Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Gmoney23

What Market to Begin Trading?

Recommended Posts

I understand it has a lot to do with personal preference and interests but I'm curious what everyone's opinion is on what the best markets would be to focus on for a beginning trader?

 

Not to say one is definitely easier then another but maybe some markets would be better for a beginning trader to start out in.

 

If I start in Mid Cap Stocks, Futures, or Forex, who knows what, but what is a good number of stocks/currencies etc to be studying at one time?

 

For example it might be more beneficial to just study the hell out of the ins and outs of 15 stocks opposed to trying to study 500 stocks at one time.

 

Curious what opinions are on a first market to focus on and how to devote my focus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Gmoney23 said:
I understand it has a lot to do with personal preference and interests but I'm curious what everyone's opinion is on what the best markets would be to focus on for a beginning trader?

 

Not to say one is definitely easier then another but maybe some markets would be better for a beginning trader to start out in.

 

If I start in Mid Cap Stocks, Futures, or Forex, who knows what, but what is a good number of stocks/currencies etc to be studying at one time?

 

For example it might be more beneficial to just study the hell out of the ins and outs of 15 stocks opposed to trying to study 500 stocks at one time.

 

Curious what opinions are on a first market to focus on and how to devote my focus.

 

Hi GMoney,

 

I think this will depend almost totally on your goals.

 

If you're wanting a long-only buy and hold portfolio, then the answer might be several thousand stocks. If you're wanting to swing trade commodities, then you might want to consider ten or so futures contracts, dependent on your capital. And if you want to daytrade then you might like to focus entirely on a single instrument such as the Euro, the ES, or CL.

 

Your goals should lead to an approach, and that approach should lead you to the most appropriate market(s) to trade. Think of an instrument as a tool to help you achieve your financial goals; you want to use the most appropriate tool for the job you have in mind, right?

 

Hope that helps,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest deciding if you want to be a scalping-type day trader or a longer time-frame swing trader. Or maybe even you think you want to hold options or stocks for an even longer time frame. Decide what you think you will be best at and that will help you your decision. Check out this poll: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/trading-markets/15171-who-makes-more-money.html

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i traded stocks in the past, then studied forex, now im getting back into stocks.

 

for the most part id say stick to stocks but study forex as well. i think the majority of traders that are active on forums are forex traders, and many of these traders create new ideas that one can apply to the stock market (maybe other markets as well).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started by focusing on 1 stock. It has always been my belief that a trader needs to be a "specialist" in a few products which he becomes very familiar with. In general, I feel that discretionary traders who do well focus on a few products whereas system traders often do well trading many products.

 

You need to get a feeling for what you're more interested in.. if you're more interested in macro-economic style analysis or just calling direction (like me) then the S&P 500 is a great contract. A lot of people complain about it but really the entire market is mostly correlated these days. If I say the S&P 500 is going up tomorrow then most of the time the NASDAQ, Crude, Oil, Apple, and so forth will also be going up.

 

I haven't ever really traded stocks. So I can't say how that works. You might take a look at SMB Capital. I think they trade stocks. But, I feel like futures the best fair and unequal market there is.

----

Curtis

Home - OrderFlowDashPro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Gmoney23 said:
I understand it has a lot to do with personal preference and interests but I'm curious what everyone's opinion is on what the best markets would be to focus on for a beginning trader?

 

Not to say one is definitely easier then another but maybe some markets would be better for a beginning trader to start out in.

 

If I start in Mid Cap Stocks, Futures, or Forex, who knows what, but what is a good number of stocks/currencies etc to be studying at one time?

 

For example it might be more beneficial to just study the hell out of the ins and outs of 15 stocks opposed to trying to study 500 stocks at one time.

 

Curious what opinions are on a first market to focus on and how to devote my focus.

 

 

 

Stocks, no other answers better than this, no leverage, and information is easy to access

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't give specific market for you. Some people like to trade HK$ - USD some are others. That is depend on yourself. You need to read news about it before you start trading. This can help you to choose the market. For me I am taking Euro - USD and GBP - USD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Gmoney23 said:
I understand it has a lot to do with personal preference and interests but I'm curious what everyone's opinion is on what the best markets would be to focus on for a beginning trader?

 

Not to say one is definitely easier then another but maybe some markets would be better for a beginning trader to start out in.

 

If I start in Mid Cap Stocks, Futures, or Forex, who knows what, but what is a good number of stocks/currencies etc to be studying at one time?

 

For example it might be more beneficial to just study the hell out of the ins and outs of 15 stocks opposed to trying to study 500 stocks at one time.

 

Curious what opinions are on a first market to focus on and how to devote my focus.

 

Go for stocks first (though i would say learning forex is much more easier, atleast from my experience) ..make a list of stocks ( 25-40) would be enough and only concentrate on them at first..

1 other advice -->dont scalp in the start , people may say scalping is the easiest method bt thats wrong..scalping drains ur mind like no other thing in trading . and before making a trade always look at the daily charts , daily charts are the true representation of an asset..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would rather suggest start with stocks and that too in cash market, not in derivative (i.e. F&O), once you are comfortable with trading on this, then start trading in derivative segments of stocks where you can leverage your earnings.

 

 

  Gmoney23 said:
I understand it has a lot to do with personal preference and interests but I'm curious what everyone's opinion is on what the best markets would be to focus on for a beginning trader?

 

Not to say one is definitely easier then another but maybe some markets would be better for a beginning trader to start out in.

 

If I start in Mid Cap Stocks, Futures, or Forex, who knows what, but what is a good number of stocks/currencies etc to be studying at one time?

 

For example it might be more beneficial to just study the hell out of the ins and outs of 15 stocks opposed to trying to study 500 stocks at one time.

 

Curious what opinions are on a first market to focus on and how to devote my focus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.