Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

philmg

How to Make Money Hedging?

Recommended Posts

Hi, I may have a very stupid question, let's see.

 

I frequently hear and see, that traders may want to limit their risk by hedging and trade another stock/future/etc. in the other direction. As far as I understand both products should typically in the opposite direction, so they are correlated.

 

Now, I am wondering, if you do that you do not only limit you risk, but also your profit potential. Isn't the total profit often times 0 due to making a profit on the one trade and making a loss on the other.

 

How do you make money with this? Is it that you expect you trade 1 to show a larger move than you hedge?

 

I don't get it, sorry for this newb question, but it would be great, if someone could fill me in or point me to a source, where it is well described.

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  philmg said:
Hi, I may have a very stupid question, let's see.

 

I frequently hear and see, that traders may want to limit their risk by hedging and trade another stock/future/etc. in the other direction. As far as I understand both products should typically in the opposite direction, so they are correlated.

 

Now, I am wondering, if you do that you do not only limit you risk, but also your profit potential. Isn't the total profit often times 0 due to making a profit on the one trade and making a loss on the other.

 

How do you make money with this? Is it that you expect you trade 1 to show a larger move than you hedge?

 

I don't get it, sorry for this newb question, but it would be great, if someone could fill me in or point me to a source, where it is well described.

 

Thanks!

 

Hi Phil,

 

It's not a stupid question (no question is too stupid to ask, as a rule).

 

Hedging and what I think you're describing above are slightly different.

 

With hedging, you're not expecting to make a profit (or a loss); the goal is to 'lock-in' or guarantee the current price. Suppose you own an airline and therefore your operating costs are dependent on the price of jet fuel. You're worried that the price of fuel is going to increase significantly over the next year. So you hedge, buying in oil futures. If the price of oil increases over the next twelve months then your long futures position should make a profit that will offset your increased operating costs. If you're wrong and the price of oil falls, then you'll lose on your futures position but this should be offset by the savings in your operating costs. You've 'locked' in' prices at the current level for the next year. This is in fact the original purpose of futures and options, and the whole reason they came to exist.

 

What you consider above is perhaps more associated with Statistical Arbitrage ('StatArb'), or 'pairs trading', where the aim is to profit from the price convergence of two different assets. Assuming that the two behave in a similar way (correlation is not an appropriate measure for this though - the two need to be cointegrated), then when the spread between them widens then the one that is considered to be trading at a discount is bought, while the one trading at a premium is sold short. One does not need to be correct about both states to profit - it is simply necessary that the spread narrows over time.

 

Unlike true arbitrage, statistical arbitrage is not risk-free; it is perfectly possible that the one asset continues to be 'discounted' while the other continues to trade at a high 'premium'.

 

Hope that helps!

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good answer by BlueHS....

Also dont get too caught up when people talk about hedging, spreading, arbitrage etc ; a lot of the time they are talking about similar things - maybe with slightly different motivations and just using the same/similar terminology.

What one person calls a hedge, another calls a spread.

 

There are additional things i might add which are sometimes involved (but not necessarily hedges) -

1....often a spread trade is done to represent a trade idea. This spread might represent the trade idea but with less (supposed) risk.

2...often using these spreads (or by putting on a hedge) allows the trader to use extra leverage to make the most out of what 'edge' or value they might see.

 

(of course this leverage can also increase the risk - see LTCM - when genius failed) and is also very topical to the hedged positions many banks. insurance agencies thought they had during the recent liquidity crisis. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

philmg

 

You are describing a perfect hedge. This is not exactly how professionals hedge. Traders can hedge with options -- which is similar to buying insurance. They can also trade a portfolio or a basket with the idea that when some stocks go down then others will go up. In general, a portfolio of low correlated assets will have a lower risk profile. Some traders may want to limit certain types of risk. For example, if I buy the SPY (with USD) then I'm implicitly long SPY and short the USD. However, if my view were such that I was bullish on both SPY and the USD then I might try to mitigate this risk by shorting Euro. This is the basic concept of many futures hedges.

 

What some traders do, and I have did this myself with some success, is to hedge a position say in Forex with a perfect hedge which is equivalent to going flat but which may produce a psychological benefit that would be similar to taking some other action: namely taking a loss to go flat and then re-entering the new position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Philmg,

 

as described before hedging is always associated with managing risk. So for example you are trading the ES and have a setup but for the valid setup your stop has to be too far away and out of your comfort zone. So you might buy weekly calls or puts on the SPYor ES to create a position similar to the ES Futures trade but with less risk (limited risk). One other example would be you are in the gains but your stop is out of your comfort zone. So you could close out your Futures contract and trade weekly options with the intention to limit your risk to a smaller degree.

With limiting your risk you do also limit your profit potential but not always ;-))

 

In my Forex account it is possible for me, as I am not an Amerikan, to hedge my position by simply going long and short at the same time. But I never did this, I rather close out the position and wait for the next shoot....

 

Happy trading

veAL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote
What some traders do, and I have did this myself with some success, is to hedge a position say in Forex with a perfect hedge which is equivalent to going flat but which may produce a psychological benefit that would be similar to taking some other action: namely taking a loss to go flat and then re-entering the new position.

 

anecdotally speaking - from the set of 'cases' of this I've observed, the bottomline benefits AND the psychological benefits of FX 'perfects' are minimal :doh:

ie below the surface, hedging a loss tends to prolong and reinforce the loss... ultimately ... usually ends up worse :crap:

ie only 'hedge' winners. :helloooo: .. especially in FX

... just saying...

 

The answers above are good...there are few really appropriate 'hedges' these days. One is owning phyical PM's and strategically hedging with futures... after 20 years at it i'm finally getting pretty proficient at it

 

have a great weekend all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  veAL said:

 

In my Forex account it is possible for me, as I am not an Amerikan, to hedge my position by simply going long and short at the same time.

 

Spread betting? And what's with the 'Amerika' spelling, been reading Kafka? :)

 

With other types of accounts such as futures and fx you can do this by using two seperate accounts. I would imagine that you could probably persuade your broker to recognise the link between both accounts and use credit from the one to margin the other - does anyone have any experience with this, by the way?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:
Spread betting? And what's with the 'Amerika' spelling, been reading Kafka? :)

 

Sorry for the spelling. Used German-English or some form of it ;-))

 

We in Germany are allowed to hedge with the same account where the US do not. Spread and Commissions apply, so my broker is satisfied...

 

Cheers

veAL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we can use hedging when our order against the trend for longer time and to lock some loses then we can use hedging to save the balance and also we have the chance to convert it to profit

hedging can be used with open 2 order at the same time and make it opposite each others, then we can lock the floating minus and wait for good profit and close the other

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.