Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TheDude

Charts.

Recommended Posts

  SIUYA said:
oh there is still a good amount of skill in operating an order - being able to read the ebb and flow of the market. They have the advantage of only having to go one way, not worry about stops, and to follow instructions - they have the disadvantage of usually having to follow the instructions, put up with the sales guys, or PM, beat vwap (or other measure) ensuring they get filled, and usually managing other orders - eg; what happens when you have a large order to sell on a screaming rally day as well as large orders to buy - do you favour one or the other? It is a different skill set.

The difference for them is that the next day they wander in and sit down and get a new set of orders - like analysts - the risk is transferred to another person who actually does the trade.

 

Totally agree!

 

Lets remember, sometimes these guys get laid off, venture in to our neck of the woods and find out it aint so easy after all!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Obsidian said:
hmm what made me move to fx..well, there are less instruments to focus on, trading hours allow me to trade while i am at home (since i live in asia, i can trade during the london session without any distraction) and i can rely more on technicals (hard to manipulate compared to stocks)...

 

 

Interesting.

 

When I traded fx futures - that was one of my main reasons - the manipulation.

 

People say it's the biggest, most liquid market etc, but they forget the fact that the fx market exists so governments can control/exercise fiscal policy/manipulate. You get head wind of that (interest rate moves and so forth) and you have your trend which is kind of guaranteed for a good few months + giving swings etc.

 

Look at the Brazilian Real. Currently pegged to USD. That isnt going to last forever. I want to be there when they start thinking otherwise!

 

I guess the rules for stocks world wide are very much different. Because they are the staple of so many pension funds, 'manipulation' is seen as a bad thing. It affects Mr Main Street and his long term wealth in a brutally honest way.

 

If a CEO sells a bunch of stock before poor earnings or similar, hes in jail for insider trading. If a govt sell its own currency ahead of a rate announcement it's seen as a 'fiscal measure'. The fact that that it (may) devalues the entire countries stock market in real terms/notional value - and thus the pensions/savings is ignored.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Obsidian said:
hmm what made me move to fx..well, there are less instruments to focus on, trading hours allow me to trade while i am at home (since i live in asia, i can trade during the london session without any distraction) and i can rely more on technicals (hard to manipulate compared to stocks)...

 

Hi Obsidian,

 

I'm getting rather off topic but . . . do you ever trade the USD/JPY pair, and do you have any insights into its behaviour that you'd be prepared to share? Despite a few profitable swing trades off the top of a channel when I first started trading (more luck than skill), in testing I have never been able to find a single consistent way to extract profits from it - it somehow seems to behave completely unlike every other market.

 

Cheers,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

:offtopic:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SIUYA said:
good point - it raises another issue.

Humans are naturally good at seeing patterns and recognising, however when it comes to data and such, often those patterns have no real significance. (others may say this better)

 

When it comes to trading thats why often the visual is the road map and you have too see what happens when you get to certain points on the map.

 

Hi SIUYA,

 

You mentioned the difficulties of programming support and resistance. I'm assuming that Sierra Chart has something similar to the diagonal trendlines indicator below? Far from perfect, of course, but it can provide a good starting point, and lines can be removed with discretion. Let me know if not - I'll post the EL code and then you can get someone to re-program it for your platform.

 

BlueHorseshoe

5aa7113f39508_SupportResistance.thumb.gif.52ce76c1920603d0470b9df73602163e.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheDude said:
Interesting.

 

When I traded fx futures - that was one of my main reasons - the manipulation.

 

People say it's the biggest, most liquid market etc, but they forget the fact that the fx market exists so governments can control/exercise fiscal policy/manipulate. You get head wind of that (interest rate moves and so forth) and you have your trend which is kind of guaranteed for a good few months + giving swings etc.

 

Look at the Brazilian Real. Currently pegged to USD. That isnt going to last forever. I want to be there when they start thinking otherwise!

 

I guess the rules for stocks world wide are very much different. Because they are the staple of so many pension funds, 'manipulation' is seen as a bad thing. It affects Mr Main Street and his long term wealth in a brutally honest way.

 

If a CEO sells a bunch of stock before poor earnings or similar, hes in jail for insider trading. If a govt sell its own currency ahead of a rate announcement it's seen as a 'fiscal measure'. The fact that that it (may) devalues the entire countries stock market in real terms/notional value - and thus the pensions/savings is ignored.

 

The manipulation is everywhere..but in fx, at least you are aware of it..centrals banks and their policies of course affect currency pairs..some can control it, EUR/CHF 1.20 floor for example...some just cant, USD/JPY for example...anyway, I think technical analysis works better when the volume (i.e. the number of participants) is real high..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:
Hi SIUYA,

 

You mentioned the difficulties of programming support and resistance. I'm assuming that Sierra Chart has something similar to the diagonal trendlines indicator below? Far from perfect, of course, but it can provide a good starting point, and lines can be removed with discretion. Let me know if not - I'll post the EL code and then you can get someone to re-program it for your platform.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

thanks Blue - I have seen similar things before often called auto trend lines or similar.....I have never found them any use as I am more interested in horizontal lines. (price levels that show true support, resistance as opposed to my self imposed trend lines (no judgement on these)

(please feel free to post the EL code - I could read it and have a look)

 

The closest I use is the old Donchian channels (HHV and LLV) mainly as they give me clear levels - problems with these is they dont necessarily pick up the swing points I might deem as significant, and like MAs they converge on the areas of consolidation - where everything gets chopped up....usually I combine these with a swing count - that i can see.

Best I can get is manual support and resistance - which only becomes and issue when trying to automate things really - you still need to watch what happens when it gets there, and act accordingly. (Plus did you see what happened in the EUR this morning - eye curumba for slippage)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bluehorseshoe -- yes - my guess is that is much the same as a zig zag line study that sierra chart has. Thanks.

(only its written in C++)

if you have the code for the easy language it would be great i might be able to read it and modify it in - or find someone who can do it - might compare and contrast.

 

Problem with all these is that I still need to put the bias on.....

eg; this is compressing, that first LH was broken but that then becomes an alert as opposed to a trigger - lets see what happens in this pullback - is it fast, slow, does it immediately reject the low - was there an abc type swing in between, is it clean and smooth or is it climbing a wall of worry. (if its one, then where is it happening in the context of what has occured the last 5 days), is this the third attempt to have a go at this level, have each of the retracements prior to this been shorter than before. Given this, are they good odds to purchase on a pullback, and set the stop at the last swing low, or a fixed amount.....how do i go at it again if the stop is hit and immediately reverses - the computer thinks its a new low, I think its a screamer to happen as i first thought....

 

 

I may be complicating it a little but these are the things l look at and programming this - beyond my grade.

I have tried various combos -

eg; hh,hl,lh,ll - then buy break of last lh - you miss some of the great entries for a trend, and often get on at the end.

or ll,lh,hl, hh - sell break of hl - sometimes the better bet is to see that there has been prior overlap and that looking for a failure just after the hh is a great entry.

Cant get much real value out of it.

Or there is enough chop you still get chopped up,

Or there is not a great way to ensure that you get set at support - how hard do you chase - and if you miss it....was that the trade you needed to get.

(if you are always taking the breaks of HH, or LL, then its a breakout system)

 

Same old drill.

Zigzag.thumb.jpg.21ecde5aba0f26b84abc00778632d4ee.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.