Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TinGull

[VSA] Volume Spread Analysis Part I

Recommended Posts

What is a WRB?

Wide Range Body.

 

Pivot's concept of WRB and long tails, really put all the pieces together for me when applying VSA. It took me one step further than the bootcamp CD did in solidifying the concepts VSA to develope a trading approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You'll usually see a test break into new low ground to "test" an area underneath the previous low. A No Supply bar will usually not break new ground lower than the previous bar.

 

Actually, TG, if look at the last chart PP posted (permalink #670) you'll see that there are 4 "No Supply" bars listed, and all four of them close below the previous bar.

 

So, here's my comparison of Test and No Supply:

1) both close lower than the previous bar

2) both occur on volume that's lower than the previous 2 bars

3) both occur at price lows, after or during a period of consolidation

 

So, the only difference I can see right now between them is that a Test is suppose to close near its highs and a No Supply closes near its lows.

 

One question I have is how important it is for a Test to dip below support to "Test" new lows. That would seem to make sense, but some examples I've seen here (e.g. permalink #630, a Tradeguider example; permalinks #106 + #166 both from PP) do not stick their noses into new lows, and they still get called Tests. So, maybe the main criteria for a Test are its location (price lows, consolidation) as well as its high close and low volume, with an added benefit being a long shadow dipping below support. Well, that's my best shot at it anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True...I may be totally wrong...it's happened before. To me, tho, that's what my feeble brain would be looking at for a test vs no supply. Test's I dont think should close lower than the previous bar, though they certainly could close a little lower depending on where the close sits in the range. Tests *should* probe a low into new ground and get bought back up. Just a rejection of lows.

 

I think a no supply shouldn't close below the low of the previous bar...but that's just me. If I saw a lower volume bar close below the low of the previous bar, even if it's on lighter volume, I still wouldn't be a buyer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, TG, I like your more conservative approach. I keep wondering what I can get away with to call something a Test or a No Supply bar. I think my attitude needs changing--I should be more stringent in viewing the rules. I'm still not using VSA to make trades, so I have the luxury of being wrong without losing my shirt. Eventually, I want to get good enough to place real money on VSA setups, and when I do, I think your conservative approach would serve me well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's what I would call a test...

 

chart_station_-_parallels_desktop-20071107-142943.jpg

 

We had the big spread bar with huge volume, then a couple of consolidation bars and that bar thats marked probed a low beneath the lows of those consolidation bars, INTO the wick of the wide spread candle.

 

That, to me, is a test. Now, if there are up bars on lower volume, that's saying that if you did get long that test bar, you better think about getting out because there's obviously no demand after the test bar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly("JJ") why wouldn't the trade be managed using VSA rather than a trailing stop (It may not have been you that mentioned this).

 

Tin.

Yes correct and as you have said the bar after the initial sell of bar shows new buying.

Something to remember and may help is that exhaustion bars whether of buying OR selling need something to exhaust.

Either a prolonged bullish or bearish move. This can eliminate guessing for some who could initially mistake the 3rd bar back from the yellow line in your chart as some sort of initial exhaustive move.(Not seeing the whole chart makes this more difficult).

 

Now, if there are up bars on lower volume, that's saying that if you did get long that test bar, you better think about getting out because there's obviously no demand after the test bar.

 

Don't know that I agree with this. Low volume and an increase in price can show lack of supply in fact on all 4 bars after your test bar lack of supply has been confirmed.

(1) Up bars rise on low volume.

(2) The reversal bar has lower volume again and is narrow in body.

It often takes a few bars to be able to decipher what volume and Range are

clearly saying in a chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have to disagree with you saying that upbars on low volume are showing a lack of supply. Reading directly from TradeGuider on the indicator information of a "Basic Test" it states:

 

Low volume up bars indicate their withdrawal from the market. The market failing to respond upwards, or even lower prices indicates the unwillingness of the marketmakers and main platers to participate in the market despite the indication of strength.

 

Maybe it's just me, but seeing lower volume upbars doesn't show a lack of supply, but a lack of demand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TG

 

Yes this is very difficult to get your head around.

It flies at 180 degrees with that which we are all educated on.

IE Volume = strength/weakness when in actual fact very high volume on very wide range bars means the exact opposite.

 

Bar 8 is a perfect example of no demand. As is the bar 4th from the left.

By low volume in the case of the chart being discussed I mean lower than the exhaustion bar as opposed to almost no volume.Note the volume is increasing but not massively,if it did then that would indicate supply coming in a sign of weakness.If we see low volume bars failing to make new highs from here this will also indicate weakness in no demand.

 

It will be the bars immediately following these bars which will complete the picture as will background VSA information not seen on the screen shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

chart_station_-_parallels_desktop-20071107-153109.jpg

 

Here's the rest of the chart. Some of what you have said isn't what I've learned about VSA. Note how the next bar after the first chart I posted is a HIGHER close on LOWER volume....that to me is a clear lack of demand, showing that the down move is going to continue. Which it has.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes this is very difficult to get your head around.

It flies at 180 degrees with that which we are all educated on.

IE Volume = strength/weakness when in actual fact very high volume on very wide range bars means the exact opposite.

 

What you said here makes PERFECT sense to me via VSA. I have no qualms with saying Ultra high volume on an Ultra wide spread is opposite of what people would think. What I'm saying is that your statement

 

Low volume and an increase in price can show lack of supply in fact on all 4 bars after your test bar lack of supply has been confirmed.

 

makes no sense to me. Low volume on UP bars indicates weakness, I don't in any way see how this can indicate strength to you. If you can post charts with explanations to fix what I'm thinking, then that would be appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

makes no sense to me. Low volume on UP bars indicates weakness, I don't in any way see how this can indicate strength to you. If you can post charts with explanations to fix what I'm thinking, then that would be appreciated.

 

Will do.I'll post some trade guider charts with Basic test commentary (from Tradeguider).

 

This may help.

If the basic test is at the top of a move followed by a low volume up bar then this is a sign of weakness.

If the basic test is at the bottom of a move and the next bar is a low volume UP bar this is a sign of strength.

 

Note how the next bar after the first chart I posted is a HIGHER close on LOWER volume....

 

Yes and the second component in reading VSA is also available in the range.

Clearly the highs could not be held,supportive of your Low volume up bar--indicating an exhaustion of this move in this time frame.

The next 2 bars further support the argument for weakness Wide range high volume down day---predictably followed by a weak up move and again now a wide range high volume---almost perfect double bottom.

The next bars is a very low volume up bar indicating lack of supply.

To early to cal a return to positive trading BUT a low risk entry with a stop below the low if the previous bar makes this a good setup in my view.---worth watching.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok...I'd love to see those charts. What I quoted earlier was straight from a TradeGuider commentary regarding low volume UP bars after a test showing weakness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Firstly("JJ") why wouldn't the trade be managed using VSA rather than a trailing stop (It may not have been you that mentioned this).

 

It was me. I use a combination of trailing the stop based on the appearance of WRBs and VSA signs. Hence, VSA is used to manage the trade.

 

 

Don't know that I agree with this. Low volume and an increase in price can show lack of supply in fact on all 4 bars after your test bar lack of supply has been confirmed.

(1) Up bars rise on low volume.

(2) The reversal bar has lower volume again and is narrow in body.

It often takes a few bars to be able to decipher what volume and Range are

clearly saying in a chart.

 

This is incorrect. Low volume up bars shows NO DEMAND. Volume is activity and low volume (volume less than the previous two bars) means that the Professional Money is not active. That is, they are not interested in higher prices at that moment.

 

Again, strength comes in on down bars and weakness shows itself on up bars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd have to disagree with you saying that upbars on low volume are showing a lack of supply. Reading directly from TradeGuider on the indicator information of a "Basic Test" it states:

 

Low volume up bars indicate their withdrawal from the market. The market failing to respond upwards, or even lower prices indicates the unwillingness of the marketmakers and main platers to participate in the market despite the indication of strength.

 

Maybe it's just me, but seeing lower volume upbars doesn't show a lack of supply, but a lack of demand.

 

This would be the exception to the previous post about up bars showning No Demand. It is possible to have a Test that closes higher (up) on low volume (volume less than the previous two bars) and close on the high and trade lower into a previously high volume area. While this would be an up bar, it is not No Demand, but a Test which would indicate no supply below the market.

 

However, this would not be considered the ideal type of Test. We would rather see the test close down. Hence being congruent with the idea that down bars on low volume are signs of strength.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*head spinning*....whenever you have a moment, a chart showing what you said would be absolutely sweet.

 

Thanks!! I'll re-read it later, too, and maybe it'll make more sense to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
*head spinning*....whenever you have a moment, a chart showing what you said would be absolutely sweet.

 

Thanks!! I'll re-read it later, too, and maybe it'll make more sense to me.

 

 

Here's an old chart that shows a few different Tests.

 

Note that the Test which is part of the valid doji pattern closes up, but is a sign of no supply. The fact that volume is low as price traders lower (although closing higer) speaks of no willngness by the Smart Money to be sellers.

 

After the Squat there is another Test bar. Again, we close on the highs with volume less than the previous two bars, but we close higher than the previous bar. Were it to close lower than the previous bar it would be the ideal test as it has a narrower range, closes on its high and trades into a previous high volume area.

 

The next Test which comes a few bars later, closes down from the previous bar.

 

The point is that you can have an up bar that singals "No Supply". It comes in the form of a Test. That is what they are testing for: supply/sellers.

5aa70e4ddf8ac_post670.thumb.PNG.32d469d87fc945df29afd58c9fbd9893.PNG

Edited by mister ed
Add back chart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh, the things that you seem to be differentiating look exactly the same to me. On the doji/test I see a bar that probed the low and closed higher on lower volume. That would be a test to me. Then the next bar has higher volume, showing that the bar was in fact a test and we should start to see higher prices.

 

The squat bar is followed by a down bar on less volume than the squat, showing no selling conviction to me. Then there is the probe below that bar, but closing higher than the previous close...on lower volume. The next bar is a hammer on higher volume in fact showing that the previous bar was a test, which you have marked.

 

The next test I see as a bar on lower volume that closed below the close of the previous bar, but has a candle formation of strength, so I see that, too, as a test with the probe below the lows and closing just off the highs, testing that squat bar's range.

 

So whether or not the "test' bar closes higher or lower than the previous bar, to me isn't as great an issue as to the candle formation that it makes. If I see a bullish formation on low volume that tests an area of prior resistance, I assume that is now support and when I see confirmation from the next bar closing higher on higher volume...I know it's right. If I get in on the test and see the next bar closing higher on LOWER volume, I assume I'm wrong and get out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go back to your original question. Can there be up bars that signal no supply?

 

While a Test bar is not the same as No Supply, it can close up. Now, what is being tested for is Supply or Sellers underneath the market. In other words, an up bar on volume less then previous two does not have to be No Demand. You have pointed out such cases in your posts.

 

In general, however, Up bars would be where we find weakness: Something else you have correctly pointed out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi everyone,

I was asked by Tech/a to have a visit and show you how I combine VSA with Elliott Wave. This is an Aussie stock from today which has some good characteristics.

 

VIDEO HERE

 

Regards

Nick

 

 

Good to have you on board Nick, your Elliot Wave/VSA analysis on Dow was excellent. Would certainly like to hear more from you especially on your understanding of VSA concepts. Wonder if you trade major Index futures Intraday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UPBARS AND DOWNBARS ON LOW VOL.

 

I like to keep it simple:

 

!. Background Weakness, upbars on Low vol - No demand

2. Background Strength, Downbars on Low Vol - testing for supply

 

However have observed countless times that markets can keep rising on low vol, narrow bars whole day long,(crawl up) simply because there is no supply to the left, or pros are not interested in selling at those prices and waiting to unload at higher levels.

 

Similarly prices can falling on low vol. once again pros. are not interested in stepping in and buy.

 

Have to step out of the idea that in the vol on a single bar there are more or less buyers than sellers and vice versa,

 

IMHO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll try to clarify.Some charts to help out below.

 

Any alert given by Tradeguider/VSA analysis is simply an alert.Read in isolation without consideration to the background is folly.

It takes a great deal of effort to terminate a trend in either direction.

Less to begin a trend.The first chart shows a basic test as determined by tradeguider with the accompanying commentary,You'll notice that the stock rises on below or around average volume,the second chart shows more of the past volume.

 

TraderslabBasictest.gif

 

The last bar has broken out on the lowest volume of the last 3 bars.If this were to represent then "No Demand" we would expect weakness.

 

 

To chart 2.

Here price continues to rise on average volume,until we get to the last bar in the chart where we have a massive volume spike and a wide range.The high volume is indicating Supply and sellers are happy to take all that buyers want.

This is the FIRST sign of weakness. This price action must be viewed in context.Moves rarely start and finish with "V" tops and bottoms and we must be alert to these changes.

 

TraderslabBasictest1.gif

 

To chart 3

NOW we look for whats occurring in the next bars.

Price rises but on low volume indicating lack of DEMAND (After a high volume up bar).

Supply continues on the next 2 bars as new highs cannot be held.

Once buyers have been exhausted we see price fall off with little to no demand. A test occurs 6 bars from the end of the chart but the next 2 bars confirm no demand.

 

Hope this is helpful.

 

TraderslabBasictest2.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "To make more capable, powerful AI models, developers need a steady flow of fresh data to train their models on. However, they’re starting to run out. Current generative AIs have scraped everything from the Internet that can be scraped. The alternative is to use “synthetic” data—training data generated by earlier forms of AI instead of original sources found on the Internet.  Using synthetic data is tempting. It’s cheaper than licensing datasets (an increasingly common requirement); there’s virtually no limit to the amount of data, text, or images AIs can create; and no one’s privacy is violated. The problem is that, over several generations, AIs trained synthetically develop what has been called “Model Autophagy Disorder,” or MAD, by the researchers at Rice University who discovered it. They like the acronym “MAD” because it’s similar to “Mad Cow Disease,” a calamitous, fatal brain disease that turned up in beef cattle in the 1980s when they were fed the ground-up remains of their butchered colleagues.  The word “autophagy” is a combination of the Greek “auto,” meaning self, and “phagy,” to eat. After training successive visual AI models on synthesized data, the scientists found a disturbing pattern: images of faces began to show grid-patterned scratch marks and eventually began more and more to look like the same face. Images of numbers gradually distorted until they became a mass of unintelligible squiggles.  “Even after a few generations of such training, the new models can become irreparably corrupted,” computer engineer Richard Baraniuk said in a university press statement.  As synthetic data, and synthetically trained AIs, proliferate online, the problem will feed on itself and become steadily worse, he warned. “One doomsday scenario is that if left uncontrolled for many generations, MAD could poison the data quality and diversity of the entire Internet,” Baraniuk said. “Short of this, it seems inevitable that as-to-now-unseen unintended consequences will arise from AI autophagy even in the near term. “Without enough fresh real data,” he added, “future generative models are doomed to MADness.” TRENDPOST: If AI developers come to believe that it is no longer possible to advance generative AI much beyond its current state, two things will happen. First, engineers will switch from developing new models to tweaking existing ones and continue customizing them to make off-the-shelf versions for specific industries. Second, developers will turn their obsession with AI power from generative systems to general AI, which can reason and make decisions without the need for human guidance.  That day might be closer than any of us, including AI engineers, are ready to deal with." Zgbs73                        
    • TS Tenaris stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 39.17 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TS
    • UAL United Airlines stock nice breakout setup at https://stockconsultant.com/?UAL
    • AAL American Airlines stock, good trend, watch for a range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?AAL
    • Date: 10th January 2025. Why is the British Pound Declining?   The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of 2025 so far after witnessing sharp declines for 3 consecutive days. The decline is largely being triggered by the bond selloff, lack of business confidence due to the UK Autumn budget and political uncertainty. Will the trend continue?     The GBP Index Declines 2% In 2025! Why Is The Pound Dropping? The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of the week and of the year so far. Below you can see a table showing the Pound’s performance in January 2025 so far. GBPUSD -2.25% EURGBP +1.69% GBPJPY -1.44% GBPCHF -1.42% GBPAUD -1.91% GBPCAD -2.00% A key reason for the GBP’s decline is the latest labor budget, which is driving a selloff in UK bonds. Bonds across the global market are declining, including in the US and Germany. However, the global decline is mainly due to monetary policy. The decline in UK bond yields is due to concerns regarding the UK budget, higher costs for business and investor confidence. As a result, investors are selling UK bonds, but also reducing their exposure to the Pound. Bond Selloff and Rising Yields: Higher bond yields can sometimes strengthen a currency by attracting increased investor demand. However, this effect is unlikely when rising yields result from a bond selloff driven by declining investor confidence. The UK 30-Year Bond Yields are at their highest level since 1998 and the 10-Year Bond Yields are up to the highest level since the banking crisis of 2008. Investors’ concerns are that the higher costs for business will be passed onto consumers, triggering higher stickier inflation. As a result, the Bank of England will struggle to reduce the cost of borrowing in 2025 and foreign investors will become more cautious of operations in the UK. The short-term impact is that the UK Chancellor may struggle to meet her fiscal rules. Her budget margin of £9.9bn to avoid overshooting borrowing has likely shrunk to about £1 billion due to market shifts, even before the OBR updates its forecasts. This uncertainty may force the Treasury to cut future spending plans, but the full picture won’t emerge until the OBR's March forecast. According to reports, the UK Chancellor cannot risk higher increases in taxes and will be forced to cut public spending. The GBPUSD Falls To A 60-Week Low! The GBP is struggling against all currencies, but the sharpest decline can be seen against the USD. The GBP’s decline is partially due to the incoming president, Donald Trump, who is expected to introduce Dollar-supporting measures, but also potentially impose tariffs on the UK.   The new White House administration is likely to impose new tariffs on imports from China, Canada, and Mexico. This is likely to potentially disrupt supply chains and prompt the Federal Reserve to adopt tighter monetary policy, thereby strengthening the national currency. Some experts believe the UK will face tariffs or be pressured to adopt more pro-American economic policies. This is also something the EU will likely experience. In addition to this, reports suggest that the UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, and Trump supporters are not on good terms, nor agree on much including on Geo-politics. Therefore, the decline is also related to concerns the UK may be put into a difficult position by the new US administration. According to analysts, Dollar strength is likely to continue throughout the year due to the new administration’s measures, but also due to a hawkish Federal Reserve. In the latest FOMC meeting minutes, the committee stated it expects interest rates to decline at a slower pace. The Federal Reserve is likely to only cut 0.50% in 2025 and may not cut until May or June. Liz Truss 2022 Or James Callaghan 1976? Is this the first Pound crisis? The GBP has experienced many "sterling crises” in the past. For example, Black Wednesday from 1992 and after Brexit in 2016. However, there have been similar crises in the past which are very similar to the current situation. For example, the Liz Truss Budget from 2022 which saw the GBP decline more than 23%. During the Sterling Crisis of 1976 the GBPUSD fell from 2.0231 to 1.5669. Both sterling crises were due to the budget, inflation and rising bond yields. Today’s issues for the GBP and UK are very similar, however, the performance of the GBP will depend on if the new SI contributions triggers lower economic activity, inflation and if the Federal Reserve indeed avoids cutting interest rates in the near future. If inflation rises it will dampen consumer demand and the Bank of England will be forced to pause any rate adjustments. As a result, the economy may contract or stall further pressuring the GBP. However, this cannot yet be certain. KPMG experts anticipate accelerated economic growth this year, supported by monetary policy and increased government spending. They project GDP to rise to 1.7%, more than doubling last year’s 0.8%. This growth, according to their estimates, will be driven by a recovery in consumer spending, expected to increase by 1.8% compared to 1.0% last year. In addition to this, if the Federal Reserve unexpectedly opts for more frequent rate cuts, the GBP and EUR are likely to benefit. When monitoring the price movement and patterns which can be seen in the exchange rate, the decline looks similar to the price movement seen in 2022, during the Truss reign. The price has now fallen below the support level from April 2024. The next support levels can be seen at 1.20391 and 1.17992. Technical analysis for the GBP can also be viewed in HFM’s latest Live Trading Session.   Key Takeaways: The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of the year so far, having declined by more than 2.00%. A key reason for the GBP’s decline is the latest labor budget, which is driving a selloff in UK bonds. UK 30-year bond yields are at their highest since 1998, while 10-year yields have reached levels last seen during the 2008 banking crisis. Investors reduce exposure to the GBP as the US edges closer to a new president and pro-Dollar supportive measures. The UK labour government will not reconsider higher taxes but may be forced to reduce public spending. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.