Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

GlassOnion

Does Price Have a Memory?

Recommended Posts

does price have a memory? no memory? does the market care about momentum? or is it all discounted in the price at every second it is quoted?

 

are we shooting darts in the dark in a random market?

can we exploit inefficiencies?

can we forecast the future via statistical representations of price movements?

 

Although I have my views on the matter I want to open a discussion about it.

 

some academics think that the masses flock to TA due to ignorance and laziness....due to it is easier to try to find patterns in a chart even if you do not know exactly what you are looking at.

 

some technicians believe all you need is a chart, all else is mental masturbation.

 

what are your views....newbie,wannabes, experts all ideas welcomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
does price have a memory? no memory? does the market care about momentum? or is it all discounted in the price at every second it is quoted?

 

are we shooting darts in the dark in a random market?

can we exploit inefficiencies?

can we forecast the future via statistical representations of price movements?

 

Although I have my views on the matter I want to open a discussion about it.

 

some academics think that the masses flock to TA due to ignorance and laziness....due to it is easier to try to find patterns in a chart even if you do not know exactly what you are looking at.

 

some technicians believe all you need is a chart, all else is mental masturbation.

 

what are your views....newbie,wannabes, experts all ideas welcomed.

 

Even better, does the Market have Memory?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
does price have a memory? no memory? does the market care about momentum? or is it all discounted in the price at every second it is quoted?

 

are we shooting darts in the dark in a random market?

can we exploit inefficiencies?

can we forecast the future via statistical representations of price movements?

 

Although I have my views on the matter I want to open a discussion about it.

 

some academics think that the masses flock to TA due to ignorance and laziness....due to it is easier to try to find patterns in a chart even if you do not know exactly what you are looking at.

 

some technicians believe all you need is a chart, all else is mental masturbation.

 

what are your views....newbie,wannabes, experts all ideas welcomed.

 

No price has no memory.

 

After 4 years at this, I still have no freaking clue what people are talking about when they say "momentum".

 

I'm not sure what momentum is, so I have no idea how it would be discounted. But none of my trading models discounts for it.

 

Yes MOST people are shooting darts at a moving board in the dark. But the markets are not random, they are just most accurately depicted by a random walk model. This means they are efficient, not random.

 

Yes you can exploit inefficiencies, but finding them is the tricky part.

 

Yes you can reasonably forecast the probabilities of future prices. But the farther out you go, the worse your odds get.

 

The academics are right, and most "technicians" are just bastardizing what could actually be fairly robust statistical tools. And I'm fairly certain gartley patterns started as a traders inside joke about Keynes "animal spirits" and someone took them terribly out of context.

 

Technicians are wrong, and likely the only thing they're good at is masturbation.

 

That being said, academics might know the rules of the game, but don't know how to play. While technicians don't know either.

 

Also I don't like pissing on peoples beliefs, so if anybody angry technicians read this, sorry. But chances are you will only really be pissed if your a technician and not making money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a tough day?

 

Price is inanimate....so no "memory" per se....markets and the folk that comprise them...do in fact display memory....most of us (those without Alzheimers) have the ability to recall past prices for tradable assets of all kinds....so it should be no surprise that markets display behavior confirming that participants do in fact remember past pricing of assets..

 

Do you really need a primer on momentum?....its not a complex concept....human beings display the same kind of herd mentality that other animals do....in financial markets, this herd mentality is affected by reference to time frame and the ability to tolerate risk....among other things....

 

and finally, technicians are no different than any other population of participants. Some display significant skill, some do not.....similar to the folks posting in this thread...

 

 

Good luck in the markets.

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

some academics think that the masses flock to TA due to ignorance and laziness....due to it is easier to try to find patterns in a chart even if you do not know exactly what you are looking at.

.

 

Im hardly an academic, but I go with this.

 

I dont trade fx either, but consider this:

 

A govt wants to control its currency for fiscal reasons. It doesnt want its currency to be > x.

 

It will therefore sell when its currency reaches x.

 

Same with a pension fund that thinks xyz stock is undervalued at x. They will keep buying near x until they reach their quota.

 

Same with an oil refinery when crude reaches x.

 

Steve kinda eludes to this. It's the participants who are willing to trade at levels.

 

Given the market is made of people/organisations - who do have a memory, and more importantly, a purpose.

 

Sometimes they cant hold their level though. Nothing is written in stone here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Im hardly an academic, but I go with this.

 

I dont trade fx either, but consider this:

 

A govt wants to control its currency for fiscal reasons. It doesnt want its currency to be > x.

 

It will therefore sell when its currency reaches x.

 

Same with a pension fund that thinks xyz stock is undervalued at x. They will keep buying near x until they reach their quota.

 

Same with an oil refinery when crude reaches x.

 

Steve kinda eludes to this. It's the participants who are willing to trade at levels.

 

Given the market is made of people/organisations - who do have a memory, and more importantly, a purpose.

 

Sometimes they cant hold their level though. Nothing is written in stone here.

 

That's good dude... i'll take it a step further if you don't mind:

 

different types of orders tend to congregate en mass in specific price points on a chart. Particularly daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly highs and lows.

 

If price is approaching a level that was a low for a previous day/week/month, etc... you tend to have a disproportionatly large amount of buy orders at or slightly above that low. And, there tends to be a disproportionately large amount of sell orders at or just a bit below that particular "previous daily/weekly/monthly low", etc.

 

Why does this occur? many reasons. I know a bank that adjusts it's capital currency balance by hedging a certain amount based on where price is now compared to where it was at the high or low of the previous month. In other words, a currency they need to get rid of is at the high of last month? sell it.

 

That's one of so many reasons why a large amount of orders are not randomly dispersed across the many points of price change measured over any particular time span.

 

I posted some charts up on my thread the last few days actually showing opportunities to exploit these large numbers of order in concentrated areas. Here's a few examples of things I posted up from last thursday/friday.

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/attachments/2/31834d1349455614-watch-typical-day-real-day-trader-aud-cad-long-opportunity.jpg

 

And, on this page, read post #250

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/market-analysis/13737-watch-typical-day-real-day-trader-32.html

 

Of course, these two examples do by no means validate the "price has a memory" side of the debate. What they do show is that it is possible to pick tops and bottoms with better than random results, if other criteria are also correct, based on non-fundamental data. Furthermore, the reason that it works is because these areas are such that they provide such a high concentration of orders in such a relatively tight price zone (compared to say, an order placed neither at a previous weekly or monthly high or low), that it provides large institutions the NECESSARY LIQUIDITY to be able to readjust or establish large positions with minimal slippage.

 

Define this type of analysis as you will, but it is clearly not fundamental analysis that works with intrinsic underlying economic or financial conditions of the market, and it happens to create a situation where price has a greater chance of turning at a price point at which it turned at previously, all things being equal. I think memory would be a terrible word to describe such a phenomenon, but it is also far from random.

 

FTX

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a follow up to my previous post, at least one person has spent a good deal of time doing studies of technical analysis of stocks that trade in the U.S. exchanges (NASDAQ, NYSE, other non OTC exchanges, etc)

 

He found a bearish engulfing candlestick pattern has a 79% chance to produce a further drop in price (he defines the conditions as well as what a "further drop" in price is, etc).

 

He made this determination after studying 20,000 different examples of this candlestick pattern, in over 500 different stocks, over the course of a 10 year period. He does give some qualifying conditions, but he also has very strict quantifiable definitions for those, so I believe nothing at all is left to discretion. It's kinda his style.

 

He does this for many other classical technical patterns, etc.

 

here is the bearish engulfing example i speak of: http://www.thepatternsite.com/BearEngulfing.html

 

I know this may not speak to price having a memory per se, but it does speak to price having statistically valid repeating patterns... call that what you will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
does price have a memory? no memory? does the market care about momentum? or is it all discounted in the price at every second it is quoted?

 

are we shooting darts in the dark in a random market?

can we exploit inefficiencies?

can we forecast the future via statistical representations of price movements?

 

Although I have my views on the matter I want to open a discussion about it.

 

some academics think that the masses flock to TA due to ignorance and laziness....due to it is easier to try to find patterns in a chart even if you do not know exactly what you are looking at.

 

some technicians believe all you need is a chart, all else is mental masturbation.

 

what are your views....newbie,wannabes, experts all ideas welcomed.

 

price does not, but market

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just to throw a spanner in the works........

 

what about when you take into account the futures backwardation and contango?

does the market adjust for this.....does the market just trade off the spot?

Is the memory just short term, or extremely selective and biased by hindsight (as memory actually is)

 

There is reality and there is fantasy, and when a market is in contango for much of the year, and people point to a continuous contract and say - if you had bought here and sold here you would have made X - they are living in a fantasy.....they forget about the reality of the roll each month.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
just to throw a spanner in the works........

 

what about when you take into account the futures backwardation and contango?

does the market adjust for this.....does the market just trade off the spot?

Is the memory just short term, or extremely selective and biased by hindsight (as memory actually is)

 

There is reality and there is fantasy, and when a market is in contango for much of the year, and people point to a continuous contract and say - if you had bought here and sold here you would have made X - they are living in a fantasy.....they forget about the reality of the roll each month.......

 

Just about every tick has meaning to someone somewhere. I have seen the same when a trader anticipates a level from a continuous contract that, in fact, did not exist the previous time around. Yet, he''ll trade it and it works; reinforcing the thought that it was a valid level. Even though price may never have been there, if enough people give the level meaning, then it has meaning.

 

We can say that a trend is price moving to a new level where enough traders on both sides find meaning. Meaning, they completely disagree on the future direction of price. When a price is trending, most people agree on the direction of price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Markets have high and low concentrations of trading activity at different prices.With that in mind I'll make 2 points. First is that if someone holds a position, the point where that position goes from positive to negative or vice versa is important to the owner of that position. Just think about how many people "move their stop to breakeven". It's a definite psychological factor. Just like 00 numbers. If there are many traders with positions there, that could cause them to act again at or beyond this point. Second is that other traders looking to profit from prior action will look at these previously important "action zones" and either trade with them in anticipation of prior business coming in once again to 'defend' their current position or look to trade a break where said positions are liquidated to a greater or lesser extent. This is why "stop hunting/running" exists. No levels = no stop hunting regardless of whether levels are self-fulfilling or not.

 

My feeling about people who claim "levels don't exist" or "price has no memory(or the market has no memory of price)" is that they do not understand the nature of trading very well. These are the guys who in the past have identified levels then tried to buy or sell every one then claim when they lose money that levels do not exist. Well, what do you expect? If the market was bound by the same levels then it would never go anywhere. Define a structure and assign context to the market which you trade, then you will truly understand how levels are so important. :shocked:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
does price have a memory? no memory? does the market care about momentum? or is it all discounted in the price at every second it is quoted?

 

are we shooting darts in the dark in a random market?

can we exploit inefficiencies?

can we forecast the future via statistical representations of price movements?

 

Although I have my views on the matter I want to open a discussion about it.

 

some academics think that the masses flock to TA due to ignorance and laziness....due to it is easier to try to find patterns in a chart even if you do not know exactly what you are looking at.

 

some technicians believe all you need is a chart, all else is mental masturbation.

 

what are your views....newbie,wannabes, experts all ideas welcomed.

 

Price have a memory,but the price is the same amnesia effect, the physical price can be calculated, but human nature is unable to calculate!Market price is variable, and human nature is the most important weight genes, so I think the technical analysis of the soul is not to create a perfect, but locking the tip of the iceberg of the physical probability, however, the calculation and control of human nature in addition to talent, and on the leftunder luck, ---Sorry,my english is

very poor!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Price have a memory,but the price is the same amnesia effect, the physical price can be calculated, but human nature is unable to calculate!Market price is variable, and human nature is the most important weight genes, so I think the technical analysis of the soul is not to create a perfect, but locking the tip of the iceberg of the physical probability, however, the calculation and control of human nature in addition to talent, and on the leftunder luck ...!

 

Post of the Month winner!

Hands down...

let's resume voting in November :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.