Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

BlueHorseshoe

Puzzles for Traders

Recommended Posts

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: now that is funny LOL :haha: and :cool:

 

So, if a newspaper headline says, "A woman was shot last week and the bullet's in her yet.", would that mean the bullet ended up in her dog...or it's in some part of the female anatomy that I'm unaware of?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh what the heck. The riddle wasn't the hoot...it was everybody's guesses. It was how funny it was to see how one guy with a really lame "riddle" led everybody around by their nose..for way too long. Then, one by one they all turned on him like Cujo yet he didn't give a flyin' flippo. Common guys, it was a fascinating process and it was funny...admit it and let's all have fun with the next one...ok.
thanks roger. now you are a real trader. real traders are never sore losers! i think livermore subscribed to that philosophy??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thanks roger. now you are a real trader. real traders are never sore losers! i think livermore subscribed to that philosophy??

 

I accept losses all the time .....of course losses happen.

 

In the context of THIS little story you put on here , it would be like trading and getting stopped out right away only to have your broker call you right after and say " you see that? You like how we just took you right out there ?? We own you"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So, if a newspaper headline says, "A woman was shot last week and the bullet's in her yet.", would that mean the bullet ended up in her dog...or it's in some part of the female anatomy that I'm unaware of?

 

I would reply to this but I have know clue what you are quoting me on??

 

did I post a response with all those funky smileys or something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Roger ,

 

Yes I agree time to move on , we all got sucked in.

 

 

Not to change the subject here but I notice the "C" under your name and it stands for Coach.....just what exactly are you are coach of?

 

I'm a trading instructor for my company called Felton Trading. Something I've been doing for the past 17 years.

 

Hey, I think ole Patuca was having fun and just got a bit carried away...whole thing just strikes me funny.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I thought the riddle was pretty funny (although the Y should have been capitalized even though that would not have helped anybody). Your attempt to turn it into a lesson in trading psychology missed the mark though.

 

You came off more like just another little Napoleon that this industry seems to be riddled with. (See what I did there? the play on the word riddle hah)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm a trading instructor for my company called Felton Trading. Something I've been doing for the past 17 years.

 

Hey, I think ole Patuca was having fun and just got a bit carried away...whole thing just strikes me funny.....

 

OK thanks for answering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well in the course of the discussions about the riddle i did say:

 

1) it was simple

 

2) the answer was right there in front of you (or something to that effect)

 

3) it was a stupid riddle

 

4) you would be mad

 

so i forewarned all. have a good evening. remember be careful what you listen to especially if it comes from me..:confused:

 

lesson to be learned: all the warning signs can be right there in front of us and we still get suckered into that bull/bear trap. don't ignore the warning signs.

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Roger ,

 

Yes I agree time to move on , we all got sucked in.

 

 

Not to change the subject here but I notice the "C" under your name and it stands for Coach.....just what exactly are you are coach of?

 

You mean you don't remember the Coach of the 1963 Texans? The man who invented the famous Divergence play in nickel formation. That play was trend setting, it took the team all the way to the double top.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JUST KIDDING..JUST KIDDING

 

"a man came to a bridge that crossed a railroad track. he went across the bridge but yet went around the bridge at exactly the same time. how did he do it?"

 

the answer is:

 

His Dog was named YET

 

Very nice. I can see why no one is ever able to solve it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK thanks for answering.

 

You bet, Gekko. I trade differently from just about anyone on the blue marble. If something isn't powerful, accurate and simple, I toss it. I've tossed a lot of junk over the years but every once in a while....

 

In trading, seems like to get the really good stuff, you have to make it yourself. But you may have discovered that already.

 

What happened to the riddles??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
oh sh$t i gotta leave. here comes mighty mouse. i see he just entered the thread.

 

bye!

 

Relax, Patuca...MM's a good trader and actually a nice guy. Plus he complimented the stupid riddle....lol

 

Besides, traders gotta learn how to handle the tuff markets, too. MM is kinda like trading in chop in very low volume...but with a bottle of Jack Daniel in your hand. Ok, I gotta go work on a better analogy than that.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Relax, Patuca...MM's a good trader and actually a nice guy. Plus he complimented the stupid riddle....lol

 

Besides, traders gotta learn how to handle the tuff markets, too. MM is kinda like trading in chop in very low volume...but with a bottle of Jack Daniel in your hand. Ok, I gotta go work on a better analogy than that.....

LOL

 

i don't like trading chop unless the chop is big

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a riddle

You are locked in a room together with a forex trader from Belize, a spotted jaguar from Columbia, and an anaconda from Brazil

You have a firearm with two bullets.

What is your procedure?

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a riddle

You are locked in a room together with a forex trader from Belize, a spotted jaguar from Columbia, and an anaconda from Brazil

You have a firearm with two bullets.

What is your procedure?

bobc

 

Shoot the Forex trader TWICE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a riddle

You are locked in a room together with a forex trader from Belize, a spotted jaguar from Columbia, and an anaconda from Brazil

You have a firearm with two bullets.

What is your procedure?

bobc

 

Shoot the FX trader with one bullet.

 

Then shoot the lock off the door with the other and run.

 

?

 

Here's my puzzle:

The hokey-cokey - maybe that really is what 'its' all about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a riddle

You are locked in a room together with a forex trader from Belize, a spotted jaguar from Columbia, and an anaconda from Brazil

You have a firearm with two bullets.

What is your procedure?

bobc

 

Shoot myself then let the FX trader figure it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Okay I thought the riddle was pretty funny (although the Y should have been capitalized even though that would not have helped anybody).
thanks..but capitalized?..why should i make it easy?... it was actually a dumb riddle but it does indicate we aren't as smart as we think we are since we can't figure out a stupid riddle when the answer is in the riddle itself.
Your attempt to turn it into a lesson in trading psychology missed the mark tho

ugh.

i have missed the mark many more times than i hit it in my life. "i succeed because i fail" it is hard to learn anything from a stupid riddle eh?

 

You came off more like just another little Napoleon that this industry seems to be riddled with. (See what I did there? the play on the word riddle hah)
like i said previousley "i don't care how i come across"... however, most traders come across arrogant like the "big Napoleon" that is why they lose and will continue to lose.

 

anyway it was done in fun with alot of tactics to divert people from the answer staring at them in the face the whole time. as i said earlier i did forewarn people but they still "fell" for it and got suckered in. such is human nature..

 

the one consolation everyone can have as they lick their wounds :rofl: :rofl::haha: IS NO ONE HAS EVER SOLVED THE RIDDLE THAT I KNOW OF. now einstein might have solved it but he is dead and his brain is in a jar somewhere. trade well :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thanks..but capitalized?..why should i make it easy?... it was actually a dumb riddle but it does indicate we aren't as smart as we think we are since we can't figure out a stupid riddle when the answer is in the riddle itself. i have missed the mark many more times than i hit it in my life. "i succeed because i fail" it is hard to learn anything from a stupid riddle eh?

 

like i said previousley "i don't care how i come across"... however, most traders come across arrogant like the "big Napoleon" that is why they lose and will continue to lose.

 

anyway it was done in fun with alot of tactics to divert people from the answer staring at them in the face the whole time. as i said earlier i did forewarn people but they still "fell" for it and got suckered in. such is human nature..

 

the one consolation everyone can have as they lick their wounds :rofl: :rofl::haha: IS NO ONE HAS EVER SOLVED THE RIDDLE THAT I KNOW OF. now einstein might have solved it but he is dead and his brain is in a jar somewhere. trade well :)

 

Hummm....I still like my answer that the bridge made a 360 degree spiral as it crossed the tracks. He'd be going over the bridge and around it at the same time YET would be walking on all fours....LOL

Edited by Roger Felton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like the riddle a man comes into town on Friday stays two days and leaves on Friday. How does he do it?

 

Was the answer within the riddle yes however a lot is to be implied. We should have assumed then the man and his dog, cousin, or whoever yet would be came to the bridge together then yet decided to not cross and go around the bridge. If both parties came to the railroad tracks however yet was not at the foot of the bridge with the man at the start of the crossing and never met the man at the foot of the bridge on the other side then would yet have not went across the railroad tracks alongside of the bridge not necessarily around it.

 

Asking the question in the singular as in how did he do it as opposed to how did this happen and your reasoning was "he" applies to the man or the dog then it would change the answer to the riddle. If a man crossed a bridge, Yet went around the brigde, how did he do it? The answer then to me would be in a car, by foot etc. As in how did he cross, how did he go around?

 

Bored at work. Silly riddle. Had my whole family involved in this one they aren't happy hahahahaha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a riddle

You are locked in a room together with a forex trader from Belize, a spotted jaguar from Columbia, and an anaconda from Brazil

You have a firearm with two bullets.

What is your procedure?

bobc

 

Was the forex trader also a Dallas Cowboy Cheerleader? Might make a difference whether I want to escape.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.