Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Trader J

How to Deal with Large Sums of Money?

Recommended Posts

With a $ 10.000 account, it seems almost everybody “knows” what to do with it. With a $100.000 account most people again know how to deal with it. A $100.000 nowadays does not seems that much money.

 

How does one trade a larger account, for example 10 million $ or 100 million $, or even more?

 

Does one just shift to a higher time frame, for example to a weekly time frame? Does one split it up in for example 10 parts and have each part traded by a different trader and strategy?

 

Is there anybody with experience that would like to share his/her knowledge? (private or public)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

Does one just shift to a higher time frame, for example to a weekly time frame? Does one split it up in for example 10 parts and have each part traded by a different trader and strategy?

....

 

I dont think I would try to scalp with that much money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally yes - go to higher time frames which is where the real money is to be made anyway.

 

Also diversification. I dont mean stocks, bonds, cash, gold, etc, I mean if you want to go long oil, you buy futures, you buy forwards, you buy swaps, you buy calls, you sell puts, you buy shares in BP, Shell, Total, you trade anything that will give you exposure to rising oil prices with a good correlation. Of course it's a bit more planned out than slamming any market you can think of - you need to think of correlations, volatility, liquidity, open interest, average daily volumes, etc.

 

Its surprising how much extra alpha you can generate over the course of a year with careful execution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I was going to ignore this, but I have to say something

 

I thinks it wonderful to assist folks asking for help...good job...

 

Now to put things in perspective...while its POTENTIALLY profitable to place a number of positions in related financial instruments...when you do this, you incur risks....and unfortunately those risks are "non-linear" (especially if are talking about options)

 

Once again not interested in putting on a seminar...but the short version is as follows

 

If you learn enough to know that you can profit handsomely by placing a series of related positions....then you are a danger to yourself....what you need to know IN ADDITION is how to characterize the risk (all the risks that you are exposed to) and "what to do" in case things go south.....are we clear....? (probably not)....

 

OK so let me make it "crystal" clear....when you put on a series of correlated investments that include options, (especially if you sell options) you have put yourself in a position whereby you can lose not only your entire position, but much more than that.....are we clear now....?

 

No personal criticism intended Dude....one hears the same recommendation all the time from others....and why not...risk is how we make money....for the orignal poster, just be clear on what your risks really are, and learn how to manage them first....otherwise at some point you will find out what the word "surprise" really means.....

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With a $ 10.000 account, it seems almost everybody “knows” what to do with it. With a $100.000 account most people again know how to deal with it. A $100.000 nowadays does not seems that much money.

 

How does one trade a larger account, for example 10 million $ or 100 million $, or even more?

 

Does one just shift to a higher time frame, for example to a weekly time frame? Does one split it up in for example 10 parts and have each part traded by a different trader and strategy?

 

Is there anybody with experience that would like to share his/her knowledge? (private or public)

 

Reality check...an individual with $100 million dollars would not be trading with it. In contrast, he/she would retire and take it easy for the rest of their life. Further, if they do decide to try to use "a little" of that $100 million...they would most likely hire someone and that someone would recommend art collections and such.

 

I think the ceiling for an individual trader is $10 million or less. That's the amount where the trader would still consider trading. Thus, anything more than that...the individual is thinking of other opportunities that's not trading related, early retirement and pleasures.

 

With that said, with a trading accounts LESS than $10 million, most would only use a small portion (e.g. 250,000 or less) for trading purposes.

 

The rest of the money, some smart person will sniff out the trader...get married...then divorce and take whatever the trader had left that hadn't already been spent on love. That's reality. :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This whole concept is putting the cart before the horse. After you are successful in trading you realize that you don't need 10 million or 1 million or 100 thousand in a trading account to make a damn good living. In a futures account anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With a $ 10.000 account, it seems almost everybody “knows” what to do with it. With a $100.000 account most people again know how to deal with it. A $100.000 nowadays does not seems that much money.

 

How does one trade a larger account, for example 10 million $ or 100 million $, or even more?

 

Does one just shift to a higher time frame, for example to a weekly time frame? Does one split it up in for example 10 parts and have each part traded by a different trader and strategy?

 

Is there anybody with experience that would like to share his/her knowledge? (private or public)

 

It depends. There are people or companies who chose like you suggest to 'spread' their risk by backing multiple traders/strategies. The trouble with this is trying to get a level of independence between them. I remember a big prop firm in London who had a lot of different traders but were they really doing drastically different things in the market? Apart from anything, from what I knew many of them were trading the same or similar products with size.

 

If you're just a really big trader or even otf (other time frame - the guys trading as pointed out already, over weeks and months) then I guess your major concern is your ability to enter and exit the markets. Size moves markets and traders look to piggy-back on that size. So getting involved at price levels where there is likely to be enough support or resistance to get in or out without moving the market greatly or where there's likely to be greater trading activity is likely to be beneficial.

 

Either this or you pay some quants and programmers to design some shit hot HFT and hope it doesn't do a Knight.:doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This whole concept is putting the cart before the horse. After you are successful in trading you realize that you don't need 10 million or 1 million or 100 thousand in a trading account to make a damn good living. In a futures account anyway.

 

What would you suggest as a minimum to make a living trading futures with normal retail leverage?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This whole concept is putting the cart before the horse. After you are successful in trading you realize that you don't need 10 million or 1 million or 100 thousand in a trading account to make a damn good living. In a futures account anyway.

 

Not to steer the thread away from its original thrust, but I am curious as to how much you think a skilled future's trader needs in account to make a damn good living, based upon your background in prop trading, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well I was going to ignore this, but I have to say something

 

I thinks it wonderful to assist folks asking for help...good job...

 

Now to put things in perspective...while its POTENTIALLY profitable to place a number of positions in related financial instruments...when you do this, you incur risks....and unfortunately those risks are "non-linear" (especially if are talking about options)

 

Once again not interested in putting on a seminar...but the short version is as follows

 

If you learn enough to know that you can profit handsomely by placing a series of related positions....then you are a danger to yourself....what you need to know IN ADDITION is how to characterize the risk (all the risks that you are exposed to) and "what to do" in case things go south.....are we clear....? (probably not)....

 

OK so let me make it "crystal" clear....when you put on a series of correlated investments that include options, (especially if you sell options) you have put yourself in a position whereby you can lose not only your entire position, but much more than that.....are we clear now....?

 

No personal criticism intended Dude....one hears the same recommendation all the time from others....and why not...risk is how we make money....for the orignal poster, just be clear on what your risks really are, and learn how to manage them first....otherwise at some point you will find out what the word "surprise" really means.....

 

Sorry Steve, I dont quite get what your driving at - youre saying you've got to understand the risks right? I would have thought that was gratis. I mean you're unlikely to have $100m if you dont have a pretty good awareness of risk right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not to steer the thread away from its original thrust, but I am curious as to how much you think a skilled future's trader needs in account to make a damn good living, based upon your background in prop trading, etc.

 

Define a 'damn good living' please?

 

a nice house, 4 houses round the globe.

2 cars, 20 cars?

 

You may have read the story in the papers about a trader who retired recently at 41 with 420 million. Apparently, despite his wealth, mansions around the world etc, he still wasnt happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Define a 'damn good living' please?

 

a nice house, 4 houses round the globe.

2 cars, 20 cars?

 

You may have read the story in the papers about a trader who retired recently at 41 with 420 million. Apparently, despite his wealth, mansions around the world etc, he still wasnt happy.

 

Yes, that phrase can mean just about anything! If you noticed, I was repeating the phrase "damn good living" from Colonel B's post, I was leaving it up to him to define, since he was the one that used it.

 

I suspect that my definition would be less money than many posters, I don't need some huge amount of money to be happy, much more important is having control over my life and my time! I've known many very wealthy people who are miserable, including one half-sister.

 

I look forward to Colonel B's reply regarding capital, for I hear figures all over the map regarding how much capital is realistically needed in the future's market. I have my own opinion, but want to hear some additional corroborating evidence, based on actual trading returns with a certain amount of capital over a sustained period of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How does one trade a larger account, for example 10 million $ or 100 million $, or even more?

 

Does one just shift to a higher time frame, for example to a weekly time frame? Does one split it up in for example 10 parts and have each part traded by a different trader and strategy?

 

I met a guy once who manages almost $5 billion (and has well over $100 million himself), the majority of which is in a futures program. They trade a lot of markets (indices, interest rates, currencies, metals, energies, and agriculturals). Their average hold time for a trade is about a week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Trader J,

 

You can do following things.

 

1) Divide your capital into 5 parts of $2 lac

2) Diversify your investment among different asset classes like Equity, Commodity, Real Estate, Fixed Income Plans and Retirement Plan

3) Breakdown your Equity Capital into three categories as Low risk, Medium risk and High risk

4) You should use your High risk capital for Intraday or scalping, Use your Medium risk capital for Short term trades ranging from 5 days to 10 days and use your low risk capital to invest for medium term period of 3-6 months by following Warren Buffet style.

5) Invest your Commodity capital in parts i.e make a rule that you would buy Gold whenever it dips 5%-10%. Remember being disciplined is very important.

6) Invest your Real Estate capital in buying a peace of land or invest in some business which can give you regular returns.

 

Do let me know if you need any other help.

 

Have a nice day..

Pushpa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First, you have to determine your goal. Growth or preservation or realization? From this you can start to make some decisions....

 

In general, traders with large sums of money are rightfully more concerned with preservation and as such they'll be more risk averse. Strategies generally involve diversification and risk reduction. In order to understand this, look up the utility value of money... if you have 100 million then gaining an additional 100 million isn't going to be worth as much as the first 100 million. As such, most people will be more inclined to protect the first 100 million then to gain the next 100 million.

 

In actuality you'd need a lot of money before you couldn't day trade in the futures markets.

--

Curtis

Home - OrderFlowDashPro

 

With a $ 10.000 account, it seems almost everybody “knows” what to do with it. With a $100.000 account most people again know how to deal with it. A $100.000 nowadays does not seems that much money.

 

How does one trade a larger account, for example 10 million $ or 100 million $, or even more?

 

Does one just shift to a higher time frame, for example to a weekly time frame? Does one split it up in for example 10 parts and have each part traded by a different trader and strategy?

 

Is there anybody with experience that would like to share his/her knowledge? (private or public)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If i had a million $ ,i would have invested it in multiple investments ..20% in real estate ,20% in hedge fund or mutual fund, 20% in stocks ,20% in options and 20% in forex/commodities...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.