Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Comparing ECNs with Market Makers

Recommended Posts

One of the central differences between equities markets (which trade on exchanges such as the NYSE) and the foreign exchange market is the fact that forex is an unregulated market that is truly global in nature. That is to say, there is no single exchange or central address where the business of currency trading takes place. Instead of using entities like the London or New York Stock Exchange, currency traders enact transactions using over-the-counter (OTC) entities where buyers and sellers from all areas of the world meet to make their transactions.

 

Since these markets lack centralization, it is possible for the prices in a currency pair to see some slight variations between brokers. Most trading activities can be traced back to some of the larger banks in the world, and this is generally referred to as the Interbank Market. Access to this market is limited, however, and retail markets must use intermediaries in order to place transactions here (because retail traders lack the necessary credit connections).

 

Of course, this does not suggest that retail traders are totally excluded from placing forex transactions but in order to make these transactions, a broker must be used. There are two main types of forex brokers that aid in this process - Electronic Communications Networks (ECNs) and Market Makers. Here, we will look at some of the benefits and drawbacks of each type of broker as a way of understanding the ways each can affect the everyday practices of forex traders.

 

The Common Workings of Market Makers

 

Market makers get their name from the fact that they set, or "make," the Bid and Ask prices that are available to their retail clients in trading platform quote screens. The “clients” in these cases can include banking institutions in addition to smaller retail investors and part of the service Market Makers provide is to bring extra liquidity to the forex market.

 

To enable these trades, Market Makers act as a counterparty to every transaction, effectively taking the opposing side of each trade that is initiated by a client. In essence, when a client buys a currency pair, the Market Maker will enter into a sell position. If a sell trade is placed, the Market Maker must buy that currency pair from trading client. Given these factors, it can be concluded that the exchange rates set by Market Makers are at least in some way influenced by their own best interests. Market Maker profits are generated largely from spread charges (the difference between the Bid and Ask prices available to clients), which are typically fixed by the Market Maker.

 

Since Market Makers find themselves in a position to act as counterparties to client trades, there are many cases where they will hedge (cover) the orders by passing them along to a third party. In other cases, these companies will actually hold the orders and trade against the client.

 

Market Makers can be divided into two categories - Retail and Institutional. Institutional market makers tend to be banks or other types of large financial corporations which might offer a bid/ask quote to other banks or financial institutions, ECNs or possibly Market Makers in the Retail space. Retail Market Makers tend to be companies focused on offering forex trading access to individual traders.

 

Benefits of Trading with Market Makers

 

When looking at the trading platforms offered by Market Makers, most of the typical chart and news feed offerings can be found, but, in some cases, the platforms can be more user friendly, given the type of client that is targeted by these companies. Additionally, price movements in currency pairs might be less volatile (relative to the movements seen with ECNs). This will be viewed as a positive by some traders, although it will be a negative factor to others (such as scalpers or news traders) who need greater volatility in order to reach profits.

 

Drawbacks of Trading with Market Makers

 

One of the most common criticisms of Market Makers comes from the possible conflict of interest that can be present when orders are executed. This comes from the fact that Market Makers are put in the position to trade against client orders on a regular basis. With this, there is the added possibility that a Market Maker will display an inaccurate (worse) bid and ask price when compared to other brokerage companies. This comes from the fact that Market Maker’s are able to manipulate their price displays, run client stop losses, and prevent client trades from reaching profit targets. There is also a greater chance of slippage in prices when major news events are released.

 

While this is not to say that all (or even a majority) of Market Makers engage in these practices, it should be acknowledged that these possibilities exist. There are many examples of Market Makers which view scalping strategies as unfavorable and, as a result, some of these companies have placed scalpers on manual execution, which reduces the probability that these traders will be able to enter into the market at their preferred prices. In other cases, there have been cited examples of quote displays from Market makers which have frozen (stalled) during times of enhanced volatility in the markets.

 

In the next section of this article, we will compare these factors with what is typically seen with ECNs in order to give traders a better sense of how their trades are actually placed when new positions are opened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when you read your contract carefully, you'll see that all retail brokers and are market makers. This isnt a bad thing....somebody's gotta be the counterparty to your trade to deal with it properly. as long as you get filled reasonably....who really cares.

 

the stigma that comes with MM term is a few less than scrupulous brokers did stop hunting, fake spikes, intentional price freezing, asyncronous slippage (positive slippage, no positive gain, negative slippage, trader gets full negative slip). This was further placed in the spotlight when the infamous virtual dealer plug-in got into the public view. metaquotes and related companies went through great lengths to suppress video and other proof of how it works. real eye-opener to see how easy it is to manipulate price feed vs orders. it is rare that a broker today will use the dealer (blatantly) as the competition is much better now and there are several reputable choices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.