Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Predictor

My Tape Reading Software & Techniques

Recommended Posts

I'm very careful when I execute in the "pocket" or what some call the pull back areas in the market. In these areas, often larger institutional traders will sit with limit orders. It is possible by tracking the aggregate volume in the Volume.Tracking.Accumulator where the "herd" is short or long. They are always going to be long/short near the new highs/lows or near the extent of the distribution in market profile terms.

 

One technique I use is to track the price in relation to these overall imbalances... I will also track how price responds to order flow more precisely.

 

Now when I said I was careful to execute on what some call "breakouts", this isn't always the case. It depends on market context but I do find this method requires larger stops. At times, I have preferred this method.

 

Shorting is even more difficult because the liquidity providers, often sitting "off market", can hold up the market for surprisingly long periods of time. So, we'll see traders trying to get short.. market making a new high and stopping them out. Often by the time the real move gets underway, it starts with the fewest participants. Often these changes will occur at obvious points that block out certain groups of traders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to explain a certain behavior that is evident in the market.

 

This behavior is we will see mostly market sell orders coming in and then the market will jump higher.. all sell orders and then jump higher. And so forth.. This behavior is caused by all the offered inventory being pulled above the market (or below the market). Both the liquidity providers and larger institutions can strongly influence the market by pulling orders above and below the market.

 

So what might be happening? In one explanation, a LQ provider instantly reacts to increase order flow and pulls his bid. He accumulates inventory at this new level and then pulls his offers to unload the newly acquired inventory at a small profit. If he controls most of the inventory close to the market then he can move the market back and to try to maintain net neutral. This is why you'll see in a range market all the buy orders near the highs and the sell orders the lows. The interaction between the LQ provider and the longer term trader is very key.

 

With the HFT, what we tend to being seeing is that the HFT traders are keeping tons of liquidity near the market but there isn't any liquidity off market because the traditional institutions can't/aren't leaving any out. I believe that the spike movements are a combined herding effect of institutions either pulling offers off market (or not having any out) and the HFTs.

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of algorithms currently in use are primed to only buy on a down tick or sell on an up tick... provides for rather interesting dynamics. This is also why often in a downtrend/uptrend that when a buy/sell program is exhausted that the "trend resumes" because it was just a single or limited buyer....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very busy week, NinjaTrader has just announced us a partner on their website, and so I feel that now is the right time to share some of the features we haven't shared until now. I just sent this video out where I introduce our Q-Tracker™ which allows us to estimate where our order is within the queue! We found under our testing scenarios that we were around 95% accurate, i.e position within +-5%. Our proprietary algorithm uses both changes in the book and executed orders in determining the estimate. Your results may vary but so far in my live trading its been pretty spot on. We use the same type capabilities for tracking spoof orders. Even better, I've developed new methods for reading the tape based on knowing queue position and pull information. I share that in the video at the bottom.

 

Some of the other new features which are very significant:

 

* We are now highlighting using the foreground color the volume that is currently updating while the current/bid ask is highlighted using the background color. This allows the trader to always know whether the volume is newly printing or was printed previously when using our OrderFlow Monitor and, of course, there is never flicker.

 

* We now have boxing for the HV nodes in our OrderFlow Bars™ and added 10's rounding option.

 

* We've upgraded and updated our Time&Sales Inspector (more on that later) and added pre-defined color themes.

 

The program is finished but we're still testing the ordering process. It will be available within the next several days for those interested.

 

Thanks!

 

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing in the last video, I notice that I don't really need to clear that often in my live trading.. was a bit over eager to show that.

 

As for pulls, typically they lead the market and price will follow. Sometimes though pulls look to be actually resting orders that were sitting too long and are timed to go market.

 

Anyway... you don't have to be glued to screen to tape read using our software.. sometimes yes but not always

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I detected a pattern that I thought I'd share. I used the Q-Tracker for this with resetting and was watching the order flow imbalances. I called a potential for reversal at around 98 back to 96. We had correlated negative order flow and it looked like the trade would work out immediately but instead the liquidity providers pull all the inventory, market retested slightly higher, and then traded lower.

 

While similar patterns I might interpret differently, in today's context my interpretation of this behavior was that the liquidity providers were net long the short inventory and pulled their offers to dump the long inventory. The buyers would be over eager longs, shorts using tight stops, or shorts who felt the market was trading higher. As soon as they dumped their long inventory, they took advantage of the new information to reset their books lower. An alternate explanation is they pulled the offers to reset long inventory but found no buyers thus pulled their bids to reset to better their average price on remaining inventory.

 

I don't know if the liquidity provider performing resets could be the cause of other "double top" type scenarios but was interesting nonetheless. The double top also formed as large limit order traders exhausted buy programs...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Today I detected a pattern that I thought I'd share. I used the Q-Tracker for this with resetting and was watching the order flow imbalances. I called a potential for reversal at around 98 back to 96. We had correlated negative order flow and it looked like the trade would work out immediately but instead the liquidity providers pull all the inventory, market retested slightly higher, and then traded lower.

 

While similar patterns I might interpret differently, in today's context my interpretation of this behavior was that the liquidity providers were net long the short inventory and pulled their offers to dump the long inventory. The buyers would be over eager longs, shorts using tight stops, or shorts who felt the market was trading higher. As soon as they dumped their long inventory, they took advantage of the new information to reset their books lower. An alternate explanation is they pulled the offers to reset long inventory but found no buyers thus pulled their bids to reset to better their average price on remaining inventory.

 

I don't know if the liquidity provider performing resets could be the cause of other "double top" type scenarios but was interesting nonetheless. The double top also formed as large limit order traders exhausted buy programs...

 

If this is not a clear, concise explanation, I do not know what is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A big realization has hit me since we released our software. It makes a lot of things make sense to me that didn't before. First, I always had in mind that I would sell to already profitable traders and professionals and that would be my primary market. This is why I didn't understand people trying to question my ability to trade or trying to somehow make me prove my software would make them money because my software was designed for the professional and semi professional trader. In a word: my software was designed for the strong and not the weak.

 

Now since we released the software, I've many requests for training and education. I was discussing this with my partner and he said well which do you want to be an education vendor or a software vendor?

 

In all honesty, it was my only thought that the professional would see we had a superior program and would be happy to subscribe to my product. We do have some professional traders who've came on board and said they yes agree with my assessment. But we've also had a lot of people wanting basic training.

 

But it really hit me.. how people view things differently then I did. And, I think my partner is right that there is way more interest in training and such.On the other hand, if we just support the professionals then there will be less support and more money per unit of work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've tried quite afew Orderfow pieces of software's in the past, but I've got to say this is shaping up to be one of the best softwares for orderflow I've ever used.

 

To all newbies.. read and understand the concepts of orderflow first. There is plenty of info around on the net, before trying to get to grips with this; otherwise not only this one, but all the other sofware's wont make any sense to you either.

 

 

Well done Curtis..

;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your positive feedback. We appreciate honest feedback from real customers. I've also added more articles over at our blog for those interested in learning about these concepts. My goal going forward is to continue to provide the highest quality instruction on these topics. Most of the new articles right now are only text. My goal is to add some illustrations, videos, and more blog posts going forward.

Thanks again!

Curtis

--

Home - OrderFlowDashPro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • SMCI Super Micro Computer stock watch, attempting to move higher off the 34.06 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?SMCI        
    • UPST Upstart stock watch, pull back to 68.15 gap support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?UPST  
    • Why not to simply connect you account to myfxbook which will collect all this data automatically for you? The process you described looks tedious and a bit obsolete but may work for you though.
    • The big breakthrough with AI right now is “natural language computing.”   Meaning, you can speak in natural language to a computer and it can go through huge data sets, make sense out of them, and speak back to you in natural language.   That alone is a huge breakthrough.   The next leg? AI agents. Where they don’t just speak back to you.   They take action. Here’s the definition I like best: an AI agent is an autonomous system that uses tools, memory, and context to accomplish goals that require multiple steps.   Everything from simple tasks (analyzing web traffic) to more complex goals (building executive briefings or optimizing websites).   They can:   > Reason across multiple steps.   >Use tools like a real assistant (Excel spreadsheets, budgeting apps, search engines, etc.)   > Remember things.   And AI agents are not islands. They talk to other agents.   They can collaborate. Specialized agents that excel at narrow tasks can communicate and amplify one another’s strengths—whether it’s reasoning, data processing, or real-time monitoring.   What it Looks Like You wake up one morning, drink your coffee, and tell your AI agent, “I need to save $500 a month.”   It gets to work.   First, it finds all your recurring subscriptions. Turns out you’re paying $8.99 for a streaming service you forgot you had.   It cancels it. Then it calls your internet provider, negotiates a lower bill, and saves you another $40. Finally, it finds you car insurance that’s $200 cheaper per year.   What used to take you hours—digging through statements, talking to customer service reps on hold for an hour, comparing plans—is done while you’re scrolling Twitter.   Another example: one agent tracks your home maintenance needs and gets information from a local weather-monitoring agent. Result: "Rain forecast next week - should we schedule gutter cleaning now?"   Another: an AI agent will plan your vacations (“Book me a week in Italy for under $2,000”), find the cheapest flights, and sort out hotels with a view.   It’ll remind you to pay bills, schedule doctor’s appointments, and track expenses so you’re not wondering where your paycheck went every month.   The old world gave you tools—Excel spreadsheets, search engines, budgeting apps. The new world gives you agents who do the work for you.   Don’t Get Too Scared (or Excited) Yet William Gibson famously said: "The future is already here – it's just not evenly distributed."   AI agents will distribute it. For decades, the tools that billionaires and corporations used to get ahead—personal assistants, financial advisors, lawyers—were out of reach for regular people.   AI agents could change that.   BUT, remember…   We’re in inning one.   AI agents have a ways to go.   They’re imperfect. They mess up. They need more defenses to get ready for prime time.   To be sure, AI is powerful, but it’s not a miracle worker. It’s great at helping humans solve problems, but it’s not going to replace all jobs overnight.   Instead of fearing AI, think of it as a tool to A.] save you time on boring stuff and B.] amplify what you’re already good at. Right now is the BEST time to start experimenting. It’s also the best time to find investments that will “make AI work for you”. Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential)   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.