Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ARTjoMS

VWAP Like MA

Recommended Posts

Hello.

 

I wonder if anyone is using VWAP for a fixed number of time periods (like MA).

 

I think that thus far i have only seen vwap that is set at one particular time and eventually builds on, but i'm not sure as i haven't looked at codes.

 

Also i wonder what would be relationships between such VWAP and MA assuming same number of time periods.

 

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello.

 

I wonder if anyone is using VWAP for a fixed number of time periods (like MA).

 

I think that thus far i have only seen vwap that is set at one particular time and eventually builds on, but i'm not sure as i haven't looked at codes.

 

Also i wonder what would be relationships between such VWAP and MA assuming same number of time periods.

 

Thank you.

 

I have created VWAPs that do what you describe, and VWAPs with standard deviation bands, donchian channel deltas, and loads of other mumbo-jumbo variations . . .

 

It all boils down to this though, in my opinion - like an MA or anything else you put on your chart, it will tell you something specific about the data - but unless you have a clear way to exploit what it is that it tells you, then it won't be much help.

 

It's usually better to have in mind what is you want to achieve, and then build an appropriate tool to achieve it.

 

What is it that you hope a VWAP with a fixed window of time reference will tell you? How would you use it?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for answer.

 

Well, i'm just a curious newbie. I was thinking that early VWAP (while it just starts to build on) is of no use and maybe someone is using what i described.

 

Also i was wondering how close VWAP and MA are and how they correlate.

 

I have a question about how these price by volume histograms are created.

 

I looked at some code and i might as well be wrong, but it felt like only information that was used to build histogram was volume + bar open + bar close + bar high +bar low, am i right?

 

I'm thinking about this in context of forex (tick) volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for answer.

 

Well, i'm just a curious newbie. I was thinking that early VWAP (while it just starts to build on) is of no use and maybe someone is using what i described.

 

Also i was wondering how close VWAP and MA are and how they correlate.

 

I have a question about how these price by volume histograms are created.

 

I looked at some code and i might as well be wrong, but it felt like only information that was used to build histogram was volume + bar open + bar close + bar high +bar low, am i right?

 

I'm thinking about this in context of forex (tick) volume.

 

Hi ARTjoMS,

 

There's nothing wrong with being curious about new approaches - my post wasn't intended to discourage you in any way :) Unless you have huge amounts of time to devote to developing ideas though, it pays to go about it in an efficient way. Personally, I find that is usually best to start with a concept or a goal, and then try and work out which of the many derivations of price and other data would be the most useful in implementing it.

 

As for VWAP . . . Your understanding of how this is calculated is spot on.

 

Sometimes 'bar open + bar close + bar high + bar low' divided by four is referred to as 'Average Price', and VWAP stands for "Volume-Weighted Average Price".

 

VWAP is calculated by multiplying the Average Price by the Volume each bar, adding this to the total from the previous bar so that it becomes cummulative, and then dividing this by a cummulative total of all the volume from that session.

 

The difference between VWAP and an MA is that the former is weighted by volume. This is a bit like having an MA that 'remembers' prices at which higher volumes were traded better than those where lower volumes were traded. Depending on how you view market behaviour, high volumes traded in a particular price area can be regarded as indicating that a large number of market particpants (both buyers and sellers) considered this price to be "fair".

 

An MA is calculated purely from price.

 

So, if you consider a session in which price declines significantly on decreasing volume, then the VWAP would increasingly 'lag' price, as the lower prices of the falling market would assume less importance in the calcution due to the low volumes traded there. An MA, on the other hand, would simply follow the price down. I've attached a chart which clearly shows this.

 

I hope that helps.

 

BlueHorseshoe

5aa7112f67b21_VWAPandMA.gif.f99bef736346c637858e19dea1bae918.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, the reason why i asked about it was because i felt like if i had to make such a histogram i would do it differently: every time price moves up or down i would put +1 for new price in histogram to get greater accuracy.

 

Of course putting small time frame and zooming out to maximum does give quite smooth price by volume histogram, but still.

 

I understand that it might not make a big difference, but as a math student i have used to be precise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello.

 

I wonder if anyone is using VWAP for a fixed number of time periods (like MA).

 

I think that thus far i have only seen vwap that is set at one particular time and eventually builds on, but i'm not sure as i haven't looked at codes.

 

Also i wonder what would be relationships between such VWAP and MA assuming same number of time periods.

 

Thank you.

 

get MultiCharts,

learn EasyLanguage.

you can whip up your indicator in no time,

and you can prove your thesis immediately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.