Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Trading Contest Discussion

Recommended Posts

I often see several of the great traders on this forum off-handedly "throw crumbs to the chooks" when asked trading questions.

 

They will either not share their strategy, or if they will, they simply point casually to the fact that "somewhere on this forum" they have a thread that is 620,000 posts long, that discusses "their method".

 

I think that is wrong. We were all newbies once, and clearly 75% of us still struggle.

 

See screen shot below:

 

If someone asks me, I will tell them how to trade.

I can tell them.

And I will tell them.

 

But I am unable to post that information on the forum, because it is not mine to give away publicly.

 

I am unable to say more.

 

Thank you for your time in reading this thread.

 

EDIT: The information is free - it will cost you nothing. This is a promise.

Poll.JPG.86eb6dd1128a542510477a76345f8846.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Ingot54 said:
The point is that a handful of us contest the right to brag every month or two, as being "the best" trader for that time.

 

I mentioned account balance as being the measure of success, and this is totally wrong.

 

This is what causes traders to fail - stretching their resources, both mentally and financially to breaking point ... failure. How many traders were close to leading at some point, but bombed out dismally at the end?

 

Their failure has N-O-T-H-I-N-G to do with "damaged psychology" in any way - it is simply that traders are not encouraged to trade the way their strategy was designed to trade. The contest on its own is attempting to force traders to win the chocolates with big trades, instead of smart trades.

 

What I am getting at is the contest is not good for trading as it stands.

 

What I propose is a contest where traders have to win pips ... not dollars ... as a measure of prowess ... and yes - bragging rights.

 

If you look at my 166% gain to win last month's contest, some might say "welldone" for the effort. The truth is the opposite - it was nothing more than a calculated gamble to earn me the right to make this post. (See posts #578 and 581):

.......

 

  Ingot54 said:
One of the problems I see with the current format for trading competitions/contests, is that "success" is based on opening and closing balances

 

This situation is hollow ... false ... wrong ... and a perfect example of how NOT to try to trade.

 

Yet - here we are encouraging each other to "excel" at trading by earning bragging rights.

 

I stated earlier that I had discovered my personal Holy Grail (see post #546 here):

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/forex-trading-laboratory/9303-traders-laboratory-forex-trading-contest-18.html

 

This is Traders Laboratory but it might well be called "Trader's Smorgasbord" unless we truly get down and dirty, and look at how we are approaching trading.

 

Look, can I just say right here and now that most of have had the fabled chalice (Holy Grail) in our grasp at some point in our journeys. That has to be a fact, because we continue to believe in something that we have seen that urges us onwards and upwards. Otherwise, without some hint of what is possible at the personal level, we would have (should have) abandoned trading long ago.

 

Is anyone so foolish as to continue losing money without any hope of one day surviving and prospering in this?

 

No.

 

And that "no" is qualified only by the inclusion of the word "hope" in that sentence.

 

So what is my point here?

 

Ingot,

 

What you say is so profound it should be made a sticky. And I'm glad you had the maturity to do this, instead of gloat in the limelight. I mentioned earlier in the contest thread about Varengold bank implementing a transparent Risk-Adjusted ROI to encourage traders to trade just as they would on a live account, and not just aim for the highest gross ROI.

(Post 222-230 discusses the concept. The formula is linked to in post #225)

 

MyFxBook has actually acknowledged the need for some additional rules to prevent the free-for-all / all in approaches that many traders are using to win (luck). They would never trade real money that way. These type of transformations will encourage the retail forex industry to have a more professional approach.

 

Because the ignorant are attracted to large gains instead of implementing [complete] systematic approaches to extracting profits from the markets (which does require taking some risks), they develop this loser mentality where they practice "wanting" to make money in the markets. So it is no surprise that they end up with only wanting, never actually finding the strategies necessary for consistent profits. These losers are particularly fond of ambiguous advice, black box systems, and other predictive (mystical) approaches to winning in the forex markets. Taking responsibility and risks in a structured format is hardly ever given any serious consideration. When it is, all kinds of excuses are made to NOT go forward and practice the real strategy.

 

There is also a different type of loser; one who does not want to be successful and also goes around trolling hoping to discourage others from being successful. Comments like "What, do you want to be spoon-fed?" are usually codewords for "I don't know what really works myself, but I don't want to admit it." They probably been burned a few times by some strategies that they thought would work and make assumptions about the whole industry. You hardly ever see these people jump on or congratulate a genuine strategy when it is available, because they too are afraid to take the risk.

 

In regards to sharing a strategy for free, I think it is honorable. I've done so already, and revealed a true price action measurement tool. But the most interesting thing I noticed is that there is a clear distinction between those who do pay for your time vs those who are freebies. The ones who pay tend to be the ones that will make productive use of their own time and yours. I noticed a disproportionate amount of freeloaders consuming most of the time I was spending in the day.

 

So one piece of advice would be to make sure you structure your schedule and information layout so that when you do offer something for free, it will also add value automatically. Like youtube videos and screenshots to illustrate how you lay out your strategy.

 

But back to the discarding the loser mentality. The key is to see things the way they really are (clearly defined price action), and systematically make a choice (take risks).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As noted on the contest thread, I am doing an experiment to see whether daytrade (Predict account) or swingtrade (my Onemove account) would be more profitable.

 

The daytrade is documented here http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/forex-trading-laboratory/16994-predict-experiment.html.

 

Today was the first day of the August Contest. I meant to take the same trade in my account as in the daytrade account, except hold it for an extended time until the direction changes. However, I already goofed. Price was far from where I intended to enter, but thinking I needed to enter one trade a day I entered a trade in the daytrade account. But then was called away. My buy order in the swing account did not trigger thus no trades today.

Edited by onemove

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  onemove said:
Entered long EURUSD @13295

 

Well, that swingtrade was not the ideal entry. Although if I was to make a comparison between the one trade a day daytrade and swingtrade accounts in the August Contest, then I had better start somewhere. I lucked out with this late swing entry on day 2. For the first week results are:

 

Daytrade: +24 pips (5 trades)

Swingtrade: +44 pips (trade still open)

 

From Aug 6 to 9, EURUSD had a 154 pip range. From open to close of this 4 day bar is 83 pips. Thus the swing trade captured less than a third of the swing and approximately half of the effective "body" from open to close.

 

In the same period the day ranges for the EURUSD was 287 pips with effective "body" of 161 pips. Ideally if my skills and timing were correct I would be capturing more pips using the daytrade than the swingtrade. But that has not been the case for this first week. Results might be also skewed here as the daytrade now is only taken in the US session between 09:30 am and 5pm EST. Might be timing or skills, this first week daytrades generated approximately 8% of the cummulative ranges.

Edited by onemove

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Week 2:

 

Daytrade: +78 pips (5 trades closed)

Swingtrade: +34 pips (2 trades open)

 

Daytrades captured 17.76% of the sum of the days' ranges at 439 pips

 

Swingtrades captures 45% of the week's range at 75 pips.

 

The swingtrade that was opened in week 1 gave back its profits. However the daily chart was still pointing up, so a second trade was added at the pullback. The second trade was entered too soon as the pullback was much deeper and the swing account spent the majority of the week in drawdown before pulling back into positive territory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Week 3:

 

Daytrade: -18 pips (5 trades closed)

Swingtrade: +5 pips (2 trades open)

 

Losing week on daytrades. The sum of the ranges for the week was 432 pips. Sum of the ranges for the week during the US session was 120 pips, day session ranged from 17 to 38 pips. Clearly I was not able to identify the market state correctly.

 

Swingtrade gained +5 pips for the week, almost at scratch. The week's range was 154 pips. The same two trades remain open with no activities in position changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Week 4:

 

Daytrade: +20 pips (5 trades closed)

Swingtrade: -79 pips (2 trades open)

 

Daytrades captured 5% of the sum of the days' ranges at 392 pips.

 

Swingtrades week's range at 161 pips. No new trades were added. The open trades lost 49% of the week's range.

 

Total for the contest period in August:

 

Daytrade: +104 pips

Swingtrade: - 80 pips

 

It is too bad that the swingtrade did not do as well as daytrade during this period.

Edited by onemove

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

If we can get 5 entries by the end of this week we can get one going for December.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Mysticforex said:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If we can get 5 entries by the end of this week we can get one going for December.

 

Where is the contest signup link?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  4EverMaAT said:
Where is the contest signup link?

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

I am not going to create the link unless we have 5 commitments by weeks end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  4EverMaAT said:
I thought I replied here. Perhaps you should also post in the other longer contest thread.

 

I would like to participate as well.

 

 

I did. Perhaps I should post here as well :cool:

 

 

Back by popular demand ! The Traderslaboratory forex trading contest.

 

 

https://fx2.oanda.com/mod_perl/fxcontest/fxcontest.pl?rm=contestDetails&contestId=3032

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read your post and would like to say thanks to you that you share this post here with us. I am totally agree with you and hope that you will continue to post here with us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Helas said:
I have read your post and would like to say thanks to you that you share this post here with us. I am totally agree with you and hope that you will continue to post here with us.

 

 

Helas,

I see this is your first post. I don't know if you are a new member though. We look forward to your continued sharing. Maybe you would join a future contest ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.