Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TinGull

[VSA] Volume Spread Analysis Part I

Recommended Posts

  Tasuki said:
To anyone who knows,

Can Pivotprofiler's code be translated into Easylanguage for us Tradestation users?

Thanks, Taz

 

Taz

 

Yes it should be possible, I'm on with it now and I'll let you know how I get on

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sledge, keep up the good work. Like you said, most of your trades are good ones. You're going to have losing trades even following VSA. I made two trades last week that were good calls but my stop got hit. Losing trades happen for a lot of reasons.

You've got to play to win.

You're certainly not a moron. In fact there was a chance that that support of the previous low could have held.

cheers mate.

 

PS, why is the GBP called cable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JJ, here's what I know.

 

GBP/USD - 'cable' (in the 1800s, the pound/dollar exchange rate was transmitted via transatlantic cable)

 

Out of interest with you being Canadian, do you know why the CAD is nicknamed the 'loonie' ?

 

 

Regards

Darren

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tawe trader said:
JJ, here's what I know.

 

GBP/USD - 'cable' (in the 1800s, the pound/dollar exchange rate was transmitted via transatlantic cable)

 

Out of interest with you being Canadian, do you know why the CAD is nicknamed the 'loonie' ?

 

 

Regards

Darren

 

Hey Tawe, Our one dollar coin has a loon on it. It's that simple!

On the off chance people don't know what a loon is, it's a native waterfowl species similar to a duck but way stealthier looking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jjthetrader said:
Sledge, keep up the good work. Like you said, most of your trades are good ones. You're going to have losing trades even following VSA. I made two trades last week that were good calls but my stop got hit. Losing trades happen for a lot of reasons.

You've got to play to win.

You're certainly not a moron. In fact there was a chance that that support of the previous low could have held.

cheers mate.

JJ-

Thank you. I just could not for the life of me figure out why it was in Freefall mode (you figure the supply would have to dry up sooner than later) After watching the Cable exclusively for the last 5 months it just fell harder and faster than its usual pace. You seem to get a gut feel in a sense of the range of which it will go after a while when you deal in only one currency/stock etc. I think I got my answer today- the rocket north was a thing of beauty to see for any trader- in the trade, on the sidelines or otherwise.

 

Seb: If you still would comment on your earlier post about the lack of support by the professional smart money- I am still very interested in understanding more about this!

 

Sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  monad said:
would greatly appreciate if you could outline the maths behind POC calculation,

 

Hi Monad

The Point of Control (POC) is the price that traded most frequently during the day according to time at price. The POC is the longest line of TPOs on the Market Profile chart. Not sure of the maths, but the POC sticks out as the longest horizontal line when one is looking at a MP chart.

Hope that helps?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Blu-Ray said:
Taz

 

Yes it should be possible, I'm on with it now and I'll let you know how I get on

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

 

 

Blu-Ray, thanks in advance. I look a look at the huge block of Metastock code and was considering converting it to easy language myself, but the only thing I could come up with is condition1, condition2, etc, so I passed. Regardless, converting that code into easy language is not as easy task. Many thanks to you for all of your generous contributions to this forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Seb Manby said:
Sorry, it is a 15m minute chart.

Sebastian,

 

The chart looks like a 20-min chart to me.

 

In any case, how far back do you go to analyze the background and would you say there was weakness in the background?

 

I assume by confirmation you mean this: the 1620 red no demand bar got painted red when the 1640 bar closed and it was a down bar.

 

Your trade was so simple and so profitable. Congratulations to you.

 

Thanks for all your contributions,

Bert

 

P.S. The chart attached is Sebastian's from several posts ago.

VSA1.thumb.gif.0cd640c8482196b288dc14c1a4eb3673.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PivotProfiler said:
Just a chart dump. Pay no attention: it does look good though.

 

Would greatly appreciate info. on how to calculate the Value Area High, low and POC , can that be done in a spreadsheet with the High, Low , Close, Open of the previous day, if , what are the formulae.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  monad said:
Would greatly appreciate info. on how to calculate the Value Area High, low and POC , can that be done in a spreadsheet with the High, Low , Close, Open of the previous day, if , what are the formulae.

 

No, the Value Area High, Value Area Low and POC cannot be calculated from the previous day's HLCO.

 

VAH, VAL and POC are Market Profile terms, and to be honest to understand them it would be a great idea to read some of the introductory posts you will find here at the Market Profile forum. Very educational indeed and well worth the time spent.

 

In brief, the value high and low are plotted around a central price referred to as the Point of Control (POC), which is the price that traded most frequently during the day according to time at price (so there is no way this can be calculated from the OHLC data). The POC is the longest line of TPOs on the Market Profile chart. The VAH and VAL are plotted so as to contain 70%, or thereabouts, of the day's trading, again as measured in number of TPOs (so again, they cannot be calculated simply from the OHLC data).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mister ed for info. on POC etc

 

I was referring to the post 1342 by Pivotprofiler who mentioned Mark Fisher's pivot method which reflects to a large degree the POC, VAH and VAL provided by the traditional MP i.e counting TPOs. It is a poor man's tool so to speak and I believe it is calculated from previous day's high, low, close,open values, although I am not 100% but checking into it. PivotProfiler has obviously mentioned that and see them plotted on his charts posted here, hence the question.

 

Anyway appreciate your kind response

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VSA question for PP/Sebastian:

 

Under what circumstances can a 1. Wide Ranging Bar with Low vol and

2. WRB with High Volume (above average but not

excessive

be considered bullish???

 

other VSA traders, please feel free to comment, am sure all inputs will shed more light

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  monad said:
Would greatly appreciate info. on how to calculate the Value Area High, low and POC , can that be done in a spreadsheet with the High, Low , Close, Open of the previous day, if , what are the formulae.

 

 

Yes and No. Actually, Yes, if you believe the work done by Mark Fisher. The Pivot Profile is my tweaked version of his Pivot Range. He contends that the Pivot Range give the same area as Market Profile roughly 95% of the time. When I heard that, a light went off. Being a believer in Market Profile, but not have data available, I took the Pivot Range and set out to make it better and even more akin to Market Profile. Some will notice that the colors used are a direct reflection of the Enthios Price Histogram.

 

Enthios talks a lot about some key Market Profile concepts. One of which is the retouch of the previous day's POC. This is also where I first saw the term Virgin POC: a POC that has NOT been touched (insert own sexual innuendo here).

 

Anyway, Mark's formula for the Pivot Range do only use High, Low, Close data. I added to the formula and made a small change. The language I use is directly from Market Profile because that is what I am attempting to emulate. Ironically, how close of an approximation it is to an actual Market Profile matters little. Why? Because all I have to do is focus on what the Smart Money is doing around these levels. And time and time again there is Smart Money activity around the levels. Time and time again, the market will trade back to the POC (see below).

 

YH:=HIGH1;
YL:=low1;

POC:=(high1 + low1 + (2*close1) ) / 4;
PivotDiff:= POC-(high1+low1)/2;
DRHb:= POC+PivotDiff;
DRLb:= POC-PivotDiff;
RRHb:= POC+(1.750*PivotDiff);
RRLb:= POC-(1.750*PivotDiff);
ERHb:= POC+(2.875*PivotDiff);
ERLb:= POC-(2.875*PivotDiff);

ERH:=If(ERHb>High1 or ERHb<Low1,Null,ERHb);
RRH:=If(RRHb>High1 or RRHb<Low1,Null,RRHb);
DRH:=If(DRHb>High1 or DRHb<Low1,Null,DRHb);
DRL:=If(DRLb>High1 or DRLb<Low1,Null,DRLb);
RRL:=If(RRLb>High1 or RRLb<Low1,Null,RRLb);
ERL:=If(ERLb>High1 or ERLb<Low1,Null,ERLb);

 

What you end up with are lines (Areas) that do a good job of defining where the market traded that day. In other words, at the close of trading on Tuesday (1700 by my broker) a New Profile is calculated and applied to Wednesday. Take a look at my previous post, the one I said pay no attention to. Note how the line do indeed define where volume and price were heaviest.

The bottom portion of the code is used to keep lines off where price did not trade that day. That is, the Extended Range High (ERH) should only be drawn if it is less than the day's high (YH). That is why the profile below has some levels below the Value Area (defined as the Deviation Range (pink lines) and not above them.

 

On to the chart below.

 

First note the low volume time that trades between the black line (YH) and the Deviation Range High (DRH) or the top of the Value Area. Price then falls into the Value Area. We then get a No Supply as price moves out. The next thing we get is a Squat at the top of the Black line which send price down back into the Value Area. At that same time, we see a squat on the 5 min that pushes down price as supply enters. We get the second Dark WRB to engulf a Test bar further showing weakness.

 

The trade. Price makes a move back up. Notice that as price tries to exit the Value Area we see a No Demand sign. Up bar on a narrow range closing off its highs and making a higher high on volume less than the previous two bars. On the 5 min, we see a squat within the range of a WRB. High volume WRB with a squat within the range of its body (I think I have said that before :) ). Price wants to do what it failed to do before: trade down to the POC (yellow line). It does. It may not be an actual Market Profile, but the trade is based on concepts from Market Profile. In fact, the next target would be to touch the lower pink line (Deviation Range Low) as this would be the 80% Value Area trade from Market Profile. Which states, that 80% the market trades outside the Value Area then reenters, it trades to the opposite side of the Value Area. The trade from yesterday used this concept.

 

P.S. Mark uses (H+L+C)/3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an updates shot with the POC on the 5 min. Again it was touched. In fact we are trading just below it as of this screen shot.

 

Green lines are stop placements levels.

 

I have no idea what the market will do, I let it take me where its going. Having said that, the Deviation Range Low (Value Area Low) is 1.4504. That would be the next price target based on the 80% rule trade.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4879&stc=1&d=1201089697

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  volume said:
Sebastian can you educate me please, i run VSA real time with an esignal feed, is metastock another feed?

 

Metastock is software that uses a few differend data feeds, the main one being Reuters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  monad said:
Thanks mister ed for info. on POC etc

 

I was referring to the post 1342 by Pivotprofiler who mentioned Mark Fisher's pivot method which reflects to a large degree the POC, VAH and VAL provided by the traditional MP i.e counting TPOs. It is a poor man's tool so to speak and I believe it is calculated from previous day's high, low, close,open values, although I am not 100% but checking into it. PivotProfiler has obviously mentioned that and see them plotted on his charts posted here, hence the question.

 

Anyway appreciate your kind response

 

Ahhh...sorry Monad, my mistake.

Can I ask what instruments you are trading? If US index futures there is a website that provides the figures (VAH POS VAL) each day before the RTH open,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PivotProfiler said:
Just an updates shot with the POC on the 5 min. Again it was touched. In fact we are trading just below it as of this screen shot.

 

Green lines are stop placements levels.

 

I have no idea what the market will do, I let it take me where its going. Having said that, the Deviation Range Low (Value Area Low) is 1.4504. That would be the next price target based on the 80% rule trade.

 

 

Many thanks, PP, info on Market Profile greatly appreciated. From the study of the formulae, it looks like you have tweaked the traditional Pivot calc. (H+L+C)/3 , then taken the midpoint of the Range i.e (H-L)/2 , subtracted this value from the Pivot to obtain the differential and then added them on to the Pivot to get Deviation Range H/L , RR, and Extended Range H/L.

 

1. What does RR stand for

2. Interesting one of the values inevitably ends up as the midpoint range ie. (H-L)/2

 

As for the VSA question in respect of Wide Range Bars, I meant an upbar:

 

Under what circumstances would one regard a Wide Range Up Bar (close higher than previous close and higher than open on the same bar) either on low volume or on above average high vol as bullish????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.