Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tams

[FUNNY] Jack Welch Tweets Conspiracy Theory

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately Mr. Welch has finally turned the corner and become senile....too bad...but on the other hand he is much more entertaining this way....and I would imagine (if he continues) he will one day have his own reality TV show....sort of like Jerry Springer.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately Mr. Welch has finally turned the corner and become senile....too bad...but on the other hand he is much more entertaining this way....and I would imagine (if he continues) he will one day have his own reality TV show....sort of like Jerry Springer.....

 

...perhaps he'll have a cooking show. "Cooking Books with Jack".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just a pity that so few members respond to this thread.

Maybe they dont understand the implications.

Or maybe they are only interested in entry/ exit info.

Its a very important comment!

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's just a pity that so few members respond to this thread.

Maybe they dont understand the implications.

Or maybe they are only interested in entry/ exit info.

Its a very important comment!

bobc

 

FWIW - or maybe there are enough political ideological sites to follow this up, and most would prefer to leave politics out of a trading site ??? (we all know all sides push their own ideas usually based on an ideology rather than evidence that might actually benefit those they are meant to represent, I mean CEOs represent the shareholders right? politicians represent the constituents right? auditors represent the truth right? government numbers never get readjusted, changed, manipulated or restated right?- but that is just my conspiracy theorist friends talking :))

 

As to its important implications for trading, what do you think they are bob?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FWIW - or maybe there are enough political ideological sites to follow this up, and most would prefer to leave politics out of a trading site ??? (we all know all sides push their own ideas usually based on an ideology rather than evidence that might actually benefit those they are meant to represent, I mean CEOs represent the shareholders right? politicians represent the constituents right? auditors represent the truth right? government numbers never get readjusted, changed, manipulated or restated right?- but that is just my conspiracy theorist friends talking :))

 

As to its important implications for trading, what do you think they are bob?

 

Hi SIUYA

The post does suggest govt. may be cooking the books, which the republicans will exploit where possible..,which is damaging to Obama.

What would you prefer to trade, a Bull or a Bear market ?

Historically,a reelected Demoratic President has led to bigger subsequent gains than a switch to Republican.

So, although I dont support Obama, I would rather trade a Bull market.

I have some supporting info on this which I will post soon.

I also have some esoteric info which points to an Obama victory and a run in equities and commodities to March 2013. This I will not post because everybody laughs at my lunar trading model.

kind regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Bob,

 

I prefer to go with the tv shows 'yes minister' and 'yes prime minister' --- ideas that its not actually the government of the day manipulating anything.

 

the father of a friend of mine used to love those tv shows - until he became a politician (a rare breed that actually represented his constituents and went against his party on a few occasions in NSW Australia)

Once he joined the system he realised how close to reality these comedy shows were.

 

As for bull or bear - either is great - range is a killer. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

…like a ranting stone ;)

 

I personally don’t think it is conspiracy thinking or even cynical to believe that almost every report ‘number’ released for ALL the decades they’ve been coming out was doctored for political / ‘economic’ motives.

 

Politics?

Let’s not limit it to false dichotomy politics. The prevailing paradigm progressively broadens what ‘conspiracy’ thinking is…

Now, these days virtually anyone who makes a gesture supporting ‘freedom’ and away from ‘collectivism’ is at risk of getting the label.

 

"~The majority of people seem OK with just waddling through life, accepting the lies and misinformation blasted from the boob tube and their various iGadgets by their collectivist owners, gorging themselves to death on Twinkies and Cheetos, paying 15% interest on their $10,000 rolling credit card balance, and growing ever more dependent on the welfare/warfare state to provide and protect them from accepting personal responsibility for their lives. A minority of critical thinking people have chosen to question everything they see and hear being spewed at us by the propagandist mainstream media.~"

 

paraphrased from Jim Quinn DECLINE, DECAY, DENIAL, DELUSION, & DESPAIR « The Burning Platform

 

and btw, claims to be neither – to not be in the ‘majority’ nor in the ‘minority’ mentioned above - won’t work much longer…

 

ranting stone … the good conspiracy theorists are not concerned with the nature of or when they will happen… they are concerned with how many false flags will occur before election… and the survey says...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.