Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Perrin

Uncrossing Trade

Recommended Posts

I'm trading stocks in the UK. At the end of the day, there's an Uncrossing Trade (UT) which is reported. This always seems to be large volume. Can anyone explain exactly what an Uncrossing Trade is? Or direct me to some light yet informative reading on the subject (ideally on the other types of trade types, too). I've read bits and pieces but I'm still not sure. My broker lists 32 different types of trades such as AT Automatic Trade, L Late Trade, O Ordinary Trade, but the information about them is not very informative. What on earth did everyone do before google and Traders Laboratory???

 

I know that I don't need to know this stuff to trade, because all I do is look at some bars on a chart and I ignore almost everything else. Whether that's right or wrong, doesn't matter really. However, being a curious sort, and of course being concerned that not knowing the ins and outs of trading may put me at risk, I thought that it might be useful to understand out what these AT, L, O, B, UT, etc., are. And not just the basic definition that the stockbroker states, but what it means in reality.

 

Stockbroker standard definition of UT - Uncrossing trade: "This is used for for the single uncrossing trade detailing the total executed volume and uncrossing price as a result of a SETS auction."

 

I understand there is an auction at 4.30pm after the UK market closes. Quite why, I'm not sure, as I did think the entire trading day is somewhat of an auction. In the modern day with the computer connections we have, is the 4.30pm auction necessary?

 

The Uncrossing Trade seems to have an effect on the last price (what I did consider the closing price). Is the auction then just an extension of the trading day for a certain section of people? The closing price (at 4.30pm) does not stay the same, by 5.00pm it has changed. The logcial part of me used to say that 'the last trade for the day made at 4.29pm and 59 seconds is the closing price' - but this is not the case. I assume due to the Uncrossing Trade?

 

My assumption has been that the Uncrossing Trade is the total volume, and average price, of the 4.30pm auction. Is it also the secret (?) or large (?) or unreported trades that were done during that day? Reading the list of different trade types, it seems as though some trades do not have to be reported when they happen, they can be revealed hours later, or at the end of the day instead?

 

Who puts orders in to be filled during the Uncrossing Trade SETS auction? I currently think that it is big market makers, stockbrokers and such. Is it because they have traded during the day only with themselves - e.g. In total, their clients bought 50,000 shares in a particular stock and sold 20,000. They do not trade any of those in the real market during the day, instead they just buy 30,000 (the balance) during the auction at 4.30pm?

 

Any thoughts or information to put me on the right track would be appreciated :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

your broker should be able to answer most of these questions - or at least the LSX....and on looking at the LSX their glossary is about as circular as a hamster in a wheel. :doh:

 

I dont trade UK stocks, but at a guess from what i have known elsewhere below are random thoughts......

 

Why a 4.30 trade?

To allow unfinished orders to be completed.

eg broker had 1million to buy over day, they completed 990,890 and the balance is to be completed, and oddlots are not left over.

or, some funds, brokers, clients try to get set on as close as possible to the end of day price.

or sometimes trades during the day have been amalgamated and are crossed and booked out to a client. Sometimes its part of two different clients matching orders and they want a price to just transfer stocks.

 

This of course means there is two closing prices (usually called a different thing - eg; last price, or settlement price) - but they are generally fairly close.

 

............

I would think your assumption that the volume is simply the matched trades at the 4.30pm auction is correct.

 

.............

Who puts them in?

if you have direct market access and can see the crossed over prices before they match out, then i would assume you should be able to participate as well. (I dont know)

 

.........

Its like a cleanup session for the end of the day.

 

..........

usually to find out more, you need to do the operators licence exams, or maybe the IMC courses......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Perrin,

 

As I recall, 'uncrossing' is a form of settlement process, and has different meanings according to the exchange. I think in some cases it may be as simple as the middle of the spread wherever that is a possible actual price. A volume weighted approach is also sometimes taken, I believe.

 

One place to look for more info might be relating to the Hang Seng - I seem to recall that this closes completely for several hours mid day, and goes through a crossing/uncrossing process for each session (that could be complete nonsense though - it's years since I took any interest in stocks . . .).

 

If you're worried about not understanding it fully, or the implications for your strategy, then why not just avoid trading into the close of session?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I asked because there are things that I know that I don't know, that I probably should know. :)

 

From experience, the end of day settlement doesn't seem to make a huge difference to the final price, and doesn't affect me much as I'm swing trading over numerous days not just over 1 night. I am curious about it though.

 

Thanks for mentioning the Hang Seng – I checked it out – weird charts. A gap in the middle of the day. I guess it's a way of trying to keep a more ordered market. Allows them to have dinner too, without worry.

 

You make a good point that my broker should be able to answer most of these (or any!) questions. I shall email them with some.

 

I looked at the London Stock Exchange website last year and it was not very clear to me. I will sit down one afternoon again and have another look through it. Now that I know more than I used to, some more of it might make sense (hopefully).

 

Regarding operators licence exams, IMC courses - I've never thought about them before. I never even knew they existed for that matter. Of course, when I think about it, every profession has rules, ways of working. Are the courses any good I wonder? Would I learn anything new or useful? I will do a bit of research on them too, thank you. I wouldn't need to take an exam but if I find some course material it might be useful, (then again, I'm not planning to have a career working for a trading company, so I think the only thing I need to understand is when to buy and when to sell. Simple!)

 

Thanks for responding :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.