Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

wmck6167

Year to Date Profit is 112.2% but Still Fighting

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am new to trader's lab and this is my second post. I am not good in English writing. But just would like make some friends here. I think I am a learner daily in stocks market since I always can learn something new from there everyday. Here is my principles for trading, first, I try not to gambling. I meant I do not place my important trade based on pure guessing. Whenever I conduct a very critical trade, I may ask me if I am gambling? If it is, I will try to look at what kind of risk I am going to bear. Second, from my experience, most of time I found that if I do trade right(what' the righteousness?), then I won't worry too much the risk, but if I do thing wrong(I am still human), then I found that I was in a war! Then I need to set up a strategy to figure out how not to be defeated!

 

Here is what I think, if you look at market, you probably agree that the probability to win and lost is just half and half, but the amount of win is always smaller than the lost generally. I think because when you trade, when price has rising, but you take profit, it continue up, but when you lost, you generally are pushed to lost max. So my strategy to win in market is not on “how you can win”, but based on “how you not to be defeated when you are in war mode!” and control the risk. Then the lost will be smaller than the profit you win and you can continue accumulate profit.

 

Like to learn from you guys if you have different thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I start learn stock trading, I like a kid want to learn a lot of things and believe that I can find some rules to beat the market. Later on, I find a lot of rules; but sometimes work and sometimes did not work. It really confused me and concluded that market is unpredictable. But sometimes I also felt someone is manipulating the market. But, theses factors are non-controllable. How can I beat these non-controllable enemies if I really need to compete with them? If there is really have a 80/20 rules, which meant what shall I do if I was fell into this 80 percent or even 90% category? So I start to focus on controllable factors. Then I need to think about a plan or strategy to let myself not to be defeated if I found that I was against the market. I focus on control the controllable factors(it's me), then I found I can reduce the lost! Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found there is an interesting thing happened in my mind when I purchased stocks. I purchased stock based on expection. The expection is coming from the judgment of tools I used to analyze the stock will go up. The I buy the stock, if the stock price go up, then I may buy more, if jump, I may take profit. This operation mode seems to be reasonable. But you still put your fate on uncontrollable since it dependents on the result you got and you wait for it. Until one day, I changed my way of operation, I do not put my fate to uncontrollable factor. I tried to set up the plan and do a little bit calculations before I decide to purchase stock. Then situation start to change dramatically. I felt that I like a fisher with good bait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, MMS,

 

How about yours? I maybe find out something different with mine or learn from yours if you shares. Thanks. Really, I believe that mine is no special compared with tons of books showed so excellent strategy in Amazon book store. I aslo learned from there, honestly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, MMS,

 

I think this is one of my strategy, I think. If I find I am kept lost in stock trading, that means I am making action easily fell into the 80% range in 80/20 rule. So the best way to win the game is developing a procedure to “play game against myself”. Then I might have a chance to fell into 20% category. So the title still fighting is meant to fight myself bad habit! Not the market! Glad to hear your any comment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
112% YTD profits? Wow ... how did you do that? What is your strategy?

 

MMS

 

HI. MMS,

Here is what I think. There are two giants I really respect. One is B. Graham and the other is W. Buffett. When I read master B. Graham book, I was impressed by his diversity on stocks to lower the risks. When I read Buffett's book, I was impressed by his concentration on profitable target. So I think how to lower risks but also concentrate the profitable target? The key words shall be diverse and concentrate. My strategy is diverse my risks, e.g. if I have poor money management, then I diverse my money to lower risks, then focus on the target. I tried to buy stocks "in my risk" is low. Again it's back to safety of margin again, I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.