Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TinGull

[VSA] Volume Spread Analysis Part I

Recommended Posts

Was just re-reading the section in MTMarkets about Trendline clusters. Than, searched on ‘VSA’ ‘trend clusters’ on the TL forum and jjthetrader’s post rating them highly from 10/27/07 was one of only two that came up.

Does anyone know how they are actually calculated?

What kind of constraints / qualifications are placed on historical trendlines etc in order for them to be used in the clusters?

Such as - must a trendline that is used be part of a historical parallel trendline channel or could a standalone trendline just from a set of tops (or bottoms) qualify, etc.? Thanks

 

Hey zdo, although not technically vsa I'll shed what light I can on clusters. They show up where multiple trend lines intersect. This will include trend lines from as far back as you have chart data.

This does also include highs and lows. I find them very effective and you can indeed watch price change it's behavior in them. If you would like to start another thread about this we could since we want to keep it strictly VSA here for the boys + girls who don't like Tguider.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This adds to the discussion from yesterday about VSA and actual trading.

 

Monad, you'll see that it's quite easy to identify the strength I have pointed out on the attached chart. That's what I mean about the easy part. Now that we identify strength, where would we enter. If we entered long after that first sign of strength and place out stop under the low then we would have got stopped out.

 

But if we get in quick and get out quick then we could trade each one of these signs of strength. So for me deciding how to trade VSA is the more difficult part of the equation.

 

This is where people's real-time trades come in handy, you see how they're actually applying it. I was hoping Sebastian might post trade entries and exits based on his VSA reading.

 

Entries might be too personal for people and they may want to keep it secret to. That's understandable, its their right. But even the guys at tguider after they promise you they'll teach you how to trade don't actually tell you when to get in. They teach you VSA and barely do a good job of that.

strength.thumb.jpg.6f60aa421493af9667735ef679ca5499.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This adds to the discussion from yesterday about VSA and actual trading.

 

Monad, you'll see that it's quite easy to identify the strength I have pointed out on the attached chart. That's what I mean about the easy part. Now that we identify strength, where would we enter. If we entered long after that first sign of strength and place out stop under the low then we would have got stopped out.

 

But if we get in quick and get out quick then we could trade each one of these signs of strength. So for me deciding how to trade VSA is the more difficult part of the equation.

 

This is where people's real-time trades come in handy, you see how they're actually applying it. I was hoping Sebastian might post trade entries and exits based on his VSA reading.

 

Entries might be too personal for people and they may want to keep it secret to. That's understandable, its their right. But even the guys at tguider after they promise you they'll teach you how to trade don't actually tell you when to get in. They teach you VSA and barely do a good job of that.

 

What you have just illustrated so graphically is I believe the first Post in any forums on the Internet regarding reading VSA and Trade Execution problem.:thumbs up:

As for TG , having seen countless seminars I wonder if any of them are able to trade consistently with this , for if trade execution etc was easy why would they bother to market it at all.

 

Think that is where those who actually trade on their VSA readings were to post the trades which worked and which were not productive, infact those which are not productive would be even more educational.

 

Great Job JJ and tawe:applaud:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JJ;

 

You chart tells me you have a grasp of some of the VSA concepts but lack a trading plan. That is not VSA's fault but yours.

 

You could only take signs of strength or weakness around certain Market Profile areas. You could take signs that occur on one timeframe and are simultaneously occurring on a higher timeframe. You could take signs that happen in conjunction with moving average crossovers.

 

In the book, Master the Markets, Tom Williams does give some ideas for entries. He talks about waiting for a down bar after a sign of strength. I would point out that after the first Sign of Strength, I would at least like to see either a Test or No Supply to use as entry. Ideally the test would be on a down bar, which would be consistent with Tom's view of entering long on down bars. (although I would wait for the confirmation which would be up). As the father of VSA, he doesn't need to wait for confirmation.

 

The question thus comes down to, Why would you enter after the first sign of strength?

 

Posting real-time charts without first having a trading plan wont answer that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What you have just illustrated so graphically is I believe the first Post in any forums on the Internet regarding reading VSA and Trade Execution problem.:thumbs up:

 

What has been illustrated is a lack of a trading plan. Nothing more.

 

Suppose somebody here had said once you see a wide spread bar on ultra high volume that closes down, you have demand entering the market. Then you should look for a Test of supply, which is a low volume sign, within the range of that high volume bar. Now you have an entry signal......

 

Oh, I think somebody has said that a time or two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What has been illustrated is a lack of a trading plan. Nothing more.

 

Suppose somebody here had said once you see a wide spread bar on ultra high volume that closes down, you have demand entering the market. Then you should look for a Test of supply, which is a low volume sign, within the range of that high volume bar. Now you have an entry signal......

 

Oh, I think somebody has said that a time or two.

 

I totally agree, I have no trading plan regarding VSA. That's why I ask for real-time trades, to see what others are doing so I can form a plan and see how it's done. I'm looking for help setting up a plan and developing trading strategies around VSA principles.

 

But I like your ideas PP about mixing VSA up with TA to find entries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not the best trade, but I hope you got what you wanted to see.

 

Some thoughts

 

* as previously stated, not the best time of day to trade. Forget 24 hr market sells picth about forex, trade during the London and New York sessions.

 

* While I don't use profit targets, initial price target was 1.4339. This would fill the gap created by the WRB.

 

* entry 1.4321 exit 1.4328 7pips 7*$10.00=$70.00 per contract

 

* price when as high as 1.4336. As I write this, however, price is at 1.4344.

5aa70e4e9ab5f_post1184.thumb.PNG.e06a5e6e53647e7298e38a922da0e0bc.PNG

Edited by mister ed
Add back chart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last pic.

 

This just shows the how the move ended up as we appear to have hit a resistance level.

 

Better trade mgmt by me could of resulted in much more profit. (note to self: don't play that game.)

 

Again, I doubt anything was learned from this exercise. If so, let me know. As far as I am concerned, I could of just shown this chart and pointed out the entry and possible price target and the same ammount of information could of been passed on.

5aa70e4e9f4a3_post1185.thumb.PNG.3537eda993d73d5e638f87e91dbc1515.PNG

Edited by mister ed
Add back chart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.............But I like your ideas PP about mixing VSA up with TA to find entries.

 

No! LOL.

 

Look into using Market Profile levels or some form of "pivot" levels. Even fib levels will work. Then simply pay attention to the signs at these levels. The Smart money may or may not be using RSI or ADX, but they certainly know where the key price levels are based on High, Low, Pivot, POC, VAH,VAL and other price levels where volume was extreme.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I lied. This is the last pic.

 

Note that there was another entry/add on as we got a WRB and then a Test within the body. This Test is a Test in a Rising Market a true sign of strength.

 

The real lesson here is: Being right and sitting tight, that's where the money is.

5aa70e4ea427a_post1187.thumb.PNG.50ab26accde748a71be282a57c4676e7.PNG

Edited by mister ed
Add back chart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PP I am using floor pivots, MP pivots and a few other things as key levels for VSA setups. Could you elaborate on fibs and what level you look at if any one area. I'm familiar with the retrace/ambush fib trades which seem to have lots of eyes on the 50/62 fib area, is that a spot you might focus on?

 

Thanks for all your insight in this thread. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the off-topic post but I would like to correct a prior statement regarding the Best of Wyckoff conference in San Francisco next Fall that we are trying to get Williams to attend; Krueger WILL be speaking. Thanks.

 

nic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mcichocki;

 

While I do believe in the "universality" of Fibs I do not use them. One main reason is that I do not know when to apply them. But I use the basic ones like: .320, .500, .620 and .780

 

I prefer the Market Profile "pivots".

 

The key is to focus on PRICE ACTION around the line. Here is where you want to see Tests, No Demands, No Supply, Stopping Volume, bottom reversals et all. And of course, WRBs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Last pic.

 

This just shows the how the move ended up as we appear to have hit a resistance level.

 

Better trade mgmt by me could of resulted in much more profit. (note to self: don't play that game.)

 

Again, I doubt anything was learned from this exercise. If so, let me know. As far as I am concerned, I could of just shown this chart and pointed out the entry and possible price target and the same ammount of information could of been passed on.

 

PP, that was very helpful, thankyou. What timeframe do you use?

 

You're right, the right edge doesn't need to be caputred as it happened, just an explanation after the fact about what you did in real-time.

 

I or we weren't refering to you about hindsight analysis. I was just requesting to see actual trades people took on a chart and not trades that people would have taken looking back.

 

I appreciate your teaching because seeing a trade like this does help to form a trading plan and create VSA setups. Obviously you have a strategy called 'the test' and you're good at executing it. What kind of volume to you like to see on the follow through bar after a test? Or do you just want it to be up?

 

What I like about your example is that you have those huge WRBs down which is basically the end of the push down but then price actually drifts lower than their lows before you find a suitable entry, almost like a false breakout to the downside (an upside down upthrust).

This is what tripped me up in the bootcamp. Tom says "if you see a bar like this get long". Then Todd of course says wait for confirmation. So I'm guessing account size plays a big role in entry.

 

I really have to switch over to candles. They're much more visual for when you're looking left for effort etc.

 

I know SoulTrader swears by MP numbers. Any idea if the MP numbers are correct at mypivots dot com?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The trouble with levels is there are so many of them! having said that I do look at them sometimes. We have floor pivot (with R1 R2 S1 S2) mid points of those if you wish. MP VAH PoC VAL along with recent few days MP values. Talking of past days there's yesterdays HLC and 3 day HL or weekly HL. Better not forget yesterdays mid point and FIB levels of its range. Of course you could also go exotic and have Ganns square of nine, Murray Math or even Pryapoint or Grid lines using square root of price. Of course if you leave lines on from previous swing highs/lows that generates a whole bunch too. If you add fib levels between those swings it gets ridiculous!

 

Phew there's an awful lot. there's something quite appealing about a plain price and volume chart. There's a real purity and simplicity. Sure the lines will give a heads up where something might happen but the price action with a bit of VSA will tell you what is happening.

 

This is certainly no criticism of key levels, clearly a lot of people watch them, its more to remind myself less is often best. A couple of lines to keep you orientated perhaps but its easy to overdo it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Over last few days quite a few posts have discussed the vagueness of entries when using VSA setups. At essence, I think the most recent posts about pivots, levels, etc. is part of that for most of us. Precision entries may be possible, but the basic premise of VSA (applying my current and limited level of understanding) is to gauge ‘professional’ accumulation (or distribution) and adjust one’s own inventories accordingly. This sort of implies that, like a professional, one would also not take on any inventory one is unable to carry without high levels of stress through short term adversity regardless of the time frame(s) used in the VSA setups. Currently, I’m looking at VSA setups / patterns as one item, then turning to wholly other techniques for entry triggers in (those diabolical) shorter time frames. In my experience, the probabilities of having the various sets of ‘professionals’ concurrently line up VSA setups for me at progressively lower time frames aren’t that great - so currently I am restricting my VSA work to one time frame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes zdo, it seems that some professionals / 'smart money' have very deep pockets. They accumulate while prices are falling and are then able to stomach prices falling even further without getting out or too worried.

 

They know eventually prices will return back to their entry level and travel beyond to give them their desired profits.

 

Which is the message that PP rightly tries to put across, just because we see wide spread down bars on increasing volume it is not a signal to jump straight into the mkt and go long. There is momentum at play (as we know one of Newton's laws) and it takes a while to stop a falling mkt (in all timeframes) even with large scale buying / demand coming in.

 

Merry xmas everyone and hopefully this excellent VSA thread will continue in the New Year.

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Over last few days quite a few posts have discussed the vagueness of entries when using VSA setups. At essence, I think the most recent posts about pivots, levels, etc. is part of that for most of us. Precision entries may be possible, but the basic premise of VSA (applying my current and limited level of understanding) is to gauge ‘professional’ accumulation (or distribution) and adjust one’s own inventories accordingly. This sort of implies that, like a professional, one would also not take on any inventory one is unable to carry without high levels of stress through short term adversity regardless of the time frame(s) used in the VSA setups. Currently, I’m looking at VSA setups / patterns as one item, then turning to wholly other techniques for entry triggers in (those diabolical) shorter time frames. In my experience, the probabilities of having the various sets of ‘professionals’ concurrently line up VSA setups for me at progressively lower time frames aren’t that great - so currently I am restricting my VSA work to one time frame.

 

Yes zdo, it seems that some professionals / 'smart money' have very deep pockets. They accumulate while prices are falling and are then able to stomach prices falling even further without getting out or too worried.

 

They know eventually prices will return back to their entry level and travel beyond to give them their desired profits.

 

Which is the message that PP rightly tries to put across, just because we see wide spread down bars on increasing volume it is not a signal to jump straight into the mkt and go long. There is momentum at play (as we know one of Newton's laws) and it takes a while to stop a falling mkt (in all timeframes) even with large scale buying / demand coming in.

 

Merry xmas everyone and hopefully this excellent VSA thread will continue in the New Year.

 

.

 

Great point guys, VSA can be tough to pick bottoms or tops for me.

I'm realizing that it's more about seeing the trend change in it's early stages and if it keeps falling but big money keeps buying you know they are still bullish at the current price levels.

 

If you are big money you probably don't stress much if you know your sucking up the float and will soon be in control, but these things take time, often lots of time it seems.

 

Love this thread...keep teaching me guys. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, those points are some of the reasons I am moving towards a bigger time frame and bigger stops/targets with vsa. The higher time frames give me more time to see the bigger picture and also more time to plan the trade out. Watching for VSA in the stock market on 60 min daily and weekly charts, is also showing some great opportunities. Only problem is scanning for good candidates. :crap:

Either way, everyone have a happy holiday and a wonderful new year. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6yn24gy.jpg

 

SO some massive volume on the DJI today. Stalled at the trend line which is major resistance and I can sort of see a head n' shoulders maybe forming. Spread wise it seems pretty damn bullish to me though, but I'm curious what you guys see in todays action?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This question of entry triggers with VSA is very interesting and it is something I believe Tom Williams has touched on. There is a video on the TG website of the first 5 minutes or so of a presentation by Williams, where he speaks about VSA (http://tradeguider.com/ss_tom2.asp)

 

He begins by talking about 2 forms of analysis, TA and FA, and then adds in the study of supply and demand as a 3rd way of analysing markets. He goes on to say, quote

 

"if you have what apparently ... appears to be say a buy signal in your technical analysis studies, if you can read supply and demand and a few bars back there's ... some indication of strength then this will back up your technical analysis as such, and I would have thought you would be almost I would say 100% accurate.. this will give you far more confidence to trade"

 

So it would appear that Williams is saying at this presentation that actual entry signals could be taken from some other method while using VSA to support that entry decision - i.e. take buy signals from technical analysis if there are indications of strength, derived from VSA, in the recent past and present.

 

Any thoughts on this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This question of entry triggers with VSA is very interesting and it is something I believe Tom Williams has touched on. There is a video on the TG website of the first 5 minutes or so of a presentation by Williams, where he speaks about VSA (http://tradeguider.com/ss_tom2.asp)

 

He begins by talking about 2 forms of analysis, TA and FA, and then adds in the study of supply and demand as a 3rd way of analysing markets. He goes on to say, quote

 

"if you have what apparently ... appears to be say a buy signal in your technical analysis studies, if you can read supply and demand and a few bars back there's ... some indication of strength then this will back up your technical analysis as such, and I would have thought you would be almost I would say 100% accurate.. this will give you far more confidence to trade"

 

So it would appear that Williams is saying at this presentation that actual entry signals could be taken from some other method while using VSA to support that entry decision - i.e. take buy signals from technical analysis if there are indications of strength, derived from VSA, in the recent past and present...

 

Yes and No.

 

I do not presume to know what is in Tom's mind, but there is a bit of placation going on here. Tom, the father of Volume Spread Analysis, does not like technical indicators. He has the ability to read a chart bar by bar and make uncannily accurate "predictions" of future price moves. As the rumors go, Tom was not very happy with TG when it first came out because; (1) there were too many signs of strength and weakness and (2) there were technical indicators included in the software. But Tom is a realist. He does understand that most traders into this area (trading) thru TA. This is because it is easier than reading a naked chart and more accessible.

 

As far as using them together, I believe, he would say if the TA doesn't match the VSA, always go with the VSA. Think about like this: Instead of going long because macd is diverging and there are signs of strength in the background; one should go long because there are signs of strength in the background and oh by the way macd is diverging. May seem like a subtle difference but they are actually worlds apart.

 

In the end, Tom does not trade your money. You have to do what works for you. It is about making money. If moving averages or CCI help you make money and make your VSA better, then use them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "To make more capable, powerful AI models, developers need a steady flow of fresh data to train their models on. However, they’re starting to run out. Current generative AIs have scraped everything from the Internet that can be scraped. The alternative is to use “synthetic” data—training data generated by earlier forms of AI instead of original sources found on the Internet.  Using synthetic data is tempting. It’s cheaper than licensing datasets (an increasingly common requirement); there’s virtually no limit to the amount of data, text, or images AIs can create; and no one’s privacy is violated. The problem is that, over several generations, AIs trained synthetically develop what has been called “Model Autophagy Disorder,” or MAD, by the researchers at Rice University who discovered it. They like the acronym “MAD” because it’s similar to “Mad Cow Disease,” a calamitous, fatal brain disease that turned up in beef cattle in the 1980s when they were fed the ground-up remains of their butchered colleagues.  The word “autophagy” is a combination of the Greek “auto,” meaning self, and “phagy,” to eat. After training successive visual AI models on synthesized data, the scientists found a disturbing pattern: images of faces began to show grid-patterned scratch marks and eventually began more and more to look like the same face. Images of numbers gradually distorted until they became a mass of unintelligible squiggles.  “Even after a few generations of such training, the new models can become irreparably corrupted,” computer engineer Richard Baraniuk said in a university press statement.  As synthetic data, and synthetically trained AIs, proliferate online, the problem will feed on itself and become steadily worse, he warned. “One doomsday scenario is that if left uncontrolled for many generations, MAD could poison the data quality and diversity of the entire Internet,” Baraniuk said. “Short of this, it seems inevitable that as-to-now-unseen unintended consequences will arise from AI autophagy even in the near term. “Without enough fresh real data,” he added, “future generative models are doomed to MADness.” TRENDPOST: If AI developers come to believe that it is no longer possible to advance generative AI much beyond its current state, two things will happen. First, engineers will switch from developing new models to tweaking existing ones and continue customizing them to make off-the-shelf versions for specific industries. Second, developers will turn their obsession with AI power from generative systems to general AI, which can reason and make decisions without the need for human guidance.  That day might be closer than any of us, including AI engineers, are ready to deal with." Zgbs73                        
    • TS Tenaris stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 39.17 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TS
    • UAL United Airlines stock nice breakout setup at https://stockconsultant.com/?UAL
    • AAL American Airlines stock, good trend, watch for a range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?AAL
    • Date: 10th January 2025. Why is the British Pound Declining?   The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of 2025 so far after witnessing sharp declines for 3 consecutive days. The decline is largely being triggered by the bond selloff, lack of business confidence due to the UK Autumn budget and political uncertainty. Will the trend continue?     The GBP Index Declines 2% In 2025! Why Is The Pound Dropping? The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of the week and of the year so far. Below you can see a table showing the Pound’s performance in January 2025 so far. GBPUSD -2.25% EURGBP +1.69% GBPJPY -1.44% GBPCHF -1.42% GBPAUD -1.91% GBPCAD -2.00% A key reason for the GBP’s decline is the latest labor budget, which is driving a selloff in UK bonds. Bonds across the global market are declining, including in the US and Germany. However, the global decline is mainly due to monetary policy. The decline in UK bond yields is due to concerns regarding the UK budget, higher costs for business and investor confidence. As a result, investors are selling UK bonds, but also reducing their exposure to the Pound. Bond Selloff and Rising Yields: Higher bond yields can sometimes strengthen a currency by attracting increased investor demand. However, this effect is unlikely when rising yields result from a bond selloff driven by declining investor confidence. The UK 30-Year Bond Yields are at their highest level since 1998 and the 10-Year Bond Yields are up to the highest level since the banking crisis of 2008. Investors’ concerns are that the higher costs for business will be passed onto consumers, triggering higher stickier inflation. As a result, the Bank of England will struggle to reduce the cost of borrowing in 2025 and foreign investors will become more cautious of operations in the UK. The short-term impact is that the UK Chancellor may struggle to meet her fiscal rules. Her budget margin of £9.9bn to avoid overshooting borrowing has likely shrunk to about £1 billion due to market shifts, even before the OBR updates its forecasts. This uncertainty may force the Treasury to cut future spending plans, but the full picture won’t emerge until the OBR's March forecast. According to reports, the UK Chancellor cannot risk higher increases in taxes and will be forced to cut public spending. The GBPUSD Falls To A 60-Week Low! The GBP is struggling against all currencies, but the sharpest decline can be seen against the USD. The GBP’s decline is partially due to the incoming president, Donald Trump, who is expected to introduce Dollar-supporting measures, but also potentially impose tariffs on the UK.   The new White House administration is likely to impose new tariffs on imports from China, Canada, and Mexico. This is likely to potentially disrupt supply chains and prompt the Federal Reserve to adopt tighter monetary policy, thereby strengthening the national currency. Some experts believe the UK will face tariffs or be pressured to adopt more pro-American economic policies. This is also something the EU will likely experience. In addition to this, reports suggest that the UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, and Trump supporters are not on good terms, nor agree on much including on Geo-politics. Therefore, the decline is also related to concerns the UK may be put into a difficult position by the new US administration. According to analysts, Dollar strength is likely to continue throughout the year due to the new administration’s measures, but also due to a hawkish Federal Reserve. In the latest FOMC meeting minutes, the committee stated it expects interest rates to decline at a slower pace. The Federal Reserve is likely to only cut 0.50% in 2025 and may not cut until May or June. Liz Truss 2022 Or James Callaghan 1976? Is this the first Pound crisis? The GBP has experienced many "sterling crises” in the past. For example, Black Wednesday from 1992 and after Brexit in 2016. However, there have been similar crises in the past which are very similar to the current situation. For example, the Liz Truss Budget from 2022 which saw the GBP decline more than 23%. During the Sterling Crisis of 1976 the GBPUSD fell from 2.0231 to 1.5669. Both sterling crises were due to the budget, inflation and rising bond yields. Today’s issues for the GBP and UK are very similar, however, the performance of the GBP will depend on if the new SI contributions triggers lower economic activity, inflation and if the Federal Reserve indeed avoids cutting interest rates in the near future. If inflation rises it will dampen consumer demand and the Bank of England will be forced to pause any rate adjustments. As a result, the economy may contract or stall further pressuring the GBP. However, this cannot yet be certain. KPMG experts anticipate accelerated economic growth this year, supported by monetary policy and increased government spending. They project GDP to rise to 1.7%, more than doubling last year’s 0.8%. This growth, according to their estimates, will be driven by a recovery in consumer spending, expected to increase by 1.8% compared to 1.0% last year. In addition to this, if the Federal Reserve unexpectedly opts for more frequent rate cuts, the GBP and EUR are likely to benefit. When monitoring the price movement and patterns which can be seen in the exchange rate, the decline looks similar to the price movement seen in 2022, during the Truss reign. The price has now fallen below the support level from April 2024. The next support levels can be seen at 1.20391 and 1.17992. Technical analysis for the GBP can also be viewed in HFM’s latest Live Trading Session.   Key Takeaways: The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of the year so far, having declined by more than 2.00%. A key reason for the GBP’s decline is the latest labor budget, which is driving a selloff in UK bonds. UK 30-year bond yields are at their highest since 1998, while 10-year yields have reached levels last seen during the 2008 banking crisis. Investors reduce exposure to the GBP as the US edges closer to a new president and pro-Dollar supportive measures. The UK labour government will not reconsider higher taxes but may be forced to reduce public spending. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.