Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ingot54

To Arm or to Disarm.

Recommended Posts

  MightyMouse said:
The purpose of the Constitution is not to arm whacked out freaks with firearms.

 

When the time comes to rise up against your government, all sorts of weapons and explosives will be available to those willing to take part in the cause.

 

Don't be concerned if laws are passed to help reduce some of the needless violence. If you are responsible and not a whack job you will be just fine.

 

299574_473187932716246_1082744035_n.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
...... If you are responsible and not a whack job you will be just fine.

 

I think the large, blaring font and wingnut replies answers that question. Wonder if his preference is for girly men in pink, frilly panties too like patuey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We’ve had some posters (in the last 90 pages or so :) ) who find it easy to reject out of hand 2nd amendment arguments in this situation. … their primary arguments are idealist variations of “wouldn’t it be better if ?” … to them, 2nd amendment arguments are distractions in the To Arm or To Disarm debate.

 

Do these people have exceptional trust in government? Are they not at all threatened by trends of the ptb, of trends in society, of trends in ‘civilian deaths’ in wars, etc. Do they think they have nothing to fear… that all is well, we won’t have any SHTF… or that they might be “just lucky I guess” when and if the SdidHTF… etc etc.

… ie it is seamless for them to denigrate or redirect any arguments that guns should not be banned because of liberty or mistrust of govt.

 

These posters are intelligent, metro people. They are ahead of the curve. They understand how there’s no need for “fear” and alarmism… They know things you don’t know. This link will help you stupid gun nuts to understand what they understand.

Articles: Good News: You May Be Spared Execution

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
We’ve had some posters (in the last 90 pages or so :) ) who find it easy to reject out of hand 2nd amendment arguments in this situation. … their primary arguments are idealist variations of “wouldn’t it be better if ?” … to them, 2nd amendment arguments are distractions in the To Arm or To Disarm debate.

 

Do these people have exceptional trust in government? Are they not at all threatened by trends of the ptb, of trends in society, of trends in ‘civilian deaths’ in wars, etc. Do they think they have nothing to fear… that all is well, we won’t have any SHTF… or that they might be “just lucky I guess” when and if the SdidHTF… etc etc.

… ie it is seamless for them to denigrate or redirect any arguments that guns should not be banned because of liberty or mistrust of govt.

 

These posters are intelligent, metro people. They are ahead of the curve. They understand how there’s no need for “fear” and alarmism… They know things you don’t know. This link will help you stupid gun nuts to understand what they understand.

Articles: Good News: You May Be Spared Execution

 

Question.....Is this is the ultimate defense of those who dont agree with you or dont share your same fears, or even if they do have a different strategy or take on it than you do.?....... that you are clearly a brainwashed sheep/communist.

 

if the crux of the argument is about government, control and power v individual rights then let that debate occur. Properly.

 

It can also be carried out by those who really want change arguing for real change - lets go for the anarchist model - and not some other bastardised variation that involves substituting one set of moral codes for another......or is it wrong to prefer a what if, non violent society?

 

That debate can also be carried out without guns, violence, fear of homosexuals, those who disagree, women, muslims or any others........or do you propose that as opposed to the communists killing of those who disagree with them, its those who disagree with them killing of the communists?

collective maya occurs in many forms.

 

I would suggest that many fear that those so vehemently opposed to the government want to implement their own set of rules in their own sheepish ways.

 

fuel for fire. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  smmatrix said:
Deaths in 2011 - What Is The Cause?

 

75375_4234638866639_336386510_n.jpg

 

 

so you oppose bans on drink drivers, poor medical practices and such?

or are you just opposed to anything Obama does and trying to link everything together?

 

 

Zdo - even the 'enlightend' ones are often not enlightened enough :roll eyes:

You at least make a rational case for being prepared if the SHTF, even if people might not agree with you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SIUYA said:
so you oppose bans on drink drivers, poor medical practices and such?

or are you just opposed to anything Obama does and trying to link everything together?

 

 

Zdo - even the 'enlightend' ones are often not enlightened enough :roll eyes:

You at least make a rational case for being prepared if the SHTF, even if people might not agree with you

 

 

Lighten up man! Oh mighty King Obama!

 

Have a laugh...

 

165063_500068213377528_2019424688_n.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny how 195,000 died from medical malpractice and Obamacare gets mentioned when it has yet to be implemented.

 

They did retroactively I suppose.

 

He probably caused the deaths from all previous wars and auto accidents too. :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smmatrix - i am plenty light except in the weight department (Christmas was a cruel but tasty mistress)....I thought we were getting in trouble by Zdo for not taking it (ie; the end of the world) seriously enough!

 

Cant win if you go long or short it seems.

 

My point is though - there seems to be a lot of one sided government haters if you get my drift. Too often you wonder what else they hate, and what else they want to change....are you swapping one bad for another bad.

Is it the restriction of abuse of government power, or abolition of the government.....or do you just want a government that fits a certain criteria - even if you might be the minority to then impose your beliefs on others - the very thing you might fear.

 

Thats the point of a discussion.

 

I did like the picture of the Michelin man. :) thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SIUYA said:
Question.....Is this is the ultimate defense of those who dont agree with you or dont share your same fears, or even if they do have a different strategy or take on it than you do.?....... that you are clearly a brainwashed sheep/communist.

 

if the crux of the argument is about government, control and power v individual rights then let that debate occur. Properly.

 

It can also be carried out by those who really want change arguing for real change - lets go for the anarchist model - and not some other bastardised variation that involves substituting one set of moral codes for another......or is it wrong to prefer a what if, non violent society?

 

...

 

I would suggest that many fear that those so vehemently opposed to the government want to implement their own set of rules in their own sheepish ways.

 

fuel for fire. :)

 

SIUYA,

 

I don’t really know what the “crux” of this argument is.

 

It does include ‘collective vs individual’,etc. elements which I have attempted to take account of in some of my posts – in increasingly cycnically, disrespectfully, satirically fashion though.

ie I’m really not trying to convince anyone or change anyone’s mind on this…

If you believe in ‘doable anarchy’, then you do.

If you don’t believe ‘doable anarchy’ is possible, I understand and am making no attempt to change your mind...

It may help you to paint me in your post as someone who thinks I know what is best for others… but, fwiw, I don’t really live my life that way... (and good grief I would also assert that my 'way' has a slightly ;), by millions and millions of souls, better historical record of tolerance and of not killing 'communists' than statists have of killing 'non communists' ;) ... )

 

Realistically, we live on a violent planet. And unfortunately violence and repression and ‘darkness’ is still increasingly at this time. Even the ‘developed’ societies are far far less 'sustainable' and stable than they appear. Practically, making guns less legal / available is an ‘allopathic’ solution to the types of ‘flag’ incidents that triggered this debate and thread. To Disarm is a very ineffective ‘solution’- except for those among us who need ‘authority’ to do something/anything to help their emotions to settle…

 

Via a quote of Tolle that I posted many pages back , I made my main point that no external changes toward the ideals we would “prefer”, like “non violent societies”, or functional national ‘centralization’, etc, etc, etc. are really sustainable without an authentic quorum of internal “awakening of awareness” first…

our ‘arguments’ about who and how To Disarm are thus pointless…

 

you go ahead and help “fuel the fire” . but, realistically, there are too many ‘hidden pink panties’ in here to do any of this debate “properly”.:rofl:

 

zdo

 

 

 

Further reading:

...from

Where Does The Hatred Of Constitutionalism Come From?

 

  Quote
Collectivists understand one thing very clearly; an America without the Constitution is destined to become a centralized country.

 

They will, of course, claim this is a gross exaggeration. They will claim that this time will be different. That the collectivist experiments of the past, which produced nothing but destruction and genocide of their own populations, are nothing similar to what they are espousing. They will pretend as if their vision is new, progressive, and far more practical than the vision of the Founding Fathers. In the end though, all they are promoting is a system as old as history; the feudal kingdom. The mercantile oligarchy. The militarized state.

 

Note: even though this was probably written in the last few days, it is definitely already ‘dated’ … this country (and most countries) are already “centralized” past point of ‘normal’ / politically directed rebalancing… example…Amid Federal Land Grab in Brazil, Whole Towns Evicted at Gunpoint - BlackListedNews.com etc etc

 

… and to those leaning ‘progressive’ among us, don't waste your time attempting to tightly bind me to the present ‘constitution’. I personally think it’s time for another ‘revolution’ and constitutional convention… correcting the vulnerabilities in the present one to the ‘statism’ that is still ascending…the ‘left’ and ‘right’, 'progressives' and 'conservatives' , (label and olabels) etc. are engineered, false dichotomies and are equally guilty in hypocrisy, betrayal, and exploitation of ‘useful idiots’ and …

 

 

... and since no one has made any To Arm posts yet :cool:

  Quote
It’s disappointing, but not unexpected, to witness another intellectual mob calling for prohibition of the one tool that holds tyranny at bay.
Guest Post: Guns, Like Washing Machines, Don't Act - People Do | Zero Hedge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
SIUYA,

 

I don’t really know what the “crux” of this argument is.

 

It does include ‘collective vs individual’,etc. elements which I have attempted to take account of in some of my posts – in increasingly cycnically, disrespectfully, satirically fashion though.

ie I’m really not trying to convince anyone or change anyone’s mind on this…

If you believe in ‘doable anarchy’, then you do.

If you don’t believe ‘doable anarchy’ is possible, I understand and am making no attempt to change your mind...

It may help you to paint me in your post as someone who thinks I know what is best for others… but, fwiw, I don’t really live my life that way... (and good grief I would also assert that my 'way' has a slightly ;), by millions and millions of souls, better historical record of tolerance and of not killing 'communists' than statists have of killing 'non communists' ;) ... )

 

Zdo - i appreciate your ideas/thoughts - it has actually been a good voice that has had me reading a few things i never thought i would. If i indicated a hint of painting - sorry - more naughty than unintended.

One thing i guess i do find surprising/disappointing/unsurprising is the lack of extra questions, thoughts and ideas from others.

maybe people of sick of it, maybe they dont care, maybe they dont want to think any more of it......maybe they do have pink panties, and the fire needs to be fueled either way.

 

for all that i personally thank you - sincerely.

 

  zdo said:

Realistically, we live on a violent planet. And unfortunately violence and repression and ‘darkness’ is still increasingly at this time. Even the ‘developed’ societies are far far less 'sustainable' and stable than they appear. Practically, making guns less legal / available is an ‘allopathic’ solution to the types of ‘flag’ incidents that triggered this debate and thread. To Disarm is a very ineffective ‘solution’- except for those among us who need ‘authority’ to do something/anything to help their emotions to settle…

 

because i have been lucky, my views are different - we live in a violent place - i think decreasingly so, the weapons might be more efficient...., but i would hope we can set examples and move beyond that.....blindless optimism maybe. I might not subscribe to Ingots version, but I would like to hope anyone and everyone would prefer to subscribe to that, and maybe it has to start somewhere.

.......disarming, across the world might be a good place - maybe it might even help the awakening.

 

 

  zdo said:

I personally think it’s time for another ‘revolution’ and constitutional convention… correcting the vulnerabilities in the present one to the ‘statism’ that is still ascending…the ‘left’ and ‘right’, 'progressives' and 'conservatives' , (label and olabels) etc. are engineered, false dichotomies and are equally guilty in hypocrisy, betrayal, and exploitation of ‘useful idiots’ and …

 

interesting - and so the question remains - a revolution, a re writing of the constitution.....with what model, with what ideas? Could all agree that most revolutions just swap one form of tyranny with another?

(this to me is the crux - if you are not long what is the alternative, short? - for the obligatory trading analogy :))

 

I agree the whole left right label and conservative v liberal think was something most people get turned off by in such debates.....you can probably be a socially leaning, politically conservative, economically right wing, minianarchist.....go figure.

Maybe thats why too often many dont want to participate in such debates or ideas.....its too easy to be bombarded with continuous pictures and slogans and name callings.

 

anyways....thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey looks like congress or Mr. Joe Biden is really going to crack down on guns. I heard that gun sales increased 800% or something like that. Well I found a little video for you folks to watch. I watched it and it inspired me.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30i_6awxEG4

 

The AR lower blanks are 90 bucks. And yes you can buy more then 1. With my mechanical background I will have no problem putting these together just in time for the zombie apocalypse. All I need is some of the 30 round mags and a couple of the adjustable stocks and maybe a bump stock. Who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Colonel B said:
Hey looks like congress or Mr. Joe Biden is really going to crack down on guns. I heard that gun sales increased 800% or something like that. Well I found a little video for you folks to watch. I watched it and it inspired me.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30i_6awxEG4

 

The AR lower blanks are 90 bucks. And yes you can buy more then 1. With my mechanical background I will have no problem putting these together just in time for the zombie apocalypse. All I need is some of the 30 round mags and a couple of the adjustable stocks and maybe a bump stock. Who knows.

 

Ha ha, Yes, that is it isn't it? It's the apocalypse the ardent nra supporters are waiting for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question - can the constitution - the rights, the freedoms from tyranny, and collectivization (socialism, communism, facism) survive and thrive without what seems to be the associated links to god and the other conspiracy theories about the illuminati? or even the idea that if you are not a believer in the constitution its because you are somehow brainwashed or stupid and below intelligence?

 

please dont see this as an attack.

 

also i thought some might like this Ghandi quote i stumbled on - i dont know if its true - i have no accurate source for it.....

 

"What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, weather the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.