Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tupapa

Tupapa's Log

Recommended Posts

Update on Bunds, nothing is clear to me this morning. We just had an upwvae up to 69, which isn't a lvel and found S at 54.

 

On the 15m we broke that red up trendline, and I can draw a down TL from 04s, touching 68. he market looks bearish on the 15m, as we failed to hold above 63, which was old support, now resistance.

 

As for a plan, I am struggling to put anything together, so it might be better to stand aside until things are more clear to me.

 

Below price, I am looking at:

 

Longs 47

Longs41

Longs 35

Longs 24

Longs 18

Longs 97

 

Above Price, the more obvious trade is short 11, and I would look to get long on a pullback, back into the range.

5aa711b6efd7a_13-2pre.thumb.png.95752564309f0782067108eb4c746c5e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something that has helped me in using the TR levels is to identify if the line represents the entry into a TR or the exit from a TR. once one plots these lines one tend to forget that they are essentially the limits of a previous value area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ye I know what you mean Niko, the problem this morning was finding the right resistance spot to sell at. Today, there simply was no such level in the vicinity of 63s, so there was no entry with the right stop placement.

 

The only opportunity for a short was when price broke the Initial Balance Low (Initial balance is the 1st hour of trading activity)

 

Here, there was a pullback at around 8:45, on diminishing volume and a contraction in volatility.

 

Unfortunately I didn't take this, since I am not very confident with this setup and it needs refining.

 

It might be something worth trying in your markets.

IBl.thumb.png.79bdf76a625f527253b8a00dd263db27.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today we trended lower, and ended up forming a range between 88 and 20, so the initial plan is obvious:

 

At 20 short a reversal, and target is midpoint of the range at 05 for the 1st half, and lower limit for the second half.

 

-IF we break above, look to buy a pullback, and reversals at 35 and at 46.

 

At 88 go long on a reversal, target is 05s and 20.

 

-If we break below, go short on a pullback and look for reversals only at 78 and 60

 

I am also including an analysis of today's trading, which was generally erractic, lacking in discipline in detailing a thorough plan and in following it, not great but some lessons for tomorrow.

5aa711b734034_14-2pre.png.f52b474a66eaf1fa0b3dbfc7d9578adc.png

5aa711b73a463_13-2afternoon.thumb.png.72b1593ff2afd96a24cb29115907cac6.png

5aa711b740113_13-2morning.thumb.png.5873888b0db6b34a4c61f3bc3dac6c13.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's trading, not bad since I only made trade outside of the plan, but still so much room for improvement...

 

Today's causes of hesitation are familiar:

 

1- Rejection of 87 I was to slow bidding 92 and didn't get a fill.

2- Then I didn't buy the Pullback to 23 because the GDP was coming out.

3- I had a decent short but took it out because of some negative news on europe and a blip against me.

14-2.thumb.png.64c4250f28611b0bd564171b189a5491.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Price has already opened above 66, so here is the plan for the day:

 

Go Long on a test of the 66 area, since we are back into the previous Rane (Value area) and there is a good chance that traders will test the upper range limit. Targets are MP for 1/2 and upper limit for 1/2

 

--If we break below 66, go short on a pullback, and look for longs at 43/23.

 

Go short on a rejection of 11, anticipating a move back into the range, targets ae MP for 1/2 and lower limit for 1/2.

 

--If we break above 11, go long on a pullback, and look for reversals at 19/32/43/60/73/87

5aa711b7ca851_15-2pre.png.49ddbfa545f5095e2d182f859e2bfefc.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For tomorrow, I am looking at 2 main value areas;

 

First: the top range between 65 and 11

second: the bottom Value area, between 23 and 60, with a midpoint at 87.

 

My initial plan revolves around the 142.65 level.

 

If we break above 142.65, go long on a pullback, and look for shorts at 01 and 09.

--If we break above 09, go long on a pullback, and monitor potential reversals at 18/41 and 60.

 

If we open below 142.65, go short on a rejection, and look for reversals at 23.

--If we break below 23, go short on a pullback, and monitor potential reversals at 05 and 87.

5aa711b8ebac5_15mpre.png.1ca33931855b0eca0034c0c8d72202fc.png

5aa711b8f0737_18-2pre.png.e9c79be6ccc10687cba621f3b5b411a6.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weekly performance:

 

17-02

Monday, 11/2: -12

-No short IBL Tline

-Hesitation coz of not exact level

-Trading with no levels.

Tuesday 12/2:0

-Was out for the day and no opportunities in the evening

Wednesday 13/2: -12

-No short IBl Tline

-To many attempts at 1 trade,

-No entry coz of figure

-Bought 4th test of support

-Continuation after trend exhaustion

-Missed a good long and anger shorted

Thursday 14/2:+18

-Hesitation coz of not exact level

-No entry coz of figure

-Scratched coz of negative commend and strong counter-wave

Friday 15/2:-6

-Massively over-traded, to many attempts at more than 1 trade.

-Had a constant bullish view and didn’t take small profits.

 

 

 

 

 

Tomorrow's levels haven't changed, Initial plan:

 

Long 66 or sell PB if we break

 

Short 86, buy PB if we break

5aa711ba8d60a_19-2pre.png.1fdd66cc949d19a9c620bda09e9bd356.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's Plan:

 

Short Rejecion of 66, if we break above, go long on a pullback.

 

Below this, we are currently finding R at the PDL 61 as I write this, but I am not short so it is going to be hard to find a level to short below this, and if price starts falling there are possible reversals at:

 

142.50 VPOC

142.45 was S a few days ago

142.22 Top of the TR

5aa711bb9a21d_20-2pre.JPG.a5b0da6df2451f9e247d416a134bc4a9.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomorrows Trades:

 

A- Long Rejection 53/45 target is Mp of range and 93.

 

B Short Rejection 93. Target is 53

 

C Short rejection 12. Target is 53

 

If break Above 12, Long PB Montitor 22.

 

If break Below 45. Short PB and monitor 14

5aa711bf43445_27-2pre.png.16c6a08731377f52eeff1706e10c0240.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday and todays trading, today I started by following my plan with discipline, but since the market didn't pick a direction, I got angry and this affected my trading negatively.

26-2.thumb.png.f0310c319896c3f785eb0502215209a1.png

27-2.thumb.png.dd09cb32fdda81f195f7ef3c987d9a8c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomorrow there are two ranges:

 

Range1- 63-37

Tange2 37-82, Mp at 17

 

The plan is:

 

If we open In range 1:

Sell rejection of 63, Target s 37

---IF we break above, Buy PB to63

 

Buy Rejection of 37

--f we break below sell PB and tagets are 17 and 82,

where I can look fo reversal setups

 

If we open in Range 2:

 

Sell rejectin of 37, tarets are 27 and 8.

--If we beak above, buy PB target s 63.

 

Buy Rejection of 82, Target is 17 ad 37.

--If we break below, sell PBm target s are 65 an 44.

5aa711c34d3f4_4-3pre.JPG.79319c6eceba63e1a5e7baa2b2737071.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomorrows Plan;

 

If we Open inside A

 

Buy 36

---If we break sell PB and monitor 17

Sell 47 Target is 36

Sell 64 Target is 36

---IF we break higher buy PB and monitor 82

 

FI we Opwn Above A, BUy pb 64 and monitor 82.

 

If we Open inside B

Sell Rejection of 36, Target is Mp of range and 82

Look for longs at Mp of range or VPOC

Buy rejection of 82.

5aa711c440cb1_5-2Pre.thumb.png.351865499f2e2a6d283aa4f2b65a97c6.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomorrows ranges:

 

A (29-03)

Go Long on a rejection of 145.03, Targets are 20 and 29

---If we break below short PB Target is 82

 

Go short on Rejection of 20

Go short on Rejection of 29

Go short on Rejection of 37

--If we break above go long on PB, Target is 57

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=35168&stc=1&d=1362553971

5aa711c4e5faf_6-3pre.thumb.png.1225168cff557c2637c666d708794900.png

Edited by tupapa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.