Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

suby

Quantitative Trading and Technical Analysis

Recommended Posts

For everyone that has read/given feedback to my previous post on applying math to technical analysis, I wanted to do a followup post to ask the community who here applies quantitative methods to their trading specifically in regards to technical analysis....?

 

I have read ernest chan's book "quantitative trading"; however, I have no desire to trade mechanically. I was wondering if it was possibly to develop quantitative indicators specifically in regards to technical analysis and apply them as a discretionary trader.

 

Any feedback/insight is extremely appreciated!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"who here applies quantitative methods to their trading specifically in regards to technical analysis....?"

 

:2c:

Any one who has done a backtest on a computer.....

anyone who has done a foward test....

anyone who records their trades and analyses the results.....

Plus

uses technical analysis fits this criteria.

 

That's why you do it.

 

Unfortunately you will find most things are at best right 50% of the time, hence why you might apply discretion.

Or you might find that they occur 90% of the time, but that last 10% wipes you out if that 1-100 year 9 standard deviation move happens......of you dont have a stop, and 90% is unlikely. etc;

etc;

 

What exactly are you after?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SIUYA said:
"who here applies quantitative methods to their trading specifically in regards to technical analysis....?"

 

:2c:

Any one who has done a backtest on a computer.....

anyone who has done a foward test....

anyone who records their trades and analyses the results.....

Plus

uses technical analysis fits this criteria.

 

That's why you do it.

 

Unfortunately you will find most things are at best right 50% of the time, hence why you might apply discretion.

Or you might find that they occur 90% of the time, but that last 10% wipes you out if that 1-100 year 9 standard deviation move happens......of you dont have a stop, and 90% is unlikely. etc;

etc;

 

What exactly are you after?

 

Structure I guess and attempting to develop an edge - maybe computers might not be the end all be all in trading?

 

I want to trade futures, specifically CL, and knowing how dominant high frequency trading is and algos are I guess i'm trying to derive an edge around that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  suby said:
Structure I guess and attempting to develop an edge - maybe computers might not be the end all be all in trading?

 

I want to trade futures, specifically CL, and knowing how dominant high frequency trading is and algos are I guess i'm trying to derive an edge around that

 

So you want to develop a mathematical edge around HFT and other algos that have been developed and are run by mathematical geniuses with more phds than ass holes......good luck. :)

 

Seriously - learn to follow the flow of the markets, understand what makes them tick, and move first, develop a feel for them - then plan and test.

 

Personally I think a lot of the 'edge' talk is BS - it comes from have a statistical or price related edge usually related to arbitrage opportunities. Our edge as traders is that we are small, nimble, dont need to trade and be patient and just need to follow what the market does. We should consider our selves as sheep and just follow the market. (others may differ but I have not seen someone argue with the market and make money over the long run as Mr market is bigger badder, more irrational and more ruthless - even big players who try and corner markets often get toweled up)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SIUYA said:
Our edge as traders is that we are small, nimble, dont need to trade and be patient and just need to follow what the market does. We should consider our selves as sheep and just follow the market.

 

You keep saying all these smart things, Siuya. But at least you're not alone:

Figuratively speaking, the small trader should imagine himself as a hitch-hiker in the market. For the ordinary hitch-hiker, someone else supplies the car, chauffeur, oil and gas. When he thinks the car is about to go in his direction, he jumps aboard and rides as far as he thinks the car will go. When he notices the machine has been stopped by a red light, or is about to turn a corner and go in some other direction, or that the car is running out of gas, or the brakes failing to work properly, he steps off and figures he has secured about as long a ride as he may expect. All he has supplied in this transaction is a modest commission and whatever brains were necessary to observe and recognize the opportunity when to get on and off. (Richard Wyckoff)

Here's an idea for an edge: learn how to draw a box and a straight line. No complex mathematical gyrations, no quantitative whatever, no statistics, no spreadsheets. Just a box and a line.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, things have changed significantly since Mr. Wyckoff was pontificating from his Jaccuzzi so many years ago....

 

Clearly if a person has limited skills and is short on education, their options are few...perhaps drawing lines pointing at and away from boxes is the best they can hope for..ultimately if you can make it work, that is what counts....

 

I notice that the gentleman suggests that if a trader finds his/her emotions are getting in the way of their success, they should simply "stop doing that".....

 

I find it all very entertaining...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
You keep saying all these smart things, Siuya. But at least you're not alone:

Figuratively speaking, the small trader should imagine himself as a hitch-hiker in the market. For the ordinary hitch-hiker, someone else supplies the car, chauffeur, oil and gas. When he thinks the car is about to go in his direction, he jumps aboard and rides as far as he thinks the car will go. When he notices the machine has been stopped by a red light, or is about to turn a corner and go in some other direction, or that the car is running out of gas, or the brakes failing to work properly, he steps off and figures he has secured about as long a ride as he may expect. All he has supplied in this transaction is a modest commission and whatever brains were necessary to observe and recognize the opportunity when to get on and off. (Richard Wyckoff)

Here's an idea for an edge: learn how to draw a box and a straight line. No complex mathematical gyrations, no quantitative whatever, no statistics, no spreadsheets. Just a box and a line.

 

Db

 

Lol thanks DB, I appreciate you putting things in perspective

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  steve46 said:
Unfortunately, things have changed significantly since Mr. Wyckoff was pontificating from his Jaccuzzi so many years ago....

 

Clearly if a person has limited skills and is short on education, their options are few...perhaps drawing lines pointing at and away from boxes is the best they can hope for..ultimately if you can make it work, that is what counts....

 

I notice that the gentleman suggests that if a trader finds his/her emotions are getting in the way of their success, they should simply "stop doing that".....

 

I find it all very entertaining...

 

Steve,

 

Do you trade quantitatively?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK lets take a step back

 

First....these are "buzzwords".....we all use math..most everyone begins using charts and indicators even though they don't really know much about the tools and how they are constructed.....it is only when a person takes the time to obtain some background that they have a chance of moving past, the half truths and urban myth that flies about here (and on most public sites for that matter)...

 

Now as mentioned we all use math....but if you happen to have a signficant background in math, you can use it to your advantage....that "advantage" which some call an edge....depends on the kind of background information you have at your command and whether or not you have the skill and experience to apply it to the markets...

 

If you have a background....if you have knowledge...the best thing to do is to bring it to bear on the problem....if you don't well, as mentioned....your options are fewer....and you have to realize that in a market place where significant money is at stake...there are a lot of very well educated folks who are competing with you...

 

If you can obtain an edge (meaning you have a way of consistently making money) by drawing lines and boxes....God bless you...go for it....but if that doesn't work for you...you may want to at least give a thought to learning something that might help...the way I figure it....the time is going to go by anyway isn't it.....I think the real question is how are you going to invest in yourself...and are you giving yourself the best tools for success...?

 

The method I used to trade relied on math...along the way I tried to simplify it for use by retail traders with a limited knowledge of that subject...what I found was unexpected...and although it still requires math, I think it is a nice compromise...you don't have to have a significant math education, but you are a step up from drawing lines and boxes....

 

 

Hope this helps

Steve

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  steve46 said:
Unfortunately, things have changed significantly since Mr. Wyckoff was pontificating from his Jaccuzzi so many years ago....

 

Clearly if a person has limited skills and is short on education, their options are few...perhaps drawing lines pointing at and away from boxes is the best they can hope for..ultimately if you can make it work, that is what counts....

 

I notice that the gentleman suggests that if a trader finds his/her emotions are getting in the way of their success, they should simply "stop doing that".....

 

I find it all very entertaining...

 

LoL

 

Nothing has changed , the underlying market mechanics are still the same.

 

All this just reminds me of this

 

NASA Spent Millions to Develop a Pen that Would Write in Space, whereas the Soviet Cosmonauts Used a Pencil

 

This tale with its message of simplicity and thrift--not to mention a failure of common sense

Does fit in this disussion well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take issue with the idea that nothing has changed

 

But I notice that people are willing to put money at risk using everything from High Frequency methods to astological alignment of the planets....I'll stick with what I am doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
You keep saying all these smart things, Siuya. But at least you're not alone:

Figuratively speaking, the small trader should imagine himself as a hitch-hiker in the market. For the ordinary hitch-hiker, someone else supplies the car, chauffeur, oil and gas. When he thinks the car is about to go in his direction, he jumps aboard and rides as far as he thinks the car will go. When he notices the machine has been stopped by a red light, or is about to turn a corner and go in some other direction, or that the car is running out of gas, or the brakes failing to work properly, he steps off and figures he has secured about as long a ride as he may expect. All he has supplied in this transaction is a modest commission and whatever brains were necessary to observe and recognize the opportunity when to get on and off. (Richard Wyckoff)

Here's an idea for an edge: learn how to draw a box and a straight line. No complex mathematical gyrations, no quantitative whatever, no statistics, no spreadsheets. Just a box and a line.

 

Db

 

It sounds so simple, doesn't it?

 

I think what Wyckoff forgot to mention is that hitchhikers sometimes get picked up by heartless bad men who empty their wallets, slit their throats and leave them in a ditch. There's always someone on the other side of the deal with an agenda of their own, and quite often they're the ones in the driving seat. They can turn the car around at a moment's notice and run it off the edge of a precipice. Or deliver you safely to your destination and leave you with a false sense of security until the next time. There's always risk.

 

But I hate extended metaphors . . .

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  suby said:
For everyone that has read/given feedback to my previous post on applying math to technical analysis, I wanted to do a followup post to ask the community who here applies quantitative methods to their trading specifically in regards to technical analysis....?

 

I have read ernest chan's book "quantitative trading"; however, I have no desire to trade mechanically. I was wondering if it was possibly to develop quantitative indicators specifically in regards to technical analysis and apply them as a discretionary trader.

 

Any feedback/insight is extremely appreciated!

 

Although SIUYA's comments regarding competing in the HFT arena are sensible, I do think that it is worth trying to understand a little about how HFTs (and indeed any other major market participants) operate, and how this might impact on your own trading. In the case of HFTs this will most likely relate to the availability of liquidity at key times for your strategy.

 

You might also bear in mind that to employ a quantitative, statistical approach does not mean you need to trade with high frequency. As I recall, Chan's strategies can involve holding periods of several months.

 

Hope that's some help.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:
It sounds so simple, doesn't it?

 

I think what Wyckoff forgot to mention is that hitchhikers sometimes get picked up by heartless bad men who empty their wallets, slit their throats and leave them in a ditch. There's always someone on the other side of the deal with an agenda of their own, and quite often they're the ones in the driving seat. They can turn the car around at a moment's notice and run it off the edge of a precipice. Or deliver you safely to your destination and leave you with a false sense of security until the next time. There's always risk.

 

But I hate extended metaphors . . .

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Sounds colorful, but you're missing the point. Wyckoff is about determining the flow of price and riding that flow until it reverses. If you don't like the auto metaphor, great. One could also use surfing and sailing, but surfers wipe out and sailboats founder. But the metaphor is not the thing.

 

Markets are about demand and supply and have been since at least the Sumerians. Sellers want the highest price. Buyers want the lowest. If one looks at this as nothing more than numbers, he will spend his trading life chasing shadows, which may be why beginners spend so many years learning how to make more than lunch money, if they ever do.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
Sounds colorful, but you're missing the point. Wyckoff is about determining the flow of price and riding that flow until it reverses. If you don't like the auto metaphor, great. One could also use surfing and sailing, but surfers wipe out and sailboats founder. But the metaphor is not the thing.

 

Markets are about demand and supply and have been since at least the Sumerians. Sellers want the highest price. Buyers want the lowest. If one looks at this as nothing more than numbers, he will spend his trading life chasing shadows, which may be why beginners spend so many years learning how to make more than lunch money, if they ever do.

 

Db

 

I agree (who wouldn't?) with the essential nature of supply and demand. However, as I suggested before, what the Wyckoff allegory is missing is any sense of the inherent risk in this (or pretty much any) approach to trading. Risk isn't a reason not to trade, but I don't like to read colorful verbiage that glosses it over: "just jump on board and ride a trend, man, go with the flow". It's crass, reductive, and an unfair way to represent what a trader will doubtless experience.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:
I agree (who wouldn't?) with the essential nature of supply and demand. However, as I suggested before, what the Wyckoff allegory is missing is any sense of the inherent risk in this (or pretty much any) approach to trading. Risk isn't a reason not to trade, but I don't like to read colorful verbiage that glosses it over: "just jump on board and ride a trend, man, go with the flow". It's crass, reductive, and an unfair way to represent what a trader will doubtless experience.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Wyckoff hardly ignores risk. Risk management is a key element of his approach.

 

From page 1 of his course:

This is a method of judging the stock market by its own action.

 

It is intended for investors as well as for traders.

 

It has been planned and prepared for those who desire to safeguard their investment capital against, and to make money from, the fluctuations in the priced of stocks dealt in on the New York Stock Exchange or any other organized exchange.

 

It is applicable as well to bonds, preferred stocks and the leading commodity markets.

 

Anyone who buys or sells a stock, a bond or a commodity for profit is speculating if he employs intelligent foresight.

 

If he does not, he is gambling.

 

Your purpose should be to become an intelligent, scientific and successful investor and trader.

 

This Method is for those who have had either little or no experience operating in the stock market, or for those who have had much experience but who have never been shown the real rules of the game.

 

Out of the very limited number who really understand the inner workings of the stock market, practically no one has been willing to show the public the real inside. I believe it is time for someone to step forward and do this.

 

The appalling losses, in securities, suffered annually by millions of people, are enough to make the angels weep.

 

These losses are the direct result of stock market plunging by people, most of whom do not realize what they are risking, and who have an amazingly small knowledge of the market.
[Emphasis mine] (Richard Wyckoff)

 

Those who suffer from emotional problems will insist that one cannot trade without emotion. Emotion must be controlled. Emotion must be directed. Emotion must be managed.

 

None of this is true.

 

Those who don't understand the nature of buying and selling will insist that quantification is necessary, that one must apply statistical analysis and maintain spreadsheets and address "algos" and "HFTs" and so forth.

 

But none of this is true, either (unless one is scalping for ticks).

 

Then there are those who insist that the market is a battlefield and that one must know and prepare for and fight one's enemies.

 

But this is a misdirection as well, since it necessitates forcing one's ego into the matter, and we all know how helpful ego is when trading.

 

Or there's the one about the market being shark-infested waters. Nothing like inviting that old fear response, is there?

 

I can't help but wonder why message board habitues fill beginners' heads with this stuff.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Those who suffer from emotional problems will insist that one cannot trade without emotion. Emotion must be controlled. Emotion must be directed. Emotion must be managed".

 

It seems to me sir, that you have the perfect solution to all this....simply delete any challenging, provacative or emotionally charged material from your view.....

 

To the extent that you are able to control the world around you, everything should be perfectly calm.....:cool:

 

Then all you have to do is to make sure you never get caught outside your climate controlled little neighborhood at night....or the big bad wolf may come and take your lunch money.....

 

Oh look at that....its getting dark out....

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:

I can't help but wonder why message board habitues fill beginners' heads with this stuff.

 

I never suggested that Wyckoff ignores risk. I suggested that the quote you had chosen downplays this aspect.

 

You can deduce what you like about my psychological makeup, but I think that the markets are indeeed "shark-ridden waters". Not a charity ball.

 

As for "message board habitues", well you're the one with 2300+ posts to your name, so you should know pal ;)

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:
I never suggested that Wyckoff ignores risk. I suggested that the quote you had chosen downplays this aspect.

 

You can deduce what you like about my psychological makeup, but I think that the markets are indeeed "shark-ridden waters". Not a charity ball.

 

As for "message board habitues", well you're the one with 2300+ posts to your name, so you should know pal ;)

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I know nothing about your psychological makeup, but the fact that you view the markets as you do affects the approach you take to trading. Whether or not this view results in profits that are sufficient to provide oneself (and his family) with a reasonably high standard of living is a matter for conjecture.

 

As for the number of posts, note that I joined TL four years ago. You've racked up 685 in nine months, so it'll all wind up about the same.

 

In any case, comments about emotional problems and the denizens of message boards do not necessarily apply to any one person in particular. But it is nonetheless common that someone who has at last been able to eke out a profit of any kind after years of trying by at least discovering the ultimate MACD setting, for example, will insist that this is the true course, and that all beginners must also follow this course if they are to reach the promised land. Likewise, those who have found a way to beat their id into submission in order to complete a trade will most likely come to believe that everybody endures this same struggle and must treat their ids likewise.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

suby - no wonder we all get so confused.

its simple - if you have a maths back ground and an affinity to it, and really want to learn it - go for it. You will be competing against very smart people and teams of them who have been doing this for a long time.

if not stick to the simple things, and most importantly things that work for you.

Drawing a box, or using statistical probability distributions pretty much do the same things IMHO - you find places of support, or resistance and you trade accordingly.

You manage the trade - and your emotions (either by shutting them out or tricking them or playing to your strengths combined with your strategy)

 

Period - every one pretty much does the same things to make money.

and while its not that easy it is that simple at a base level. the rest becomes semantics of how to define support, resistance, a trend, where you place stops etc. and most people who are arguing with each other generally do the same thing but in different ways.

 

any way --- have a good weekend - I am off to a buck's day pub crawl where statistically its a high probability i will get trollied (100% certainty), hitch a ride home in a taxi and not end up in a box with the cold hard cement as support - and will not find resistance from my partner because I did not deal with her or my emotions well as a result of my historical educational walk between pubs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.