Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

BlueHorseshoe

The Non-Optimisation Myth

Recommended Posts

Everything you do can be considered optimization one way or the other. The important question is whether the optimization process results in different system dynamics when it varies the parameters. Different dynamics can be assessed by different trade distributions. In that case the system is data-mining and it is subject to data-mining bias, i.e. the uncovering of spurious hypotheses. So this should be a criterion. If this criterion holds then you should take the final system and see if it performs well in several unrelated markets. If it does not, you have wasted you time and possibly money. The following posts in price action blog provide some good initial background but I think one must go even further than that:

 

Curve-fitting and Optimization | Price Action Lab Blog

 

Fooled by Randomness Through Selection Bias | Price Action Lab Blog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second your recommendation to study what Michal Harris of Price Action Lab's has disclosed. Everyone (serious) like all of you posting to this thread, should understand the advantages and disadvantes of artificial intelligence. Some of you should specialize in it and take it beyond where it is, to something that can benefit us as a species.

 

Everything you do can be considered optimization one way or the other. The important question is whether the optimization process results in different system dynamics when it varies the parameters. Different dynamics can be assessed by different trade distributions. In that case the system is data-mining and it is subject to data-mining bias, i.e. the uncovering of spurious hypotheses. So this should be a criterion. If this criterion holds then you should take the final system and see if it performs well in several unrelated markets. If it does not, you have wasted you time and possibly money. The following posts in price action blog provide some good initial background but I think one must go even further than that:

 

Curve-fitting and Optimization | Price Action Lab Blog

 

Fooled by Randomness Through Selection Bias | Price Action Lab Blog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had read the Price action Blog previously and it is definitely highly recommended.

One of his conclusions sums it up nicely for the Q of this thread.....

 

"As a conclusion we can state that the issue is not whether a system is optimized, because all systems are in one way or another, but to what degree optimization impacts the probability that the system will fail in the future due to its nature."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For my own 'optimizationing' of the types of systems being discussed in this thread , I would amend

"As a conclusion we can state that the issue is not whether a system is optimized, because all systems are in one way or another, but to what degree optimization impacts the probability that the system will fail in the future due to its nature."

 

to

 

"As a conclusion ...the issue is not whether a system is optimized, because all systems are in one way or another, but to what degree optimization impacts the probability that the system will degrade in the future due to its nature."

 

ie...to "failure" is too kiss... if the parameters are optimizable for a system, get busy on them to the left or the right as soon as it degrades

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For my own 'optimizationing' of the types of systems being discussed in this thread , I would amend

"As a conclusion we can state that the issue is not whether a system is optimized, because all systems are in one way or another, but to what degree optimization impacts the probability that the system will fail in the future due to its nature."

 

to

 

"As a conclusion ...the issue is not whether a system is optimized, because all systems are in one way or another, but to what degree optimization impacts the probability that the system will degrade in the future due to its nature."

 

ie...to "failure" is too kiss... if the parameters are optimizable for a system, get busy on them to the left or the right as soon as it degrades

 

Good suggestion. It is important to always be alert to prevent failure by constantly analyzing and upgrading systems. It is a horrible mistake to assume that a system should not be changed after it is deployed.

 

This is another good one by Harris where he argues that certain types of exits, like trailing stops, may produce curve-fitted systems:

 

Trailing Stops and Curve-Fitting in Trading System Development | Price Action Lab Blog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thx Equtrader...

 

One reason that I do not use this type of stop when developing trading systems and in algorithms I have developed for machine design of trading systems is that it renders the entry signals irrelevant in most cases. However, the robustness of the entry signals and their predictive ability under the majority of possible market conditions is what secures longer-term positive performance for trading system. Trailing stops can be used during actual trading to enhance profits and cut losses. One way to check whether signals generated by a trading system have predictive ability is to set a small percent or dollar stop. If the profit factor when the stops are set like that is not sufficiently high, you are probably dealing with a random entry generator.

The risk of curve-fitting is also high when using indicators to exit signals although entry signals may not be rendered irrelevant. But this is an even more interesting and complex case that will be the subject of another post.

from the closing of the article you cited

 

Haven’t posted these particular yada yadas in a while so…

>It is ALWAYS a “3 body problem” (anecdotally borrowing the phrase to illustrate the integral interplay, not same as it’s used in real physics, btw) ---

entry, exit, stop – never isolated

"optimized" close to, but not at, optimal - all at once…

 

>In system and automation design, any tweak is actually not a tweak, it is a whole distinct new system

 

If he persists, I predict before he’s done he will

1) retract that across the board “the robustness of the entry signals and their predictive ability under the majority of possible market conditions is what secures longer-term positive performance for trading system”

You can make such generalities about certain types of systems, but you can’t make such generalities about all systems… ie that is a good generality for systems exploiting limit cycles / oscillations of markets. It is not a good generality for systems exploiting ‘trend’ where “entry signals [can be rendered more] irrelevant” and

2) he will also conclude that “using indicators to exit” really isn’t an “even more and complex case” ...

 

Not a criticism at all… I periodically check in with this blog, learn a lot, and admire his development

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LZ LegalZoomcom stock, watch for a bull flag breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?LZ
    • XMTR Xometry stock, watch for a local breakout above 37.5, target 44 area at https://stockconsultant.com/?XMTR
    • INTC Intel stock, nice bounce off the lower 19.12 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?INTC
    • Date: 11th February 2025.   Market Update: Tariffs, Inflation, and Investor Sentiment Shape Global Markets.   Asian equities and US stock index futures experienced declines. At the same time, gold surged to a record high, reflecting investor caution following President Donald Trump’s announcement of new tariffs on US imports of steel and aluminium. Stock markets in Hong Kong and mainland China faced selling pressure, contributing to a regional downturn. Futures contracts for the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, and Euro Stoxx 50 also traded lower. Meanwhile, Japanese markets remained closed due to a public holiday. Gold, often seen as a safe-haven asset duringeconomic uncertainty, extended its rally for a third consecutive session, briefly surpassing $2,942 before paring some gains. The US dollar index maintained its Monday gains, signalling sustained strength amid market volatility. The precious metal has surged about 11% this year, setting successive records as Trump’s disruptive moves on trade and geopolitics reinforce its role as a store of value in uncertain times. US Steel and Metals Sector Reacts to Tariffs Shares of US Steel Corporation surged as much as 6% following Trump’s announcement, as domestic metals producers saw a boost from the prospect of increased business and stronger pricing power. Canada, Brazil, and Mexico, the top steel suppliers to the US, are expected to be significantly impacted by these trade restrictions. Trump stated that the new tariffs, effective in March, aim to revitalize domestic production and job growth. However, he also suggested the possibility of further tariff increases, adding to market uncertainty.     Investor Concerns Over Tariffs and Trade War Escalation Investors are grappling with the implications of Trump’s tariffs, particularly in distinguishing between policy announcements and concrete actions. The uncertainty surrounding additional levies and potential retaliatory measures has reignited fears of an intensifying global trade war. Tariffs on Chinese goods are already in effect, and concerns persist about further economic fallout. According to Christian Mueller-Glissmann, head of asset allocation research at Goldman Sachs, the key challenge in portfolio strategy now lies in identifying assets that can effectively hedge against tariff risks. Speaking to Bloomberg Television, he noted, “The big challenge is that this is going to be much more difficult from here because the tariffs are very specific.” Key Economic Data and Federal Reserve Testimony in Focus Beyond trade tensions, investors are closely watching this week’s critical economic reports and statements from Federal Reserve officials. Fed Chair Jerome Powell is set to testify before Congress, while fresh inflation data will provide further insight into price trends. According to the New York Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Expectations, inflation expectations for both the one-year and three-year outlooks remained steady at 3% in January. Short-term US inflation expectations have now risen above longer-term projections to their widest gap since 2023, signalling potential shifts in monetary policy. Inflation data, Powell’s congressional testimony, and tariffs are poised to drive the market today. A reprieve from negative surprises, such as the impact of DeepSeek, ongoing tariffs, and consumer sentiment concerns, could push S&P 500 to break out of its two-month consolidation.     Currency and Commodity Markets React The currency market also reflected shifting investor sentiment. The Japanese Yen remained largely unchanged. Meanwhile, the British Pound weakened after a report from the Financial Times cited Bank of England policymaker Catherine Mann’s concerns that weakening demand is beginning to outweigh inflationary risks. Gold’s continued ascent has been accompanied by significant inflows into bullion-backed exchange-traded funds. Global holdings have risen in six of the past seven weeks, reaching their highest levels since November. Banks have forecast that gold could test the $3,000 mark, with Citigroup predicting it could hit that level within three months and J.P. Morgan Private Bank projecting a year-end target of $3,150. Market Resilience Amid Trade Uncertainty Despite ongoing tariff tensions, equities have demonstrated resilience, leading some analysts to caution that further trade escalations could trigger renewed market pullbacks. Strategists at Deutsche Bank AG, including Binky Chadha, suggested that historical patterns indicate sharp but short-lived equity selloffs during geopolitical events, with markets typically rebounding before any formal de-escalation occurs. They projected that, in such scenarios, equity markets could decline by 6%-8% over a three-week period before recovering in a similar timeframe. China’s Growing Gold Reserves and Market Influence China’s central bank expanded its gold reserves for the third consecutive month in January, signalling an ongoing commitment to diversifying its holdings despite record-high prices. In addition, China introduced a pilot program allowing 10 major insurers to invest up to 1% of their assets in bullion for the first time. This initiative could translate into as much as 200 billion Yuan ($27.4 billion) in potential gold investments. Key Market Events to Watch This Week Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s semiannual testimony before the Senate Banking Committee today Speeches by Fed officials Beth Hammack, John Williams, and Michelle Bowman today US Consumer Price Index (CPI) report, Wednesday As global markets continue to navigate economic uncertainties, investors remain watchful of trade developments, monetary policy signals, and inflation trends that could shape the financial landscape in the coming weeks.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • KAR Openlane stock breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?KAR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.