Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Trading Contest Discussion

Recommended Posts

The N/J pair did come back near my first entry level and I jumped back in.

Lets see what happens.

 

You noticedWork on that.

 

Not much to add - you already know ONE problem.

 

If you are trading the daily TF, then why are you looking at the trade other than at the daily candle close?

Same goes for all other TF. Turn the charts and trading platform off, and do something else. Let the trade

develop and breathe as intended. You quoted Livermore ... if you are "right" ... then "sit tight."

 

Often it is not the trade that beats us - we beat ourselves by talking ourselves out of the trade,

because of a simple, natural pullback in price.

 

You found that yourself - "Now out and watching the first idea develop as planned."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Signed in.

Let me be first at some thing here :)

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
C'mon Ingot, this is no real bucks. We know you couldn't bet the family's house on one trade. Tell us what happened.

 

1. The trade is waaay over-leveraged

2. The trade is still open

3. Traders who can make pips as opposed to making $$$ will win this contest

4. Traders who can make pips will make the money in the long run

 

If the contest was designed around showing who can make the most pips over time,

the outcome might be different. Regardless, a point is coming where I believe my

trade will came back with a vengeance, and we have the time this month for that

to occur ... or not.

 

As far as the contest goes, my trading is nothing short of cowboy style.

But when trading the daily TF ... you need to define your point at which the trade fails.

My pockets are not deep enough to sustain the kind of losses you see here in the

contest, in live trading.

 

I am trading the EURAUD, which is showing a pullback.

 

My latest entry is at 1.2185 (short)

My point of failure for this trade is 1.2440

And I will have dipped out on draw-down rules before that happens

 

For what it's worth, I take the same trades in my live trading @ $5/pip, but with

60-pip SL and manage them on the 1H or 4H TF as a rule. I closed my live trade

with a $300 loss, and will not trade live until I see the conditions I need once again.

 

The EURAUD could be close to a setup again for a short - I won't know for another

10 or 15 hours, but it should be another nice trade if it eventuates.

 

Let's see.

 

On Wednesday the market did a strange thing ... the EURAD - EURUSD - AUDUSD

all rallied at once. Clearly this could not continue for long, if you know anything about

correlation, and it was the Aussie that got the wobbly knees first. Couldn't find

anything fundamental for the pullback in the AUD, but there is was.

 

A nice bit of arbitrage if anyone spotted that occurrence.

 

Remember what I said in post #16 above:

 

"King of the world"?

 

Maybe ... for this moment only ... so yes, enjoy doing what you came to do.

Savour the moment, and let the success of the moment wipe out earlier pain,

and remind you that trading success IS possible.

 

Next week I may no longer be king, but I shall have the reminder, that with

tight management of my head and best application of my strategy, I will be

positioned to receive whatever the market chooses to put my way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1. The trade is waaay over-leveraged

2. The trade is still open

3. Traders who can make pips as opposed to making $$$ will win this contest

4. Traders who can make pips will make the money in the long run

 

If the contest was designed around showing who can make the most pips over time,

the outcome might be different. Regardless, a point is coming where I believe my

trade will came back with a vengeance, and we have the time this month for that

to occur ... or not.

 

As far as the contest goes, my trading is nothing short of cowboy style.

But when trading the daily TF ... you need to define your point at which the trade fails.

My pockets are not deep enough to sustain the kind of losses you see here in the

contest, in live trading.

 

I am trading the EURAUD, which is showing a pullback.

 

My latest entry is at 1.2185 (short)

My point of failure for this trade is 1.2440

And I will have dipped out on draw-down rules before that happens

 

For what it's worth, I take the same trades in my live trading @ $5/pip, but with

60-pip SL and manage them on the 1H or 4H TF as a rule. I closed my live trade

with a $300 loss, and will not trade live until I see the conditions I need once again.

 

The EURAUD could be close to a setup again for a short - I won't know for another

10 or 15 hours, but it should be another nice trade if it eventuates.

 

Let's see.

 

On Wednesday the market did a strange thing ... the EURAD - EURUSD - AUDUSD

all rallied at once. Clearly this could not continue for long, if you know anything about

correlation, and it was the Aussie that got the wobbly knees first. Couldn't find

anything fundamental for the pullback in the AUD, but there is was.

 

A nice bit of arbitrage if anyone spotted that occurrence.

 

Remember what I said in post #16 above:

 

Ingot,

As I am reading your pos I am looking at a chart of EUR/.4HR tf, AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE PAIRFELL OFF A MOUNTAIN !!

 

Maybe I am missing something..

eu4.thumb.gif.dbba5d39c290d2fa9a2e0a3fb1c1e177.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"-How do you differentiate between gold and cocoa in your trading?

-They are both a 1% bet, they are the same to me.

-You mean to tell me that you see no difference between gold and cocoa?"

Larry Hite, market wizard, on the importance of risk management.

 

You frightened me Ingot, with that 255 pips risk on a trade. That's a week's range! But you reassured me that on your live accounts you limit yourself to a 60 pips risk. My average is 40, depending on the pair. We all are making experiments here.

I now understand what you mean by pips result as compared to $$$ but I think that also brings us back to the % debate of earlier in this thread.

You can never be sure of what might happen the second AFTER you got in a trade, but you can always chose the risk amount, zero included. Therefore I believe risk precedes timing.

 

I agree with your analysis, the E/A is clearly in a multi year down trend and you just happened to be on its way for some retracement. Problem is you never know when a retracement will happen nor end.

This might as well be an inverted H+S forming, we are still above the 1.1600 lows.

So, if I were you, I would look out before re entering "with vengeance" :).

 

 

 

1. The trade is waaay over-leveraged

2. The trade is still open

3. Traders who can make pips as opposed to making $$$ will win this contest

4. Traders who can make pips will make the money in the long run

 

If the contest was designed around showing who can make the most pips over time,

the outcome might be different. Regardless, a point is coming where I believe my

trade will came back with a vengeance, and we have the time this month for that

to occur ... or not.

 

As far as the contest goes, my trading is nothing short of cowboy style.

But when trading the daily TF ... you need to define your point at which the trade fails.

My pockets are not deep enough to sustain the kind of losses you see here in the

contest, in live trading.

 

I am trading the EURAUD, which is showing a pullback.

 

My latest entry is at 1.2185 (short)

My point of failure for this trade is 1.2440

And I will have dipped out on draw-down rules before that happens

 

For what it's worth, I take the same trades in my live trading @ $5/pip, but with

60-pip SL and manage them on the 1H or 4H TF as a rule. I closed my live trade

with a $300 loss, and will not trade live until I see the conditions I need once again.

 

The EURAUD could be close to a setup again for a short - I won't know for another

10 or 15 hours, but it should be another nice trade if it eventuates.

 

Let's see.

 

On Wednesday the market did a strange thing ... the EURAD - EURUSD - AUDUSD

all rallied at once. Clearly this could not continue for long, if you know anything about

correlation, and it was the Aussie that got the wobbly knees first. Couldn't find

anything fundamental for the pullback in the AUD, but there is was.

 

A nice bit of arbitrage if anyone spotted that occurrence.

 

Remember what I said in post #16 above:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The chart I see here is a 5 min., not 4h.

 

Ingot,

As I am reading your pos I am looking at a chart of EUR/.4HR tf, AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE PAIRFELL OFF A MOUNTAIN !!

 

Maybe I am missing something..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ingot,

As I am reading your pos I am looking at a chart of EUR/.4HR tf,

AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE PAIRFELL OFF A MOUNTAIN !!

 

Maybe I am missing something..

Mystic - you may be thinking the mountain is the 4H ... but I think it is just a hill.

The mountain you could be looking at is the 5M from your post.

 

I hope my post/chart clarifies what happened - the trade is 5 1/2 days old now ... and I

can see that I have been disqualified. Nevertheless, I remain in that trade, until the end.

 

 

You frightened me Ingot, with that 255 pips risk on a trade. That's a week's range!

But you reassured me that on your live accounts you limit yourself to a 60 pips risk.

My average is 40, depending on the pair. We all are making experiments here.

I now understand what you mean by pips result as compared to $$$ but I think

that also brings us back to the % debate of earlier in this thread.

You can never be sure of what might happen the second AFTER you got in a trade,

but you can always chose the risk amount, zero included. Therefore I believe risk

precedes timing.

 

I agree with your analysis, the E/A is clearly in a multi year down trend and you just

happened to be on its way for some retracement. Problem is you never know when

a retracement will happen nor end.

This might as well be an inverted H+S forming, we are still above the 1.1600 lows.

So, if I were you, I would look out before re entering "with vengeance" :).

as mentioned Kuokam, I remain in that trade.

 

It is a legit setup and risk for me, but I blew my opportunity in the contest by the

cowboy tactic of not using position sizing, and going all-in.

 

I will be back into this in my own live trading this coming week, when the parameters

for entry align.

 

Ingot ... no longer king! :rofl:

5aa7117d2712c_EURAUD4H.JPG.5168d04e2c689013f3ef4c55fd6cccc3.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since I am learning so much with all the commentaries here, I have put that pair on my watch list. As Mr Trichet would say "I will be closely monitoring it" and let you know when I trade it.

 

Certainly the hindsight effect or just my platform but it looks like it was a bit oversold when you got in.

 

 

Mystic - you may be thinking the mountain is the 4H ... but I think it is just a hill.

The mountain you could be looking at is the 5M from your post.

 

I hope my post/chart clarifies what happened - the trade is 5 1/2 days old now ... and I

can see that I have been disqualified. Nevertheless, I remain in that trade, until the end.

 

as mentioned Kuokam, I remain in that trade.

 

It is a legit setup and risk for me, but I blew my opportunity in the contest by the

cowboy tactic of not using position sizing, and going all-in.

 

I will be back into this in my own live trading this coming week, when the parameters

for entry align.

 

Ingot ... no longer king! :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since I am learning so much with all the commentaries here, I have put that pair on my watch list. As Mr Trichet would say "I will be closely monitoring it" and let you know when I trade it.

 

Update 21/11/2012: Bought 50.000 units at 1.2340, sl 1.2308

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have posted The Nov-Dec contest open to join on Oanda.

The start t date will be:Mon. 12/4

The end date will be Thurs Jan 31st.

 

We are a a 2 month contest to compensate for the Holidays.

 

Hi

 

I'm new here.

Can I join this trading contest?

 

 

TT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi

 

I'm new here.

Can I join this trading contest?

 

 

TT

 

Absolutely !! The November contest is just about over..

The next contest starts Dec 1 and runs for 2 months.

 

You need an Oanda demo acct to join, then go to to the "current contest pages", on the 2nd page you will see wwwtraderslaboratory Dec/Jan contest click join and you are in.

Here's the link :

https://fx2.oanda.com/mod_perl/fxcontest/fxcontest.pl?rm=listContests&sortCriteria=1&page=2

 

Your demo acct will start you with $100K. You can change it if you want to whatever amount you feel comfortable. VERY IMPORTANT!! do not change your acct balance while the contest is under way. Good Luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have posted The Nov-Dec contest open to join on Oanda.

The start t date will be:Mon. 12/4

The end date will be Thurs Jan 31st.

 

We are a a 2 month contest to compensate for the Holidays.

A couple quick questions, then:
  • I assume you mean 12/3, not Tuesday, 12/4
  • By "Monday" do you mean 5:00 PM ET Sunday evening? or 12:01 ET Monday morning?

Thanks in advance.

 

dwt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A couple quick questions, then:
  • I assume you mean 12/3, not Tuesday, 12/4
  • By "Monday" do you mean 5:00 PM ET Sunday evening? or 12:01 ET Monday morning?

Thanks in advance.

 

dwt

I guess it has a lot to do with your TZ. I am in EST so the new contest will start on the evening of Sunday Dec.2 and end on Thursday Jan 31st.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Continuing the discussion from the Trading Contest thread:

 

Traders Laboratory Forex Trading Contest! - Page 55 - TL - 9303

 

Regarding MT4 platform: I have always found it to be fantastic for charting.

It is possible to create charts of multiple time frames, and have them displayed in one window

on your desktop. The colours and indicators are infinitely tweakable, and many scripts and

Expert Advisors run faultlessly (mostly) on it.

 

The data feed is free, and most strategies can be implemented on it. It is available in demo

account form, and funded live trading form. (I have never used it for live trading.)

 

You can trade on margin from 1:1 to 50:1 to 400:1 (though this level is for gamblers.)

 

There are other things, but we are not here to promote MT4.

 

The problem I had when wanting to move from Oanda standard to Oanda MT4, was that the

setup would not allow me to open the MT4 under my current username. I then had to create a

new account. Currently I have created a sub-account for MT4, but while it appears on the list of

demo accounts on my Oanda standard account, the MT4 format can not be linked... as far as I

have been able to find out.

 

And to complicate matters, even with a new password, I have been unable to log in to the new

account I created for the new username.

 

The MT4 functions of, and is bootable from a desktop icon, like all of them.

 

It just fails (so far) to establish that link to an account registered for the contest.

 

I do not wish to register twice, as it would be construed as a form of cheating, since I would

have 2 usernames. But I do seriously wish to road-test the MT4 under contest conditions.

It would help me control my position sizes and tendency to risk more than I should.

 

I am familiar with the MT4, and trade risk is much more clearly defined at the time the trade entered.

One tends to trade the same way used in one's live trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like nobody has done it here. Have you tried with their "ask us a question" feature? It might just be that the link doesn't exist. I am completely helpless re. Mt4.

 

As for position sizing, the heaviest I have so far taken is 200.000 units.

 

 

 

Continuing the discussion from the Trading Contest thread:

 

Traders Laboratory Forex Trading Contest! - Page 55 - TL - 9303

 

Regarding MT4 platform: I have always found it to be fantastic for charting.

It is possible to create charts of multiple time frames, and have them displayed in one window

on your desktop. The colours and indicators are infinitely tweakable, and many scripts and

Expert Advisors run faultlessly (mostly) on it.

 

The data feed is free, and most strategies can be implemented on it. It is available in demo

account form, and funded live trading form. (I have never used it for live trading.)

 

You can trade on margin from 1:1 to 50:1 to 400:1 (though this level is for gamblers.)

 

There are other things, but we are not here to promote MT4.

 

The problem I had when wanting to move from Oanda standard to Oanda MT4, was that the

setup would not allow me to open the MT4 under my current username. I then had to create a

new account. Currently I have created a sub-account for MT4, but while it appears on the list of

demo accounts on my Oanda standard account, the MT4 format can not be linked... as far as I

have been able to find out.

 

And to complicate matters, even with a new password, I have been unable to log in to the new

account I created for the new username.

 

The MT4 functions of, and is bootable from a desktop icon, like all of them.

 

It just fails (so far) to establish that link to an account registered for the contest.

 

I do not wish to register twice, as it would be construed as a form of cheating, since I would

have 2 usernames. But I do seriously wish to road-test the MT4 under contest conditions.

It would help me control my position sizes and tendency to risk more than I should.

 

I am familiar with the MT4, and trade risk is much more clearly defined at the time the trade entered.

One tends to trade the same way used in one's live trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like nobody has done it here. Have you tried with their "ask us a question" feature?

It might just be that the link doesn't exist. I am completely helpless re. Mt4.

 

As for position sizing, the heaviest I have so far taken is 200.000 units.

Yes mate - I have spoken to Oanda "chat" and they advised me to get in touch with frontdesk.

They say "1 or 2 business days" so it looks like if I am to joint the contest I will have to do it with the old Oanda a/c.

 

I am road testing a revised strategy - best suited to MT4 because of the brilliant charting capabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had small losses in gold and G/A.The pair that succeeded was N/J. Was in for two weeks, then could no longer resist the massive gain pressure and trailed the stop too close and it got triggered.

In retrospect I am wondering if I should not have added to the position instead. It is up 100 more pips since I went out. Another "sit tight" occasion missed.

 

 

Kuokam, which pairs were you trading? And how long are your hold times?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow optiontimer, down 10% in one day and back again next day.

Do you trade real account with same risk?

 

Is there a max DD rule for this contest?

 

I think they run a max 20% drawdown or some such. It was a rule argued for by a phony poster who knows nothing of real trading and never even stepped up to participate in the contest.

 

Trading is a "long run" game, and even the best approach will suffer larger than normal yet not unexpected drawdowns at the hands of the approach's standard deviation. While three to five losses in a row at a 2-3% risk is never fun, it is nonetheless beatable (as you will see once Oanda updates again).

 

In real life, I often will have more than 2% at risk depending upon the situation and my confidence level.

 

By the way, if your approach has an edge, then 20% max drawdown rule has no place in your trading. If your system has an edge that delivers a positive expectation over the long run, then it is a mistake to have a rule that would have you quit the game at what is likely the tail-end of a larger than normal yet not unexpected drawdown due to a simple adverse standard deviation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think they run a max 20% drawdown or some such. It was a rule argued for by a phony poster who knows nothing of real trading and never even stepped up to participate in the contest.

 

Trading is a "long run" game, and even the best approach will suffer larger than normal yet not unexpected drawdowns at the hands of the approach's standard deviation. While three to five losses in a row at a 2-3% risk is never fun, it is nonetheless beatable (as you will see once Oanda updates again).

 

In real life, I often will have more than 2% at risk depending upon the situation and my confidence level.

 

By the way, if your approach has an edge, then 20% max drawdown rule has no place in your trading. If your system has an edge that delivers a positive expectation over the long run, then it is a mistake to have a rule that would have you quit the game at what is likely the tail-end of a larger than normal yet not unexpected drawdown due to a simple adverse standard deviation.

Perfect response, OT - couldn't have put it better myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.