Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Duarte

Why S&P 500 will be much higher in 5 years?

Recommended Posts

I'll try to explain why the S&P 500 will be much higher in 5 years.

(It's a guess, not a certainty.)

 

Chart 1 - S & P500 index monthly candlestick chart between March 1964 and January 2013.

 

My guess about what is happening is that the S & P 500 since 2000 is following the path between 1968 and 1983.

This suggests that the S&P 500 may rise in the long term.

 

IhynT.png

 

 

Chart 2 - The following chart shows the Price ROC indicator between March 1964 and January 2013.

 

cLLI2.png

 

The triple bottom pattern that the indicator did in 1994 was repeated between 2011 and 2012.

After the triple bottom pattern in 1994, the S&P 500 rose during 5 years.

This also suggests that the S&P 500 may rise in the long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll try to explain why the markets will be much higher in 5 years.

(It's a guess, not a certainty.)

 

 

Chart 1 - S & P500 index monthly candlestick chart between March 1964 and January 2013.

 

IhynT.png

 

My guess about what is happening is that the S & P 500 since 2000 is following the path between 1968 and 1983.

This suggests a period up for several years for stocks.

 

 

 

 

Chart 2 - The following chart shows the Price ROC indicator between March 1964 and January 2013.

 

cLLI2.png

 

 

The pattern that the indicator did in 1994 was repeated between 2011 and 2012.

After the indicator having had the pattern in 1994 the market has been up for 5 years.

This also suggests a period up for several years for stocks.

 

Why not ?!

 

I participate anyway!

 

But boom years , are easymony ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting analysis ... but what do you think about the technology and market environment changes since? With HFT and huge hedge funds and the extreme leverage being used, I tend to think we will see more big swings ... volatile ups and downs. However, I do think the next few years will be good for the markets.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now how in the sam hell is the market ...say the ES...gonna be higher in 5 years since we won't begin to get out of this recession/depression/cliff until around 2018? helicopter ben will continue scattering $$$ around and of course that will prop things up for a while but you know sooner or later all bubbles pop. the next big bubble is well you know the $$$ aka as the greenback. when it pops the cow manure will hit the fan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After a long term analysis made, I will adopt a passive strategy of buy and hold.

For this strategy, I will now use 10 000 dollars and, maybe in one or two years' time,

I will use more 10 000 dollars.

 

I'll do this for each of the following risk profiles /ETFs:

 

Higher Risk / UPRO

Medium-higher Risk /SSO

Medium Risk / SPY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
After a long term analysis made, I will adopt a passive strategy of buy and hold.

For this strategy, I will now use 10 000 dollars and, maybe in one or two years' time,

I will use more 10 000 dollars.

 

I'll do this for each of the following risk profiles /ETFs:

 

Higher Risk / UPRO

Medium-higher Risk /SSO

Medium Risk / SPY

 

About the risk:

 

The risk varies according to the leverage of the ETF used.

 

SPY is not leveraged. SPY is designed to have the same gain or loss as the S&P 500.

SSO is 2x leveraged. SSO is designed to have twice the gain or loss as the S&P 500 index.

UPRO is 3x leveraged. UPRO is designed to have thrice the gain or loss as the S&P 500 index

Edited by Duarte

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting analysis ... but what do you think about the technology and market environment changes since? With HFT and huge hedge funds and the extreme leverage being used, I tend to think we will see more big swings ... volatile ups and downs. However, I do think the next few years will be good for the markets.

 

MMS

 

Thanks. As regards the issue of technology and market environment changes, this is a difficult question, I stil think that the long term movements will continue similar to the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sincerely hope you are right and you do make a fairly convincing TA argument, but the fundamentals are a tough pill to swallow. We have the overhanging debt that is going to eat away at the little economic recovery we've been able to muster as of late. The S&P downgrade of the US credit rating to AA was a bad blow in itself, but now there is talk of more credit agencies doing the same.

It is well agreed by many analysts that the fiscal agreement was premature and does not represent a solution to the long-term problem. But they really had no choice given that the impending tax cuts and spending increases were so close and would have led to a double dip recession if the U.S. government failed to act.

The only thing that can really rescue this economy is if Clinton is indeed right and that the Obama policies do take effect as we move further into his 2nd term in office.

There is also a chance of another tech boom on the scale of the one in 90s driving the U.S. economy to new heights; we had a miniature one recently but it's sufficient.

There is a part of me that feels as if the U.S. is taking a step back to move two steps forward because the economy is definitely adjusting to the changes that are taking place across the globe. We need to let the bad jobs go (to China, India wherever) as Obama said and embrace the change to a knowledge economy with high tech manufacturing here in the U.S.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is that the S&P 500 will rise to its resistance line, close to the level of 1575.

 

Chart - S & P500 index monthly candlestick chart between May 1999 and March 2013.

 

df94gwF.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
After a long term analysis made, I will adopt a passive strategy of buy and hold.

For this strategy, I will now use 10 000 dollars and, maybe in one or two years' time,

I will use more 10 000 dollars.

 

I'll do this for each of the following risk profiles /ETFs:

 

Higher Risk / UPRO

Medium-higher Risk /SSO

Medium Risk / SPY

 

In the first months of this year, the evolution of “buy and hold” portfolios was positive.

 

8wMgfuh.png

 

 

6kXtgni.png

 

 

6OOiHeU.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I compared the previous period with the current period, and I came to the conclusion that the S&P500 after reaches its resistance line (key value: 1575) can follow the path 1 or 2, in the first chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why S&P 500 will be much higher in 5 years?

Simple Answer: Cause of Inflation Adjustment...Inflation is only going to go higher in the long term (by long term i mean decade or decades) cause of increase in population, increase in crime, increase in gold,oil,commodities prices...there will be correction and even market crashes in the way bt overall trajectory over long term is only up...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I compared the previous period with the current period, and I came to the conclusion that the S&P500 after reaches its resistance line (key value: 1575) can follow the path 1 or 2, in the first chart.

 

The two paths described remain open as long as the S&P 500 remains below to 1625.

 

If, over the next two months, the S&P 500 remains below to 1575, I think that the S&P 500 will follow the path 1, but if the S&P500 rises above 1625, I think that the S&P 500 will follow the path 2.

 

I will continue to evaluate on a monthly basis to determine the need to change the initial plan.

 

 

79Eypd2.png

 

zEMUWpx.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It wont be long now and the doo doo will hit the fan...

 

What is doo doo? 700 points? 900 points?

 

Is it 60-150 points?

 

The market needs much greater retail representation in order to have a drop that we can call doo doo; otherwise, it is just a fart in the wind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Below are the charts along with brief commentary.

 

The following two monthly charts give a long-term perspective for the S&P 500.

 

I am going to look again closely for the period between 1967 and 1984, as well as, for the period between 2000 and 2013.

In December 1980, the S&P 500 closed above to its resistance line and then fell for 20 months. For that reason, even if the index closes above to its resistance line, the fall will remain possible. On the other hand, if the index rises above 1625 (above 3,17% of its resistance line), it is more likely to go up rather than down.

At this time, the two paths remain open but the very bearish sentiment supports the continuation of the rise.

Let's see what happens. This month and next month will be very important to trace the path for long term.

 

T4ZOzz5.png

 

eYzINOX.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.