Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

BlueHorseshoe

Puzzles for Traders

Recommended Posts

Here is a "simple" probability problem:

 

Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

 

Is the game always played the same? meaning will the host always open a second door?

 

Assuming the game is played the same every time, it would be neither to your advantage or disadvantage to switch your choice. But your odds of winning are greater.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stumbled on this....not so much a brain teaser- or is it?

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/general-discussion/4420-test-your-tool.html

 

I was fine with all of these except the second one. NLP type things always seem to get me. I have concluded that I must be highly suggestible and susceptible to linguistic programming, and for that reason I avoid both hypnotists and trading vendors . . .

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is the game always played the same? meaning will the host always open a second door?

 

You have a free choice of one of the 3 doors, once you have made a selection the host will always show you a door with a goat behind it. Does that answer your question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The bridges in bold are two different bridges.
no it is the same exact bridge, same exact day, same exact time.

 

however, you guys are giving some pretty good answers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a "simple" probability problem:

 

Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

 

Because you 'know' that the host will open a door that has no prize after your original pick, you should always swap....the odds increase.

Basically - when the host reveals the dud door, there are two doors left and so the odds change from 1:3, to 2:3 chance of winning.

Intuitively we think it does not make a difference - to swap or not. - this is wrong.

 

(Its hard to conceptualise - but here goes)

Remember you have to assume this occurs on many games - and that over the long run you are better switching. This is not a one off odds decision.

 

At the start you have a 1 in 3 chance of picking the right door

Then the host opens the dud door, so now you know he has eliminated one of the dud doors. So what has happened is that you know that there will always be two doors that are eliminated - your pick and the hosts, and that the host will always eliminate a 'dud' door.

So no matter which you choose the host will help you.

 

Basically without any maths, tables or other formulas.

 

If you choose to stay then your odds remain at the 1 in 3

If you choose to swap they increase - you should swap.

 

................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a man came to a bridge that crossed a railroad track. he went across the bridge but yet went around the bridge at exactly the same time. how did he do it?

 

to go across and around the bridge at the same time he was taking part in a quantum physics experiment?:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
no it is a regular straight bridge.

 

If the man is on board a train, and the track is arranged in a figure of eight so that it crosses itself using the bridge, then the trajectory of the man's journey would be such that any complete loop of the track would take him both over and around the bridge.

 

But that's not literally at the exact same time, so it can't be correct, right?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No he just walked across a normal straight bridge an yet went around it at the exact time on the same exact day. no quantum physics.

 

The year was 1991. He was Iraqi. He was crossing the bridge and he was hit by a missile fired by an American fighter jet at the same time. He was crossing it and he ended up going "around it" at the same time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No he just walked across a normal straight bridge an yet went around it at the exact time on the same exact day. no quantum physics.

 

He came to the bridge and decided to walk down to the next bridge and cross there: He crossed a bridge, and went around a bridge at the same time. If that's not it... I give up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There were three men in the desert. Each had a camel. They all made a bet that whoever's camel could reach the finish line last was the bravest and most worthy man. For days the three men rode there camels as slow as possible and were beginning to run out of water and feel the effects of the hot sun. Luckily, they spotted an oasis and eventually reached it. at this oasis, the men regained there strength, and talked to a very respected wiseman. One telling the man about the problems they were facing (due the the bet) they jumped onto the camels and rode off as fast as they could.

 

What advise did the wise man give these three men, without causing them to call off the bet????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were three men in the desert. Each had a camel. They all made a bet that whoever's camel could reach the finish line last was the bravest and most worthy man. For days the three men rode there camels as slow as possible and were beginning to run out of water and feel the effects of the hot sun. Luckily, they spotted an oasis and eventually reached it. at this oasis, the men regained there strength, and talked to a very respected wiseman. One telling the man about the problems they were facing (due the the bet) they jumped onto the camels and rode off as fast as they could.

 

What advise did the wise man give these three men, without causing them to call off the bet????

 

He told them to race to the finish line riding one of the camels that belonged to the other person causing his camel to cross the finish line before his own camel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were three men in the desert. Each had a camel. They all made a bet that whoever's camel could reach the finish line last was the bravest and most worthy man. For days the three men rode there camels as slow as possible and were beginning to run out of water and feel the effects of the hot sun. Luckily, they spotted an oasis and eventually reached it. at this oasis, the men regained there strength, and talked to a very respected wiseman. One telling the man about the problems they were facing (due the the bet) they jumped onto the camels and rode off as fast as they could.

 

What advise did the wise man give these three men, without causing them to call off the bet????

 

This is a golden oldy

the wise man said - the first camel to die will always be the last to reach the line by never doing so, so by riding the camels into the ground the first camel to die would never reach the finish line. :)

Or alternatively.....

he told them to swap camels and race each other, that way the camel that comes first means that the riders camel was more likely to finish last as it was beaten.

 

.........................

.........................

For a probabilty puzzle, another golden oldie......

 

How many people must be gathered together in a room, before you can be certain that there is a greater than 50/50 chance that at least two of them have the same birthday?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He came to the bridge and decided to walk down to the next bridge and cross there: He crossed a bridge, and went around a bridge at the same time. If that's not it... I give up.

 

nope that not it. he crossed the bridge and yet went around the same bridge on the same day at the same exact time. don't feel bad the answer is disgusting simple but i have never had anyone guess it the about 30 years that i've know the puzzle/riddle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The year was 1991. He was Iraqi. He was crossing the bridge and he was hit by a missile fired by an American fighter jet at the same time. He was crossing it and he ended up going "around it" at the same time.
LOL that is not the answer but i can see where you might think that could be it since you know i think more guns will decrease the violence. :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL that is not the answer but i can see where you might think that could be it since you know i think more guns will decrease the violence. :haha:

 

I contacted my congressman and requested that he sponsor a request for a 28th amendment: Right to Bear Missiles

 

I know you say it, but I don't think you really think it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nope that not it. he crossed the bridge and yet went around the same bridge on the same day at the same exact time. don't feel bad the answer is disgusting simple but i have never had anyone guess it the about 30 years that i've know the puzzle/riddle.

 

OK... I've given up. PM with the answer...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Patuca

I think the bridge refers to a part of a ship.

You can cross the bridge and walk around it at the same time.

regards

bobc

nope. it is a normal regular bridge you can drive a car over or walk over. the bridge is over a set of railroad tracks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess US has fund managers and investment banking institutions looking after the portfolios on behalf of their clients.
    • There are many resources related to forex trading available on forums like babypips and forexfactory etc.
    • Candle stick pattern is one of the easiest charting patterns available to learn and make money. However, new traders never learn about the skills needed for earning money but they rush for making money and eventually lose their money.
    • Nothing wrong with being a ‘progressive’. Nothing wrong with being a ‘conservative’.  Very generally, ‘conservatives’ have preponderance of the here and now neurotransmitters, prefer empirical references, the rule of law, and value individual agency (It has been said that conservatives love humans and progressives love humanity) . Very generally, ‘progressives’ are dopaginaric - driven by passion for a better possible future, prefer references to others  (Example Karmela won’t answer questions with facts.  She cites the opinion of 18 ‘experts’), have a penchant for rule by man/mobs not by law , and value ‘societal' agency.  However, excesses of either tendency indicates mental illness, collective malaise, and has consequences.  When either camp is systematically captured by control seekers and/or, situationally by mobs, the whole is lessened. A key sign that is occurring is when one side no longer allows disagreement.  Progressives have  currently gone crazy in those excesses and are no longer allowing anything but unithought... examples - You can still be a vocal pro choice republican.  Try being a vocal pro life democrat. For snicks just try it.  You’ll get cancelled.  Bust a myth about blacks in America, true up the real  history of Republicans ending slavery and what has happened since, how the democrats are the party of the KKK, how Obama did not a fkn thang for blacks in general, be a black republican, etc.    You will get canceled in a heartbeat. Step up and question the social agendas of federally subsidized schools at a board meeting... get treated like shit and also get an immediate case number with the FBI ... Question the requirements to watch and lickkiss the 'rainbows' and also make sure your kids show up for it, not to mention fund transitions out of your pocket and see what you get ‘labeled’ Question mainstream media bias - even just to mention that biased, agenda driven narrative is different from truth in reporting - and see what happens to your voice... Excesses have consequences... imbalances have consequences... just sayin’
    • SBUX Starbucks stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 99.81 at https://stockconsultant.com/?SBUX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.