Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

GCB

Volume Gradient + Heikin Ashii Trend Indicator

Recommended Posts

In the spirit of the current interest in volume-based indicators, I wrote this TradeStation hybrid of Volume Gradient and Heikin Ashii Trend. It will create a chart with two distinct ranges of colors. One color range, defaulted to green, indicates an uptrend--the other, defaulted to red, indicates a downtrend. The relative darkness of each color reflects the amount of volume in a particular bar relative to a previous sample average. The number of bars in the sample both for determining the trend and the average volume is the same and is set by the input parm Length.

 

Since PlotPaintBar takes RGB color numbers, to provide the full range of colors, the inputs to this indicator allow a completely customizable red, green and blue setting for each end of each color range. For example, UpHR = The uptrend, high volume red component, UpHG = the uptrend, high volume green component, and so forth. DnLB = the downtrend, low volume blue component, and so forth.

 

You can use any typical Windows color selection dialog box to select colors and find out the Reg, Green, Blue component numbers for the color. (See the sample picture.)

 

I suggest using washed-out colors for the low volume colors and rich colors in the same basic color for the high volume colors. For example, faded pink to deep red. But of course you can do whatever makes sense to you and looks good to your eye.

 

(Note that the algorithm used for determining trend is not exactly the same as TTM trend, but the results are pretty much the same.)

 

Hope this helps!

TrendVol.jpg.e868fb65b944cbb73ff005a6776a82ac.jpg

Pallette.jpg.54e9debbc4acdfc1c63be679013baf99.jpg

TRENDVOL BARS.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have had a great idea... Thanks!

 

I wonder if there would be a way to show the volume like a thermometer on each candle? If you could use up volume on all candles but show it like water in a drinking glass? The difference would be down volume. That would be special.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys,

 

Thanks for your interest in this indicator.

 

Here's a new version. It adds an input that allows you turn off the trend indicator and just paint normal up and down bars albeit with the volume shadings.

 

Also, IMPORTANT, I discovered that for the colors to show consistent density they must parallel each other. This is hard to explain, but if you look at the settings below you can see what I mean.

 

UpHR(0),

UpHG(135),

UpHB(0),

 

UpLR(205),

UpLG(255),

UpLB(205),

 

DnHR(135),

DnHG(0),

DnHB(0),

 

DnLR(255),

DnLG(205),

DnLB(205);

 

Without this you will have problems with similar relative volumes showing inconsistent shading between the up and the down versions.

 

Please note that you have to delete the indicator and re-add it after installing the new version or it will use your old color settings.

TRENDVOL BARS.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GCB, just so I understand how to use this correctly, the winner of the up/down volume battle gets the candle. And... if the winner won the candle overwhelmingly, the color is darker. Light color for a close call.

 

Is that correct? I think I like it better without the trend. You have done a great job with this. Two thumbs up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Robert,

 

Thanks very much.

 

Actually, the way it works is this: If the candle is an up candle--that is the close (or current) price is greater than open price--then the density of the candle color is based upon the amount of up volume for that candle relative to the average of up volume for the preceding n candles, where n is set by the VolLength input. Vice versa for down. So up volume is only compared to up volume, and down is only compared to down. So if an up candle is dark it means it had quite a bit more up volume than the average of the preceding n candles' up volume.

 

Since each candle gains volume as it is being formed you will not know the end color of a candle until either it reaches its darkest possible color or the next candle begins. Practically all candles start out light colored.

 

When the trend indicator is in an uptrend all candles are green, whether they are up or down candles, and in a downtrend all candles are red. Even so, up candle volume is only compared to the average of up volume, and vice versa. The PriceLength input is used to determine the moving average for the trend determination.

 

Note also that this can only be used on intraday charts. Daily charts or larger do not differentiate between up and down volume on TS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent.

 

You said PriceLength is used to determine the moving average for the trend. May be a dumb question but how does that work? Does this mean we can adjust the sensitivity, i.e. when the trend bars change color?

 

I was looking at a few volume "share bar" candle charts with this indicator. It appears to be working correctly with those too. Also I was thinking that your above explanation would be good to include inside the eld. Maybe a little credit for yourself too. :) Nothing wrong with putting your name on your work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Excellent.

 

You said PriceLength is used to determine the moving average for the trend. May be a dumb question but how does that work? Does this mean we can adjust the sensitivity, i.e. when the trend bars change color?

 

I was looking at a few volume "share bar" candle charts with this indicator. It appears to be working correctly with those too. Also I was thinking that your above explanation would be good to include inside the eld. Maybe a little credit for yourself too. :) Nothing wrong with putting your name on your work.

 

Yes, a longer PriceLength will find longer more sure trends, will but have a larger lag. A shorter PriceLength will locate trends faster, but will give more false signals. Such is the nature of trendfinding.

 

This indicator considers it a change to a downtrend when a point on the moving average is lower than the previous point, and a change to an uptrend when a point is higher than the previous point.

 

I will upload a new version soon with the comments, and also with a new option to allow determining the moving average price by something other than Close. e.g. (High+Low+Close)/3. This was a feature I neglected to add.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have dowloaded the latest version of the indicator and still cannot get the chart to print cadle stick chart as in the original example. When I toggle between OHLC and candlestick the OHLC is overlayed on the candlestick. It seems that the paintbar will only showup in OHLC format.

I also noticed that at the bottom section for volume in the original example there is a $I-Volume is there something I'm missing to get this to show as the example?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have dowloaded the latest version of the indicator and still cannot get the chart to print cadle stick chart as in the original example. When I toggle between OHLC and candlestick the OHLC is overlayed on the candlestick. It seems that the paintbar will only showup in OHLC format.

I also noticed that at the bottom section for volume in the original example there is a $I-Volume is there something I'm missing to get this to show as the example?

Can you post a screenshot of your desktop? The indicator is working properly for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest version with new inputs plus comments.

 

Price = Calculation of price to be used to determine trend. e.g. Close, or, (High+Low+Close)/3), etc.

 

PriceLength = Number of price bars to look back to determine trend.

 

VolLength = Number of volume bars to look back to determine volume trend.

 

ShowTrend = Paint the bars showing the trend. If false, up bars are green, down are red.

 

ShowVolume = Paint the bars show showing volume density. If false, all bars are the same density.

TRENDVOL BARS.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob,

 

No still only paints OHLC - works great but no go on the candles - I also tried the default Volume Gradient and it does the same thing. I will look to upgrade to ver 8.2 over the weekend and not migrate existing data. Fresh install and I will manually move everything back in. Hopefully that will fix it. What version are you on hence it works for you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Doesn't work for me either and I'm on TS82. v3863. Screenshot attached of candle vs. bar chart.

 

Any ideas GCB?

 

keymoo,

 

That is so weird. I have no idea right now. The function which does the work is NormGradientColor(), everything else about the indicator is pretty basic.

 

I can't debug it because it's not happening to me. All I can suggest is to call TS.

 

But try the TS supplied paintbar indicator called Volume Gradient. They'd hesitate to to support mine, but they have to support their own.

 

G

 

 

Rick,

 

Send me your email addresss. The forum won't let me upload a workspace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GCB;

 

While VSA makes different assumptions about volume, I must say that this is a great idea. I commend you on your work. Would love to see more charts and then of course......trading ideas/set-ups that this tool brings about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm pretty sure that a Russian resident would say that recessions are real today. Their prime interest rate is 21%, their corporate military contractors are threatening to file bankruptcy, and sticks of butter are kept under lock and key in their grocery stores because shoplifters are stealing it in bulk so they can resell it on the black market. A downturn is cyclical until it turns into a collapse. I really don't think anyone will be buying-into this mess.😬
    • Well said. This principle is highly analogous to trading. Any human can easily click buy or sell when they "feel" that price is about to go up or down. The problem with feeling, commonly referred to as "instinctive" trading, is that it cannot be quantified. And because it cannot be quantified, it cannot be empirically tested. Instinctive trading has the lowest barrier to entry and therefore returns the lowest reward. As this is true for most things in life, this comes as no surprise. Unfortunately, the lowest barrier to entry is attractive to new traders for obvious reasons. This actually applied to me decades ago.🤭   It's only human nature to seek the highest amount of reward in exchange for the lowest amount of work. In fact, I often say that there is massive gray area between efficiency and laziness. Fortunately, losing for a living inspired me to investigate the work of Wall Street quants who refer to us as "fishfood" or "cannonfodder." Although I knew that we as retail traders cannot exploit execution rebates or queues like quants do, I learned that we can engage in automated scalp, swing, and trend trading. The thermonuclear caveat here, is that I had no idea how to write code (or program) trading algorithms. So I gravitated toward interface-based algorithm builders that required no coding knowledge (see human nature, aforementioned). In retrospect, I should never have traded code written by builder software because it's buggy and inefficient. However, my paid subscription to the builder software allowed me to view the underlying source code of the generated trading algo--which was written in MQL language. Due to a lack of customization in the builder software, I inevitably found myself editing the code. This led me to coding research which, in turn, led me to abandoning the builder software and coding custom algo's from scratch. Fast forward to the present, I can now code several trading strategies per day across 2 different platforms. Considering how inefficient manual backtesting is, coding is a huge advantage. When a new trading concept hits me, I can write the algo, backtest it, and optimize it within an hour or so--across multiple exchanges and symbols, and cycle through hundreds of different settings for each input. And then I get pages upon pages of performance metrics with the best settings pre-highlighted. Having said all of this, I am by no means an advanced programmer. IMHO, advanced programmers write API gateways, construct their own custom trading platforms, use high end computers with field programmable gateway array chips, and set up shop in close proximity to the exchanges. In any event, a considerable amount of work is required just to get toward the top of the "fishfood"/"cannonfodder" pool. Another advantage of coding is that it forces me to write trade entry and exit conditions (triggers) in black & white, thereby causing me to think microscopically about my precise trade trigger conditions. For example, I have to decide whether the algo should track the slope, angle, and level of each bar price and indicator to be used. Typing a hard number like 50 degrees of angle into code is a lot different than merely looking at a chart myself and saying, that's close enough.  Code doesn't acknowledge "maybe" nor "feelings." Either the math (code) works (is profitable) or doesn't work (is a loser). It doesn't get angry, sad, nor overly optimistic. And it can trade virtually 24 hours per day, 5 days per week. If you learn to code, you'll eventually reach a point where coding an algo that trades as you intended provides its own sense of accomplishment. Soon after, making money in the market merely becomes a side effect of your new job--coding. This is how I compete, at least for now, in this wide world of trading. I highly recommend it.  
    • VRA Vera Bradley stock watch, pull back to 5.08 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?VRA
    • MU Micron stock watch, pull back to 102.83 gap support area with high trade quality at https://stockconsultant.com/?MU
    • ACLX Arcellx stock watch, trending at 84.6 support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?ACLX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.