Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tupapa

Tupapa's Log

Recommended Posts

This morning price found R at C, but then broke through and I didn't move my stop to BE, which was an error.

 

It then moved all the way up to D, where it V-reversed, and then found Support at C, then all the way up to D again,l where it triple topped and traveled to the IBL, where it found Support. Unfortunately I didn't have a level here so I didn't take this.

 

For the afternoon, it seems like C is losing its importance, and the market is range bound between D and the IBL.

 

Plan is to buy the IBL and short D on rejections. if we break D, short E on a rejection

If we break the IBL, go long at B.

 

If we break any of these levels short a pullback.

5aa711a120c84_15-1morning.thumb.png.98458d6736143738c05b8df7c4171c0b.png

5aa711a126643_15-1afternoonpremarket.thumb.png.9f9ddcb7a0540202492fb5d2ac70a94e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's afternoon trading was ok, given the few opportunities following my plan.

 

For tomorrow:

 

Short a rejection of C

 

Long at E

 

If we break below, short a pullback as usual, the rest of the level also apply.

5aa711a158e86_16-11PREMARKET.thumb.png.ce67ee74b497df2a078497fd3c5186ea.png

5aa711a160cb1_15-11afternoon.thumb.png.19b55f3afa6c2e6c1b65012b7ca4af0d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Few changes to the plan to reflect the evening session:

 

At B go long if hold above, if we break below short a pullback and look for a reversal at C.

 

At A short a rejection, if we break above watch out for D for a reversal, if we hold above A go long and watch for a reversal at E

5aa711a2152f8_16-11pre.thumb.png.59d19e75ef631da6184b25d9630cbd1d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First looking at yesterdays trading:

 

I found conditions very choppy in the morning, but kept trading, losing ticks when I should've stayed out of the market. It isn't the first time that I experience a choppy market and it's very difficult to keep a stop

 

Secondly in the afternoon, I missed the best trade, short the pullback to 60 because I was focused on a double bottom pattern, this is irrelevant and the break of TL and test is a perfect entry.

 

Today has been a pretty crazy morning and I haven't been controlled. Exiting the short at 18, when I had so many reasons to stay in it made me mad at myself and I lost focus.

 

For the afternoon,l the plan is:

 

Buy A and sell B

 

if we break below A sell a pullback

16-11.thumb.png.53ca2b9331a5506e114a8b2346f93a4e.png

5aa711a36cf51_17-11afternoonplan.thumb.png.53923322ec565b3a10abac4ff4e0fe34.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's story, and how I perceived things, which resulted in a mediocre morning and a terrible afternoon:

 

7:16- Looks more like Ret than Rev

7:43- Comes up very quickly, don't wanna short against it.

8:03- Market falls, I wanna short a test of 48

8:12- Climax and break of Tl, don't wanna short anymore, dont want shorts

 

From here I went long at 46, thinking it was the climax re-test.

 

After this I didn't hold to my short at 18, which was the trade of the day, and my trading got worse and worse during the afternoon, I lost control and went absolutely mental after 12.

 

Errors:

 

1- Imagining patterns, climax and re-tests.

 

2- Following other traders.

 

3- Not holding to my winners.

 

4- Entering on "mini ranges" against the trend, when there is no real rejection but acceptance and my stops get hit.

 

5- Using tight stops which lead to very frustrating losers.

 

More importantly, I just didn't follow the plan and until I can do this, I shouldn't trade real money, it is very frustrating seing how If I'd followed the plan, I'd made money. When I am in front of the screen, I think I focus to much on the intraday levels, and forget my 30m levels, which are what I should be trading.

 

Tomorrow its long A ans short B, lets see if I can follow this.

5aa711a398834_17-11morning.thumb.png.c9464b7dbbdcdaa8a4c7ef1d3e6dd567.png

5aa711a39fcaf_17-11afternoon.thumb.png.7465f1cd667bfd18b73dde78d71f6d88.png

5aa711a3a465d_18-11pre.thumb.png.cf78addf8854e2bb5f548b9303ae3da9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This morning there was no test of 38 and hence no short.

 

I tried shorting the IBL on two occasions but was looking for to good prices and confirmation, at the same time, so didn't get fills. After this I was patient and waited for my next level, which was 94. Here price went through it like a knife through butter, and I shorted the pullback.

 

There was a double bottom at 87, which was part of the plan, but I wasn't fast enough to SAR, after this I got in at 11:00, but didn't hold for long enough.

 

This afternoon, the plan is:

 

At A go Long, if we break short a pullback.

At 142.78 go long on a rejection, if we break, short a pullback.

 

Above price there is resistance at B and C, sho a short of either level would be called for on a rejection.

5aa711a5babd1_21-1afternoonplan.thumb.png.31fb834fddc5a54fc2e3b540a7ce4d17.png

5aa711a5c189f_21-1morning.thumb.png.c50ea8ba15572e648ed0a1ddd28b6360.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This afternoon I only made one more trade which was part of the plan, long at 87 and out 94.

 

Overall a good disciplined day, I could've been more aggressive entering at the IBL and I didn't hold the winner at 11:00 for long enough.

 

A part from that a good day.

5aa711a662ea4_22-1pre.thumb.png.fda312d1ea33eee132e7f59a06d25ffd.png

5aa711a66a10d_21-1afternoon.thumb.png.15cdb886c5982aa97ff42e9ecd639e1f.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomorrow I will upload today's trading. The plan for the day is initially to look for a reversal at A,B,C or D, although depending on where we open, other levels could come into play.

5aa711a71f081_23-1pre.png.1c543df019665834dd20317677a015ee.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Attached is yesterdays trading, which was my best performance so far.

 

This morning traders paid attention to 38, but I wasn't fast enough to enter the 1m double top or the IBH test.

 

After this Price found Support at 07, and is now in the middle of the profile. Or of this was determined in foresight, but planning and execution are two completely different skills, my execution needs much improvement.

 

For the afternoon:

 

Short the IBH rejection at 37

Long on a pullback to 28 (we've jsut broken)

Short rejecion of45

Short rejection of 55

Short rejection of 61-64

22-1.thumb.png.7358b4d5dfc33b31a1e5d5b744b9bf8f.png

5aa711a767461_23-1afternoon.JPG.39bf0097ebddfb584d1e681d6d680f6d.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How price reacted to the morning plan:

 

It found good support at 40, which I perceived but didn't take because it was 2 ticks away from my level at 38.

 

Then it blasted through 64 and 78, and I hadn't planed for levels above this, which was a mistake from my part, since it lead to confusion.

 

Then we pulled back to 78, but found Support at 73, where there is Single prints and air below, it is now an important level.

 

For the afternoon:

 

Short a rejection of C, if we break above, buy a pullback.

 

Long if B holds, if we break, short a pullback.

 

Long on a rejection of A, below this, short a pullback.

5aa711a867b68_24-1afternoon.thumb.png.ab2cca6acd3d1920319800b93bb93f98.png

23-1.thumb.png.1986d093bc22c59873e27c1543925b3a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's trading wasn't great, because I failed to perceive the change in trend at 12:00 and kept looking for longs. I also missed some important info on the profile, that would've enabled me to make some good trades, instead of perceiving them after they'd taken place.

 

In order to avoid this, I am incorporating a periodic MP, Trend and S/R assessment throughout the day.

5aa711a898442_25-1pre.thumb.png.dc9666beec4d8c03836729ab3a3702b6.png

24-1.thumb.png.51b053b7aabced04d5d48f7c5ecfc3bc.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A recap on the Bunds most recent action:

 

After the fakeout on thursday, there was a very strong downtrend on friday. Friday's bar is extremely wide, showing very strong selling pressure, and a breakout to the downside seems likely, specially after sellers rejected the all time highs around 146.00

 

I don't know where we'll open tomorrow, but if there is a Gap down, 141.92 could come into play as support, below this there is 141.37, between these two levels, 141.64 could act as S/R, since it is the MP of that small daily range.

 

On the 60m chart, the most relevant levels are 142.21, which was the low point of friday, and also the lower limit of the value area of the current range. Below this there is the swing low 142.07, this level seems less relevant, because we are below value, and traders really haven't spent any time around here, we could easily slide through it like a knife through butter.

 

Now on to the 15m chart and the plan for the day:

 

If we open above 142.21, look to go long if there is a rejection of this level.

 

Above this level, a short is called on a rejection of the following: 142.36, 142.60 and 142.79. Although it seems unlikely that we'll get to 142.79, it is also the 50% ret of the most recent downmove.

 

Below 142.21, look to go short if sellers reject the level.

If buyers step in and reverse the trend at 142.07, go long.

Watch out for a potential reversal at 142.00, traders love round numbers, below this, look for a reversal at 141.92, for the reasons mentioned in the daily chart analysis.

5aa711aa3eabf_Bunddaily27-1.png.622d9f29246c0df834007aaae1523d0c.png

5aa711aa43528_Bund60m27-1.png.4f4e3a264c1d993e41d95bb435b42422.png

5aa711aa47a10_27-115m.png.d8fe55e23de1760d73ab723c7623f5af.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Price found R at 53, which was a swing high on the 15m I didn't mention yesterday. Then it broke below 20 and 06, didn't pullback to 06, instead made a LH at 03.

 

After this there was PSupport at 141.75 and support at 141.64, which was a level and ended up being the low of the day.

 

Tomorrows plan:

 

Long rejection of 141.37, from yesterdays daily analysis.

Long rejection of 141.64, if we fall below, short a pullback

Long Rejection of 141.85

 

Short rejection of 142.03

Short rejection of 142.11

Short Rejection of 142.20

5aa711aaca5af_29-1pre.png.2b0183b2541a188916b2e99bee2111cb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This morning was bad for me, I was to focused on following the plan, and lost sight of how choppy the market was, I started taking 2 losers, on one of them I didn't move my stop to breakeven, and after this I lost focus, I was angry and didn't realize how choppy the market was.

 

Price was paying no attention whatsoever to my levels, and that should've been a sign to stop me from trading, until the market picked a direction.

 

When the market is moving so sluggishly, making marginally HHs or LLs but not picking a direction, there is a lot of potential for account destruction. I am trying to see this as an experience that I can learn from, as opposed to a failure.

 

In order to avoid getting caught in this sort of conditions again, I am including a "choppiness" in my 2 hourly conditions assessment, if there are no trends in the market, there is no point in trading it.

30-1.thumb.png.fe96c849c89ee591648063a91ca83ff9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tupapa said:
Tomorrow's Plan:

 

Long on a rejection of A

Short Rejection of B

Short Rejection of C

Short Rejection of D

 

Long rejection of E

Long Rejection of F

 

Are you only trading REVs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When prices reach your levels, do you look for actionable patterns (DB, DT, HL, LH, Hinges and SBs?

 

I have found that looking for these kind of patterns on the tick chart when price reaches S/R helps me avoid some of the chop.

 

I have not tested that extensively, but for example, when approaching R a DT followed by a break of DL increases the probability of success, besides, entering in the tick gives you razor thin stops. The problem I am dealing with now is how to get out of the tick and manage the trade following longer term waves.

 

Just my 2 cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.