Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ingot54

Pearl Harbour - Whodunnit?

Recommended Posts

Did the US provoke Japan into attacking the Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbour?

 

What foreknowledge did Allies (Britain and the USA) have of the impending attack?

 

Was this a case of sacrificing the men and ships of the Pacific Fleet, in order to give reason for the USA to come into the war?

 

The following is an excerpt from:

http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq66-1.htm

 

Is it a convenient write-up of history, of how it would like to be remembered, rather than how it should be remembered - truthfully?

 

When the attack ended shortly before 10:00 a.m., less than two hours after it began,

the American forces has paid a fearful price. Twenty-one ships of the U.S. Pacific Fleet

were sunk or damaged: the battleships USS Arizona (BB-39), USS California (BB-44),

USS Maryland (BB-46), USS Nevada (BB-36), USS Oklahoma (BB-37), USS Pennsylvania (BB-38),

USS Tennessee (BB-43) and USS West Virginia (BB-48); cruisers USS Helena (CL-50),

USS Honolulu (CL-48) and USS Raleigh (CL-7); the destroyers USS Cassin (DD-372),

USS Downes (DD-375), USS Helm (DD-388) and USS Shaw (DD-373); seaplane

tender USS Curtiss (AV-4); target ship (ex-battleship) USS Utah (AG-16); repair ship

USS Vestal (AR-4); minelayer USS Oglala (CM-4); tug USS Sotoyomo (YT-9); and

Floating Drydock Number 2. Aircraft losses were 188 destroyed and 159 damaged, the

majority hit before the had a chance to take off. American dead numbered 2,403. That

figure included 68 civilians, most of them killed by improperly fused anti-aircraft shells

landing in Honolulu. There were 1,178 military and civilian wounded.

 

Today would be a good opportunity to review what happenens in war - truth being the first casualty - but unfortunately after

the smoke clears, the truth is not always as clear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ingot,

You may want to look at our embargo/trade restrictions on Japan which happened I believe the year/summer prior for clues. Many felt that the embargo would force a retaliation. I'm not an expert on this but I think it was a common belief at the time. Interestingly, the Japanese had a stock market even then...

 

The American oil embargo caused a crisis in Japan. Reliant on the US for 80% of its oil, the Japanese were forced to decide between withdrawaling from China, negotiating an end to the conflict, or going to war to obtain the needed resources elsewhere.

 

http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/worldwarii/a/wwiipaccauses_2.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the US provoke Japan into attacking the Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbour?

 

Uh... No. Japan was responsible for its own actions. BTW, We AMERICANS spell it

harbor, not harbour.

 

It is of course popular with leftists to always blame Western nations for everything - in their eyes, all the world's ills must be caused by Caucasians - blacks and asians are always de facto the victims... The fact that JAPAN was the aggressor never occurs to them - somehow , it must be the white man's fault.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well guys, I am interested in getting to the truth of this.

 

We hear stories about the CIA involvement in the Arab Spring uprisings and so on - all wonderful stuff ... but lacking in documentation. Until of course, that is, until someone like Wikileaks breaks ranks with Mainstream media, and spills four or five beans!

 

So I think the only thing I can do is look at sources that have written about it, and see if they are believable.

 

I apologise that I I spell with "s" instead of "z" - or keep the old forms of spelling.

 

I use "bour" for "neighbour" and "harbour" and "iour" for words like "behaviour".

 

I don't think it detracts from the essence of what I write. It belies the fact of my Australian English education, which still resists the Americanisation of everything that threatens to dumb us down.

 

I mean we are still wondering what kind of expressions "I ain't no muv-vucker, man" are, where I live, and thankfully so. It is not educated English - it is creole I think.

 

But that's another topic for another day.

 

I found an interesting item by Robert Higgs here, during my search for truth - but like all things, it is just a part of a larger picture:

 

How U.S. Economic Warfare Provoked Japan's Attack on Pearl Harbor - Robert Higgs - Mises Daily

 

Note the spelling of "Harbor" for the purists.

 

I am expecting that as soon as some notice where this item was published, they will immediately throw the baby out with the bathwater, without following the 17 mins presentation.

 

 

He quotes his sources, which have been documented since the 1940's and are on the public record.

 

FDR got his way - they goaded the Japanese into an untenable position whereby they "fired the first shot" ... and more than 2400 Americans lost their lives on that fateful day, December 7th 1941.

Attack on Pearl Harbor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Sacrificed for political aims ... or the greater good?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread really pisses me off. Some nut from Australia thinks because the US cuts off oil from the Japs because they are murdering hundreds of thousands (maybe millions)? of Chinese that it is our fault the Japs attacked us like a bunch of buzzards from Hell? This is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Maybe the stupid Japs shouldn't of been murdering the Chinese in the first place? Now who would be smart enough to think of that? An American of course! LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This thread really pisses me off. Some nut from Australia thinks because the US cuts off oil from the Japs because they are murdering hundreds of thousands (maybe millions)? of Chinese that it is our fault the Japs attacked us like a bunch of buzzards from Hell? This is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Maybe the stupid Japs shouldn't of been murdering the Chinese in the first place? Now who would be smart enough to think of that? An American of course! LOL
Finally ... an emotional response from a yank ... Touché !

 

I guessed it would strike a nerve from the purist warmongers, who always like to say they are "peace-keeping" :rofl::rofl:

 

I s'pose you are referring to me as "some nut from Australia" ... coming from a yank (small "y" ) I will accept the compliment!

 

Thank you, marine. You missed Australia in your conquest of the world ... and we have oil, gas, copper, gold, iron, bauxite, zinc, coal, uranium, and a few Brit-born politicians.

 

There is a big red stone out in the middle, but the sisters and the brothers might want it back. No, it is not made of gold, and there is no oil underneath it. Don't even think about it!

 

What we try to keep out, is ... no prizes for guessing, because we have had a degree of success here ... the yanks! Sadly, they have Pine Gap, and recently took over Darwin, so I guess the end is nigh.

.................................................................................... :helloooo: ....... :helloooo: .......:helloooo:

Be nice to us nuts, yank, when you come for us. :helloooo: :rofl: :helloooo: :rofl: :helloooo: :rofl: :helloooo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing worth remembering was that Japan was a great power at the time while the US was not -- not at all like we are the super power today. There's a great story on youtube about how the commander who carried out the mission did not want to go to war with the U.S and said if he did that in 3-4 years they would fail. This man had spent some years in the U.S beforehand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The best way to teach people not to be hypocrites is to drop a couple of atom bombs on them.

How close to the truth are you hoping this thread will get us Ingot? I would think the US Gov

at the time knew exactly what happened and why and so would the Japanese.I'm no

expert either but i bet we'd get 2 very different explanations.

The source I found and posted above in post #6 is not the only one.

 

And the USA is not the only western nation to use this tactic.

 

Further, the USA is not alone in abusing its relationships with its allies.

 

If you look at the Australian and New Zealand (ANZACS) attack/assault on Turkey at the beach at

Gallipoli, you will see how utterly futile that exercise was, and the treatment of those troops as

fodder for the cannons! As an Australian I know this story only too well. My maternal grandfather

was there as a machine gunner, before being lucky enough to be amongst the survivors,

and sent to France.

Gallipoli Campaign - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

The persistent lack of progress was finally making an impression in the United Kingdom,

with contrasting news of the true nature of the campaign being smuggled out by journalists

like Keith Murdoch and Ellis Ashmead-Bartlett, so discrediting Hamilton's performance.

Disaffected senior officers such as General Stopford also contributed to the general air of gloom.

The prospect of evacuation was raised on 11 October 1915 but Hamilton resisted the suggestion,

fearing the damage to British prestige. He was dismissed as commander shortly afterwards

and replaced by Lieutenant-General Sir Charles Monro.

 

It should be clear to all that the evidence from that Wikipedia quote is pointing to the use by the British,

of men under their command, to prop up their "prestige."

 

This is a more honest appraisal:

Dr Peter Stanley speaks about Gallipoli myths

 

Breen also says it is time to spare a thought for the working class, which was used as cannon

fodder by British upper-class officers at Gallipoli, and Australians should focus on that tragic injustice.

 

The point of posting the above, is to show that despite all the rhetoric and hand-wringing

at the respective times of our National Memorial Days, people need to remember that their

governments - the "servants of the people" quite often had an agenda to satisfy their own prestige

as commanders, as well as satisfy the debt they owed to the financiers who helped get them elected.

 

What role did the Rubber and Tin Companies play in the decision to "fight the spread of communism"

in Vietnam?

 

What role did the multi-national Halliburton play in the decision(s) to invade Iraq in 1992 and 2003?

Halliburton (with the Vice-president of the USA Dick Cheney as a former CEO) This is the same

Dick Cheney who "served" as Defense Secretary whilst actively involved in the running of Halliburton!

 

Imagine that - you make the policy, you make the bombs, you outfit the soldiers, and you get the

contracts to rebuild, as well as the contracts to provide "security" during the aftermath!

I am not making this stuff up. just Google "Halliburton and Iraq" and "Dick Cheney and Halliburton"

and you will see the corruption and filth associated with this company and the politicians

who condoned it in full knowledge of the game.

 

Yet GW Bush - the President of the USA did nothing to protect the interests of his own people

against this predatory man and his company.

 

So don't try to make some lolly story about Pearl Harbor (there - spelled "right" for the pedantic).

PH was no more and no less another "Anzac Cove" to give the people an excuse to emotionally

back Roosevelt in drawing the nation into a war it had no business fighting, just as has always

been the case. I think people now need to question the motives and facts a little more closely.

 

The "weapons of mass destruction" myth proves that!

 

I should add, that without the involvement of the US, the WW II was going rather precariously

for the Allies. But that does not give anyone any reason to believe fairy stories.

 

If Roosevelt had been an honest person, he would have faced the people and said:

"Our Allies are in trouble. It's time we rolled up our sleeves and lent a hand."

 

What reasonable person would have denied that as an honourable thing to do?

 

Politicians have no respect for, and no faith in their constituents. They believe the people are

there to be used, and while the people allow it, it will continue. I don't buy the rhetorical:

"They are only there until the next election" ... to be replaced with ... ???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can also claim that we provoked Al Qaida on 911. I think either claim is a stretch. The US is not that cunning. Reactionary and opportunistic, yes. Cunning, no.
MM - while I have a lot of respect for most of your views, I am struggling with this one right now.

 

I imagine you would know better than an Australian what happened during the JFK years ... or more precisely what might have happened, had Kennedy had the morals of Bush and Obama today ... with their "executive decree" over-riding your constitution these days. America should be very glad they had JFK for as long as they did. Unlike the warmongers of today, he was very mindful of just what war does to people. I believe he captained a ship of some kind in the Pacific during WW II?

Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Operation Northwoods was a series of false-flag proposals that originated within the

United States government in 1962, but were rejected by the Kennedy administration.[2]

The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to

commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to

be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation,

which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro.[3] One part of Operation

Northwoods was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in

other Florida cities and even in Washington".

 

Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the

introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:

 

The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United

States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and

irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban

threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.

 

Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or

simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was

drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to

the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project

anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was

authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy.

 

It shows clearly how out of control those in power were then, and do you think they are more accountable today ... or less so?

 

In the light of Northwoods, would you say that the 911 blame game on Al Qaeda was true ... likely to be true, possibly true, not true, or something outside these possibilities?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MM - while I have a lot of respect for most of your views, I am struggling with this one right now.

 

I imagine you would know better than an Australian what happened during the JFK years ... or more precisely what might have happened, had Kennedy had the morals of Bush and Obama today ... with their "executive decree" over-riding your constitution these days. America should be very glad they had JFK for as long as they did. Unlike the warmongers of today, he was very mindful of just what war does to people. I believe he captained a ship of some kind in the Pacific during WW II?

Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Operation Northwoods was a series of false-flag proposals that originated within the

United States government in 1962, but were rejected by the Kennedy administration.[2]

The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to

commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to

be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation,

which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro.[3] One part of Operation

Northwoods was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in

other Florida cities and even in Washington".

 

Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the

introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:

 

The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United

States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and

irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban

threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.

 

Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or

simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was

drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to

the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project

anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was

authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy.

 

It shows clearly how out of control those in power were then, and do you think they are more accountable today ... or less so?

 

In the light of Northwoods, would you say that the 911 blame game on Al Qaeda was true ... likely to be true, possibly true, not true, or something outside these possibilities?

 

Ingot,

 

If you agreed with everything I posted, we would be bored.

 

There is no way they would ever have pulled that off. As far as 911 is concerned, you really need to look at how poorly we do things to grasp how impossible it would be for our government to orchestrate such a plot. Incidentally, I know of a family from my town who was on the first plane. They were very real people and not part of a conspiracy.

 

Did they try to use 911 as a reason to invade Iraq? yes. Was it inevitable to the rest of the world that we were going to invade no matter what? Look at the way we handled iraq once the sand cleared. We broke one of the major rules of war.

 

I said we weren't cunning because I thought that we were embarrassingly transparent in our objectives, in spite of our attempt to be deceptive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When it comes to war mongers and such from any side - most of these people are 'orchestrating the PR' more than the operations.

They are more likely extremists themselves who manage to view an opportunity to push their own ideas, and at the same time they think whats wrong with making some money at the same time......

There usually is not a single truth or catalyst that caused something but as they say the biggest casualty to war is truth.

 

Ingot as an aside to this - --- this might be interesting to you Japanese history textbook controversies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

My wife lived in Japan and was constantly amazed when many of her Japanese friends did not think many of the atrocities occurred, and where amazed when they found out.....its the deliberate re-writing of history on any side winner or looser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.