Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ingot54

To Arm or to Disarm.

Recommended Posts

  TheDude said:
Comparing Obama to Hitler just shows how deranged some people are.

 

It is funny to me how they compare Hitler, a NAZI, to someone, Obama, who is generally considered to be a Socialist.

 

It is also funny to me how they criticize him for pushing us toward socialism, yet they want and use all the benefits that he is providing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  smmatrix said:
544051_458354827553341_1058149531_n.jpg

 

This picture demonstrates just how moronic pro gun folk are.

 

It makes perfect sense why the US President needs such security guards, yet some silly hicks think they are somehow in the same predicament as the US President with nut jobs wanting to kill them? This argument doesnt display any hypocrisy, just stupidity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheDude said:
This picture demonstrates just how moronic pro gun folk are.

 

It makes perfect sense why the US President needs such security guards, yet some silly hicks think they are somehow in the same predicament as the US President with nut jobs wanting to kill them? This argument doesnt display any hypocrisy, just stupidity.

"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

 

-Thomas Jefferson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  smmatrix said:

"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

 

-Thomas Jefferson

 

 

eeeer ok, I think the rest of the world has moved on a bit now though. And besides, it's another dead argument. One reason is because this statement could be interpreted by some wacko in the following ways:

1. go shoot the president if you dont like his policies

2. go march into the county traffic wardens office and shoot everyone to bits for giving me that bogus parking ticket.

3. Hey, my old school was a government body and they really fucked me up, and I'm such a failure, I'm gunna shoot everyone in there because I think they are a tyranny and it's all their fault'.

4. I've just been sacked by the tyranny of a fire department thats controlled by local government, so I'm gunna make a false call and shoot up everyone who comes to answer that call.

 

Another reason it's moronic is that the government have far better ways of controlling you now than with force of a gun - namely the media and tax policy.

Edited by TheDude

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheDude said:
eeeer ok, I think the rest of the world has moved on a bit now though. And besides, it's another dead argument. One reason is because this statement could be interpreted by some wacko in the following ways:

1. go shoot the president if you dont like his policies

2. go march into the county traffic wardens office and shoot everyone to bits for giving me that bogus parking ticket.

3. Hey, my old school was a government body and they really fucked me up, and I'm such a failure, I'm gunna shoot everyone in there because I think they are a tyranny and it's all their fault'.

4. I've just been sacked by the tyranny of a fire department thats controlled by local government, so I'm gunna make a false call and shoot up everyone who comes to answer that call.

 

Another reason it's moronic is that the government have far better ways of controlling you now than with force of a gun - namely the media and tax policy.

 

Only a complete dumbass with a very low IQ could make assertions like those. I use to think traders had brains with analytical capabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  smmatrix said:
Only a complete dumbass with a very low IQ could make assertions like those. I use to think traders had brains with analytical capabilities.

 

Unfortunately there are lot of dumbass' in the world. Only a dipshit would suggest that giving a dumbass a gun is the way forward.

 

I would have assumed anyone with any common sense or analytical ability could figure that one out; trader, dumbass or dipshit.

 

And please dont retort with 'it's unfair to the non-dumbass who wants to carry a gun', because only a dumbass would want a gun.

 

And dont give me any 'personal freedom' shit either. Lets face facts: Half of Americans cant even feed themselves properly without getting overweight and obese. If someone cant even eat responsibly and look after themselves, I dont think giving them a gun is the way forward do you?

 

Perhaps gun ownership if it must exist, should only be allowed if the individual:

Isn't poor (ie less likely to rob someone or have silly ideas)

Has above average IQ

Is able to eat a sensible diet and prove they are capable of looking after themselves.

Is able to point out various countries and cities on a map.

 

Only then, could they be trusted. But then again, I guess this would exclude 90% of people from gun ownership. Objective achieved!!

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheDude said:
This picture demonstrates just how moronic pro gun folk are.

 

It makes perfect sense why the US President needs such security guards, yet some silly hicks think they are somehow in the same predicament as the US President with nut jobs wanting to kill them? This argument doesnt display any hypocrisy, just stupidity.

maybe the recent shooting makes perfect sense why schools need armed guards and armed teachers??:helloooo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheDude said:
Unfortunately there are lot of dumbass' in the world. Only a dipshit would suggest that giving a dumbass a gun is the way forward.

 

I would have assumed anyone with any common sense or analytical ability could figure that one out; trader, dumbass or dipshit.

 

And please dont retort with 'it's unfair to the non-dumbass who wants to carry a gun', because only a dumbass would want a gun.

 

And dont give me any 'personal freedom' shit either. Lets face facts: Half of Americans cant even feed themselves properly without getting overweight and obese. If someone cant even eat responsibly and look after themselves, I dont think giving them a gun is the way forward do you?

 

Perhaps gun ownership if it must exist, should only be allowed if the individual:

Isn't poor (ie less likely to rob someone or have silly ideas)

Has above average IQ

Is able to eat a sensible diet and prove they are capable of looking after themselves.

Is able to point out various countries and cities on a map.

 

Only then, could they be trusted. But then again, I guess this would exclude 90% of people from gun ownership. Objective achieved!!

 

:)

 

The Adam Lanza kid had an IQ that was off the charts

He wasn't poor

He seemed to be lean and able to eat a balanced diet.

He attended college at 16. Likely to be able to point out countries and cities.

Unfortunately, he would be able to have a gun based on your criteria.

 

I do like the spirit of your idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
The Adam Lanza kid had an IQ that was off the charts

He wasn't poor

He seemed to be lean and able to eat a balanced diet.

He attended college at 16. Likely to be able to point out countries and cities.

Unfortunately, he would be able to have a gun based on your criteria.

 

I do like the spirit of your idea.

oh sh$t TheDude screwed up didn't he? :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
The Adam Lanza kid had an IQ that was off the charts

He wasn't poor

He seemed to be lean and able to eat a balanced diet.

He attended college at 16. Likely to be able to point out countries and cities.

Unfortunately, he would be able to have a gun based on your criteria.

 

I do like the spirit of your idea.

 

Yeah - well there's always one thats going to slip through the net though. My ideas will stop a lot of crimes though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

could we like... start... an idiot hall of fame thread? i would like to nominate as candidates:

 

Tams

MM

TheDude

Sundancer (aka suntrader)

 

I am not saying they are idiots... don't misunderstand...but i think they may give anyone a good run for their money...oh sh$t it is hard not to laugh! :rofl: :rofl: if they had a gun... my ass might get shot..maybe a few other areas too...:rofl: :rofl: my ass may be grassed over this post i.e. i may get banned...well if i do i guess that is that...i left this thread but kept peeking back and i fell into the temptation to post again when i saw all the BS being posted...should have just stayed away ...i suppose...bye..................................

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Patuca said:
maybe the recent shooting makes perfect sense why schools need armed guards and armed teachers??:helloooo:

 

Why not just ban guns? It's much simpler. If some nut job wants to kill a load of people, he will IF he has a gun. With your idea, we'll end up with a load of dead cops in a shoot out - especially if he has an assault riffle. Great thinking!

 

Besides, would you really want your kids going to a school with armed guards everywhere - permanently reminded of the horrors of this world?

 

 

C'mon folks, it's not rocket science. Look at Europe and the civilised world. People arent allowed to carry guns and there is next to zero gun crime. The murder rate is also much lower. It doesnt take Einstein to see the correlation. Remember that across the civilised world, there are all types of government - both left and right wing, Principalities, Kingdoms, Republics, etc, so you cant draw politics or any other socio-economic circumstance in to what is so bleeding obvious to a four year old!! Geddit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Patuca said:
could we like... start... an idiot hall of fame thread? i would like to nominate as candidates:

 

Tams

MM

TheDude

Sundancer (aka suntrader)

 

I am not saying they are idiots... don't misunderstand...but i think they may give anyone a good run for their money...oh sh$t it is hard not to laugh! :rofl: :rofl: if they had a gun... my ass might get shot..maybe a few other areas too...:rofl: :rofl: my ass may be grassed over this post i.e. i may get banned...well if i do i guess that is that...i left this thread but kept peeking back and i fell into the temptation to post again when i saw all the BS being posted...should have just stayed away ...i suppose...bye..................................

 

 

Says the person who thinks teachers should carry guns.

 

What ever next???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheDude said:
  Quote
Why not just ban guns? It's much simpler. If some nut job wants to kill a load of people, he will IF he has a gun. With your idea, we'll end up with a load of dead cops in a shoot out - especially if he has an assault riffle. Great thinking!
um.. because gun bans won't stop him from getting a gun..something you can't seem to get into your peckerhead brain.
  Quote
Besides, would you really want your kids going to a school with armed guards everywhere - permanently reminded of the horrors of this world?
absolutely

 

  Quote
C'mon folks, it's not rocket science. Look at Europe and the civilised world. People arent allowed to carry guns and there is next to zero gun crime. The murder rate is also much lower. It doesnt take Einstein to see the correlation. Remember that across the civilised world, there are all types of government - both left and right wing, Principalities, Kingdoms, Republics, etc, so you cant draw politics or any other socio-economic circumstance in to what is so bleeding obvious to a four year old!! Geddit?/
um..me thinks you don't know sh$t about the stats..the only reason Europe exist is because of american guns:haha: :haha: :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“another dead argument” TheDude

I love crowds. How many of us serial posters in this thread have noticed … ?

that the “logic” of most arguments of the To Arm posters only holds together well if you believe in ‘guns rights’ a priori ?

that the “logic” of most arguments of the To Disarm posters only holds together well if you believe in ‘gun bans’ a priori ?

(that I'm using the word :logic: quite loosely would be an understatement ;))

 

like

“please dont retort with 'it's unfair to the non-dumbass who wants to carry a gun', because only a dumbass would want a gun.”

 

… I guess this would exclude 90% of people from gun ownership. Objective achieved!!"

 

This thread got started and is sustained by reactions to the acts of a criminally insane person… not a dumbass. Dude, be careful who you’re calling dumbasses. It’s “dumbasses” who are sensation based enough to want to be able to react directly in such situations … the more cerebral thinking types prefer waiting for the “dumbasses’” to show up and take care of it.

 

Re: recruiting dumbasses (and whowouldwanttorecruitsdumbasses btw?)

Government Pushes Propaganda Through Video Games | Zero Hedge

Gov't wants control of the dumbasses... dumbass 'fat' is leverage.

 

Do you know what D. Umas actually said ? He said

“…better to have a gun and not be able to get to it, than not have one and … ”

 

So until we get this ‘dumbass cleansing’ thing worked out, :logic: like

 

Law and good policy prevents insanity and crimes of insanity...

 

 

so…

 

 

outlaw guns...

 

only holds together if you believe in gun control a priori

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Patuca said:
could we like... start... an idiot hall of fame thread? i would like to nominate as candidates:

 

Tams

MM

TheDude

Sundancer (aka suntrader)

 

I am not saying they are idiots... don't misunderstand...but i think they may give anyone a good run for their money...oh sh$t it is hard not to laugh! :rofl: :rofl: if they had a gun... my ass might get shot..maybe a few other areas too...:rofl: :rofl: my ass may be grassed over this post i.e. i may get banned...well if i do i guess that is that...i left this thread but kept peeking back and i fell into the temptation to post again when i saw all the BS being posted...should have just stayed away ...i suppose...bye..................................

 

Patuca,

 

Don't go. I appreciate your intellectual irresponsibility. Your comments are a lesson to all of the crippling power of pride.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
Patuca,

 

Don't go. I appreciate your intellectual irresponsibility. Your comments are a lesson to all of the crippling power of pride.

:applaud: :applaud: :dito :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.