Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ingot54

To Arm or to Disarm.

Recommended Posts

The purpose of the Constitution is not to arm whacked out freaks with firearms.

 

When the time comes to rise up against your government, all sorts of weapons and explosives will be available to those willing to take part in the cause.

 

Don't be concerned if laws are passed to help reduce some of the needless violence. If you are responsible and not a whack job you will be just fine.

 

299574_473187932716246_1082744035_n.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...... If you are responsible and not a whack job you will be just fine.

 

I think the large, blaring font and wingnut replies answers that question. Wonder if his preference is for girly men in pink, frilly panties too like patuey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We’ve had some posters (in the last 90 pages or so :) ) who find it easy to reject out of hand 2nd amendment arguments in this situation. … their primary arguments are idealist variations of “wouldn’t it be better if ?” … to them, 2nd amendment arguments are distractions in the To Arm or To Disarm debate.

 

Do these people have exceptional trust in government? Are they not at all threatened by trends of the ptb, of trends in society, of trends in ‘civilian deaths’ in wars, etc. Do they think they have nothing to fear… that all is well, we won’t have any SHTF… or that they might be “just lucky I guess” when and if the SdidHTF… etc etc.

… ie it is seamless for them to denigrate or redirect any arguments that guns should not be banned because of liberty or mistrust of govt.

 

These posters are intelligent, metro people. They are ahead of the curve. They understand how there’s no need for “fear” and alarmism… They know things you don’t know. This link will help you stupid gun nuts to understand what they understand.

Articles: Good News: You May Be Spared Execution

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We’ve had some posters (in the last 90 pages or so :) ) who find it easy to reject out of hand 2nd amendment arguments in this situation. … their primary arguments are idealist variations of “wouldn’t it be better if ?” … to them, 2nd amendment arguments are distractions in the To Arm or To Disarm debate.

 

Do these people have exceptional trust in government? Are they not at all threatened by trends of the ptb, of trends in society, of trends in ‘civilian deaths’ in wars, etc. Do they think they have nothing to fear… that all is well, we won’t have any SHTF… or that they might be “just lucky I guess” when and if the SdidHTF… etc etc.

… ie it is seamless for them to denigrate or redirect any arguments that guns should not be banned because of liberty or mistrust of govt.

 

These posters are intelligent, metro people. They are ahead of the curve. They understand how there’s no need for “fear” and alarmism… They know things you don’t know. This link will help you stupid gun nuts to understand what they understand.

Articles: Good News: You May Be Spared Execution

 

Question.....Is this is the ultimate defense of those who dont agree with you or dont share your same fears, or even if they do have a different strategy or take on it than you do.?....... that you are clearly a brainwashed sheep/communist.

 

if the crux of the argument is about government, control and power v individual rights then let that debate occur. Properly.

 

It can also be carried out by those who really want change arguing for real change - lets go for the anarchist model - and not some other bastardised variation that involves substituting one set of moral codes for another......or is it wrong to prefer a what if, non violent society?

 

That debate can also be carried out without guns, violence, fear of homosexuals, those who disagree, women, muslims or any others........or do you propose that as opposed to the communists killing of those who disagree with them, its those who disagree with them killing of the communists?

collective maya occurs in many forms.

 

I would suggest that many fear that those so vehemently opposed to the government want to implement their own set of rules in their own sheepish ways.

 

fuel for fire. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Deaths in 2011 - What Is The Cause?

 

75375_4234638866639_336386510_n.jpg

 

 

so you oppose bans on drink drivers, poor medical practices and such?

or are you just opposed to anything Obama does and trying to link everything together?

 

 

Zdo - even the 'enlightend' ones are often not enlightened enough :roll eyes:

You at least make a rational case for being prepared if the SHTF, even if people might not agree with you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so you oppose bans on drink drivers, poor medical practices and such?

or are you just opposed to anything Obama does and trying to link everything together?

 

 

Zdo - even the 'enlightend' ones are often not enlightened enough :roll eyes:

You at least make a rational case for being prepared if the SHTF, even if people might not agree with you

 

 

Lighten up man! Oh mighty King Obama!

 

Have a laugh...

 

165063_500068213377528_2019424688_n.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny how 195,000 died from medical malpractice and Obamacare gets mentioned when it has yet to be implemented.

 

They did retroactively I suppose.

 

He probably caused the deaths from all previous wars and auto accidents too. :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smmatrix - i am plenty light except in the weight department (Christmas was a cruel but tasty mistress)....I thought we were getting in trouble by Zdo for not taking it (ie; the end of the world) seriously enough!

 

Cant win if you go long or short it seems.

 

My point is though - there seems to be a lot of one sided government haters if you get my drift. Too often you wonder what else they hate, and what else they want to change....are you swapping one bad for another bad.

Is it the restriction of abuse of government power, or abolition of the government.....or do you just want a government that fits a certain criteria - even if you might be the minority to then impose your beliefs on others - the very thing you might fear.

 

Thats the point of a discussion.

 

I did like the picture of the Michelin man. :) thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question.....Is this is the ultimate defense of those who dont agree with you or dont share your same fears, or even if they do have a different strategy or take on it than you do.?....... that you are clearly a brainwashed sheep/communist.

 

if the crux of the argument is about government, control and power v individual rights then let that debate occur. Properly.

 

It can also be carried out by those who really want change arguing for real change - lets go for the anarchist model - and not some other bastardised variation that involves substituting one set of moral codes for another......or is it wrong to prefer a what if, non violent society?

 

...

 

I would suggest that many fear that those so vehemently opposed to the government want to implement their own set of rules in their own sheepish ways.

 

fuel for fire. :)

 

SIUYA,

 

I don’t really know what the “crux” of this argument is.

 

It does include ‘collective vs individual’,etc. elements which I have attempted to take account of in some of my posts – in increasingly cycnically, disrespectfully, satirically fashion though.

ie I’m really not trying to convince anyone or change anyone’s mind on this…

If you believe in ‘doable anarchy’, then you do.

If you don’t believe ‘doable anarchy’ is possible, I understand and am making no attempt to change your mind...

It may help you to paint me in your post as someone who thinks I know what is best for others… but, fwiw, I don’t really live my life that way... (and good grief I would also assert that my 'way' has a slightly ;), by millions and millions of souls, better historical record of tolerance and of not killing 'communists' than statists have of killing 'non communists' ;) ... )

 

Realistically, we live on a violent planet. And unfortunately violence and repression and ‘darkness’ is still increasingly at this time. Even the ‘developed’ societies are far far less 'sustainable' and stable than they appear. Practically, making guns less legal / available is an ‘allopathic’ solution to the types of ‘flag’ incidents that triggered this debate and thread. To Disarm is a very ineffective ‘solution’- except for those among us who need ‘authority’ to do something/anything to help their emotions to settle…

 

Via a quote of Tolle that I posted many pages back , I made my main point that no external changes toward the ideals we would “prefer”, like “non violent societies”, or functional national ‘centralization’, etc, etc, etc. are really sustainable without an authentic quorum of internal “awakening of awareness” first…

our ‘arguments’ about who and how To Disarm are thus pointless…

 

you go ahead and help “fuel the fire” . but, realistically, there are too many ‘hidden pink panties’ in here to do any of this debate “properly”.:rofl:

 

zdo

 

 

 

Further reading:

...from

Where Does The Hatred Of Constitutionalism Come From?

 

Collectivists understand one thing very clearly; an America without the Constitution is destined to become a centralized country.

 

They will, of course, claim this is a gross exaggeration. They will claim that this time will be different. That the collectivist experiments of the past, which produced nothing but destruction and genocide of their own populations, are nothing similar to what they are espousing. They will pretend as if their vision is new, progressive, and far more practical than the vision of the Founding Fathers. In the end though, all they are promoting is a system as old as history; the feudal kingdom. The mercantile oligarchy. The militarized state.

 

Note: even though this was probably written in the last few days, it is definitely already ‘dated’ … this country (and most countries) are already “centralized” past point of ‘normal’ / politically directed rebalancing… example…Amid Federal Land Grab in Brazil, Whole Towns Evicted at Gunpoint - BlackListedNews.com etc etc

 

… and to those leaning ‘progressive’ among us, don't waste your time attempting to tightly bind me to the present ‘constitution’. I personally think it’s time for another ‘revolution’ and constitutional convention… correcting the vulnerabilities in the present one to the ‘statism’ that is still ascending…the ‘left’ and ‘right’, 'progressives' and 'conservatives' , (label and olabels) etc. are engineered, false dichotomies and are equally guilty in hypocrisy, betrayal, and exploitation of ‘useful idiots’ and …

 

 

... and since no one has made any To Arm posts yet :cool:

It’s disappointing, but not unexpected, to witness another intellectual mob calling for prohibition of the one tool that holds tyranny at bay.
Guest Post: Guns, Like Washing Machines, Don't Act - People Do | Zero Hedge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SIUYA,

 

I don’t really know what the “crux” of this argument is.

 

It does include ‘collective vs individual’,etc. elements which I have attempted to take account of in some of my posts – in increasingly cycnically, disrespectfully, satirically fashion though.

ie I’m really not trying to convince anyone or change anyone’s mind on this…

If you believe in ‘doable anarchy’, then you do.

If you don’t believe ‘doable anarchy’ is possible, I understand and am making no attempt to change your mind...

It may help you to paint me in your post as someone who thinks I know what is best for others… but, fwiw, I don’t really live my life that way... (and good grief I would also assert that my 'way' has a slightly ;), by millions and millions of souls, better historical record of tolerance and of not killing 'communists' than statists have of killing 'non communists' ;) ... )

 

Zdo - i appreciate your ideas/thoughts - it has actually been a good voice that has had me reading a few things i never thought i would. If i indicated a hint of painting - sorry - more naughty than unintended.

One thing i guess i do find surprising/disappointing/unsurprising is the lack of extra questions, thoughts and ideas from others.

maybe people of sick of it, maybe they dont care, maybe they dont want to think any more of it......maybe they do have pink panties, and the fire needs to be fueled either way.

 

for all that i personally thank you - sincerely.

 

Realistically, we live on a violent planet. And unfortunately violence and repression and ‘darkness’ is still increasingly at this time. Even the ‘developed’ societies are far far less 'sustainable' and stable than they appear. Practically, making guns less legal / available is an ‘allopathic’ solution to the types of ‘flag’ incidents that triggered this debate and thread. To Disarm is a very ineffective ‘solution’- except for those among us who need ‘authority’ to do something/anything to help their emotions to settle…

 

because i have been lucky, my views are different - we live in a violent place - i think decreasingly so, the weapons might be more efficient...., but i would hope we can set examples and move beyond that.....blindless optimism maybe. I might not subscribe to Ingots version, but I would like to hope anyone and everyone would prefer to subscribe to that, and maybe it has to start somewhere.

.......disarming, across the world might be a good place - maybe it might even help the awakening.

 

 

I personally think it’s time for another ‘revolution’ and constitutional convention… correcting the vulnerabilities in the present one to the ‘statism’ that is still ascending…the ‘left’ and ‘right’, 'progressives' and 'conservatives' , (label and olabels) etc. are engineered, false dichotomies and are equally guilty in hypocrisy, betrayal, and exploitation of ‘useful idiots’ and …

 

interesting - and so the question remains - a revolution, a re writing of the constitution.....with what model, with what ideas? Could all agree that most revolutions just swap one form of tyranny with another?

(this to me is the crux - if you are not long what is the alternative, short? - for the obligatory trading analogy :))

 

I agree the whole left right label and conservative v liberal think was something most people get turned off by in such debates.....you can probably be a socially leaning, politically conservative, economically right wing, minianarchist.....go figure.

Maybe thats why too often many dont want to participate in such debates or ideas.....its too easy to be bombarded with continuous pictures and slogans and name callings.

 

anyways....thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey looks like congress or Mr. Joe Biden is really going to crack down on guns. I heard that gun sales increased 800% or something like that. Well I found a little video for you folks to watch. I watched it and it inspired me.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30i_6awxEG4

 

The AR lower blanks are 90 bucks. And yes you can buy more then 1. With my mechanical background I will have no problem putting these together just in time for the zombie apocalypse. All I need is some of the 30 round mags and a couple of the adjustable stocks and maybe a bump stock. Who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey looks like congress or Mr. Joe Biden is really going to crack down on guns. I heard that gun sales increased 800% or something like that. Well I found a little video for you folks to watch. I watched it and it inspired me.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30i_6awxEG4

 

The AR lower blanks are 90 bucks. And yes you can buy more then 1. With my mechanical background I will have no problem putting these together just in time for the zombie apocalypse. All I need is some of the 30 round mags and a couple of the adjustable stocks and maybe a bump stock. Who knows.

 

Ha ha, Yes, that is it isn't it? It's the apocalypse the ardent nra supporters are waiting for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question - can the constitution - the rights, the freedoms from tyranny, and collectivization (socialism, communism, facism) survive and thrive without what seems to be the associated links to god and the other conspiracy theories about the illuminati? or even the idea that if you are not a believer in the constitution its because you are somehow brainwashed or stupid and below intelligence?

 

please dont see this as an attack.

 

also i thought some might like this Ghandi quote i stumbled on - i dont know if its true - i have no accurate source for it.....

 

"What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, weather the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.