Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

BlueHorseshoe

Patently Not the Case?

Recommended Posts

I was recently made aware that Mark Helweg has received a patent for ValueCharts.

 

Is there anyone with a legal background who would care to explain how this is possible?

 

I consulted a corporate lawyer with this question a few years back (not about ValueCharts specifically, you understand), and was told that it was not possible to patent a mathematical formula, otherwise it would be possible to patent something like the theory of relativity and restrict its use by others.

 

In fact, didn't George Lane try and patent the Stochastic oscillator and fail?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was recently made aware that Mark Helweg has received a patent for ValueCharts.

 

Is there anyone with a legal background who would care to explain how this is possible?

 

I consulted a corporate lawyer with this question a few years back (not about ValueCharts specifically, you understand), and was told that it was not possible to patent a mathematical formula, otherwise it would be possible to patent something like the theory of relativity and restrict its use by others.

 

In fact, didn't George Lane try and patent the Stochastic oscillator and fail?

 

BlueHorseshoe

i don't think you can patent a mathematical formula but you can a visual representation (such as a chart..etc.) that may have that formula in its' number crunching. The visual representation would be a creation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And then how would one define a formula that was similar but not identical? Just a complete can of worms. I am not aware of the ability to patent a mathematical formula either. Value charts are in the public domain anyway, and have been for years. It's never been used much because well, their isn't a lot of 'value' in 'value charts' LOL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i don't think you can patent a mathematical formula but you can a visual representation (such as a chart..etc.) that may have that formula in its' number crunching. The visual representation would be a creation.

 

A bit like patenting a video game rather than the underlying code that generates the graphics?

 

But then the visual representation of a value chart is just OHLC bars. Maybe I should try and dig a copy of Helweg's patent application out from the web . . .

 

Thanks.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So this patent does exist:

 

United States Patent: 8195553

 

The patent would seem to be for any indicator that generates a volatility derived normalisation of price. Slightly hard to believe.

 

So, what does this mean? Does it mean that Mr Helweg could try and stop someone else selling an indicator which normalizes price within, say, Keltner Channels?

 

I suspect if Gosu were still around at TL he'd have known the answer!

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since the only people interested in this will be the suckers, does it really matter? (Ooo, look at all the pretty colors...)

 

Db

 

Hi DB,

 

Try and abstract from the specific to the general . . .

 

I'm not interested in ValueCharts - I am interested in the fact that someone has been able to earmark such a general and public concept as their own intellectual property. You have a golden 'C' next to your name - I'm sure you can figure out the implications.

 

Anyway, if you're not interested, why bother posting on the thread?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know about patents, but clearly how something is represented can make a big difference.....

have you followed the samsung v apple court cases lately?

Plus there was the TT static DOM that had a lot of patent issues in recent years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why not to simply connect you account to myfxbook which will collect all this data automatically for you? The process you described looks tedious and a bit obsolete but may work for you though.
    • The big breakthrough with AI right now is “natural language computing.”   Meaning, you can speak in natural language to a computer and it can go through huge data sets, make sense out of them, and speak back to you in natural language.   That alone is a huge breakthrough.   The next leg? AI agents. Where they don’t just speak back to you.   They take action. Here’s the definition I like best: an AI agent is an autonomous system that uses tools, memory, and context to accomplish goals that require multiple steps.   Everything from simple tasks (analyzing web traffic) to more complex goals (building executive briefings or optimizing websites).   They can:   > Reason across multiple steps.   >Use tools like a real assistant (Excel spreadsheets, budgeting apps, search engines, etc.)   > Remember things.   And AI agents are not islands. They talk to other agents.   They can collaborate. Specialized agents that excel at narrow tasks can communicate and amplify one another’s strengths—whether it’s reasoning, data processing, or real-time monitoring.   What it Looks Like You wake up one morning, drink your coffee, and tell your AI agent, “I need to save $500 a month.”   It gets to work.   First, it finds all your recurring subscriptions. Turns out you’re paying $8.99 for a streaming service you forgot you had.   It cancels it. Then it calls your internet provider, negotiates a lower bill, and saves you another $40. Finally, it finds you car insurance that’s $200 cheaper per year.   What used to take you hours—digging through statements, talking to customer service reps on hold for an hour, comparing plans—is done while you’re scrolling Twitter.   Another example: one agent tracks your home maintenance needs and gets information from a local weather-monitoring agent. Result: "Rain forecast next week - should we schedule gutter cleaning now?"   Another: an AI agent will plan your vacations (“Book me a week in Italy for under $2,000”), find the cheapest flights, and sort out hotels with a view.   It’ll remind you to pay bills, schedule doctor’s appointments, and track expenses so you’re not wondering where your paycheck went every month.   The old world gave you tools—Excel spreadsheets, search engines, budgeting apps. The new world gives you agents who do the work for you.   Don’t Get Too Scared (or Excited) Yet William Gibson famously said: "The future is already here – it's just not evenly distributed."   AI agents will distribute it. For decades, the tools that billionaires and corporations used to get ahead—personal assistants, financial advisors, lawyers—were out of reach for regular people.   AI agents could change that.   BUT, remember…   We’re in inning one.   AI agents have a ways to go.   They’re imperfect. They mess up. They need more defenses to get ready for prime time.   To be sure, AI is powerful, but it’s not a miracle worker. It’s great at helping humans solve problems, but it’s not going to replace all jobs overnight.   Instead of fearing AI, think of it as a tool to A.] save you time on boring stuff and B.] amplify what you’re already good at. Right now is the BEST time to start experimenting. It’s also the best time to find investments that will “make AI work for you”. Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential)   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/     
    • What a wild year.   AI seems to be appearing everywhere you look, Paris hosted a weird Olympics, unrest continues in the Middle East, the US endured a crazy-heated election, and the largest rocket ever to fly successfully landed in a giant pair of robot arms.   Okay, but what about the $money stuff?   Well, this year we've seen a load of uncertainty - inflation is still biting and many businesses have gone down.   Property has been very fractured, with developments becoming prohibitively expensive, while other markets have boomed.   It hasn't been an easy ride, that's for sure.   However, the stock market has had some outstanding results, and for those who know how to trade, some have done VERY well for themselves.   Some have replaced their incomes. Some have set themselves up for the rest of their days on this planet.   How about you? How did you go? Author: Louise Bedford    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/  
    • U Unity Software stock watch, attempting to move higher off the 22.4 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?U  
    • TSSI TSS stock, watch for an ascending triangle breakout above 11.49, target 15 area at https://stockconsultant.com/?TSSI
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.