Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

suby

Backtesting TA Strategies - Discretionary Trading and The Wyckoff Way

Recommended Posts

I have checked through the forums in attempts to learn a bit more on backtesting and I can't deem what is on here as valid.

 

I realize that this should probably be posted in automated trading but as a discretionary trader who uses Technical Analysis I figured this would be the best spot.

 

I was wondering if other discretionary traders on here who follow Technical Analysis backtest...

 

If so, what do you often test for?

 

Specifically in regards to trading with the Price to Volume relationship and the teachings of Wyckoff

 

Suby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  suby said:
I have checked through the forums in attempts to learn a bit more on backtesting and I can't deem what is on here as valid.

 

I realize that this should probably be posted in automated trading but as a discretionary trader who uses Technical Analysis I figured this would be the best spot.

 

I was wondering if other discretionary traders on here who follow Technical Analysis backtest...

 

If so, what do you often test for?

 

Specifically in regards to trading with the Price to Volume relationship and the teachings of Wyckoff

 

Suby

 

Backtesting allows you to test a specific hypothesis on an historical data set that may hopefully be representative of future market behaviour.

 

Before you can arrive at a specific hypothesis you need to derive more general tendencies from the data.

 

"I can profitably fade any price cross of a 4 period SMA back in the direction of the slope of a 200 period EMA when the ADX is below 30" . . . Is an example of a specific hypothesis that one could backtest.

 

"I can profitably fade small countertrend movements back in the direction of a longer term trend when the market is showing a lack of trending capability in the intermediate term" . . . Is an example of a conjugation of more generalised tendencies which, if generally held to be true, might inspire a specific hypothesis such as the one above.

 

So the first thing that I would do is to mine the available data to try and establish some general tendencies that you can build upon. Once you have these you can begin to select more specific tools (such as indicators) to exploit these tendencies within a back-testable strategy.

 

Most back-testing software will allow you to carry out a data-mining styled exercise.

 

Here is an example of the sort of thing you might like to know:

 

Do most short term highs occur on higher or lower volume?

 

The trick here is that you'll need to test across a variety of definitions of short term high. These might range from a three day high to a twenty day high. You might find that 100% of all 17 day highs in your test occur with volume that is higher than the previous period. Unfortunately this isn't much help - what you need to know is whether short term highs in general occur on higher volume than the previous period. For all your tests, then, you might average out the percentage of short term highs that occur on higher volume. If this percentage comes out at, say, 78%, then you might conclude (assuming that your data set is large enough and sufficiently representative) that this general tendency will hold to a reasonable degree regardless of the specific periodicity reference used for the high within the strategy you subsequently devise.

 

Hope that helps - anything I was unclear about then just ask!

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:
Backtesting allows you to test a specific hypothesis on an historical data set that may hopefully be representative of future market behaviour.

 

Before you can arrive at a specific hypothesis you need to derive more general tendencies from the data.

 

"I can profitably fade any price cross of a 4 period SMA back in the direction of the slope of a 200 period EMA when the ADX is below 30" . . . Is an example of a specific hypothesis that one could backtest.

 

"I can profitably fade small countertrend movements back in the direction of a longer term trend when the market is showing a lack of trending capability in the intermediate term" . . . Is an example of a conjugation of more generalised tendencies which, if generally held to be true, might inspire a specific hypothesis such as the one above.

 

So the first thing that I would do is to mine the available data to try and establish some general tendencies that you can build upon. Once you have these you can begin to select more specific tools (such as indicators) to exploit these tendencies within a back-testable strategy.

 

Most back-testing software will allow you to carry out a data-mining styled exercise.

 

Here is an example of the sort of thing you might like to know:

 

Do most short term highs occur on higher or lower volume?

 

The trick here is that you'll need to test across a variety of definitions of short term high. These might range from a three day high to a twenty day high. You might find that 100% of all 17 day highs in your test occur with volume that is higher than the previous period. Unfortunately this isn't much help - what you need to know is whether short term highs in general occur on higher volume than the previous period. For all your tests, then, you might average out the percentage of short term highs that occur on higher volume. If this percentage comes out at, say, 78%, then you might conclude (assuming that your data set is large enough and sufficiently representative) that this general tendency will hold to a reasonable degree regardless of the specific periodicity reference used for the high within the strategy you subsequently devise.

 

Hope that helps - anything I was unclear about then just ask!

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

First time behind the computer this weekend, but thank you for the detailed reply BlueHorseshoe!

 

I can't think of anything too indepth at this point of time just two questions for you

 

1) How/what do you use to backtest? What is your Opinion on Trading Blox?

 

2) Where do you obtain your data from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  suby said:
First time behind the computer this weekend, but thank you for the detailed reply BlueHorseshoe!

 

I can't think of anything too indepth at this point of time just two questions for you

 

1) How/what do you use to backtest? What is your Opinion on Trading Blox?

 

2) Where do you obtain your data from?

 

Hi Suby,

 

Glad my reply was helpful - if it only gets you thinking then that's a great start because like pretty much anything in trading, backtesting can be both a massive help and a huge hindrance.

 

Nowadays I do everything in TradeStation, and this is also where my data comes from. I think TradeStation is absolutely fantastic, but I have very limited experience with other platforms, so that's by no means an objective recommendation. I think that it might be worth posting this as a seperate thread question and seeing what response you get.

 

I have never used TradingBlox, but it certainly used to be very highly regarded, as it offered portfolio analysis capabilities before most other retail platforms (TradingRecipes was another MSDOS pioneer in this area). I know nothing about the costs associated with TradingBlox, or the extent of your requirements, but you may possibly get all that you actually need for free from elsewhere, especially if you have no need of portfolio analysis.

 

As a recommendation of a platform that I do have substantial backtesting experience with, is completely streamed (no download or software install), offers great end of day charting for free, and allows you to sign up for a free trial of intraday data, try http://www.prorealtime.com. It doesn't seem well known in the US, but I think it's pretty damn good as far as free stuff goes.

 

Overall though, I'd recommend you ask around - I just stumbled upon something I liked and stuck with it, so can't really offer an objective viewpoint.

 

Pretty much the classic guide for backtesting and optimisation, I think, is Thomas Stridsman's 'Trading Strategies that Work' - this gives a pretty balanced view of exactly what you can and can't expect to achieve with backtests.

 

Regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.