Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ingot54

To Arm or to Disarm.

Recommended Posts

You might also take note that the gun was a legally purchased firearm. Another individual who is allowed to have a firearm who cannot discern between reality and fantasy. If he would not have had a firearm, no bystanders would have been injured.

 

Sure, you can look at it as Thank Goodness the off duty cop was there.

 

To protect your unlimited ability to have firearms, guns are going to fall into the hands of completely deranged individuals. All this to protect yourself from the boogie man.

 

530505_472802096088163_1911514690_n.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"You're a hatchet man of the New World order": Gun advocate Alex Jones has on-air meltdown in explosive interview with Piers Morgan - Yahoo! News UK

 

The king of the conspiracy theorists gets a chance to rant (his default mode) at Piers Morgan- a man whose skin is so thick you'd need several high calibre bullets to pierce it (Pierce Morgan?)

 

Sweeeeet! Alex ripped that lib-faggot a new asshole. Get that scum out of the U.S. He doesn't deserve to live within our borders and enjoy our rights that guns have procured for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You might also take note that the gun was a legally purchased firearm. Another individual who is allowed to have a firearm who cannot discern between reality and fantasy. If he would not have had a firearm, no bystanders would have been injured.

 

Sure, you can look at it as Thank Goodness the off duty cop was there.

 

To protect your unlimited ability to have firearms, guns are going to fall into the hands of completely deranged individuals. All this to protect yourself from the boogie man.

so now the truth comes out. you are really for a total gun ban not just assault weapons. there is absolutely no indication the guy was deranged when he purchased the LEGAL firearm. he may not have been deranged when he did the shooting..but he was sure pissed off...now how the hell you gonna tell through some test or something that a person may be get pissed off 8 years down the road and try to shoot their ex girlfriend? you get so mad MM just arguing about gun control that you might hit me in the head with your famous gof club if i was there in person. i think they should ban all golf clubs. especially people like MM should not be allowed to have them.

 

this deranged stuff in this case is all fantasy in your liberal mind. you really want a total ban on all fireams. better drop your trousers and check to see if you are wearing pink lacy underwear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this deranged stuff in this case is all fantasy in your liberal mind. you really want a total ban on all fireams. better drop your trousers and check to see if you are wearing pink lacy underwear.

 

LOL

Patuca - it is nice to see you indulging in your own fantasy of MM in pink lacy underwear and the fact that you feel anyone who might not agree with you is wearing them.........;)

is there an emoticon for raised eyebrows and a sultry look?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To protect your unlimited ability to have firearms, guns are going to fall into the hands of completely deranged individuals. All this to protect yourself from the boogie man.
um seems like you haven't learned from history MM or forgot your history lesson.

 

The ratification of the 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution--which banned the manufacture, transportation and sale of intoxicating liquors--ushered in a period in American history known as Prohibition. The result of a widespread temperance movement during the first decade of the 20th century, Prohibition was difficult to enforce, despite the passage of companion legislation known as the Volstead Act. The increase of the illegal production and sale of liquor (known as "bootlegging"), the proliferation of speakeasies (illegal drinking spots) and the accompanying rise in gang violence and other crimes led to waning support for Prohibition by the end of the 1920s. In early 1933, Congress adopted a resolution proposing a 21st Amendment to the Constitution that would repeal the 18th. It was ratified by the end of that year, bringing the Prohibition era to a close.

 

source:history.com

 

banning does not work. see you are really against the right to own any firearms. you just hide behind the skirt of controlling them so they don't fall in the hands of deranged individuals.

 

as for me i will be against any efforts of individuals or the gov to take away the right to keep and bear arms. if there come unwanted consequences from this stance such as public shootings then they will just have to happen much like cars on the highway and people getting killed in cars but nobody says ban cars. people get killed because of drunk drivers and irresponsible deranged drivers. nobody says ban cars. deranged individuals will always exist. how come nobody is saying a word about taking the drivers license away from the perp of this school tragedy (that they shouldn't allow people like him to have lic) or this guy that went to kill his ex GF in the movies. how come none of you people are shouting that he "shouldn't have drivers lic?" because you are only interested in taking away the guns. that is the total sum of the story. that is exactly what you are after.

 

you probally will never want to ban cars because that would imply walking..something i am quite sure you aren't willing to do yourself.

 

to make it easy on you i have highlighted in red what will happen with a total ban of guns ....same a thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL

Patuca - it is nice to see you indulging in your own fantasy of MM in pink lacy underwear and the fact that you feel anyone who might not agree with you is wearing them.........;)

is there an emoticon for raised eyebrows and a sultry look?

LOL you must be wearing them too????:rofl: i bet you got a few earings also :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no earings - but i guess that would make someone who has them --- what? WTF does wearing panties, gun laws or any other such thing have to do with gun laws.....side track.

 

Re the prohibition - so you agree prohibition does not work, and that people should be free to exercise personal freedoms in most things (assuming it does no harm to others).....or does it only apply to areas of personal defense, where is the line drawn?

 

It cant be because it is in the constitution - the prohibition act was added, then taken away, so i assume its based on some other measure? is this a personal choice measure or should society/government legislate.

 

You see where i am going on this......basically is this an issue about guns, or is it more than that. It does seem contradictory that one might support some bans but not others......or is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so now the truth comes out. you are really for a total gun ban not just assault weapons. there is absolutely no indication the guy was deranged when he purchased the LEGAL firearm. he may not have been deranged when he did the shooting..but he was sure pissed off...now how the hell you gonna tell through some test or something that a person may be get pissed off 8 years down the road and try to shoot their ex girlfriend? you get so mad MM just arguing about gun control that you might hit me in the head with your famous gof club if i was there in person. i think they should ban all golf clubs. especially people like MM should not be allowed to have them.

 

this deranged stuff in this case is all fantasy in your liberal mind. you really want a total ban on all fireams. better drop your trousers and check to see if you are wearing pink lacy underwear.

 

What if you could tell through some test? would it be worth it to take a gun away from some deranged guy?

 

There are plenty of licenses that require ongoing testing education. It's common. If you are a maniac, you don't need a gun. You'll find creative ways to kill people anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL

Patuca - it is nice to see you indulging in your own fantasy of MM in pink lacy underwear and the fact that you feel anyone who might not agree with you is wearing them.........;)

is there an emoticon for raised eyebrows and a sultry look?

 

I have questioned his infatuation with genitalia in past posts. I am OK with his orientation as long as he keeps his distance. Gotta be careful with him. He does carry a gun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have questioned his infatuation with genitalia in past posts. I am OK with his orientation as long as he keeps his distance. Gotta be careful with him. He does carry a gun.
we have a few names for you guys (MM and suiya) but since i am not allowed to post them i'll have to let it slide...but i'll give you a hint. for one of them it start with synonym for backbone and ends the name of a reptile that eats mosquitos..etc..:haha: :haha: :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There are plenty of licenses that require ongoing testing education. It's common. If you are a maniac, you don't need a gun.

 

maybe they should ban maniacs? the line is open for anyone that wants to get in line?

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What if you could tell through some test? would it be worth it to take a gun away from some deranged guy?
um no but we could send him to live with you so you could like maybe educate or reform him???:rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well i am leaving this thread. it is getting to be a waste of time.

 

i will just say this: IF we allow any bastard to take our guns we will regret it in the future and there will be no recourse. so americans better think long and hard about this because there will be no return back to the right to keep and bear arms if we give them up.

 

 

adios

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
um no but we could send him to live with you so you could like maybe educate or reform him???:rofl:

 

no interest in reforming anyone. You have the wrong label. I just would like to keep a gun out of his hand. You shouldn't worry if you are sane.

 

I do believe that people can be taken off of drugs and alcohol if at least temporarily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
we have a few names for you guys (MM and suiya) but since i am not allowed to post them i'll have to let it slide...but i'll give you a hint. for one of them it start with synonym for backbone and ends the name of a reptile that eats mosquitos..etc..:haha: :haha: :rofl:

 

 

Boo hoo.....you have already been through the name calling and other insults. The 'we' you refer to.....your posse?

 

A bit of comedy aside......once the question is asked about where you draw the line on freedoms and rights you decide to withdraw....? You insult MM with both the insinuation that he is a woman (i am sure 50% of the population appreciate that one), and then leave a final insult for both of us that i think is quite flatterring....if also bizarre.

 

Backbone

Part of Speech: noun

Definition: strength of character

Synonyms: courage, determination, firmness, fortitude, grit, guts, hardihood, heart, intestinal fortitude, mettle, moral fiber, nerve, pluck, resolution, resolve, spunk, stamina, steadfastness, tenacity, toughness, will, willpower

 

Reptile that east mosquitoes.....any that does that is a good one in my book.

 

Stick that in the BlueHorseshoe brain teaser please.

thanks

 

..............

 

It might be a surprise but - not everyone has an agenda to take away all weapons, or impose a one world government or even larger government. Most would just prefer to see some sort of solution to problems without an escalation of weapons, or violence.

 

Here is a question for you - when criminals are let go on a legal technicality is that because of some bleeding heart liberal agenda or the checks and balances to ensure that individual rights are upheld - those things that many liberals and conservatives hold dear? What determines who is a criminal - a good guy or a bad guy? etc; etc; etc;

................

................

For me just call me an agitator and one who believes that its a good thing to have moderate but not extreme views, to question the extremists from both sides of any debate and that a peaceful compromise solution is far better than any that is based in violence.

(Yes I am openly biased to one side in any debate - that of moderation i would hope. I would like to be an extremist on many issues - it makes life easier to confirm everything to my view - alas my non conformity streak wont even allow that)

I like to learn from the other side of my initial bias - that way my bias might change, i can better understand why/how/what and dont need to think the other side has some sort of character trait that is considered a flaw or an abomination.....or would that in some circles be considered a mental illness?

Plus US history and politics is very interesting.

 

zdo - is this being part of the collective maya?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"The purpose of the Constitution is to limit the power of the Federal Government, NOT the American People."

 

isn't that through through states rights representing the people more than individual rights????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"The purpose of the Constitution is to limit the power of the Federal Government, NOT the American People."

 

The purpose of the Constitution is not to arm whacked out freaks with firearms.

 

When the time comes to rise up against your government, all sorts of weapons and explosives will be available to those willing to take part in the cause.

 

Don't be concerned if laws are passed to help reduce some of the needless violence. If you are responsible and not a whack job you will be just fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
we have a few names for you guys (MM and suiya) but since i am not allowed to post them i'll have to let it slide...but i'll give you a hint. for one of them it start with synonym for backbone and ends the name of a reptile that eats mosquitos..etc..:haha: :haha: :rofl:

 

The only synonym for backbone that comes to mind that describes siuya and I is moral fiber, but it doesn't end with a reptile name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a selfish, evil part of me that really does not want the rest of humanity educated or intelligent or thinking, because without those traits, I can take every single penny that they have and leave them broken and destitute.

 

However the reason I am writing on this thread is because I can see that in reality it would do me no good for others to be ignorant. They would become that very intruder that we are so afraid of. And then I'd need a gun to defend myself. What would be the point? What is the point in me trying to become wealthy if people around me are getting murdered, I would have to live in a gated community with barbed wire and machine guns all around, living in constant fear. Why would I want that? Is there a better way? How do we go about breaking the cycle of violence?

 

Anyone can call others silly names – the problem is (for the name caller) that when a person does that it shows that they have lost the argument and all they have to fall back on is name calling and childish behaviour. What good does that do you or your side of the argument? Where are the benefits to you to acting in this manner? And what happens when your behaviour causes you pain? Will you use your guns and violence to desperately cling onto your beliefs? At what point will you look long and hard at yourself and accept the fact that more children will be murdered until you look at how broken the system is and figure out (sensibly, logically, intelligently) how to fix it.

 

We have to be selfish and accept responsibility for the deaths of those children if we would like things to change. If you want more children to be murdered then you should continue with the same system. It's logical. You're a trader, you know this.

 

Guns = violence. You cannot solve violence with more violence. It seems to work on an individual scale (e.g. woman shoots intruder, that's great (that's assuming we ignore the huge amounts of problems, fear, pain, etc, that it's created for all concerned – if you were the husband how would you feel leaving your wife in the house on her own from now on? What happens when 2 intruders come next time? 5 intruders?)). In any kind of society, in the long term, violence makes things worse. We need to break the cycle. Sometimes it takes a catastrophic loss in order to change behaviour.

 

You can keep ignoring the problem and allowing more children to be murdered, and you could call that acceptable losses (of course it's not acceptable – but if you were to completely strip away all emotion you could), for as long as it happens to someone else and not to you personally. At what point does it become unacceptable? What happens when it happens to your family? Instead of ending up at the point where we are facing the risk-of-ruin and we have to kill or be killed, how about pulling back from the abyss and thinking things through.

Edited by Perrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit of comedy aside......once the question is asked about where you draw the line on freedoms and rights you decide to withdraw....? You insult MM with both the insinuation that he is a woman (i am sure 50% of the population appreciate that one), and then leave a final insult for both of us that i think is quite flatterring....if also bizarre.

 

It's funny that I am the guy who wants to use a club or a bat instead of a gun to crack the skull of the 280 boogieman and I am the woman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i just clicked.....its Scarface....

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPzDLGfyjw0]Money and the Power from Scarface - YouTube[/ame]

 

First control the money - bankers know this

Then you get the power - politicians, and bankers.....

what for....all to get the woman....

 

Maybe Patuca and Smmatrix are on to something....one is hiding in your momma's bedroom, the other is fantsizing about MM being a woman......

 

(I am bored today - heading off to look at houses - what fun - thinking about paying for it with a minted platinum coin i was thinking of making )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.