no memory and one flip has nothing to do with another. Every flip starts out fifty-fifty.

 

 

The probability of any particular sequence of three is 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 = 0.125.

 

But the puzzle is to guess which sequence is more likely to occur before mine (not what the next three flips will be).

 

In other words, we might have to continue flipping for a while before either sequence comes up and one of us can be declared winner.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Coin-flipping analogies are commonly used in explanations of probability in trading literature, so here's a heads or tails puzzle . . .

 

I'm flipping a coin. It's evenly weighted, giving a 50/50 probability of heads or tails with each toss. We will each predict a sequence of three flips, and the person whose sequence occurs first is the winner. I predict:

 

Heads, Tails, Tails.

 

To maximise your chances of winning, what sequence should you predict and why?

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I would pick

 

Tails,Tails,Tails

 

I just change one flip based on your decision

So theoretically i need just one flip right

 

But then again both sequences have an equal chance

To appear

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Coin-flipping analogies are commonly used in explanations of probability in trading literature, so here's a heads or tails puzzle . . .

 

I'm flipping a coin. It's evenly weighted, giving a 50/50 probability of heads or tails with each toss. We will each predict a sequence of three flips, and the person whose sequence occurs first is the winner. I predict:

 

Heads, Tails, Tails.

 

To maximise your chances of winning, what sequence should you predict and why?

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Much the same as the other answers except I think the odds are 50/50....my maximum odds.

 

For you to win, you need HTT, so to maximise my chances of winning I should piggy back you....and then switch for the last one and choose HTH

 

Otherwise, if i choose a completely different sequence the odds are the same as yours.....slim, whereas by piggybacking you my odds go up to 50:50 for the last coin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.